The Straits Times Forum published a letter by a certain Mr Syu Ying Kwok today, 8 July. The letter was titled, “Five years? MM Lee’s estimate was optimistic.

In his letter, Syu gave his thoughts on MM Lee Kuan Yew’s earlier remarks about how it would take only five years for Singapore to be “unscrambled” should the opposition come into power.

There is nothing unusual about Syu’s letter – until this part where he made reference to Mr Tan Lead Shake’s “tragic event in his family”:

Recently, opposition politician Tan Lead Shake made headlines after a tragic event in his family. But what chills the bones is the fact that in the past three elections, an average of more than 20 per cent of the electorate voted for him or anyone else who stood for election with little consideration of his credentials or abilities.

We fail to see how the two are linked or can be linked – a personal tragedy in the family and the electorate voting for him. It is a cheap shot at a person whose family tragedy is used here to question the number or percentage of voters who voted for him in the elections. The words used in the letter speak for themselves – “chills the bones”, it says.

It is totally appalling and vile that such a letter could be published in a national newspaper which prides itself on integrity and respectability. Did the editors of the Straits Times Forum not go through the letter? By what criteria did they pass it for publication – with the above parts intact?

Where is the responsibility and common decency? How is it that a letter such as Syu’s, making tenuous connections between what is undoubtedly a very sorrowful time for the Tan family, and particularly Tan Lead Shake, and Tan’s participation in three general elections?

What is the purpose?

While we condemn Syu for the stupidity of his letter, our anger is directed at the editors of the Forum Page.

We call on the editors of the Straits Times, especially the editors of the Straits Times Forum, to issue an apology to Tan Lead Shake, and also to all its readers and subscribers.

As for Syu himself, we would like to ask him: Please show us or tell us the link between the two issues of Tan’s personal family tragedy and his participation in elections.

We would also like to urge all our readers, fellow bloggers and Singaporeans to write in to the ST Forum’s editors and express your disgust for allowing such a letter to be published.

You can send your letters to: [email protected]

You can post your letters sent to the Straits Times in the comments section for this article.

————————–

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Lowest income had highest inflation & lowest pay rise?

By Leong Sze Hian I refer to the article “Singapore’s inflation up 4.1%…

维文访马 两国总检察长续磋商水价议题

新马水价问题随着新加坡外交部长维文医生出访马来西亚,和马来西亚外交部长赛夫丁会面后有了新的发展,两国总检察长将继续磋商,了解彼此立场。 维文出访马来西亚,昨日在布城和赛夫丁会面,谈及两国最近热炒的水供课题。 联席记者会上,维文表示,对于有没有权利检讨水价一事,两国持有不同看法,但是双方都同意让两国的总检察长继续会谈,以便更加了解彼此在1962年新马水供协议下有没有检讨水价的立场。 赛夫丁则表示,秉持着“寻找友好前进道路”的理念,两国总检察长将再次展开磋商。 他补充说,两国将通过具建设性方法解决双边课题,努力促进两国外交关系,寻找能够取得双赢的友好解决方案,平等互相尊重地拉近双边关系。 他表示,这是马国在会谈中秉持的根本精神,并且会持续下去。 同意坐下商讨了解立场 维文随后在接受新加坡媒体访问时指出,两国总检察长将在近期内会面,但是目前两国并没有就水价课题达成任何协议。 他指出,双方目前只是同意坐下来谈,解释、讨论后,进一步了解彼此的立场。 他随后也访问了马国交通部长陆兆福和经济事务部长阿兹敏。 在1962年新马水供协议下,双方可在协定签署25年后检讨协定条款,但是马来西亚在1987年选择了不调整水价,因此新加坡指马来西亚已经失去检讨水价的权利,至今不变立场。 马来西亚则认为,两国是在协定签署25年后检讨,但是并不是只能在第25年进行检讨。…

堆满杂物单位着火 男子受困遭浓烟呛死

堆满杂物的单位发生火患,外号“黑人”的60岁拾荒叔受困其中,因吸入热气,遭浓烟呛死在厕所内。 有关火警于5月27日晚上9时许,在淡滨尼12街第157座组屋的一个单位发生。 外号“黑人”的死者是60岁的阿叔沈梅璧(Sim Buay Piak译音),事发时他独自在住家内,且根据婚姻注册局网站资料显示,死者未婚。 寻获时已无生命迹象 验尸庭近日针对死者的死因做出结论,指死者被发现时已无生命迹象,因吸入过多浓烟而夺命。 据法庭文件指出,事发当晚9时15分,一名男子声称在死者楼上的单位闻到烟味,然后在死者家门外发现火患,赶紧报警。 民防部队人员赶抵现场时,因没人应门而强闯,却发现该单位内的堆满了杂物,其中包括厕所门、冰箱和冷气机等,屋内仅有一条狭窄的走道。 队员们最后在厕所内发现身穿百慕大(Bermudas),双手放胸前地蹲在厕所内,其中一只手还握着塑料水管。 寻获死者时,到场的医疗人员产证对方已无生命迹象,民防部队将他抬出屋外。 民防部队当时派出了两辆消防电单车、两辆消防车和一辆支援车到现场,火势经由民防部队以一个水枪扑灭。…