<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bloggers&#8217; group proposes sweeping changes in Internet regulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/bloggers-group-proposes-sweeping-changes-in-internet-regulation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/bloggers-group-proposes-sweeping-changes-in-internet-regulation/</link>
	<description>Singapore&#039;s #1 Socio-Political Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 01:30:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DathEnhag</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/bloggers-group-proposes-sweeping-changes-in-internet-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-205631</link>
		<dc:creator>DathEnhag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 15:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-205631</guid>
		<description>бивает</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>бивает</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fumefumsnug</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/bloggers-group-proposes-sweeping-changes-in-internet-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-203955</link>
		<dc:creator>Fumefumsnug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 09:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-203955</guid>
		<description>))))) Под столом!!!!))))))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>))))) Под столом!!!!))))))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drapes curtains</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/bloggers-group-proposes-sweeping-changes-in-internet-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-195914</link>
		<dc:creator>drapes curtains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 07:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-195914</guid>
		<description>Heya this topic is very interesting. Keep it going guy !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heya this topic is very interesting. Keep it going guy !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Find Out Whether AIMS is Screwing The Right Hole &#171; JUST STUFF</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/bloggers-group-proposes-sweeping-changes-in-internet-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-18130</link>
		<dc:creator>Find Out Whether AIMS is Screwing The Right Hole &#171; JUST STUFF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-18130</guid>
		<description>[...] Bloggers’ group proposes sweeping changes in Internet regulation (Press Release) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bloggers’ group proposes sweeping changes in Internet regulation (Press Release) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Void Deck</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/bloggers-group-proposes-sweeping-changes-in-internet-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-6492</link>
		<dc:creator>The Void Deck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 07:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-6492</guid>
		<description>Awesome dudes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome dudes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ong Lei Kit</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/bloggers-group-proposes-sweeping-changes-in-internet-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-6491</link>
		<dc:creator>Ong Lei Kit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 05:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-6491</guid>
		<description>As much as I support the G15. I dont agree they are wet blankets or eLEEtist just bc they highlight something as obvious as wat was mentioned, if you cannot take the heat of debate, then get out of the kitchen or go set fire to yourself, but pls dont stop ppl from airing their views or try to threaten them with WSM type mob lynching threats just bc you have a different view from them. It will not work with this bhpress idiot, his grass root support is too strong, have you ever considered how many lonely and dysfunctional ladies typically read the rubbish he passes off as novels?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I support the G15. I dont agree they are wet blankets or eLEEtist just bc they highlight something as obvious as wat was mentioned, if you cannot take the heat of debate, then get out of the kitchen or go set fire to yourself, but pls dont stop ppl from airing their views or try to threaten them with WSM type mob lynching threats just bc you have a different view from them. It will not work with this bhpress idiot, his grass root support is too strong, have you ever considered how many lonely and dysfunctional ladies typically read the rubbish he passes off as novels?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ong Lei Kit</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/bloggers-group-proposes-sweeping-changes-in-internet-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-6490</link>
		<dc:creator>Ong Lei Kit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 05:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-6490</guid>
		<description>Good initiative, but how inclusive and participatory and representative was it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good initiative, but how inclusive and participatory and representative was it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liyuen</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/bloggers-group-proposes-sweeping-changes-in-internet-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-6489</link>
		<dc:creator>Liyuen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 04:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-6489</guid>
		<description>It may be a good idea to look at what this Darkness or Darth Vader character is saying. I am not saying I agree with him or Yawning Bread etc. I have not decided, but I have been to Aaron&#039;s blog recently and what he says seems to stick in my brain like chewing gum.

However I dont believe this guy will stick around, from what I see, he even seems to be fighting with his own ppl who want him to shut up, these bad boy types are usually very tempremental, like Italian sportscars, a bit bo gham, they will just take off, thats a real pity as blogosphere really needs every bit of grey matter to see itself through these challenging times, otherwise how do we go beyond settling differences?

Oh well, for what its worth 3 cheers to the G15 bloggers! Keep up the good fight!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may be a good idea to look at what this Darkness or Darth Vader character is saying. I am not saying I agree with him or Yawning Bread etc. I have not decided, but I have been to Aaron&#8217;s blog recently and what he says seems to stick in my brain like chewing gum.</p>
<p>However I dont believe this guy will stick around, from what I see, he even seems to be fighting with his own ppl who want him to shut up, these bad boy types are usually very tempremental, like Italian sportscars, a bit bo gham, they will just take off, thats a real pity as blogosphere really needs every bit of grey matter to see itself through these challenging times, otherwise how do we go beyond settling differences?</p>
<p>Oh well, for what its worth 3 cheers to the G15 bloggers! Keep up the good fight!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guojun</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/bloggers-group-proposes-sweeping-changes-in-internet-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-6488</link>
		<dc:creator>guojun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-6488</guid>
		<description>Studying overseas lah.  No wonder i couldn&#039;t make it...anyway, i&#039;m waiting for your official release too!

guojun/the truth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Studying overseas lah.  No wonder i couldn&#8217;t make it&#8230;anyway, i&#8217;m waiting for your official release too!</p>
<p>guojun/the truth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patriot</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/bloggers-group-proposes-sweeping-changes-in-internet-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-6487</link>
		<dc:creator>patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-6487</guid>
		<description>Hi all;

May I say that I do not see a need to pre-empt the Issue of Internet Regulation.

It is indeed possible for Bloggers to react after the Regulations are made public by the Authority. It appears that the Blogging Community sees itself as having some bargaining powers, personally I agree. But why not bargain after a price is quoted or made known? What is the Reason(s) for the Rush?

I do not see the Authority having the audacity to &#039;totally contain&#039; the Blogging Community and cripple it and make it totally impotent. If the measures are too restrictive and unacceptable, I believe the Internet Community will not accept them and counter measures including bargaining shall then come in. A little patience will yield better result, I think.

Yours sincerely:

patriot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all;</p>
<p>May I say that I do not see a need to pre-empt the Issue of Internet Regulation.</p>
<p>It is indeed possible for Bloggers to react after the Regulations are made public by the Authority. It appears that the Blogging Community sees itself as having some bargaining powers, personally I agree. But why not bargain after a price is quoted or made known? What is the Reason(s) for the Rush?</p>
<p>I do not see the Authority having the audacity to &#8216;totally contain&#8217; the Blogging Community and cripple it and make it totally impotent. If the measures are too restrictive and unacceptable, I believe the Internet Community will not accept them and counter measures including bargaining shall then come in. A little patience will yield better result, I think.</p>
<p>Yours sincerely:</p>
<p>patriot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: feedmetothefish</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/bloggers-group-proposes-sweeping-changes-in-internet-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-6486</link>
		<dc:creator>feedmetothefish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-6486</guid>
		<description>To Alex and Zheng Xi, my sincere appreciation!

Keep it up guys!

If it&#039;s worth doing, it&#039;s worth doing well!

As always, there&#039;ll be those who would try to sabotage a good thing going.

To the wet blankets and eLeetists who feels threatened or neglected for not being consulted I, like Aaron of http://aaron-ng.info/blog/,  would say, &quot;Pleeze get your uncaring elite faces out of mine!&quot; Elite faeces are nothing more than faeces or are the aka shit face? ;)

The times, they are a-changing . . .

For the better!

feedmetothefish</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Alex and Zheng Xi, my sincere appreciation!</p>
<p>Keep it up guys!</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s worth doing, it&#8217;s worth doing well!</p>
<p>As always, there&#8217;ll be those who would try to sabotage a good thing going.</p>
<p>To the wet blankets and eLeetists who feels threatened or neglected for not being consulted I, like Aaron of <a href="http://aaron-ng.info/blog/" rel="nofollow">http://aaron-ng.info/blog/</a>,  would say, &#8220;Pleeze get your uncaring elite faces out of mine!&#8221; Elite faeces are nothing more than faeces or are the aka shit face? ;)</p>
<p>The times, they are a-changing . . .</p>
<p>For the better!</p>
<p>feedmetothefish</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CelluloidReality</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/bloggers-group-proposes-sweeping-changes-in-internet-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-6485</link>
		<dc:creator>CelluloidReality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-6485</guid>
		<description>Elfred,

Then tell the person you disagree with, without this kind of disambiguation.

*rolls eyes*

...Liao si kang hai yah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elfred,</p>
<p>Then tell the person you disagree with, without this kind of disambiguation.</p>
<p>*rolls eyes*</p>
<p>&#8230;Liao si kang hai yah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fever Guy</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/bloggers-group-proposes-sweeping-changes-in-internet-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-6484</link>
		<dc:creator>Fever Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 13:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-6484</guid>
		<description>Darkness,
I believe you too wants the best for singapore. Same as well.

It is never too late for a new proposal if the first one fails. I mean you can still participate in it with u chairing the event. I don think the current proposal will be taken lightly by the gahment but i am sure nothing concrete will come out of it as you know GE2011 is still far away. The gahment wont endorse anything yet which may disadvantage them too soon, Remember most of the MIW are not internet savvy and they themselves are fearful of being under the spotlight of their stupid policies and failings they created are to be discussed by bloggers 24hrs a day. They will not try to hang dirty linen out too soon   for the netizens.

Cheers to the G15 bloggers!
F.G</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darkness,<br />
I believe you too wants the best for singapore. Same as well.</p>
<p>It is never too late for a new proposal if the first one fails. I mean you can still participate in it with u chairing the event. I don think the current proposal will be taken lightly by the gahment but i am sure nothing concrete will come out of it as you know GE2011 is still far away. The gahment wont endorse anything yet which may disadvantage them too soon, Remember most of the MIW are not internet savvy and they themselves are fearful of being under the spotlight of their stupid policies and failings they created are to be discussed by bloggers 24hrs a day. They will not try to hang dirty linen out too soon   for the netizens.</p>
<p>Cheers to the G15 bloggers!<br />
F.G</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elfred</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/bloggers-group-proposes-sweeping-changes-in-internet-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-6483</link>
		<dc:creator>Elfred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 13:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-6483</guid>
		<description>CelluloidReality,

Yeah~ But... the message was not targetted at you, inspite your name is mentioned.

You have got to get more used to this kinda &#039;communication&#039;.

Nice day~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CelluloidReality,</p>
<p>Yeah~ But&#8230; the message was not targetted at you, inspite your name is mentioned.</p>
<p>You have got to get more used to this kinda &#8216;communication&#8217;.</p>
<p>Nice day~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weijia</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/bloggers-group-proposes-sweeping-changes-in-internet-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-6481</link>
		<dc:creator>Weijia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 11:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-6481</guid>
		<description>Who are you darkness? the anger is great in you, i sense... lol.

why don&#039;t u introduce yourself before you &quot;drive back where you came from&quot;. i&#039;m sorry but i must confess the name that you hide behind (darkness) is not familiar to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who are you darkness? the anger is great in you, i sense&#8230; lol.</p>
<p>why don&#8217;t u introduce yourself before you &#8220;drive back where you came from&#8221;. i&#8217;m sorry but i must confess the name that you hide behind (darkness) is not familiar to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CelluloidReality</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/bloggers-group-proposes-sweeping-changes-in-internet-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-6482</link>
		<dc:creator>CelluloidReality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-6482</guid>
		<description>Elfred,

To each his own, lah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elfred,</p>
<p>To each his own, lah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elfred</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/bloggers-group-proposes-sweeping-changes-in-internet-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-6480</link>
		<dc:creator>Elfred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-6480</guid>
		<description>CelluloidReality,

There is no Singapore culture, &lt;strong&gt;yet&lt;/strong&gt;. I said this before, even argued recently in YPforum with Panter. Hahahaha...

It&#039;s not yet, so it&#039;s for creation. Mr Lee said he not expect it till hundreds of years... but maybe other people see it possible faster, like myself. Hahahahahahahahaha...

Joker,

Internet&#039;s 江湖大事 should remain in cyberspace. Who is Singapore to try set a regulation in cyberspace which is shared by the world, right? So I hope the new law minister no be the scapegoat for this intervention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CelluloidReality,</p>
<p>There is no Singapore culture, <strong>yet</strong>. I said this before, even argued recently in YPforum with Panter. Hahahaha&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not yet, so it&#8217;s for creation. Mr Lee said he not expect it till hundreds of years&#8230; but maybe other people see it possible faster, like myself. Hahahahahahahahaha&#8230;</p>
<p>Joker,</p>
<p>Internet&#8217;s 江湖大事 should remain in cyberspace. Who is Singapore to try set a regulation in cyberspace which is shared by the world, right? So I hope the new law minister no be the scapegoat for this intervention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CelluloidReality</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/bloggers-group-proposes-sweeping-changes-in-internet-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-6479</link>
		<dc:creator>CelluloidReality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 06:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-6479</guid>
		<description>There is a Singapore culture. But it is being undermined.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a Singapore culture. But it is being undermined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darkness</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/bloggers-group-proposes-sweeping-changes-in-internet-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-6469</link>
		<dc:creator>Darkness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 06:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-6469</guid>
		<description>You know what FG, you&#039;re 100% right. You know what? I am going to take your recommendation and retract everything I just said, stick a dummy sign on my back and get back in my car and drive back where I came from. How&#039;s that?

You ppl can do what you like.

[There&#039;s no way I can possibly have a decent conversation here; it takes over 12 hours for what I write to be posted here. You go and ask the folk in TOC why? - bye bye]

Darkness 2008</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what FG, you&#8217;re 100% right. You know what? I am going to take your recommendation and retract everything I just said, stick a dummy sign on my back and get back in my car and drive back where I came from. How&#8217;s that?</p>
<p>You ppl can do what you like.</p>
<p>[There's no way I can possibly have a decent conversation here; it takes over 12 hours for what I write to be posted here. You go and ask the folk in TOC why? - bye bye]</p>
<p>Darkness 2008</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clarification.</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/04/bloggers-group-proposes-sweeping-changes-in-internet-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-6474</link>
		<dc:creator>Clarification.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 06:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=740#comment-6474</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t this exposure part of the whole consultation process?
If anyone has got anything to add or refute, he can always write to the emails provided in the above article directly to seek for the details and then to give his inputs.  It is not too late. It is only just the beginning.  I don&#039;t see a problem here.

P/S:  I understand that there was an open request in Nov 2007 for anyone interested to come forward at a meeting in Dec 2007.  It was published by TOC as well. Whoever interested in this should have turned up then, isn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t this exposure part of the whole consultation process?<br />
If anyone has got anything to add or refute, he can always write to the emails provided in the above article directly to seek for the details and then to give his inputs.  It is not too late. It is only just the beginning.  I don&#8217;t see a problem here.</p>
<p>P/S:  I understand that there was an open request in Nov 2007 for anyone interested to come forward at a meeting in Dec 2007.  It was published by TOC as well. Whoever interested in this should have turned up then, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

