The following was sent to TOC by Seelan Palay

The Singapore government, through its government-linked company, Singapore Technologies Kinetics Ltd (ST Kinetics), manufactures, stockpiles and publicly advertises two types of cluster ammunitions for sale (Cluster Munition Coalition 2008) .

They are the ‘155mm DPICM artillery projectiles (containing 63 or 49 grenades) equipped with electro- mechanical self-destruct fuzes with an advertised dud rate of 3 percent’ and ‘a 120mm mortar bomb which delivers 25 DPICM grenades’ (Singapore Technologies Engineering n.d., cited in Cluster Munition Coalition, 2008 ).

As world governmental representatives converged in Dublin on the 19th May to seek an agreement on banning cluster bombs, the absence of major producers such as United States, China and Russia have seriously undermined these efforts (Gergely 2008) . The U.N. Development Programme claimed that ‘cluster munitions have caused more than 13,000 confirmed injuries and deaths around the world, the vast majority of them in Laos, Vietnam and Afghanistan‘ (Gergely 2008).

In a brief online scan of Singapore‘s two major newspapers, TODAY and Straits Times, dating 16 to 20 May, both well-read newspapers in the country have remained silent over this issue. The online blogosophere has also been muted on Singapore‘s role in possessing such bombs.

Singapore has also not attended the international conferences held in Oslo, Lima, Vienna, and Wellington which seek to prohibit the use of cluster bombs. As of April 2008, Singapore remains not having subscribed to the Wellington Declaration which affirms the countries’ “objective of concluding the negotiation of such an instrument prohibiting cluster munitions that cause unacceptable harm to civilians’. The declaration is a prerequisite to full participation in the conference in Dublin (Cluster Coalition Munition, 2008).

Cluster munitions can cause excessive harm to civilians even when the conflict has been over for it ‘can remain a threat for decades’. It is primarily a weapon which contains ‘multiple explosive submunitions’ which are ‘dropped from aircrafts or fired from the ground and designed to break open in mid-air, releasing the submunitions and saturating an area that can be the size of several football fields. Anybody within that area, be they military or civilian, is very likely to be killed or seriously injured’.

Those that are not exploded, and most of them don’t, ‘are left on the ground and, like landmines, remain a fatal threat’. As such, people are prevented from using ‘their land and to access schools and hospitals’. Cluster munitions have been used since the Second World War and most recently in Lebanon in 2006 (Cluster Munition Coalition Ireland 2008). Given that the world-wide trend is towards banning cluster bombs; and that the Singapore government has remained steadfastly committed to manufacturing and selling such munitions, Singaporeans should be duly concerned about these weapons being used against innocent civilians.

What then, can Singaporeans do, given that the media has not reported on this issue?

They can:

1. Act as citizen journalists by highlighting this issue in their website or blog.

2. Sign and forward the petition which is to campaign on the ban at Dublin .

3. Execute a nation-wide campaign to pressurise the government into entering into negotiations with the aim to ban cluster bombs.

4. Write to their MPs and urge them to field questions about this issue during Question Time in Parliament; or to the Opposition, appealing to them to take up this cause.

5. Tell everyone you know about Singapore‘s involvement as a producer of cluster munitions and its detrimental effects.

——————

Visit Human Rights Watch’s Documents on Cluster Bombs.

Read also:

Dublin conference targets cluster bomb ban by AFP.

Cluster bomb victims overwhelmingly civilian by Reuters.

Victims urge cluster-bomb ban by The New York Times.

Victims call for complete ban of cluster bombs as conference opens in Austria by The International Herald Tribune

Civilians main cluster bomb victims by The Guardian

Pictures of child victims of cluster bombs here. (Explicit)

Read about cluster bombs here and here.

——————

Videos:

Global move to ban cluster bombs – 19 May 2008

Nations push to ban cluster bombs (Conference in Dublin)

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

国会三读通过刑事法修法 加重偷窥偷拍刑罚

国会在昨日(5月6日),三读通过刑事法典修法,偷窥或偷拍者日后被定罪,将被罚监禁最长两年,比非礼罪的监禁刑罚还多一倍。 内政部长兼律政部长尚穆根在法案二读时强调,当局早在国大宿舍偷拍事件前,就已意识到,现有法律不足以应付偷窥等罪行,因此修法也纳入这类犯罪趋势的考量。 上述修法旨在更好地保护弱势群体和受害者。其中弱势受害者,被定义为外籍女佣、未满14岁青少、弱智或残障,以及无法自我保护的弱势者。 另一组弱势受害者则指与犯罪者有亲密关系(intimate relationship)或密切关系者(close- relationship)。 如果受害者属弱势群体,罪加一等,是一般最高刑罚的两倍。若蓄意导致弱势受害者重伤甚至死亡,被告可面对最长20年的监禁。 尚穆根表示,只要涉及弱势受害者,警方就能介入逮捕嫌犯,即时有关罪名原本不允许警方直接行使逮捕权。 法案也加入一项假定条文,被告只要录影或偷窥他人私密行为或私处,就属未经受害者同意的行为,被告需负起举证责任,向法庭证明他们是经得允许的情况下进行录影或窥视,才可能脱罪。 至于动手脚安装针孔摄影机偷拍,也属刑事罪。 过去三年,大学37宗偷拍案涉弱势受害者 针对如国大偷拍事件的案例,目前的刑法称之为非礼罪(insult…

若政府执意开发杜佛树林 与应对气候暖化承诺相矛盾

担忧位于乌鲁班丹的杜佛树林(Dover Forest)被开发,新加坡自然协会向建屋发展局请命,希望能保留这片树林。 根据建屋局的环境基准报告,杜佛森林占地33公顷,有丰富的自然生态,包括120种植物与158物种,包括飞禽、蜥蜴、两栖类、哺乳动物、昆虫与蜗牛的栖息地,其中涵盖了不乏濒危动植物。 不过,这片林地早在2014年的市区重建局大蓝图,大部分都被划预留为住宅用途。这也意味着,杜佛森林有被开发进行组屋项目的可能。 政府曾承诺百年内斥巨资解决气候变化问题 但如果读者还记得,回溯2019年,总理李显龙在国庆群众大会上表示,气候变化是人类面临最严峻的挑战之一。 李显龙指出,目前离解决全球气候暖化问题仍然在遥远的道路上,因此李显龙也呼吁新加坡应该尽最大的努力,并且做最坏的打算。 就连总理也在呼吁要保护环境,而迄今为止,我们能够想得到的解决方案之一,即是尽力保护仅剩不多的绿色森林,而不是将其砍伐开发发展。 据本社了解,已有六名议员,将在2月份国会中提议有关气候变化的解决议案,呼吁政府和私营部门,以及公众透过可持续性方针减缓和适应气候变化。 如果国会通过这些动议,显然正确的做法,应该是将诸如金文泰森林和杜佛森林等林地,列为自然保护区,协助对抗气候变化,造福后代子孙。 低生育率是否有建屋需求? 此外,各界对政府仍有意开发绿地发展组屋项目的动机相当怀疑,原因在于,目前我国的房产足够,且全国总生育率一直都很低。…

Transcript: Lim Tean decries action by CAD as politically motivated

Transcript of politician and lawyer, Lim Tean’s livestream on 2 Oct evening…

院方病患跟进系统存严重缺陷 妇女起诉樟宜综合医院上诉得直

上诉法院星期二(2月26日)判定,若不是樟宜综合医院(CGH)的疏忽,肺癌病患的病情能够更早被诊断出来,并提早接受治疗,推翻了此前高等法院的判决。 关于医院应该支付给诺阿兹林(Noor Azlin Abdul Rahman,39岁)的赔偿金问题,则交由高等法院,由法官洪素燕进行评估。 法官鼓励院方寻求和解 在宣布以上判决时,上诉庭法官潘文龙指出,诺阿兹林的病情已经处在第四阶段,鼓励樟宜医院考虑与病患达成和解。 在新加坡大法官梅达顺以及上诉庭法官朱迪柏拉卡斯陪同下,潘文龙指出,“她(诺阿兹林女士)将因为身体状况,继续面临身心灵上的挑战,我们认为友好和解,将有助于(她)结束纠纷,能更专注于对抗癌症病毒和尽可能地恢复”。 “在我们看来,基于我们发现樟宜医院的疏忽,导致推迟诊断(诺阿兹林)患有肺癌,因此我们觉得作为权宜之计,院方应该有可能的解决方案。” 起诉医院和三名医生 诺阿兹林是在2012年2月被诊断患有肺癌。 她起诉樟宜医院和三名医生,因为2007至2011年,她都接受了这三名医生的治疗。诺阿兹林认为是医生的疏忽,导致延迟了她的癌症检测,失去了更好的治疗机会。有关控诉于2018年2月遭高等法院驳回,但是她提出了上诉。…