<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Damage control by the prime minister?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/</link>
	<description>Singapore&#039;s #1 Socio-Political Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:26:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PMET</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/comment-page-1/#comment-110689</link>
		<dc:creator>PMET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/12/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/#comment-110689</guid>
		<description>Hmm... looking back at this article, the same questions that came to me when I heard it then, is still the same questions I am thinking of now.

Given that his increments ain&#039;t a small amount, 
1) Would that mean that his income tax will be greatly reduced, while he is still able to maintain his current pay? Doesn&#039;t this mean that he is still getting an &quot;increase&quot; of some sort in his salary?

2) Which charity has he pledged his increments to? How come there is no announcement of this in the MSM? 
Which charity has received his monies? 
When was it received?

So many questions... so little answers!

Until we are sure that charities he claims he will be giving his increments to, it is all just lip service! Will SOMEONE please proof me wrong?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; looking back at this article, the same questions that came to me when I heard it then, is still the same questions I am thinking of now.</p>
<p>Given that his increments ain&#8217;t a small amount,<br />
1) Would that mean that his income tax will be greatly reduced, while he is still able to maintain his current pay? Doesn&#8217;t this mean that he is still getting an &#8220;increase&#8221; of some sort in his salary?</p>
<p>2) Which charity has he pledged his increments to? How come there is no announcement of this in the MSM?<br />
Which charity has received his monies?<br />
When was it received?</p>
<p>So many questions&#8230; so little answers!</p>
<p>Until we are sure that charities he claims he will be giving his increments to, it is all just lip service! Will SOMEONE please proof me wrong?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poor Citizens</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/comment-page-1/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>Poor Citizens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 05:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/12/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/#comment-588</guid>
		<description>In a Bi-POLAR Economy, Economy doing well is NOT EQUAL to Citizens doing well.

In fact, it is the REVERSE in REALITY.
In a Bi-POLAR Economy, Economy doing well is EQUAL Citizens doing POORLY.

CHECK on Consumer Prices of every items in the markets.

Set up the transparent Standard of Living Index.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a Bi-POLAR Economy, Economy doing well is NOT EQUAL to Citizens doing well.</p>
<p>In fact, it is the REVERSE in REALITY.<br />
In a Bi-POLAR Economy, Economy doing well is EQUAL Citizens doing POORLY.</p>
<p>CHECK on Consumer Prices of every items in the markets.</p>
<p>Set up the transparent Standard of Living Index.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cry Baby Talent</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/comment-page-1/#comment-587</link>
		<dc:creator>Cry Baby Talent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 05:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/12/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/#comment-587</guid>
		<description>What &quot;damage&quot; to control!
What is there to control?
Everything is alreaded CONTROLLED!!!

Maximise What Profit? and What Talent?

SHOW the HISTORY, Profit came from the POLITICAL PLATFORM and NOT the POLITICAL TALENT.
Once a POLITACAL TALENT left the POLITICAL PLATFORM, NO PROFIT is to be made.  CHECK IT OUT.
From America, to Japan, to Taiwan to Thailand.

What is the use of POLITICAL TALENT when you do not have the ECONMICAL PLATFORM to have NO FEARS to do it BIGGEST and make the BIGGEST MISTAKES at somebody else&#039;s COSTS?

POLITICS means PricePlay Overpromises Lies Incomes Taxes Controls Slippery-Slopes

All over the World land prices are being priced upwards and there is nothing with land supply which is now Unlimited without FREEHOLD LEASES.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What &#8220;damage&#8221; to control!<br />
What is there to control?<br />
Everything is alreaded CONTROLLED!!!</p>
<p>Maximise What Profit? and What Talent?</p>
<p>SHOW the HISTORY, Profit came from the POLITICAL PLATFORM and NOT the POLITICAL TALENT.<br />
Once a POLITACAL TALENT left the POLITICAL PLATFORM, NO PROFIT is to be made.  CHECK IT OUT.<br />
From America, to Japan, to Taiwan to Thailand.</p>
<p>What is the use of POLITICAL TALENT when you do not have the ECONMICAL PLATFORM to have NO FEARS to do it BIGGEST and make the BIGGEST MISTAKES at somebody else&#8217;s COSTS?</p>
<p>POLITICS means PricePlay Overpromises Lies Incomes Taxes Controls Slippery-Slopes</p>
<p>All over the World land prices are being priced upwards and there is nothing with land supply which is now Unlimited without FREEHOLD LEASES.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pay &#38; Pay</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/comment-page-1/#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>Pay &#38; Pay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 16:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/12/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/#comment-589</guid>
		<description>Hoho, Singapore is too High-End for me to live, in few years time i leaving here. :D What they are doing is s*ck up our hard earn money while they seat at offices shaking legs. thumbs up for Singapore. YAHOO!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoho, Singapore is too High-End for me to live, in few years time i leaving here. :D What they are doing is s*ck up our hard earn money while they seat at offices shaking legs. thumbs up for Singapore. YAHOO!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gouzai</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/comment-page-1/#comment-590</link>
		<dc:creator>gouzai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 09:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/12/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/#comment-590</guid>
		<description>Please note the PM&#039;s exact words.  He said &quot;suitable good causes&quot;, not &quot;charity&quot;.

One reasonable interpretation of a &quot;suitable good cause&quot; to him could be the PAP party funds.  After all, why shouldn&#039;t he support a party that has done so much for Singapore?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please note the PM&#8217;s exact words.  He said &#8220;suitable good causes&#8221;, not &#8220;charity&#8221;.</p>
<p>One reasonable interpretation of a &#8220;suitable good cause&#8221; to him could be the PAP party funds.  After all, why shouldn&#8217;t he support a party that has done so much for Singapore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/comment-page-1/#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/12/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/#comment-576</guid>
		<description>Look... as if we needed higher wages to retain bright talent such as PM Lee.  Firstly, his salaries are high already. Secondly, it&#039;s obvious from this he, too, thinks peanuts of his money.

But don&#039;t expect a turnaround in the next GE. It simply won&#039;t happen. And the situation spiralling out of control? Who would dare lead that spiral?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look&#8230; as if we needed higher wages to retain bright talent such as PM Lee.  Firstly, his salaries are high already. Secondly, it&#8217;s obvious from this he, too, thinks peanuts of his money.</p>
<p>But don&#8217;t expect a turnaround in the next GE. It simply won&#8217;t happen. And the situation spiralling out of control? Who would dare lead that spiral?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jurong</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/comment-page-1/#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator>Jurong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/12/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/#comment-575</guid>
		<description>Vivian B might end up as the next PM for support rendered during such trying period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vivian B might end up as the next PM for support rendered during such trying period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fenian</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/comment-page-1/#comment-578</link>
		<dc:creator>fenian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 03:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/12/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/#comment-578</guid>
		<description>refuse to pay your taxes. make a point. dun just grouse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>refuse to pay your taxes. make a point. dun just grouse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin.l</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/comment-page-1/#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin.l</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 02:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/12/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/#comment-573</guid>
		<description>Donating = being morally upright? Right.............  These people shouldn&#039;t talk so much. Just do lah, whether they have our consensus or not doesn&#039;t matter, they&#039;re going to do it (eg. casino, gst hike, public transport hike) anyways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donating = being morally upright? Right&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.  These people shouldn&#8217;t talk so much. Just do lah, whether they have our consensus or not doesn&#8217;t matter, they&#8217;re going to do it (eg. casino, gst hike, public transport hike) anyways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/comment-page-1/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 00:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/12/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/#comment-574</guid>
		<description>Jurong,
of course it is true. No one doubt that, George Bush don&#039;t doubt that, and the 82 cronies won&#039;t doubt that either because quite sometimes mean 48 hours ago !!!! Anytime is quite sometimes for PAP. Last moment is any moment of PAP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jurong,<br />
of course it is true. No one doubt that, George Bush don&#8217;t doubt that, and the 82 cronies won&#8217;t doubt that either because quite sometimes mean 48 hours ago !!!! Anytime is quite sometimes for PAP. Last moment is any moment of PAP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jurong</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/comment-page-1/#comment-580</link>
		<dc:creator>Jurong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/12/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/#comment-580</guid>
		<description>Vivian B said that the PM decided to donate &quot;quite some time ago&quot;. So it was not pressure that forced him into this damage control maneuver. I&#039;m not so sure if &quot;quite some time ago&quot; is true or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vivian B said that the PM decided to donate &#8220;quite some time ago&#8221;. So it was not pressure that forced him into this damage control maneuver. I&#8217;m not so sure if &#8220;quite some time ago&#8221; is true or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mad Salary</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/comment-page-1/#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad Salary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/12/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/#comment-579</guid>
		<description>Singaporeans keep an eye on the government&#039;s performance? my my.. even their numbers are cooked to make them look good. At the end of the day, ask yourself if you were better off than you were during the previous GE. If you were only marginally better off when you should have been a lot better off, or worse off, then vote according to that. Don&#039;t be fooled into thinking ERS or some upgrading carrots really makes you better off. The ERS came from you tax dollars. THe upgrading costs you money because you co-pay and the increase in HDB flat value means nothing if all the other houses everywhere also go up.

&quot;There&#039;s no free lunch&quot;, Ho ching says. Yep, no free lunch for singaporeans, but guess who is having singaporeans for lunch?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Singaporeans keep an eye on the government&#8217;s performance? my my.. even their numbers are cooked to make them look good. At the end of the day, ask yourself if you were better off than you were during the previous GE. If you were only marginally better off when you should have been a lot better off, or worse off, then vote according to that. Don&#8217;t be fooled into thinking ERS or some upgrading carrots really makes you better off. The ERS came from you tax dollars. THe upgrading costs you money because you co-pay and the increase in HDB flat value means nothing if all the other houses everywhere also go up.</p>
<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s no free lunch&#8221;, Ho ching says. Yep, no free lunch for singaporeans, but guess who is having singaporeans for lunch?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uip</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/comment-page-1/#comment-585</link>
		<dc:creator>uip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/12/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/#comment-585</guid>
		<description>Just a political move to divert the attention.

People will not focus on the unreasonable (or shall I say unnecessary) pay hikes. Instead, they will focus on his donations. If people continue to focus on the pay hikes and express their displeasures, things can spiral out of control. This issue will be etched permanently into many people&#039;s minds and they will not forget this till the time comes for their votes. Guess what will happen then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a political move to divert the attention.</p>
<p>People will not focus on the unreasonable (or shall I say unnecessary) pay hikes. Instead, they will focus on his donations. If people continue to focus on the pay hikes and express their displeasures, things can spiral out of control. This issue will be etched permanently into many people&#8217;s minds and they will not forget this till the time comes for their votes. Guess what will happen then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hammersphere</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/comment-page-1/#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator>hammersphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/12/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/#comment-584</guid>
		<description>This is a typical case of PM Lee wanting to maintaining the moral authority to lead for the next 4 years until the next elections is called and more importantly, earning the political capital that has been lost since May 2006

1. Upgrading

2. GST

3. Ministerial Salaries Hike.

Time to start building up lost political capital. And now you start seeing ministers and ordinary MPs donating money to charities.

I think next year Rev. Ming Yi of Ren Ci Hospital don&#039;t neeed to do stunts liao.. Ask PM for some donations.. enough liao.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a typical case of PM Lee wanting to maintaining the moral authority to lead for the next 4 years until the next elections is called and more importantly, earning the political capital that has been lost since May 2006</p>
<p>1. Upgrading</p>
<p>2. GST</p>
<p>3. Ministerial Salaries Hike.</p>
<p>Time to start building up lost political capital. And now you start seeing ministers and ordinary MPs donating money to charities.</p>
<p>I think next year Rev. Ming Yi of Ren Ci Hospital don&#8217;t neeed to do stunts liao.. Ask PM for some donations.. enough liao.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comment</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/comment-page-1/#comment-586</link>
		<dc:creator>Comment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/12/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/#comment-586</guid>
		<description>To build a people, you need transparency and honesty. A materialistic society that values mercenaries cannot create such an environment that encourage such a people to florish. Since its principles and fundamentals are made of stocks and derivatives, the intrinsic content becomes a means to centralise wealth rather than a driving motivation of life, which can only produce an intricate  mixture of indiscreet hypocrasy and dishonesty in its people. This is especially evident in the all encompassing marketplace, the house of representatives where this social dissease is most infective on the human condition. As such, the light it shines is one in which it slowly scorches those that it enfolds before it takes the life of his first born and collapses into oblivion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To build a people, you need transparency and honesty. A materialistic society that values mercenaries cannot create such an environment that encourage such a people to florish. Since its principles and fundamentals are made of stocks and derivatives, the intrinsic content becomes a means to centralise wealth rather than a driving motivation of life, which can only produce an intricate  mixture of indiscreet hypocrasy and dishonesty in its people. This is especially evident in the all encompassing marketplace, the house of representatives where this social dissease is most infective on the human condition. As such, the light it shines is one in which it slowly scorches those that it enfolds before it takes the life of his first born and collapses into oblivion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theonlinecitizen</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/comment-page-1/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>theonlinecitizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 05:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/12/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/#comment-581</guid>
		<description>Hey Sarek,

Good to see you here again. :)

Yes, it is a much bigger issue than any of the casino or the GST or the minority form saga, as you mentioned.

Clearly, the PM is feeling the heat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Sarek,</p>
<p>Good to see you here again. :)</p>
<p>Yes, it is a much bigger issue than any of the casino or the GST or the minority form saga, as you mentioned.</p>
<p>Clearly, the PM is feeling the heat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarek</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/comment-page-1/#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 05:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/12/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/#comment-583</guid>
		<description>Yes, it is damage control.  It is bigger than the casino decision.  It is bigger than the minority form saga u-turn.  It is a huge and irreparable damage to the PAP&#039;s standings.

Million dollars income not enough for materialistic life style?

Squeeze the maximum profit from individual talent instead of serving the people at a price tag of mere million?

What kind of elite the PAP has raised?  How do they inspire the people to serve?

Average people don&#039;t want to have more children.  Talented people don&#039;t want to serve unless they get the &#039;right&#039; payment.  By these two yardsticks, PAP fails badly in term of nation building.  To build a nation, we build the people, not just the economy.

The monister tries to donate the pay hike to give himself the moral standing.  In other word, he acknowledged he does not have enough moral standing to speak to the people.  It might have worked if he did it before the topic ever raised in Parliament.  Now it is too late.

The people will forever remember these monisters and remember that a million dollar is not enough to get them to serve the nation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is damage control.  It is bigger than the casino decision.  It is bigger than the minority form saga u-turn.  It is a huge and irreparable damage to the PAP&#8217;s standings.</p>
<p>Million dollars income not enough for materialistic life style?</p>
<p>Squeeze the maximum profit from individual talent instead of serving the people at a price tag of mere million?</p>
<p>What kind of elite the PAP has raised?  How do they inspire the people to serve?</p>
<p>Average people don&#8217;t want to have more children.  Talented people don&#8217;t want to serve unless they get the &#8216;right&#8217; payment.  By these two yardsticks, PAP fails badly in term of nation building.  To build a nation, we build the people, not just the economy.</p>
<p>The monister tries to donate the pay hike to give himself the moral standing.  In other word, he acknowledged he does not have enough moral standing to speak to the people.  It might have worked if he did it before the topic ever raised in Parliament.  Now it is too late.</p>
<p>The people will forever remember these monisters and remember that a million dollar is not enough to get them to serve the nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john'arc</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/comment-page-1/#comment-577</link>
		<dc:creator>john'arc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 04:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/04/12/damage-control-by-the-prime-minister/#comment-577</guid>
		<description>It certainly is a political move. But i don&#039;t see it as backing down to assuage public anger. They have foreseen the public outcry. I see it as carefully orchestrated wayang kulit to manage the expected outcry, and also to present the mini Lee as a leader in shining light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It certainly is a political move. But i don&#8217;t see it as backing down to assuage public anger. They have foreseen the public outcry. I see it as carefully orchestrated wayang kulit to manage the expected outcry, and also to present the mini Lee as a leader in shining light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

