<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An old message regurgitated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/an-old-message-regurgitated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/an-old-message-regurgitated/</link>
	<description>Singapore&#039;s #1 Socio-Political Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 04:31:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/an-old-message-regurgitated/comment-page-1/#comment-33557</link>
		<dc:creator>Q</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3130#comment-33557</guid>
		<description>Let us not be misled and deceived again &amp; again! The change I believe in lies on the hands of the people, NOT THE GOVT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let us not be misled and deceived again &amp; again! The change I believe in lies on the hands of the people, NOT THE GOVT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: red_dot</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/an-old-message-regurgitated/comment-page-1/#comment-33549</link>
		<dc:creator>red_dot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3130#comment-33549</guid>
		<description>Oppressive and Suppressive!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oppressive and Suppressive!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiredsingaporean</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/an-old-message-regurgitated/comment-page-1/#comment-33535</link>
		<dc:creator>tiredsingaporean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3130#comment-33535</guid>
		<description>so goodluck to all you papees voters, they are creating a system to do all you people in now, too late to regret now, you are all being trapped into believing all the golden years ahead and now kenna pay and pay till you go to your coffin . . . . maybe no money to buy coffin by then, must borrow from bank, DBS maybe offering coffin loans soon as the population aged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so goodluck to all you papees voters, they are creating a system to do all you people in now, too late to regret now, you are all being trapped into believing all the golden years ahead and now kenna pay and pay till you go to your coffin . . . . maybe no money to buy coffin by then, must borrow from bank, DBS maybe offering coffin loans soon as the population aged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gemami</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/an-old-message-regurgitated/comment-page-1/#comment-33534</link>
		<dc:creator>gemami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3130#comment-33534</guid>
		<description>32) Anonymous
&lt;i&gt;The fundamental question to ask: Does the country belong to the people or a party?/i&gt;

Dare the PAP make this into an election issue? Let the people decide.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>32) Anonymous<br />
<i>The fundamental question to ask: Does the country belong to the people or a party?/i&gt;</p>
<p>Dare the PAP make this into an election issue? Let the people decide.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Albert</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/an-old-message-regurgitated/comment-page-1/#comment-33533</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Albert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3130#comment-33533</guid>
		<description>Dear Lan Jiao Long: 

Other than PAPPY white outfit, there is nothing about the PAPPY that is clean. Please change a new underwear and stop flipping here and there until the stinky smell start to be obvious.

One day when the opposition became the ruling party, I be the first one to request a total check of what is left of our CPF and where it went and how much your father Tan-Li-bie-Si holding actually blown them away? I believe there are many people behind me wanted to know too!

Not forgetting, how much a HDB unit costed and what is HDB profits? Finally, where do they go?? Enjoy better sleep if you can and if your PAPPY dare a early election, you only bring your nightmare come faster. Go ahead and prove to every Singaporean how out of touch the PAPPY really is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Lan Jiao Long: </p>
<p>Other than PAPPY white outfit, there is nothing about the PAPPY that is clean. Please change a new underwear and stop flipping here and there until the stinky smell start to be obvious.</p>
<p>One day when the opposition became the ruling party, I be the first one to request a total check of what is left of our CPF and where it went and how much your father Tan-Li-bie-Si holding actually blown them away? I believe there are many people behind me wanted to know too!</p>
<p>Not forgetting, how much a HDB unit costed and what is HDB profits? Finally, where do they go?? Enjoy better sleep if you can and if your PAPPY dare a early election, you only bring your nightmare come faster. Go ahead and prove to every Singaporean how out of touch the PAPPY really is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wh173rav3n</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/an-old-message-regurgitated/comment-page-1/#comment-33531</link>
		<dc:creator>wh173rav3n</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3130#comment-33531</guid>
		<description>Same old fascist propaganda a la Nazi party after WW1 in which Hitler argued himself into absolute power through the ballot box. After becoming Chancellor, he systematically eliminated his opponents and consolidated his power and led the nation to WW2. LKY did much the same way except lead us to war, altho he led us into Merger and M&#039;sia and then got kicked out of M&#039;sia for becoming too hasty and greedy in his grab for power to be the PM of M&#039;sia. UMNO wasnt going to stand for his tricks. Now once again, his son takes over and becomes his mouthpiece to hold on to absolute power. Only in Singapore can such arrogance be tolerated and rewarded. Singaporeans have only themselves to blame! The PAP should have been thrown out long ago. They were once only a one man show in 1955. Alas! Apathetic and easily cowed Singaporeans deserve the dictatorship they created.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same old fascist propaganda a la Nazi party after WW1 in which Hitler argued himself into absolute power through the ballot box. After becoming Chancellor, he systematically eliminated his opponents and consolidated his power and led the nation to WW2. LKY did much the same way except lead us to war, altho he led us into Merger and M&#8217;sia and then got kicked out of M&#8217;sia for becoming too hasty and greedy in his grab for power to be the PM of M&#8217;sia. UMNO wasnt going to stand for his tricks. Now once again, his son takes over and becomes his mouthpiece to hold on to absolute power. Only in Singapore can such arrogance be tolerated and rewarded. Singaporeans have only themselves to blame! The PAP should have been thrown out long ago. They were once only a one man show in 1955. Alas! Apathetic and easily cowed Singaporeans deserve the dictatorship they created.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/an-old-message-regurgitated/comment-page-1/#comment-33512</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3130#comment-33512</guid>
		<description>Yes.. change.. by first willingly lower your pay so that we have more surplus to spend on more meaningful movement to help people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.. change.. by first willingly lower your pay so that we have more surplus to spend on more meaningful movement to help people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiredsingaporean</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/an-old-message-regurgitated/comment-page-1/#comment-33503</link>
		<dc:creator>tiredsingaporean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 12:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3130#comment-33503</guid>
		<description>36) cy on November 17th, 2008 8.26 pm If a country such as New Zealand which has a population about the same as us can have more than one party and still not doing badly. I don’t see the rationale why a ’small’ country like us can’t tolerate a 2 party system.

Power corrupts, absolute power absolutely corrupts.

 I don’t see the rationale why a ’small’ country like us can’t tolerate a 2 party system.

Its not about tolerating, its about getting total rid of all those check and balance so no one can stop them and they can help themselves with more $billions to god knows where the monies would end up. With already so many $billions of losses down the drain, one just can&#039;t help wondering how much more $billions of the peoples&#039; trapped cpf monies would be gone in no time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>36) cy on November 17th, 2008 8.26 pm If a country such as New Zealand which has a population about the same as us can have more than one party and still not doing badly. I don’t see the rationale why a ’small’ country like us can’t tolerate a 2 party system.</p>
<p>Power corrupts, absolute power absolutely corrupts.</p>
<p> I don’t see the rationale why a ’small’ country like us can’t tolerate a 2 party system.</p>
<p>Its not about tolerating, its about getting total rid of all those check and balance so no one can stop them and they can help themselves with more $billions to god knows where the monies would end up. With already so many $billions of losses down the drain, one just can&#8217;t help wondering how much more $billions of the peoples&#8217; trapped cpf monies would be gone in no time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smallvice585</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/an-old-message-regurgitated/comment-page-1/#comment-33501</link>
		<dc:creator>smallvice585</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 12:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3130#comment-33501</guid>
		<description>Anyway, in his speech, PM LHL referred to Taiwan as a country. He will be screwed by Beijing over this. Beijing was already very vocal about the Taiwan issue when Singapore was negotiating a Free Trade Agreement with Taiwan few months ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyway, in his speech, PM LHL referred to Taiwan as a country. He will be screwed by Beijing over this. Beijing was already very vocal about the Taiwan issue when Singapore was negotiating a Free Trade Agreement with Taiwan few months ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cy</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/an-old-message-regurgitated/comment-page-1/#comment-33496</link>
		<dc:creator>cy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 12:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3130#comment-33496</guid>
		<description>If a country such as New Zealand which has a population about the same as us can have more than one party and still not doing badly. I don&#039;t see the rationale why a &#039;small&#039; country like us can&#039;t tolerate a 2 party system.

Power corrupts, absolute power absolutely corrupts.

If we don&#039;t make the transition to a 2 party system while the PAP is still not rotten,we will face tremendous difficulties in doing that when PAP becomes rotten in the future because who knows what tricks they would pull up the sleeves when faced with nore dissent?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a country such as New Zealand which has a population about the same as us can have more than one party and still not doing badly. I don&#8217;t see the rationale why a &#8216;small&#8217; country like us can&#8217;t tolerate a 2 party system.</p>
<p>Power corrupts, absolute power absolutely corrupts.</p>
<p>If we don&#8217;t make the transition to a 2 party system while the PAP is still not rotten,we will face tremendous difficulties in doing that when PAP becomes rotten in the future because who knows what tricks they would pull up the sleeves when faced with nore dissent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiredsingaporean</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/an-old-message-regurgitated/comment-page-1/#comment-33495</link>
		<dc:creator>tiredsingaporean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 12:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3130#comment-33495</guid>
		<description>34) Enigmatic on November 17th, 2008 7.11 pm Change within the party itself is absolutely no change at all- just like a shaken bottled liquid which settles itself after awhile- but uncapping it and adding into it foreign elements to be reckoned with- then you will clearly see the change .

They have no other choice because by now they aleady knew that their party will lose next coming GE, so before situation gets worse, they resort to strike you first before any new party can be formed to take over them. This is not about the people anymore, its about the party alone to protect their own wealth building with no one to report to even when things have gone incredibly wrong as there won&#039;t be any check and balance nor accountability of the peoples monies being held ransom by them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>34) Enigmatic on November 17th, 2008 7.11 pm Change within the party itself is absolutely no change at all- just like a shaken bottled liquid which settles itself after awhile- but uncapping it and adding into it foreign elements to be reckoned with- then you will clearly see the change .</p>
<p>They have no other choice because by now they aleady knew that their party will lose next coming GE, so before situation gets worse, they resort to strike you first before any new party can be formed to take over them. This is not about the people anymore, its about the party alone to protect their own wealth building with no one to report to even when things have gone incredibly wrong as there won&#8217;t be any check and balance nor accountability of the peoples monies being held ransom by them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enigmatic</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/an-old-message-regurgitated/comment-page-1/#comment-33478</link>
		<dc:creator>Enigmatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3130#comment-33478</guid>
		<description>Change within  the party itself is absolutely no change at all- just like a shaken bottled liquid which settles itself after awhile- but uncapping it  and adding into it   foreign elements  to be reckoned with- then you will clearly see the change .

Inevitably, change is unavoidable, just like the lives of Singaporeans - are they for the better or the worse- we need to seek empathy at the various levels to find out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Change within  the party itself is absolutely no change at all- just like a shaken bottled liquid which settles itself after awhile- but uncapping it  and adding into it   foreign elements  to be reckoned with- then you will clearly see the change .</p>
<p>Inevitably, change is unavoidable, just like the lives of Singaporeans &#8211; are they for the better or the worse- we need to seek empathy at the various levels to find out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: min</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/an-old-message-regurgitated/comment-page-1/#comment-33475</link>
		<dc:creator>min</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 10:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3130#comment-33475</guid>
		<description>if an individual can be charged for contempt of court or the justice system, can LHL be charged for contempt of democracy?
How dare he make such comments! It is up to the people to decide who we want as representatives, not LHL, not anybody. He might as well scrap elections, scrap the constitution, and rule by decree. Oops he&#039;s doing exactly that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if an individual can be charged for contempt of court or the justice system, can LHL be charged for contempt of democracy?<br />
How dare he make such comments! It is up to the people to decide who we want as representatives, not LHL, not anybody. He might as well scrap elections, scrap the constitution, and rule by decree. Oops he&#8217;s doing exactly that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/an-old-message-regurgitated/comment-page-1/#comment-33457</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3130#comment-33457</guid>
		<description>The fundamental question to ask: Does the country belong to the people or a party?

No one, even the PAP die-hards, can argue against the notion that the country belongs to the people.

If so, let the people decide what they want in a national referendum: single party or mutliple parties for the country!!  If they want multiple, split the RP into 2.  Sound crazy?  They have done it on PUB to split it into multiple generation companies.  In telecom, they curtailed the power of Singtel and encouraged M1 and Starhub.  If that can be done in business, why can&#039;t it be done in politics? After all, our mini-stars are all CEO calibre commanding CEO salaries.  They sure know how to compete in a mutli-party system.

Instead, the party is now talking down on the people that they need a single party system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fundamental question to ask: Does the country belong to the people or a party?</p>
<p>No one, even the PAP die-hards, can argue against the notion that the country belongs to the people.</p>
<p>If so, let the people decide what they want in a national referendum: single party or mutliple parties for the country!!  If they want multiple, split the RP into 2.  Sound crazy?  They have done it on PUB to split it into multiple generation companies.  In telecom, they curtailed the power of Singtel and encouraged M1 and Starhub.  If that can be done in business, why can&#8217;t it be done in politics? After all, our mini-stars are all CEO calibre commanding CEO salaries.  They sure know how to compete in a mutli-party system.</p>
<p>Instead, the party is now talking down on the people that they need a single party system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yamasam</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/an-old-message-regurgitated/comment-page-1/#comment-33450</link>
		<dc:creator>Yamasam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3130#comment-33450</guid>
		<description>He said : &#039;as the Republicans in the opposition, will be to undermine the Democrat party and in the next elections … get back into power&quot;

First, there are many ideological differences between the 2 parties.  As such, one would expect a lot more partisan voting patterns for bills that touched upon those differences.  However, they have also shown many instances of bipartisanship if it is for the good of the country. There are also many instances where democrats/republicans senators/congressmans breaking from party ranks if they believe their party is taking the wrong position.

Second, it is not necessarily a bad thing.  At least, every legislation is subjected to rigorous debates and not just a rubber-stamping process.  Of course, sometimes there is a downside in that things will move a lot slower than desired, but it is a small price to pay to ensure check and balances.

Have we ever seen any PAP MPs voted against any govt legislation despite speaking out against the bill ?  Rarely and never when the party whip is imposed.  Anyway, if they do, they are just committing political suicide because they will find themselves &quot;retired to make way for new blood&quot; in the next GE.

MPs here are selected for GEs by the party leadership. So our MPs here are beholden to the party leadership and have to toe the party line to ensure political survival.  Unlike the US system where all congressmans have to campaign and voted upon in the primaries just to be nominated as candidates.

Besides, they are lots of in-breeding within the PAP.  The CEC members are elected by the party cadres (about 1000) who are actually selected by the CEC.  You scratch my back, I scratch yours.

If the PAP party leadership stays clean, then everything will be fine.  But no one can guarantee that or will it remains clean forever.  But once, it turn bad, their system will perpetuate and it will be extremely difficult to turn around.  With their more than 2/3 majority in parliament, they can amend the constitution anytime to preserve their power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He said : &#8216;as the Republicans in the opposition, will be to undermine the Democrat party and in the next elections … get back into power&#8221;</p>
<p>First, there are many ideological differences between the 2 parties.  As such, one would expect a lot more partisan voting patterns for bills that touched upon those differences.  However, they have also shown many instances of bipartisanship if it is for the good of the country. There are also many instances where democrats/republicans senators/congressmans breaking from party ranks if they believe their party is taking the wrong position.</p>
<p>Second, it is not necessarily a bad thing.  At least, every legislation is subjected to rigorous debates and not just a rubber-stamping process.  Of course, sometimes there is a downside in that things will move a lot slower than desired, but it is a small price to pay to ensure check and balances.</p>
<p>Have we ever seen any PAP MPs voted against any govt legislation despite speaking out against the bill ?  Rarely and never when the party whip is imposed.  Anyway, if they do, they are just committing political suicide because they will find themselves &#8220;retired to make way for new blood&#8221; in the next GE.</p>
<p>MPs here are selected for GEs by the party leadership. So our MPs here are beholden to the party leadership and have to toe the party line to ensure political survival.  Unlike the US system where all congressmans have to campaign and voted upon in the primaries just to be nominated as candidates.</p>
<p>Besides, they are lots of in-breeding within the PAP.  The CEC members are elected by the party cadres (about 1000) who are actually selected by the CEC.  You scratch my back, I scratch yours.</p>
<p>If the PAP party leadership stays clean, then everything will be fine.  But no one can guarantee that or will it remains clean forever.  But once, it turn bad, their system will perpetuate and it will be extremely difficult to turn around.  With their more than 2/3 majority in parliament, they can amend the constitution anytime to preserve their power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elysian-</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/an-old-message-regurgitated/comment-page-1/#comment-33442</link>
		<dc:creator>elysian-</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3130#comment-33442</guid>
		<description>first impression for me was LHL trying rather failingly to imitate barack obama&#039;s message of change.

unfortunately he didn&#039;t realise that hopes and ideals of change cannot be diluted and bent as one likes. at least, not so transparently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>first impression for me was LHL trying rather failingly to imitate barack obama&#8217;s message of change.</p>
<p>unfortunately he didn&#8217;t realise that hopes and ideals of change cannot be diluted and bent as one likes. at least, not so transparently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoodSingaporean</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/an-old-message-regurgitated/comment-page-1/#comment-33433</link>
		<dc:creator>GoodSingaporean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3130#comment-33433</guid>
		<description>hello...give me S$1million per year i also can cum out wf they so called policies...and i can be vy minister and i vow i will never corrupt!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello&#8230;give me S$1million per year i also can cum out wf they so called policies&#8230;and i can be vy minister and i vow i will never corrupt!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wynx</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/an-old-message-regurgitated/comment-page-1/#comment-33426</link>
		<dc:creator>Wynx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3130#comment-33426</guid>
		<description>They have no power or influence over the 3 Gods sitting on top of the ivory tower.? 
 
Hahaha...The fudder, Son and the hole-ly Goh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have no power or influence over the 3 Gods sitting on top of the ivory tower.? </p>
<p>Hahaha&#8230;The fudder, Son and the hole-ly Goh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: don</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/an-old-message-regurgitated/comment-page-1/#comment-33424</link>
		<dc:creator>don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3130#comment-33424</guid>
		<description>Very tired of the same old story.. can tell me something new PM Lie?
MM told us we are better off compared to our neighbouring countries, now PM tells us we are better off with one dominant, strong, clean, good party.

No matter what, we are always better off.. erm tell this to my ah ma, ah gong, mother father &amp; ask them if they are better off?

Even if PAP changes from within, legal corruption (million $$$ salaries) won&#039;t change, nepotism won&#039;t change, kangaroo judicial system won&#039;t change...so what if you change a few cats / dogs? They have no power or influence over the 3 Gods sitting on top of the ivory tower. 

What we need is an overhaul of the whole political system. Is PAP up to that?
I think they too kiasu...scared alternatives will win. 
Then please don;t talk about change when your so-called change is only lip service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very tired of the same old story.. can tell me something new PM Lie?<br />
MM told us we are better off compared to our neighbouring countries, now PM tells us we are better off with one dominant, strong, clean, good party.</p>
<p>No matter what, we are always better off.. erm tell this to my ah ma, ah gong, mother father &amp; ask them if they are better off?</p>
<p>Even if PAP changes from within, legal corruption (million $$$ salaries) won&#8217;t change, nepotism won&#8217;t change, kangaroo judicial system won&#8217;t change&#8230;so what if you change a few cats / dogs? They have no power or influence over the 3 Gods sitting on top of the ivory tower. </p>
<p>What we need is an overhaul of the whole political system. Is PAP up to that?<br />
I think they too kiasu&#8230;scared alternatives will win.<br />
Then please don;t talk about change when your so-called change is only lip service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiredsingaporean</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/an-old-message-regurgitated/comment-page-1/#comment-33406</link>
		<dc:creator>tiredsingaporean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 06:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3130#comment-33406</guid>
		<description>Instead of winning the people&#039;s trust to them for another term, now they just go ahead and renew it themselves whether you like it or not, in this way even should there be any intended new party or parties being formed, the result is as good as &quot;It&#039;s All Mine Now&quot; you can form as many parties as you like now but the door is already closed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of winning the people&#8217;s trust to them for another term, now they just go ahead and renew it themselves whether you like it or not, in this way even should there be any intended new party or parties being formed, the result is as good as &#8220;It&#8217;s All Mine Now&#8221; you can form as many parties as you like now but the door is already closed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

