The following was sent to TOC by Mr Alton Tan. It is a reply to PAP MP, Dr Lam Pin Min, on the P65 blog. TOC thanks Mr Tan for allowing us to re-publish it here.

Dear Dr Lam,

I refer to the article, “New formula for public transport fare revision to be out this week” (The Straits Times, 1 July 2008).

More ERP gantries, higher ERP charges. Taxi surcharges have gone up, and taxi companies may be implementing a fuel charge soon. The latest news? Fares on public transport will be increased. I sometimes really wonder how “public” is Singapore’s public transportation system. They are private companies with management who only focus on profits, profits, and more profits.

Let me quote you an example. A few years ago when the North East line (NEL) was officially opened, several bus services going towards the city were terminated from my area. These services were basically from the Serangoon and Hougang depots (e.g. 111, 106, 501, 502 etc), reason being it wasn’t profitable to run these bus services along the same route as the NEL. Why? The NEL is owned by SBS Transit.

But removing these services adversely affected those people who do not live near a NEL station. Travelling to Shenton Way or Orchard Road used to be just a 15-25 minute ride away from my house (I live along Boundary Road/Ang Mo Kio Ave 1) with express bus services 501/502. Now, it takes me 45-60 minutes to hop on a bus and switch to a train to get to town. Would you now rather drive or take a bus? If 501/502 were still serving the Boundary Road stretch, I would gladly take them. It would only be a 20 minute ride along the expressway.

I have a simple question to ask: wouldn’t these bus services ease the heavy crowds on trains and other bus services if they were reinstated?

Is the Public Transport Council trying to improve the public transportation system, or is it thinking of profits for the public transport companies only?

With the inflation rate at an all-time high and still rising, raising public transport fares now will be a big blow to low/middle income families. Will the Government only finally step in when low/middle income citizens resort to bicycles as a form of transportation and public transport becomes nothing but a luxury for the poor? Will cars, trains and buses be restricted to only the rich and higher income families? Maybe one day roads in Singapore will be for cars only and only one lane on the road will be allocated to citizens’ vehicles and public buses because only the elite can afford to drive.

I am writing this because I really feel for lower income families. I am currently working part time as I will be leaving to go overseas to further my studies soon. I currently only earn $1200/mth and after deducting CPF, I am left with $1000. After deducting my daily expenses and bills, I am left with $400. I really salute those low-income families who can raise a family with a pay similar to mine (and I am only supporting myself). I hope that in 2010 when I return to Singapore, I will not see more beggars on the street begging for money, or senior citizens stalking tables at hawker centres collecting empty drink cans or cardboard.

Regards,

A sad Singaporean

—————

HELP keep the voice of TOC alive!

If you like this article, please consider a small donation to help theonlinecitizen.com stay alive. Please note that we can only accept donations from Singaporeans. Thank you for your assistance.

54 Responses to “How “public” is S’pore’s public transportation system?”

  1. To be fair, for SBS Transit, although group revenues have been increasing, profits have maintained (at lower rates than SMRT) from 2004 to 2007. That at least has been some consolation…

  2. S’pore’s public transportation system good ? 7 July 2008

    50) ng65 on July 7th, 2008 1.43 pm

    “In fact, I find many of them merely reflect the well-known short-falls, some of them gave hypothetical reasons, and others even wrote personal and political attacks. What I also find disappointing is the absence of gracious lucid articulation”

    The only lucid thing is that our pockets gets burned deeper and deeper with no imporovement but the situation getting worst because of unforseen consequences. So what solutions & gracious lucid articulation are we talking about. They have been experimenting (you may call it deliberately planning) for so many years with COE, PARF, ERP, weekend plate, high fuel tax, taxi fare (with so many levels of costs that add to confusion rather than enligtenment), privatisation in the name of competition and whatnots and so what do you get finally.

  3. LiveWithIt 16 July 2008

    This is Singapore. We are a small island and we love peace. In Singaporeans’ mind, if ‘they’ want to increase, what can we do? Will they really listen to all this feedbacks all of you here giving now? Wake up! The answer is NO. They are smart, unlike some other countries. They will not increase 1 dollar or more, they will tell you 1 cent, 3 cent. Over the time you will get it.

    Anyway what can we do, We just LOVE PEACE. Change your mindset! LIVE WITH IT!

    Don’t waste time here. What we should do now is to earn more money to pay for the increasing standard of living in Singapore. I always think that the more richer you are, the more all this “increased in standard of living” will benefit you. Looking forward for the opening of the whole stretch of KPE.