Main Stories, Top Story - Written on Friday, August 22, 2008 10:39 - 24 Comments
Burmese citizens denied renewal of visas in Singapore
The following is a media release from a group of Burmese nationals in Singapore.
Groundless non-renewal of key immigration and work documents of Burmese Patriots by Singapore immigration and manpower authorities.
Background
Since the Saffron Revolution of September 2007, the Burmese anti-junta movement has gained remarkable momentum in Singapore, fuelled by the increasing frustration and discontent of the Burmese people in Singapore at the outrageous atrocities committed by the Burmese military junta.
Burmese patriots in Singapore work as one united group to raise awareness about human rights violations by the Burmese junta, advocate for free and democratic Burma, and stand in solidarity with the freedom and democracy movements inside Burma as well as around the world.
Some of the notable milestones are the peaceful protest along Orchard Road on 20th November 2007 during ASEAN Summit and the “Vote NO” Campaign for the sham referendum on the military-drafted, new constitution for Burma during late April and early May 2008. These activities were not only effective in raising awareness about the injustice committed by the Burmese Junta and the true desires of the Burmese people but also lawful in Singapore.
The political objectives of the Burmese activists have always been to advocate political change in Burma and their guiding principle is to use peaceful as well as lawful means in Singapore while expressing themselves. Indeed, none of the anti-junta political activities of the Burmese activists has ever been declared unlawful or in conflict with the local sensitivities by the Singapore government. Apart from receiving a police warning for their participation in the Orchard Road anti-junta protest, the Burmese activists have never been charged for any unlawful act while pursuing their political objectives.
Non-renewal of key immigration documents
Since July 2008, many Burmese patriots in Singapore have been denied renewal and extensions of their visas or permits by Singapore’s Immigration and Checkpoint Authorities and the Ministry of Manpower for no reason or explanation. In a span of just over two weeks, 6 Burmese patriots have been affected, and 3 of them have been forced to leave Singapore to date.
There is no evidence that the 6 affected Burmese patriots have ever committed a crime against the law in Singapore. No reason or explanation has been given by the Singapore Immigration and Checkpoint Authorities for rejecting the renewal and extension of the visas and permits of these Burmese patriots. In the eyes of the Burmese patriots affected, the rejections appear arbitrary and without rationale.
Statement of intent
We, Burmese patriots, are releasing this press statement to publicly inquire:
- The underlying reasons for the apparently arbitrary rejections by Singapore authorities.
- Whether the Burmese activists have been rejected for their peaceful political activism.
- Why the Singapore government unfairly ill-treated the Burmese activists despite its declarations of support for peaceful political change in Burma.
Myo Myint Maung
Ngwe Zin Soe
——————–
Details of the press conference to be held this afternoon:
Date: 22 August 2008 (Friday)
Time : 3.00pm to 5.00pm
Venue : Lilac Room, Level 5, Peninsula Excelsior Hotel
————
PROFILES
The following are the profiles of the 4 out of 6 affected activists and the details of their cases.
Ngwe Zin Soe
Occupation: Assistant Engineer
Type of visa/permit: PR Re-entry Permit
Related agency: ICA
Since her graduation from Temasek Polytechnic in 2003, Ngwe Zin Soe has been working in an
Engineering company with a Permanent Resident (PR) status in Singapore. Considering her PR Re-entry Permit would expire on 11th September 2007, she went to ICA on 21st July 2008 to apply for its
extension as Re-entry Permit can be extended within 6 months prior to the expiry date. At ICA, Ngwe Zin Soe was told that her permit could not be extended immediately and she would be contacted at a later time. It is an unusual delay because PR Re-entry Permit extension can be processed usually within 30 minutes. However, no reason was given for this. To date, she has yet been contacted by ICA in regard to her application.
According to ICA, “a Singapore Permanent Resident (SPR) who wishes to leave Singapore must obtain a Re-Entry Permit (REP) to enable him/her to return to Singapore as a SPR. A SPR who remains outside Singapore without a valid REP will lose his/her SPR status.”
Maung Soe Thiha
Occupation: Student (recently graduated from NUS in 2008)
Type of visas/permit: Social Visit Pass & Employment Pass
Related agency: ICA & MOM
Since the expiry of his Student Pass on 17th May 2008, 8 days after the completion of his studies at NUS, Maung Soe Thiha was living on a Social Visit Pass to look for a job. According to a bond between him and MOE, he has to work in Singapore-registered companies for 3 years upon graduation in return for his receipt of MOE Tuition Grant.
About two weeks after his receiving a degree scroll at NUS Commencement, his application for long-
term Social Visit Pass was rejected by Immigration & Checkpoints Authority (ICA) through a letter dated 24th July 2008, which his sponsor received on 26th July 2008. On both 28th July 2008 (Monday) and 29th July 2008 (Tuesday), he approached ICA officers to ask for the reason of the rejection as he had valid reasons to remain in Singapore – to seek employment in order to serve his bond. No reason was given.
In the morning of 30th July 2008, the day when his Social Visit Pass expired, the flight to Cambodia he intended to take was missed by him because of the delay caused by an unreasonably long checking of his passport by an immigration officer at the airport. He was later told that his passport was alright, but no reason was given by the officer for checking it so long. Eventually, he was given a Special Pass for one-day stay in Singapore with the requirement that he leaves Singapore from Changi Airport.
In that time of dismay, he got a job as a project engineer at Hai Yong Engineering in the afternoon of
30th July 2008. An application for Employment Pass was done for him through EP Online System around 1:30 pm on 30th July 2008. With his employment letter, Maung Soe Thiha then went to ICA to appeal for the extension of his Social Visit Pass until the outcome of his EP application would become available.
That appeal was outright rejected by ICA; however, again, no reason was given.
Maung Soe Thiha left for Cambodia on 31st Jul 2008 and his application for Employment Pass is still pending after nearly three weeks so far.
Myo Tun
Occupation: Construction worker
Type of visa/permit: Work Permit
Related agency: MOM
On 30th Jul 2008, the extension of Myo Tun’s Work Permit Pass, which expired on 1st August 2008, was rejected. As per normal, Work Permit extensions are applied in batches by his company. Out of 5 or 6 applicants in his batch, Myo Tun was the only one left out by MOM for rejection without any apparent reason.
Myo Tun left Singapore on 2nd August 2008 and is currently staying in Thailand.
Hlaing Moe
Occupation: Technical Supervisor
Type of visa/permit: S Pass & Social Visit Pass
Related agency: MOM & ICA
Hlaing Moe had been working as a Technical Supervisor in Sankyu (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., since 17th July2006 on S Pass when his application for the renewal of his S Pass was rejected on 17th July 2008 according to the letter from MOM. There was no reason given for the rejection and his company was still willing to employ him further. On 21st July 2008, he submitted an appeal letter to MOM for reconsideration, but it was again rejected on 25th July 2008 without any reason given.
After the cancellation of his S Pass, he received a Social Visit Pass to stay in Singapore until 5th August2008. He is studying part-time for Diploma in Technology (Mechanical) at Ngee Ann Polytechnic and in his 5th semester there so far. Since he had then upcoming exams during 14th August 2008 to 24th August 2008, he appealed to ICA on 29th July 2008 to extend his Social Visit Pass until he would have finished sitting the exams. Despite his valid reasons for staying in Singapore, the appeal was outright rejected for no given reason.
Hlaing Moe left Singapore on 5th August 2008 and is currently staying in Malaysia. During his stay in Malaysia, he applied for Singapore visa in order to sit the exams that have started since 14th August 2008. It was finally approved on 20th of August 2008 in the evening, just two days before this press conference, but it was too late for him.
———–
Related posts:
24 Comments
Perhaps we should leave out their ID numbers? May invite unnecessary pranks by some mischievous individuals looking for some cheap thrills or infamy – something that they do not need at this difficult time.
Note: Name and ID can be used for account changes with telcos for example.
We should welcome FTs, so they say.
Various blogs have posted the same media release with the full ID number early today.
Think “account changes with telcos for example” requires DOB, address etc!?
Ganga,
Thanks for the suggestion. We’ve taken them off.
Just shows that even foreigners have to follow the rules in Singapore. Very sorry for the 6 people who are affected.
Unfortunately, it looks like they have become victims of a bunch of bureaucratic idiots who knows only how to follow the law. It looks as if the authorities are practicing a policy of appeasement to the generals in Myanmar. And as we all know, appeasement will only encourage the bullies to become bigger bullies. I feel very sorry for the victims. I also feel very sorry for Singapore…
Well I feel for them, but in a way they deserved it. If ure a foreigner, better observe the damn rules. Its quite blatant how anal our gov can be with such outdoor protests.
Dont need to make a mountain out of a molehill, its only a handful, its a good enough lesson to the rest besides the burmese.
The China-born Falungong members here do the same but the police and ICA don’t bother them. Why? Coz they’re ethnic Chinese?
Those China-born Falungong members seem to got the same treatment, just that we are not aware of most cases.
Here is an example of Falungong members caught by Singapore law:
27 April 2001
Case of Falungong Practitioners Arrested on 31 Dec 2000, Press Release from SIR, 27 Apr 01
Thirteen foreigners and two Singaporeans were arrested on 31 December 2000 at MacRitchie Park for holding an illegal assembly. The 15 adults charged comprised 9 males and 6 females aged between 21 and 40. Only 2 are Singapore citizens. Of the 13 foreigners, 5 are permanent residents and the others hold various Passes/Permits
2 Seven – Li Ying, Hu Jian, Ang Chee Pheng, Xiong Changlei, Gao Hao, Wu Guorui and Xiong Shouyong – were sentenced to a jail sentence of one month for obstructing public servants from carrying out their duty, with the Courts taking into consideration their participation in an illegal assembly. The rest – Chen Hong Mei, Ng Chye Huay, Kang Cui Wei, Ma Xiao, Zhen Hanfei, Zhang Zhao Pei, Xu Dong and Dong Yuexing – were fined $ 1,000 each on the charge of participating in an assembly without a permit with the obstruction charge taken into consideration.
Upholding Law and Order
3 Registered societies, including the Falun Buddha Society (Singapore), are free to carry out their activities in Singapore, provided that the activities do not break any Singapore laws. However, when the activities of a group, or of any individual for that matter, contravene our laws or are prejudicial to public peace, welfare or good order, the Government must act to uphold the law and maintain the peace. This is no different from what Governments in other countries would do.
Immigration Status
Permanent Residents
4 Obstructing public servants from carrying out their duty is a serious offence. Of those convicted of the obstruction charge, Ms Li Ying will have her permanent resident status revoked and be asked to leave Singapore because of her active involvement in various illegal gatherings for which she was previously warned.
5 The other four permanent residents will be allowed to stay in Singapore on the condition of good conduct. They are:a) Mr Gao Haob)Mr Hu Jianc)Ms Chen Hongmei d)Mr Dong Yuexing If they breach the condition of good conduct, they will have their permanent resident status revoked and will subsequently be asked to leave Singapore.
Social Visit Pass (SVP) holder
6 For Ms Ma Xiao, who was fined for participating in an illegal gathering, she will be allowed to stay here on her SVP, subject to good conduct.
Student’s Pass holders
7 The Student’s Passes of those who were sentenced to jail for obstructing public servants and were previously warned for an offence of assembly without permit, will be cancelled. This is because they have breached the conditions specified in the Student’s Pass. The conditions are attached at Appendix A. The two Student’s Pass holders are:a)Mr Xiong Changleib)Mr Xiong Shouyong
8 For Mr Wu Guo Rui whose Student’s Pass had earlier expired and was staying in Singapore on SVP for the purpose of the court case, his SVP will not be renewed.
9 The other two students who were fined for participating in an illegal assembly will be allowed to continue studying here, subject to good conduct. They are:a) Mr Zhang Zhao Pei b) Ms Zhen Hanfei
Work Permit holder and Employment Pass holder
10 Mr Xu Dong, an Employment Pass holder, will be allowed to continue to stay in Singapore on his work pass, subject to good conduct
11 Ms Kang Cui Wei, whose Work Permit was cancelled by her employer, has left Singapore.
12 Similarly, for those whose immigration passes have been cancelled or are not renewed, SIR will issue a Special Pass for them to settle their personal matters before leaving Singapore. They can travel to any country.
13 For clarification, the media may contact Mr Lee Boon Hwee at Tel: 3916190 or fax their queries to Fax: 2987869.
END OF NEWS RELEASE
Singapore Immigration & Registration
27 Apr 2001
APPENDIX A
?
?
IMPORTANT NOTICE
?
1. This Pass is issued subject to the condition that the holder thereof shall not:-(a)be engaged in any form of employment or in any business, profession or occupation in Singapore whether paid or unpaid, without the consent in writing of the Controller of Immigration;(b)be proposed for adoption in any adoption proceedings commenced in Singapore;(c)be involved in any criminal or drug offences in Singapore; and(d)enter or be retained as a student in any other school/institution other than that specified overleaf.
2. This Pass shall cease to be valid if the holder thereof fails to enter or to be retained as a student in the school/institution specified overleaf.
3. This Pass has to be produced for every extension.
sarek_home, you’d be surprised how silly the call centre folks can be at times. Once my bro-in-law was checking on something over the phone with one telco on my behalf and the staff just gave out my personal details without verifying if the person they were talking to was me. And my bro-in-law was not even trying to impersonate me or anything like that.
And although the information is available elsewhere, why should TOC have to take the blame if a prankster chose to claim he got the info here first. Although the onus is on the persons who released their press statement, my purpose was to limit any possible blame on TOC, hope that clarifies my position.
I have no sympathy for these leeches for enjoy free education from our government, take away jobs from Singaporeans, and still protest in Singapore.
One less FT, the better!
[[ The other four permanent residents (China nationals) will be allowed to stay in Singapore on the condition of good conduct. ]]
That’s the point Enough was trying to make. PRCs get fined but are allowed to stay but the Burmese who were given warnings are booted out once their passes/permits expire.
I feel some sympathy for these burmese as they seem caught between countries that dont want them.
But end of the day i feel we owe them nothing.
Im sorry but I think alot of those that support their cause are being hypocrits.
One moment we decry the government’s liberal FT policy of giving out sponsorships to foreigners and letting them enjoy life in singapore without doing NS, and the next moment we are saying give them all the privileges of citizenship.
DISCLAIMER
My fellow Burmese patriots and I DO NOT ask from Singapore government:
- the right to stay but the rationale for non-renewal of our passes/permits;
- favors but fairness; and
- mercy but magnanimity.
Myo Myint Maung
To TPM and the like,
I’m sorry if my fellow Burmese patriots and I have ever upset you and your government by failing to be law-abiding even at the expense of our conscience. Sometimes, it is very hard to be both law-abiding and at the same time morally right in Singapore.
Myo Myint Maung
“Sometimes, it is very hard to be both law-abiding and at the same time morally right in Singapore.”
nicely said, myo myint maung. :)
FT issues aside, i think ICA should give a reason for their actions. I think there’s an admin law case here.
Myo Myint Maung,
Please spare us your self-righteous portrait of “brave burmese patriots fighting the junta and PAP regimes”.
If this were Burma, your asses would be in a prison up some mountain. Will there be an explaination given to you?
Our government is bureaucratic, autocratic, technocratic…etc…. but there must be something that attracted your 100k strong community here. Oh yes, jobs, education,…. opportunities taken away from singaporeans.
Please use your freedoms to go eslewhere. I will fight for my own thank you very much.
Reply to local sg patriot,
You should ask your government for all foreigner to out from your country if you think all foreign are taking job.
I don’t think so you will ask for that if you have brain.
I wanna see singapore servive without foreigner.
Come on now, lets not turn this into some foreigners versus Singaporean spat. The issue here is the transparency and integrity of our SG govt.
It is fair to ask or appeal for reasons about their application rejection.
Let’s have some respect for each other.
Reply To burmasupporter
Singapore do not need just foreigners but useful foreign professionals, and you Burnese certainly cannot be considered under useful foreign professionals if you are only here to satisfy your own political agenda.
If you think you are so brave, go back to your own country and fight it out, just like many of your respected and noble compatriots had done so and lay their precious life for their beliefs and cause.
Do not use Singapore as your base, you are not welcome here, you have no rights to carry out your activities here and Singapore is NOT YOUR country.
You can be treated like respected members of our society if you chose to respect the law of Singapore, or you can be treated as carbage, shit and rubbish if you think you are above the law just because you think you are a foreigner!
By the way, we need foreigners, but we do not need Burmese like you. Singapore will definitely be able to survive without Burmese idiots like you!!!
I would like to see your rejection letter
pls do not fight against each other whether you are singaporeans or foreigners, we are talking about issues of the country that need to be rectified and not about you people, so stop all these finger pointings.
Leave a Reply
Uncategorized - Jan 15, 2010 10:12 - 126 Comments
It is affordable – Mah Bow Tan
More In Uncategorized
- Rebutting Law Minister K Shanmugam
- Challenge of communication
- TOC & Talk Politics hold successful Year in Review forum
- “Live” from Post Museum – TOC’s Year End Review
- The Fajar Generation
Uncategorized - Jan 15, 2010 10:12 - 126 Comments
It is affordable – Mah Bow Tan
More In Uncategorized
- Rebutting Law Minister K Shanmugam
- Challenge of communication
- TOC & Talk Politics hold successful Year in Review forum
- “Live” from Post Museum – TOC’s Year End Review
- The Fajar Generation


As usual,there is an apparent gap between what the leader preaches,and what happens on the ground.
As to the question why the burmese partiots are denied entry back here,the answer is: lack of transparency.
I have never really given local govt agencies much respect.
Reason….they do things without using much of their brains.
Kevin