Andrew Loh

In a statement released to the press, lawyer Gopalan Nair rejected accusations that he had sent emails to Justice Belinda Ang and others. Nair was arrested and charged on June 4 for insulting a public servant.

Nair is also facing a second charge, this time for insulting a judge in the High Court, Justice Lai Siu Chiu.

He has since been released on bail of $5,000.

In his press statement, Nair said, “I did not at anytime send any emails to Judge Belinda Ang or anyone else as far as this incident is concerned.” He added that the authorities have seized his computer notebook as well.

Nair also defended his right to criticize Justice Ang in his blog posting. “I believe as a human being, it is my right and my duty under the constitution of the Republic of Singapore and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to be able to speak free as a free man and to state what I have seen and heard. This benefits Singaporeans and the world at large. If I did not say what I saw, I would in fact be hiding the truth.”

Saying that although he has migrated to the United States and is now a US citizen, he has been “closely monitoring the political situation in Singapore”. He added that his efforts “are directed to (sic) the plight of human beings who are denied their human rights and how I can expose the injustices they suffer.”

“In the US where I come from, the judiciary just as any other government or official body is open to criticism and they accept it as necessary for the advancement and improvement of the administration of justice”, he explained.

Nair said that after attending the three day court sitting for the assessment of damages in the lawsuit brought by Mr Lee Hsien Loong and Mr Lee Kuan Yew against the Singapore Democratic Party’s chief Dr Chee Soon Juan and SDP Central Executive Committee member Ms Chee Siok Chin, he had “no doubt at all that this Judge was clearly unfair towards Dr. Chee and Siok Chin and she did not appear to conduct herself as an impartial judge in court sitting in judgment between the parties.”

It was, he said, “necessary for me as a human being, to make it public and to the world what this court actually was, since they would not have had the luxury of being in court during the 3 days.”

Nair said that it was not his intention to ‘malign or cause distress to anyone’.

“It was never my intention to malign or cause distress to anyone and if the words that I had used had this effect, I withdraw them and apologize. But as far as the contents of my blog post; as to the events that occurred during the 3 days in court, it is an accurate observation which I have stated under my right as a free man”, he said.

You can read Mr Nair’s full press release here.

——————–

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Lee Wei Ling clarifies that she did not retract entire post regarding new law on Contempt of Court

Dr Lee Wei Ling clarifies on her Facebook post that she did…

2015年东运会风波:苏睿勇向刘威延管理公司索100万赔偿

两届东运会马拉松冠军得主苏睿勇,与我国另名知名马拉松运动员刘威延风波仍未有结果,但随着苏针对毁谤事件,向刘威延的运动管理公司提出100万元的赔偿,再度引起关注。 苏睿勇代表律师于15日,向管理刘威延运动事业的公司One Management发出律师信,称该公司所发出的三项指控涉诽谤,损害苏的职业地位与声誉,因而向公司与其合伙人Jed Senthil K Jivaraju要求各50万赔偿。 信中表明,若未获得赔偿及让步,苏睿勇将会对两者提出诽谤控诉。 One Management由Jed Senthil K Jivaraju与前马拉松选手莫英任创立,旗下公司包括ONEathlete和RunOne,负责管理刘威延运动事业。而该公司分别曾于去年10月21日、今年4月2日与9日表示对苏睿勇的控诉表示异议。…

ICA to implement new multi-biometrics system at checkpoints starting April next year

A new scanning system which will include the use of two additional…

“应在第一时间取证” 尚穆根坦言警方处理巴蒂案存疏失

内政暨律政部长尚穆根坦言,警方在处理前女佣巴蒂案中存在疏失。廖文良一家报案后,理应第一时间就前往查看物证,但办案警员却没有这么做。 巴蒂是在2016年10月28日被解雇,雇主廖文良儿子廖启龙,给他箱子限他两小时内收拾东西,当天即送返印尼。不料廖文良父子却在两日后报警,指巴蒂盗窃。 然而吊诡当时,迟至2016年12月3日,也就是廖文良报警五周后,才前往廖家取证。据了解是因为负责警员“工作忙碌和私人原因”。这段期间,廖家仍能继续使用这些物证。尚穆根称,这已违反法律要求的办案程序,也没能确保证据的完整、进行适当的记录。 尚穆根指涉事警员已被内部调查,并采取必要行动,惟未透露是否对其作出惩处。 对于高庭指责,警方在庭上向巴蒂展示的物证照片是黑白照、警方录取口供也出现文法错误,尚穆根指警方已接受高庭的建议。