As our Day of Independence, or National Day, approaches, we reflect on the meaning and relevance of being patriots of our country.

Too often, patriotism is either dismissed as something which is abstract and irrelevant in this pragmatic and materialistic society of ours, or as something which the State defines and uses as a ploy for its own aims and goals.

Too often, here in Singapore, patriotism is defined as adherence to the law, or to the Government’s dictates. Step outside these demarcated lines and you risk being portrayed as or accused of being “unpatriotic”.

What is patriotism?

Who defines what patriotism is?

Does it hold any meaning for you?

Is it important to be a patriot?

Indeed, is it even necessary?

United States Presidential candidate, Barack Obama, gave the following speech on 30 June this year in which he spoke about patriotism. It is an inspiring speech, one which perhaps is as relevant to the US as it is to Singapore.

Listen or read his speech and share your views on what it means to be a patriot of Singapore.

The following is a short excerpt from Obama’s speech and a song sung by Eddie Vedder of the rock band, Pearl Jam, titled “I am a patriot”.

Dissent does not make one unpatriotic.

No party or political philosophy has a monopoly on patriotism.

Patriotism starts as a gut instinct. My grandfather explaining to me that we could do anything we set our mind to do.

What makes America great is not its perfection, but the belief that it can be made better. Our revolution was waged for that belief. That we could be governed by laws, not men. That we could be equal in the eyes of those laws. That we could be free to say what we want, and assemble with whomever we want. And worship as we please. That we could pursue our individual dreams but the obligation to help others pursue theirs.

Patriotism is not just loyalty to a place on a map or a particular people group. It is also loyalty to America’s ideals. Ideals for which anyone can sacrifice for, or defend.

Patriotism can never be defined as loyalty to a particular leader, or government or policy.

Mark Twain…once wrote: “Patriotism is supporting your country all of the time, and your government when it deserves it.”

We may hope that our leaders and our government stand up for our ideals…But when our laws, our leaders or our government are out of alignment with our ideals, then the dissent of ordinary Americans may prove to be one of the truest expression of patriotism.

Recognizing a wrong being committed in this country’s name; insisting that we deliver on the promise of our Constitution – these are the acts of patriots, men and women who are defending that which is best in America. And we should never forget that – especially when we disagree with them; especially when they make us uncomfortable with their words.

Beyond a loyalty to America’s ideals, beyond a willingness to dissent on behalf of those ideals, I also believe that patriotism must, if it is to mean anything, involve the willingness to sacrifice – to give up something we value on behalf of a larger cause.

true patriotism cannot be forced or legislated with a mere set of government programs. Instead, it must reside in the hearts of our people, and cultivated in the heart of our culture, and nurtured in the hearts of our children.

It is up to us to teach them that it is good to give back to one’s community; that it is honorable to serve in the military; that it is vital to participate in our democracy and make our voices heard.

And it is up to us to teach our children a lesson that those of us in politics too often forget: that patriotism involves not only defending this country against external threat, but also working constantly to make America a better place for future generations.

That is the liberty we defend – the liberty of each of us to pursue our own dreams. That is the equality we seek – not an equality of results, but the chance of every single one of us to make it if we try. That is the community we strive to build – one in which we trust in this sometimes messy democracy of ours, one in which we continue to insist that there is nothing we cannot do when we put our mind to it, one in which we see ourselves as part of a larger story, our own fates wrapped up in the fates of those who share allegiance to America’s happy and singular creed.

Video of Obama’s speech:

“I am a patriot” by Eddie Vedder (lyrics here):

I am a patriot, I love my country
Because my country is all I know
I wanna be with my family
People who understand me
I got no place else to go…
I am a patriot…

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

PSP’s Lee Hsien Yang comments on Ivan Lim saga, says people should worry about PAP’s candidate screening process

People should be worry about the People’s Action Party (PAP)’s screening process…

【武汉冠状病毒】首两名病患离世! 包括一名本地75岁女公民

新加坡卫生部发文告证实,今日(21日)有两名武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)确诊病患不幸离世。 第一名离世病患是75岁女公民,她在上月23日因肺炎症状送入国家传染病中心,同日确诊。自入院以来就一直需要待在加护病房接受治疗。 她较后出现严重并发症,最终在今早7时52分,不敌病魔离世。她本身有慢性心脏病和高血压病史。 第二名患者时64岁印尼男子。本月13日病重被送入国家传染病中心加护病房,隔日确诊。他出现严重并发症,并在今早10时15分病逝。在入院前他曾因肺炎症状入院,也有心脏病史。 卫生部长颜金勇对他们的逝世感到悲痛,并将为病逝者家属予以协助。

院方病患跟进系统存严重缺陷 妇女起诉樟宜综合医院上诉得直

上诉法院星期二(2月26日)判定,若不是樟宜综合医院(CGH)的疏忽,肺癌病患的病情能够更早被诊断出来,并提早接受治疗,推翻了此前高等法院的判决。 关于医院应该支付给诺阿兹林(Noor Azlin Abdul Rahman,39岁)的赔偿金问题,则交由高等法院,由法官洪素燕进行评估。 法官鼓励院方寻求和解 在宣布以上判决时,上诉庭法官潘文龙指出,诺阿兹林的病情已经处在第四阶段,鼓励樟宜医院考虑与病患达成和解。 在新加坡大法官梅达顺以及上诉庭法官朱迪柏拉卡斯陪同下,潘文龙指出,“她(诺阿兹林女士)将因为身体状况,继续面临身心灵上的挑战,我们认为友好和解,将有助于(她)结束纠纷,能更专注于对抗癌症病毒和尽可能地恢复”。 “在我们看来,基于我们发现樟宜医院的疏忽,导致推迟诊断(诺阿兹林)患有肺癌,因此我们觉得作为权宜之计,院方应该有可能的解决方案。” 起诉医院和三名医生 诺阿兹林是在2012年2月被诊断患有肺癌。 她起诉樟宜医院和三名医生,因为2007至2011年,她都接受了这三名医生的治疗。诺阿兹林认为是医生的疏忽,导致延迟了她的癌症检测,失去了更好的治疗机会。有关控诉于2018年2月遭高等法院驳回,但是她提出了上诉。…

Rupert Murdoch: UK Should Emulate Singapore’s Million Dollar Ministerial Wages

Rupert Murdoch in his extended testimony to the British Members of Parliament…