
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Films of demos and assemblies approved by the authorities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/09/films-of-demos-and-assemblies-get-approved-by-the-authorities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/09/films-of-demos-and-assemblies-get-approved-by-the-authorities/</link>
	<description>a community of Singaporeans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:11:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lim</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/09/films-of-demos-and-assemblies-get-approved-by-the-authorities/comment-page-1/#comment-21582</link>
		<dc:creator>lim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 07:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=1567#comment-21582</guid>
		<description>Actually, I&#039;m surprised by the Govt&#039;s previous control. Gives the perception of insecurity esp when such films fall within the political fringes. 

Few will both to attend even when screened free. Fewer yet will pay money to watch such shows (Michael moore in America was an exception and even then had no impact on votes for Bush).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I&#8217;m surprised by the Govt&#8217;s previous control. Gives the perception of insecurity esp when such films fall within the political fringes. </p>
<p>Few will both to attend even when screened free. Fewer yet will pay money to watch such shows (Michael moore in America was an exception and even then had no impact on votes for Bush).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Singapore Daily &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily SG: 16 Sep 2008</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/09/films-of-demos-and-assemblies-get-approved-by-the-authorities/comment-page-1/#comment-21568</link>
		<dc:creator>The Singapore Daily &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily SG: 16 Sep 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 03:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=1567#comment-21568</guid>
		<description>[...] no regulation - TOC: Democracy and Elections: The Impact of Online Politics in Singapore - TOC: Films of demos and assemblies approved by the authorities - No &#8220;partisan stuff&#8221; political films please, we&#8217;re Singaporeans: Short film on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] no regulation &#8211; TOC: Democracy and Elections: The Impact of Online Politics in Singapore &#8211; TOC: Films of demos and assemblies approved by the authorities &#8211; No &#8220;partisan stuff&#8221; political films please, we&#8217;re Singaporeans: Short film on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Chee Wai</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/09/films-of-demos-and-assemblies-get-approved-by-the-authorities/comment-page-1/#comment-21525</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Chee Wai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 16:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=1567#comment-21525</guid>
		<description>I am curious about one thing: the Singapore police seems to consider the little sign that Seelan Palay held to be a form of &quot;public entertainment&quot;.

Obviously, given how small the sign is, Seelan could easily have printed it on his T-shirt. Would that also be considered &quot;public entertainment&quot; if he simply stood around the Malaysian High Commission wearing that without saying anything?

The police officer confronting Seelan also did not appear to give any concrete grounds for what constituted a violation of the law, simply that he needed a license.

Out of curiosity, I tried looking up &quot;Singapore Public Entertainment License&quot; and none of the description I&#039;ve found (official or otherwise) could concretely identify Seelan&#039;s act as a violation of that particular law. Perhaps I have to be a trained lawyer to properly interpret the stuff? I dunno, the whole thing seems a little out-of-whack to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am curious about one thing: the Singapore police seems to consider the little sign that Seelan Palay held to be a form of &#8220;public entertainment&#8221;.</p>
<p>Obviously, given how small the sign is, Seelan could easily have printed it on his T-shirt. Would that also be considered &#8220;public entertainment&#8221; if he simply stood around the Malaysian High Commission wearing that without saying anything?</p>
<p>The police officer confronting Seelan also did not appear to give any concrete grounds for what constituted a violation of the law, simply that he needed a license.</p>
<p>Out of curiosity, I tried looking up &#8220;Singapore Public Entertainment License&#8221; and none of the description I&#8217;ve found (official or otherwise) could concretely identify Seelan&#8217;s act as a violation of that particular law. Perhaps I have to be a trained lawyer to properly interpret the stuff? I dunno, the whole thing seems a little out-of-whack to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
