Breaking News: Malaysiakini reports that Malaysian opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim has won the Permatang Pauh by-election with a majority of 16,210 votes. He garnered 26,646 votes while Arif Shah Omar Shah got 10,436. Anwar’s wife, Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail, won the seat with a 13,388 majority at the March 8 general elections. Malaysiakini.com is down at the moment due to “extremely high traffic”. You can read Reuters and the Sydney Morning Herald’s reports. “Malaysian govt concedes by-election defeat to Anwar” – Channel NewsAsia.

John Ang / Guest Writer

Singapore is once again stuck doing strange things in order to both “stick to her guns” and “move with the times”.

The Government’s position is that they will gradually open up and liberalise Singapore and so far, they have kept their word. But realistically, it is a no-brainer. It is in their own best interest to do it, lest two things occur. Either the populace chafes under archaic laws until they’re ready to boot the current political party out and replace it with a new one, or the Government manages to keep the populace under its boot heel, but turns Singapore into a likeness of some Middle Eastern countries: great for business, but not as a place to live and express yourself.

Having established that there is nothing much to cheer over the recent liberalisation of our laws, I’ll move on to the speed of these changes, and I believe that the Government is starting a worrying trend in that it only waits until laws are hopelessly obsolete (i.e., everybody is breaking them and making a mockery of the rule of law) before starting the machinery to make amendments.

The ban on political videos comes to mind, and I shall elaborate on it later. Sometimes, the laws aren’t even changed, and the general population simply has to take the Government’s word in trust that “we will keep this [obsolete] law for conservatism’s sake, but it shall not be proactively enforced.” It is made to seem like our government is liberal in spirit, but not in the laws that it creates.

Dredging up some history, the saga in repealing Section 377A of the Penal Code, which criminalises sex between mutually-consenting adult men, started off in fact with a comprehensive review of the Singapore Penal Code in order to “better [protect] the more vulnerable in society and to take into account technological advancements and crime trends“. Yet after vigorous public debate, the Government decided to keep it verbatim for conservative reasons, but stated they wouldn’t proactively enforce it.

In a lesser-known area, this liberal in spirit but not in word of law trend seems to repeat itself, this time with regards to drug trafficking and the death penalty (Yawning Bread). In that article by Alex Au, the prosecution allegedly arbitrarily changed the amount of heroin smuggled from 18.4 grams to 14.99 grams, just 0.01g below the threshold for the mandatory death penalty, allowing the traffickers to escape the gallows. The facts and motivations around this case are not set in concrete as it was not widely reported, but it looks to me that as the world is moving towards abolishment of capital punishment, Singapore is once again stuck doing strange things in order to both “stick to her guns” and “move with the times”.

In his recent National Day rally, PM Lee declared that laws concerning political videos would be liberalised, and that outdoor demonstrations would be given a place at the Speakers’ Corner (and to make the touch even lighter, the National Parks Board (NParks) would be managing it). In view of the previous positions held by both of PM Lee’s predecessors, this is tantamount to the slaughter of not one, but two sacred cows. In this light, it is a giant leap forward (to unabashedly splice Armstrong and Mao together), since the thought of this happening even a year ago shared equal measure with the thought of putting a Singaporean on the moon. That’s the giant leap for mankind part.

Yet this liberalisation is a mere concession on the Government’s part, since it already has an explosion of homemade political videos and small, peaceful demonstrations kicking around in its backyard, and it would be unthinkable to set the police on the man simply uploading a video of an opposition rally, or arresting people holding candlelight vigils.

But if we take this round of liberalisation as a victory and grow comfortable walking hand-in-hand with the Government down the path of being liberal in spirit but not in our laws, we could end up losing more freedom than we’ve actually gained. Perhaps in the future, police would conceivably actually arrest people holding candlelight vigils because they did it in a location other than the Speakers’ Corner. That’s the Great Leap Forward bit: done with good intentions, but ending as an absolute disaster.

We may meet them halfway, but we cannot stop: we must keep on pushing for more. We must keep pushing for laws to be brought more in line with the way we want our society to work, not how we can compromise. We must keep calling for the changes in our laws to take place before, not after, half the population of the island can viably be classified as criminals. We must.

————-

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

马政联公司总裁平均年薪180万元 与普通民众收入差距229倍

马来西亚政联公司总裁(CEO),平均年薪高达550万令吉(约180万9千新元),月薪达到每月45.8万令吉(约15万新元),比首相收入多了七倍,更是普通民众中位数月入的229倍。 根据马国媒体《新海峡时报》报导,彭博社针对马国富时综合指数30大成分股分析,在最新数据和年度报告指出这些政联公司总裁年薪平均为180万9千新元。 而马国统计局的数据则显示,马国普通公民中位数收入为2160令吉(约710元)。 这使得政联公司总裁和民众的薪资差距,达到2万2816巴仙,或229倍。 数据也显示,这些马国政联公司总裁的总收入,也比一些私人企业总裁薪资多出100万令吉。私人界总裁总收入,加上补贴平均为一年300万令吉(约98万7千元)。 政联公司属公共服务领域  总裁薪资过高不合理 经济学家认为,总裁薪资过高且不合理,马国政府若要整顿政联公司董事部薪资,也有必要涵括花红等收入。 经济学家也指出,政企仍属公共服务领域,再对比市场拥有大量人才,这些总裁薪资和花红还要逐年增加,简直“说不过去”。 亚洲策略及领导研究所(ASLI)公共政策研究主席雷蒙(Ramon Navaratnam)指出,政联公司总裁受委,旨在服务政府和人民,但他们的薪资和补贴未免太高,甚至首相和部长薪资都没赚那么多。 不过,也有学者持反对意见,博特拉金融学院发展经理阿莫拉兹曼副教授捍卫,总裁是企业代表人物,有些甚至是政联公司创办人或大股东,为此领高薪是合理的。…

高达14万家户(2015年数据)落在绝对贫穷范围 “富者越富”已发生在新加坡

巡回大使许通美教授,引述连氏基金会与管理大学在2015年推出的《新加坡不平等、贫困、与为满足社会需求手册》,在2015年有10-14万家户落在绝对贫穷范围,意即他们无法负担基本生活需求。 再者,有20-35巴仙的家户处在相对贫穷范围。他们的收入少过国人中位数薪资所得(4400元)的一半,即仅为2200元。 他指出,新加坡的经济哲学,始终建立在公平的基础上,“理应是所有公民,而不只是有些公民,来分享国家繁荣的果实。” 他说,建国总理李光耀先生原本设想的,国人的收入分配模式呈橄榄形状,但是如今却变成了梨状。 而联合国也把我国列为仅次于香港,贫富差距最严重的国家。 强调有尊严的生活工资 许通美说,在国家繁荣当下,也不应忽略贫穷的程度。“我的看法是,要让国内的劳工们,都获取生活工资。什么是生活工资?生活工资确保劳工和他的家人,在有尊严、物资充足的情况下生活。” 很多劳工都没有获得足以维生的生活工资(living wage)。 他说,政府退出渐进式薪资(PW)和就业入息补贴计划(WIS),但是他们的补贴或给付并不多,仍不足以让劳工摆脱贫穷。 全球187国落实最低薪资制 许通美也指出,全球92巴仙、即187个国际劳工组织成员国,都已推行最低薪资制,只有八巴仙,包括新加坡还没有。…

MARUAH – Everyone ‘should be given due process to justice and fairness’

MARUAH first wrote to TODAY Voices regarding repatriations relating to Little India…

税收局揭新逃税手法 两个月逮10逃税集团成员

新加坡内陆税收局(IRAS)在过去两个月中,成功逮捕了涉及长期循环式消费税逃税行为的10名犯罪集团成员。 当局于周三(11月13日)发出文告指出,该局税务调查员于10月23日至24日,以及11月12至13日所展开的突击行动中,首次援引消费税法令所赋予的新权利执法。 在全岛展开的突击行动中,官员们突击了36家企业和包括加冷、淡滨尼、蔡厝港等73个地点,起获约200台电子器材和商业记录,并有41人被带到当局调查。 税务调查官指出,“逃税者正在改变其形象。以往我们只针对未能完全报告其收入,或申报某些消费不被纳入税收的商人,才会展开调查。现在,我们必须和更多曾涉案违规成员的犯罪集团打交道”。 “有些嫌疑人可能会非常不合作,他们会尝试销毁纸质文件,或拒绝交出证据。透过新的逮捕权力,我们的调查员可以更有效地将肇事者绳之於法。” 调查循环式欺诈逃税案 在此循环式欺诈逃税案,或“旋转木马式”消费税逃税骗局(carousel frauds)中,同一商品会透过人为的供应链进行交易,而商品最终将被运出口。虽然供应链上的多家公司看似无关,但是它们通常都由一个策划单位负责。 举例说,A公司取得商品后出售给B公司,而在商品供应时必须缴交消费税,但是A公司的总监却选择闹失踪,拒绝缴交消费税。 商品随后会进一步出售给充当“缓冲”的伪造企业,但是最后都会出口给另一家海外公司,而出口公司会从中赚取进项税(input GST)回扣。 有关的商品甚至会被循环使用,即从海外再次进口到我国“企业”手中,再次重复上述的供应链。…