
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Minutes With…. Choo Zheng Xi on PM Lee’s interview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/</link>
	<description>a community of Singaporeans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:32:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-6380</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-6380</guid>
		<description>Yes, check and balance...
http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/06/01/auditor-general’s-report-millions-missing/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, check and balance&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/06/01/auditor-general’s-report-millions-missing/" rel="nofollow">http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/06/01/auditor-general’s-report-millions-missing/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pisces</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-6379</link>
		<dc:creator>pisces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-6379</guid>
		<description>The key issue is whether there are sufficient checks and balances in the political system to ensure that the government (formed by whatever party) is accountable, non-corrupt and protects fundamental rights of the citizens.

The current operating assumptions by the PAP (and shared by Singaporeans at large) are that it will
1) continue to find and select the right people to join the government;
2) remain non-corrupt; and
3) remain in power perpetually.

As a result, there has been a lack of focus on developing the necessary checks and balances in the system. If and when one of the assumptions break down, we may find ourselves in deep trouble...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key issue is whether there are sufficient checks and balances in the political system to ensure that the government (formed by whatever party) is accountable, non-corrupt and protects fundamental rights of the citizens.</p>
<p>The current operating assumptions by the PAP (and shared by Singaporeans at large) are that it will<br />
1) continue to find and select the right people to join the government;<br />
2) remain non-corrupt; and<br />
3) remain in power perpetually.</p>
<p>As a result, there has been a lack of focus on developing the necessary checks and balances in the system. If and when one of the assumptions break down, we may find ourselves in deep trouble&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macktheknife</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-6378</link>
		<dc:creator>macktheknife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 00:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-6378</guid>
		<description>Hearing so much from you guys, we can&#039;t exactly say PAP is doing all that badly. Just to raise the tempo of the discussion - Last night, a Taiwan TV program caught my attention which appraises Singapore for having the best government in the world. The host and the some of the Professors cum Political Representatives agrees that they admire LKY for his works done on Singapore and its system that keeps us competitive. The issue of whether President Ma is able to emulate LKY is immaterial. I&#039;m totally honored and proud to be a Singaporean. Now, after the past few days, we have been criticizing PAP for this and that. My question is: Are our opposition parties capable of doing better? Do we really think PAP is lousy? Come on, lets be frank with each other. I am not a PAP supporter, but rather, I support the Worker&#039;s Party because I wanted more balance. If the opposition parties are not up to the task, I rather keep the current system and move on in life. How say?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hearing so much from you guys, we can&#8217;t exactly say PAP is doing all that badly. Just to raise the tempo of the discussion &#8211; Last night, a Taiwan TV program caught my attention which appraises Singapore for having the best government in the world. The host and the some of the Professors cum Political Representatives agrees that they admire LKY for his works done on Singapore and its system that keeps us competitive. The issue of whether President Ma is able to emulate LKY is immaterial. I&#8217;m totally honored and proud to be a Singaporean. Now, after the past few days, we have been criticizing PAP for this and that. My question is: Are our opposition parties capable of doing better? Do we really think PAP is lousy? Come on, lets be frank with each other. I am not a PAP supporter, but rather, I support the Worker&#8217;s Party because I wanted more balance. If the opposition parties are not up to the task, I rather keep the current system and move on in life. How say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackson</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-6377</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-6377</guid>
		<description>I think the PAP should wake up their idea and realise that now is 2008 and Singapore is very transparent to the world. How long can LKY live on? 100? LKY was born in 1923, I&#039;m born in 1986, so I&#039;ve got another 50 years to play. By then, will PAP still be around? As a Singaporean, I&#039;m disgraced that Singaporeans like the PAP don&#039;t understand politics. When it&#039;s time to rotate the party, it&#039;s time to rotate. Die die wanna stay at the top, eventually will come down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the PAP should wake up their idea and realise that now is 2008 and Singapore is very transparent to the world. How long can LKY live on? 100? LKY was born in 1923, I&#8217;m born in 1986, so I&#8217;ve got another 50 years to play. By then, will PAP still be around? As a Singaporean, I&#8217;m disgraced that Singaporeans like the PAP don&#8217;t understand politics. When it&#8217;s time to rotate the party, it&#8217;s time to rotate. Die die wanna stay at the top, eventually will come down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert HO</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-6376</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert HO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 05:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-6376</guid>
		<description>Dear EY Comment 19,

1.  The Constitution is online, last time I checked, because I asked once in an online forum -- and the PAPs heard -- why this most important piece of legalese was not online and shortly after, it was.  But you will never find a single clause that states this possibility of a voted-out PAP MP or Minister waltzing back into the Cabinet.  LIE KY LHL PAP are too dishonest to state that explicitly since it is their backdoor route back into power and millions -- big motivations for greedy and corrupt men like them.

2.  Rather, you will have to note that THERE ARE NO DISQUALIFICATIONS OR PROHIBITIONS FOR A NOMINATED MP BEING MADE A MINISTER.  So, this carefully created backdoor is never mentioned in the PAPaganda media or by the PAPs themselves but they all know the possibility.  Remember LIE KY kept warning about &quot;freak elections results&quot;?  So he prepared for this 1.  Just like calling out the army if the entire PAP govt is voted out.  Preparations long made and contingent plans worked out, who does what to whom, etc.

3.  In the Constitution, the Nominated MP has the same legal and parliamentary status as an elected MP, except for pay [allowance] and some voting restrictions, I believe.  So any NMP can become Minister or even PM.  So &quot;freak results&quot; prepared for.

4.  I had a short exchange of emails with Warren? Fernandez of the Straits Times years ago in which he admitted and acknowledged this possibility and he is 1 of those trusted and in the know; also in the right circles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear EY Comment 19,</p>
<p>1.  The Constitution is online, last time I checked, because I asked once in an online forum &#8212; and the PAPs heard &#8212; why this most important piece of legalese was not online and shortly after, it was.  But you will never find a single clause that states this possibility of a voted-out PAP MP or Minister waltzing back into the Cabinet.  LIE KY LHL PAP are too dishonest to state that explicitly since it is their backdoor route back into power and millions &#8212; big motivations for greedy and corrupt men like them.</p>
<p>2.  Rather, you will have to note that THERE ARE NO DISQUALIFICATIONS OR PROHIBITIONS FOR A NOMINATED MP BEING MADE A MINISTER.  So, this carefully created backdoor is never mentioned in the PAPaganda media or by the PAPs themselves but they all know the possibility.  Remember LIE KY kept warning about &#8220;freak elections results&#8221;?  So he prepared for this 1.  Just like calling out the army if the entire PAP govt is voted out.  Preparations long made and contingent plans worked out, who does what to whom, etc.</p>
<p>3.  In the Constitution, the Nominated MP has the same legal and parliamentary status as an elected MP, except for pay [allowance] and some voting restrictions, I believe.  So any NMP can become Minister or even PM.  So &#8220;freak results&#8221; prepared for.</p>
<p>4.  I had a short exchange of emails with Warren? Fernandez of the Straits Times years ago in which he admitted and acknowledged this possibility and he is 1 of those trusted and in the know; also in the right circles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I want the next SG PM to be a web2.0 junkie! &#124; the(new)mediaslut</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-6375</link>
		<dc:creator>I want the next SG PM to be a web2.0 junkie! &#124; the(new)mediaslut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-6375</guid>
		<description>[...] course I want the next SG PM to go beyond kissing babies, I want him/her to be a web2.0 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] course I want the next SG PM to go beyond kissing babies, I want him/her to be a web2.0 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CelluloidReality</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-6374</link>
		<dc:creator>CelluloidReality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-6374</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not buying the idea of a single party dominant political position in Singapore for the next 20-30 years.

It&#039;s not tenable and frankly, the wider the scope of political participation and liberalisation to allow for greater ownership and less schadenfreude in domestic politics, the greater the effect this has on enhancing our existence for the long term.

What&#039;s afflicting Singapore is the current state of its socio-political dynamics.

Who&#039;s up for public service? Wait, do I see hands going down.

Yeap, I do. And I roughly know why.

But I hope more are able to reckon the missives involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not buying the idea of a single party dominant political position in Singapore for the next 20-30 years.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not tenable and frankly, the wider the scope of political participation and liberalisation to allow for greater ownership and less schadenfreude in domestic politics, the greater the effect this has on enhancing our existence for the long term.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s afflicting Singapore is the current state of its socio-political dynamics.</p>
<p>Who&#8217;s up for public service? Wait, do I see hands going down.</p>
<p>Yeap, I do. And I roughly know why.</p>
<p>But I hope more are able to reckon the missives involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elfred</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-6373</link>
		<dc:creator>Elfred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-6373</guid>
		<description>Zheng Xi,

I have waited for this topic to be &#039;old&#039; to quietly tell you that... Your &#039;analysis&#039; is wrong lah~ :)

Trust me...

As for the next PM, it&#039;d probably not be someone in parliament right now. After MM Lee, will there be another MM is a question in itself. Hahahahahaha...

Given the future, the succeeding PM, for the sake of the party and Singapore, he/she must be excellent in politics, yet must be young enough to pull a regime off for enough time for internal and external confrontation.

The Law minister&#039;s appointment is a show for all to realise the essence of political appointment: From the bottom to the top, or from the top falling to bottom... anything can happen. The signal is very strong.

There is no need to guess. In politics, and if pragmatism must be, the coming political appointments will be astonishing. No choice, the global scene is changed, the domestic matters are changed drastically; but Singaporeans...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zheng Xi,</p>
<p>I have waited for this topic to be &#8216;old&#8217; to quietly tell you that&#8230; Your &#8216;analysis&#8217; is wrong lah~ :)</p>
<p>Trust me&#8230;</p>
<p>As for the next PM, it&#8217;d probably not be someone in parliament right now. After MM Lee, will there be another MM is a question in itself. Hahahahahaha&#8230;</p>
<p>Given the future, the succeeding PM, for the sake of the party and Singapore, he/she must be excellent in politics, yet must be young enough to pull a regime off for enough time for internal and external confrontation.</p>
<p>The Law minister&#8217;s appointment is a show for all to realise the essence of political appointment: From the bottom to the top, or from the top falling to bottom&#8230; anything can happen. The signal is very strong.</p>
<p>There is no need to guess. In politics, and if pragmatism must be, the coming political appointments will be astonishing. No choice, the global scene is changed, the domestic matters are changed drastically; but Singaporeans&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EY</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-6372</link>
		<dc:creator>EY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-6372</guid>
		<description>Hi Robert,

That&#039;s news! Is it possible for you to direct us to the relevant sections of the Constitution please? Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robert,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s news! Is it possible for you to direct us to the relevant sections of the Constitution please? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily SG: 16 Apr 2008 &#171; The Singapore Daily</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-6371</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily SG: 16 Apr 2008 &#171; The Singapore Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 03:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-6371</guid>
		<description>[...] PM V1.3. Search for the next Prime Minstar - The Online Citizen: 5 Minutes With…. Choo Zheng Xi on PM Lee’s interview [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PM V1.3. Search for the next Prime Minstar &#8211; The Online Citizen: 5 Minutes With…. Choo Zheng Xi on PM Lee’s interview [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert HO</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-6370</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert HO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-6370</guid>
		<description>RH:
1.  Dear Alan Wong, Comment 5 and Weijia, Comment 13:

In reply to your misreading of the Constitution and LIE KY LHL PAP&#039;s unscrupulous, dishonest, election-cheating, corrupt, greedy and totalitarian rule, THE CONSTITUTION WAS AMENDED TO ALLOW FOR A VOTED-OUT PAP MP TO REMAIN IN THE CABINET.

2.  How?  Through the carefully prepared method of &#039;Nominated MPs&#039;.  This Constitutional amendment was rubberstamped through and never mentioned by the PAPaganda media for this possibility.  If and when LHL loses an election, he will simply be &#039;Nominated&#039; as Nominated MP, which being a MP title, then allows him to be appointed back into the Cabinet as minister.

3.  Do read the Constitution again.  The entire system is not only corrupted, but rigged to be failsafe -- for the LIEs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RH:<br />
1.  Dear Alan Wong, Comment 5 and Weijia, Comment 13:</p>
<p>In reply to your misreading of the Constitution and LIE KY LHL PAP&#8217;s unscrupulous, dishonest, election-cheating, corrupt, greedy and totalitarian rule, THE CONSTITUTION WAS AMENDED TO ALLOW FOR A VOTED-OUT PAP MP TO REMAIN IN THE CABINET.</p>
<p>2.  How?  Through the carefully prepared method of &#8216;Nominated MPs&#8217;.  This Constitutional amendment was rubberstamped through and never mentioned by the PAPaganda media for this possibility.  If and when LHL loses an election, he will simply be &#8216;Nominated&#8217; as Nominated MP, which being a MP title, then allows him to be appointed back into the Cabinet as minister.</p>
<p>3.  Do read the Constitution again.  The entire system is not only corrupted, but rigged to be failsafe &#8212; for the LIEs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macktheknife</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-6369</link>
		<dc:creator>macktheknife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 23:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-6369</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, the next PM is a fixed deal. I reckon the chosen one is already in the making. Lets call it &#039;glooming&#039; the next generation, a maxim so often heard in many organizations. Actually, there is no need for discussion. I am kinda sick and tired of it. Whether or not Chinese or Indian, not important. The thing is whether the next PM is a people&#039;s PM, a fighter, a great leader, definitely not the next George Bush or so, which matter most. Let&#039;s wait and see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, the next PM is a fixed deal. I reckon the chosen one is already in the making. Lets call it &#8216;glooming&#8217; the next generation, a maxim so often heard in many organizations. Actually, there is no need for discussion. I am kinda sick and tired of it. Whether or not Chinese or Indian, not important. The thing is whether the next PM is a people&#8217;s PM, a fighter, a great leader, definitely not the next George Bush or so, which matter most. Let&#8217;s wait and see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Thinker</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-6368</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Thinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-6368</guid>
		<description>Angrez Says:
April 15, 2008 at 10:02 pm

Free Thinker, So if both the president and the PM are Chinese, then its alright?

====================================

Hi Angrez,

No, if both President and PM are Chinese, also not alright. From past experiences, only two Chinese Presidents, i.e. the late Wee Kim Wee and Ong Teng Cheong. Wee was more penarakan than Chinese, so no problem - smooth sailing all the way; but Ong was very Chinese, as he had a Chinese-education background, so big big problem. Best is never to have same race between PM and President. Like this will be good for local multi-racial consumption as well as for international, foreign-relations, image projection.

That is what I personally think, freely think.

But what I have said earlier was on what I&#039;d thought what LHL&#039;s thinking was.  I was only trying to read his mind, albeit very amateurish.

Have I answered your question?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angrez Says:<br />
April 15, 2008 at 10:02 pm</p>
<p>Free Thinker, So if both the president and the PM are Chinese, then its alright?</p>
<p>====================================</p>
<p>Hi Angrez,</p>
<p>No, if both President and PM are Chinese, also not alright. From past experiences, only two Chinese Presidents, i.e. the late Wee Kim Wee and Ong Teng Cheong. Wee was more penarakan than Chinese, so no problem &#8211; smooth sailing all the way; but Ong was very Chinese, as he had a Chinese-education background, so big big problem. Best is never to have same race between PM and President. Like this will be good for local multi-racial consumption as well as for international, foreign-relations, image projection.</p>
<p>That is what I personally think, freely think.</p>
<p>But what I have said earlier was on what I&#8217;d thought what LHL&#8217;s thinking was.  I was only trying to read his mind, albeit very amateurish.</p>
<p>Have I answered your question?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joker</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-6367</link>
		<dc:creator>joker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-6367</guid>
		<description>An unfulfilled life may be defined as:

A: Being a non-entity when compared to one&#039;s father.

B: Having a non-entity as a son.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An unfulfilled life may be defined as:</p>
<p>A: Being a non-entity when compared to one&#8217;s father.</p>
<p>B: Having a non-entity as a son.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weijia</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-6366</link>
		<dc:creator>Weijia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-6366</guid>
		<description>@Alan Wong

i can answer for him, cos this one clear cut one. hahaha answer is found in Article 25 of the singapore constitution.

1) If he loses the election in his ward, he will no longer be an MP. and so is not in parliament. so cannot be PM.

2) The president is the one selecting the PM.

3) not quite sure what your third question means. but.. whatever it is i believe they&#039;ll follow the procedures set. as to how independent it is is another question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Alan Wong</p>
<p>i can answer for him, cos this one clear cut one. hahaha answer is found in Article 25 of the singapore constitution.</p>
<p>1) If he loses the election in his ward, he will no longer be an MP. and so is not in parliament. so cannot be PM.</p>
<p>2) The president is the one selecting the PM.</p>
<p>3) not quite sure what your third question means. but.. whatever it is i believe they&#8217;ll follow the procedures set. as to how independent it is is another question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patriot</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-6365</link>
		<dc:creator>patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-6365</guid>
		<description>If memory serves me right, Wee Toon Boon is still a cohort in PAP, I think I saw him appeared at a PAP Anniversary Celebration, just two or three years back, in a News Telecast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If memory serves me right, Wee Toon Boon is still a cohort in PAP, I think I saw him appeared at a PAP Anniversary Celebration, just two or three years back, in a News Telecast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wong Can't Sing</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-6364</link>
		<dc:creator>Wong Can't Sing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-6364</guid>
		<description>Why is it that with only 66% of the votes, the PAP can control 98% of parliament and 100% of the  cabinet?

Shouldn&#039;t the other 33% singaporean votes translate to a more proportional representation in parliament and cabinet?

Such a formula by the PAP is in fact, setting Singapore up for social chaos sooner or later because there will be a growing significant proportion of singapore&#039;s society which is NOT BEING REPRESENTED, marginalized and ignored.

The question is not if, but when.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that with only 66% of the votes, the PAP can control 98% of parliament and 100% of the  cabinet?</p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t the other 33% singaporean votes translate to a more proportional representation in parliament and cabinet?</p>
<p>Such a formula by the PAP is in fact, setting Singapore up for social chaos sooner or later because there will be a growing significant proportion of singapore&#8217;s society which is NOT BEING REPRESENTED, marginalized and ignored.</p>
<p>The question is not if, but when.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seeking Salvation</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-6363</link>
		<dc:creator>Seeking Salvation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-6363</guid>
		<description>they were wrong on many choices

Wee Toon Boon - Corruption
Phey Yew Kok - Corrupted Embezzle and dissappeared
Teh Chean Wan - Corrupted
3 down and more to come
with the current cocky style it made not difference
because 60 pct of Sporeans are complacent not to care and take control by voting them out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they were wrong on many choices</p>
<p>Wee Toon Boon &#8211; Corruption<br />
Phey Yew Kok &#8211; Corrupted Embezzle and dissappeared<br />
Teh Chean Wan &#8211; Corrupted<br />
3 down and more to come<br />
with the current cocky style it made not difference<br />
because 60 pct of Sporeans are complacent not to care and take control by voting them out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wong Can't Sing</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-6362</link>
		<dc:creator>Wong Can't Sing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-6362</guid>
		<description>The stage has been set.

Wong Can&#039;t Sing will be promoted out of the way to be the next Singapore President.

Spend his multi-million dollar salary cutting ribbons, patronizing boy scouts, attending gala dinners, rejecting the occasional presidential appeal, rubber stamping whatever the PAP puts before him, and oh, safeguarding our national reserves when he don&#039;t even have an idea how much there is because it will take 56 man years to account for them.

It will be a case of Wong Can&#039;t Sing and Can&#039;t Count.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The stage has been set.</p>
<p>Wong Can&#8217;t Sing will be promoted out of the way to be the next Singapore President.</p>
<p>Spend his multi-million dollar salary cutting ribbons, patronizing boy scouts, attending gala dinners, rejecting the occasional presidential appeal, rubber stamping whatever the PAP puts before him, and oh, safeguarding our national reserves when he don&#8217;t even have an idea how much there is because it will take 56 man years to account for them.</p>
<p>It will be a case of Wong Can&#8217;t Sing and Can&#8217;t Count.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Teoh</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-6361</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Teoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-6361</guid>
		<description>They say need 3 elections to groom the new PM, what happen before 3 elections pap is voted out ? are they so confident they can win every election?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They say need 3 elections to groom the new PM, what happen before 3 elections pap is voted out ? are they so confident they can win every election?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
