Such a hypocrite and selfish people!

WP manifesto: Working towards a first world parliament with alternative voice? With this kind of person around, no way!

Lets move on with more urgent matters like the extra trains provided by smrt during lunch hour. The majority (50%)of the promised 720 trains are mostly for the lunch hour timing. What help does it get? The peak hour in the morning and evening are still very very packed. If SMRT is going to raise fares again because of extra trains it provided i say they can go eat “SHIT”!

behind PM ‘s back. It is no honest mistake to begin with just pure stupidity. We are

all waiting….please dont setup a COI just like MSK incident what a waste of time…be

a politician that has gut to say it out and the bravery to quit too.

Up to now, Inderjit Singh has done a far better job of questioning than anybody else.

We are not putting in opposition for opposition sake. Elected opposition members carry the responsibilty and hope of those who rooted for them. Failing to perform satisfactorily is as good as betraying the support rendered.

I agree with your observations.

What Ling How Doong now must do is to tell Yaw Shin Leong in the face:

DONT’ TALK COCK!

And all of us will clap and laugh ….. Hahahahaha ……

One more K to add: Kilat-lari Mas Selamat !

In 1988, How Doong scored 47% againt Seet Ai Mee. Shin Leong (probably a primary school kid then) must have thought that almost half of Bukit Gombak residents then were morons.

In 1991, Lin How Doong upped and scored 52%. Lo and behold! An actual win! Against a minister-of-state no less. Shin Leong (probably a secondary school teenager then) must have thought that Bukit Gombak residents should get the IMH project instead of Buangkok Green.

Between 1991 and 1997, during How Doong’s term as MP, what went wrong with Bukit Gombak? The nice little clean and beautiful between Bukit Batok, Bukit Gombak and Choa Chu Kang? What went wrong? I say nothing.

Saying “don’t talk cock” in Parliament? Worse things have been said by JBJ, whom Shin Leong and many other opposition aspirants still idolise.

Now, to Shin Leong, reflect upon yourself. How do your performance and antics compare with Lin How Doong?

I agreed totally with your comments. We dont need a cabinet just a mayor is more than enough. Even the president is extra here.

2. I had described SG under the LIEgime as an Abomination and an Aberration. This is to emphasise that Mr YAW would have been right to vote for the PAP if SG were a normal democratic city state. In a normal state, you vote for the best MP for your constituency, then leave him and all the other elected MPs of the majority party to then elect THEIR preferred leaders who would then form the Cabinet. Thus, in a normal state, it makes perfect sense to vote purely for the best MP who would do the best job for your constituency, and then let him vote for HIS leader and Cabinet.

3. BUT SG IS AN ABOMINATION AND AN ABERRATION! So this normal process does NOT apply!

4. For example, SG is too small an islet, so the lines between State and constituencies are blurred, even missing! Most rules, taxes, levies, etc, imposed on constituencies by their TCs are in actual fact, imposed by the LIEgime. There is very little, only token, local govt as opposed to national govt. When you approach your MP for help on any matter, most times, they can do nothing but refer you, with a nice letter if at that, to a national agency. Further, the entire TC concept was devised to PUNISH constituencies that voted in Opposition. NOT because local govt is more efficient than state govt! LIE KY himself made this clear, that ‘if you vote in an Opposition MP, then you must suffer for it by having your entire constituency blacklisted and deprived of monies, services, infrastructure [even MRT stations and bus stops], etc, which PAP constituencies enjoy’.

5. SG is so tiny it can be easily and efficiently ruled and managed by just a Mayor, no need for a Cabinet or govt at all! It is much smaller in population and size than most cities in the world, which only have mayors. So given that our MM or ‘Mayor Minister’ has the entire taxation and law-making powers of a big govt, not just a mayoral dept, he can literally do wonders, from taxing you to conscripting you for the army. Thus, powers and advantages no other mayors have.

6. To put this another way, suppose the mayors of Shanghai, London, New York, etc, also have the same lawmaking and taxation powers that LIE KY LHL have — they would do wonders, too. No brainer.

7. Thus, TCs are also part of the Abomination and Aberration. They are exactly like Parliament, a rubber stamp, for show only. This is why in this A and A, voting for the best TC manager is NOT the issue. Neither is voting for the best MP to speak up for you in Parliament since that, too, is an A and A.

8. Now, we begin to see more clearly the real issues. In this A and A, your vote is not to choose the best TC manager or the best speaker for your interests in Parliament since both TC and P are rubber stamps. So what does the vote become? Just an expression of defiance. A Referendum on the LIEgime, except that, in most elections and even our first and only Referendum around 1962 [on joining Malaysia in 1963], that Referendum was rigged, too, with all 3 Options for joining Malaysia and none against!

9. Thus, politics, especially Opposition politics, are also A and A here. No wonder CST and LTK are so cowed that their only strategy is Stealth Politics, to go so low under the LIE KY LHL PAP radar that they are ignored so that, hopefully, the majority hatred and resentment of the electorate for the LIEgime will keep returning them again and again to their S$13,500pm part time job [since Parliament meets less than ~50 days a year].

10. We all, voters, critics, bloggers, Opposition politicians, must recognise all these so that we can play the LIEgime game more intelligently. They have rigged all the rules of the game but it is possible, by their leave, to get into Parliament by stealth, by avoiding any politicking at all, in this A and A.

11. Thus, we all Commenters and enraged onliners need to see Mr YAW betrayal in these lights. Not a very pretty picture but these are the dynamics that have been created and in place for decades. Only by understanding them, biding our time for the inevitable Death or Dissolution of the Most Hated Man in SG can we hope to gain some leeway at all. These are election basics that Mr YAW and others like him must know, otherwise they will keep making mistakes, thinking that they are living in a normal democracy, with normal rules, and can thus vote normally.

Now, if you don’t eat your own dog food, how can you expect others to do so and tell you how it taste like?

Hence, while I accept that his stance is correct, he doesn’t seemed to have done enough thinking to really achieve his stated goal of “better serve the interests of our country”. He is really just being myopic and thinking solely about his own estate/GRC.

I agree with your view that YSL should join back the PAP. He seems to be one of
those who believes “All men are equal but some are more equal” and says to the
voters “Do what I tell you to do but don’t do what I do”.

I would be very afraid of him, who if given a chance to be in a position of power
will tell the public to do one thing but behind the back he does completely the
opposite.

Such a double-mouth or double-dealing person are crafty politicians but cannot be trusted even by their own wives and children. As it is, we already have one too
many of such people sitting up in the ivory towers. Singapore could do less
with such calibre of people even if they are extremely brilliant. In fact, the more
brilliant they are, the more we should be afraid of because on the whole
Singapore will suffer under those kinds of brains.

As I mentioned earlier, I have a feeling that many oppositionists vote for PAP.