Comments on: Mind-twisting

By: Steven

Steven — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:33:19 +0000

This is a 1st world oxymoronic statement made by a so called Division 1 Minister. If PCF can withdraw its services when it loses the ward to the opposition, how can it still be unpolitical. I may not have a PHD like AP Ho, but this is truly 1st world BS!

By: Sgcynic

Sgcynic — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 09:52:09 +0000

To all who do not understand the million dollar statement, it means that PCF is strictly non-political in nature. It is the PAP that is polticking and threatened to withdraw the services of PCF. So the cycling, err, family carnival is non-political. It is just that the PAP manipulates the event for its own end, get it? That’s why, years back, the PAP keeps harping on being a party of jun zi (men of integrity) and yet now?

By: Daniel

Daniel — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 06:56:14 +0000

Lewis Carroll,
you get it wrong. Our gahmens’ brain are world-class and highly original because you can’t find their absurd idea blatantly promoted elsewhere in the world. Despite reality prove their ideas otherwise, they are always right and number-one as long as no one dare to tell the emperor that he wears no clothes.

By: berak bagus

berak bagus — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 06:49:36 +0000

Ho Peng Kee has to be Chua Lee Hoong’s mentor. Similar style of using twisted logic to justify their statements.
All statements made officially by Ho Peng Kee should be kept on record and forwarded to IBA. It is relevant because Ho P K represents the Law Ministry and is a reflection of what PAP stands for.
IBA should present their next report on this govt and its judiciary at the UN and World Court. And if this govt is serious about regaining some self respect, they must be made to regain it the hard way.

By: Lewis Carroll

Lewis Carroll — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 05:47:48 +0000

Lawyers esp legal academics

Yr comments pls on the legal logic of these words.

Is it the words of First Class Brain, II 1, II 2 or III?

And is the law school world class or third world?

Or is this Alice In Wonderland logic at work?

By: alky

alky — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 05:03:25 +0000

Why is the PAP allowed to run PCF in the first place? Can the other parties do something similar?

By: percevale

percevale — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 04:07:26 +0000

LOL

By: Layman Brudders Car Pooht

Layman Brudders Car Pooht — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 01:13:52 +0000

I realised that the Majority had spoken. This can be surely worth a Thesis! But for unspoken reasons, such thesis may not be allowed. I am not sure.

Questions should actually be posed to the Majority.
Why for nearly half a CENTURY? (in a short while it will be HALF a CENTURY)

What to do ?
Its Happened.
Lets Close shanks
and Move Onwards.

regards
Thar-mee with chee hum many many

By: Overseas Singaporean

Overseas Singaporean — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:56:27 +0000

So in other words, PCF’s activities are non-political, but it dispenses its services due to political considerations.

Million dollar government built on world class BS