
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Letter to TOC &#8211; An unhealthy speculative practice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/letter-to-toc-an-unhealthy-speculative-practice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/letter-to-toc-an-unhealthy-speculative-practice/</link>
	<description>a community of Singaporeans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:16:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gilbert Goh</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/letter-to-toc-an-unhealthy-speculative-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-35211</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilbert Goh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3216#comment-35211</guid>
		<description>Tan Chin Cheong:

We all have choices. It&#039;s only whether we want to exercise it or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tan Chin Cheong:</p>
<p>We all have choices. It&#8217;s only whether we want to exercise it or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tan Ching Cheong</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/letter-to-toc-an-unhealthy-speculative-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-35202</link>
		<dc:creator>Tan Ching Cheong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3216#comment-35202</guid>
		<description>There is REALLY nothing we can seriously do, in my humble opinion.
I asked around and asked around some more,
everyone gave me the boh-pian look like some  kind of taboo if they were to speak about it.

Thus, is it that regardless of the Tak Boleh Tahan-ness, there is nothing we can do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is REALLY nothing we can seriously do, in my humble opinion.<br />
I asked around and asked around some more,<br />
everyone gave me the boh-pian look like some  kind of taboo if they were to speak about it.</p>
<p>Thus, is it that regardless of the Tak Boleh Tahan-ness, there is nothing we can do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ACACIA</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/letter-to-toc-an-unhealthy-speculative-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-35148</link>
		<dc:creator>ACACIA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3216#comment-35148</guid>
		<description>I am angry because every month I pay my fees for some form of  services in my area and when I slip up they send me a letter to pay up and legal letter to claim.
I am angry because I will not get anything  or one cent more if the investment  showed positive returns. The rebates I receive are part of the government package to help us ease over.  I will not be angry if I had put part of my money in the investments from the sinking fund and not get any returns knowing the risks. 
I am angry because there was a breach of trust in the town councils because they used  the money to invest without being transparent. 
Excercise your vote, vote the PAP out at the  next  election!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am angry because every month I pay my fees for some form of  services in my area and when I slip up they send me a letter to pay up and legal letter to claim.<br />
I am angry because I will not get anything  or one cent more if the investment  showed positive returns. The rebates I receive are part of the government package to help us ease over.  I will not be angry if I had put part of my money in the investments from the sinking fund and not get any returns knowing the risks.<br />
I am angry because there was a breach of trust in the town councils because they used  the money to invest without being transparent.<br />
Excercise your vote, vote the PAP out at the  next  election!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The People's</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/letter-to-toc-an-unhealthy-speculative-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-34969</link>
		<dc:creator>The People's</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3216#comment-34969</guid>
		<description>I always thought that the payment I made to the town council is meant for running the estate. And as things inflate so does our payment. I never knew that my payment to town councils were also used as investment until this saga surfaced. Perhaps I have been less observant than usual. But if I have known, I will think that the investments are questionable. And most likely will never agree to it unless proven to be safe and lucrative. Since it is not, I will not approve to it.

But it appears that I have never agreed to use my money for such investments, does this constitute as breech of trust? I feel rather insulted that the Town councils will use the payment I made to somethings not ethical.  I&#039;m utterly disappointed that the town councils will do such things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought that the payment I made to the town council is meant for running the estate. And as things inflate so does our payment. I never knew that my payment to town councils were also used as investment until this saga surfaced. Perhaps I have been less observant than usual. But if I have known, I will think that the investments are questionable. And most likely will never agree to it unless proven to be safe and lucrative. Since it is not, I will not approve to it.</p>
<p>But it appears that I have never agreed to use my money for such investments, does this constitute as breech of trust? I feel rather insulted that the Town councils will use the payment I made to somethings not ethical.  I&#8217;m utterly disappointed that the town councils will do such things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inconvenient truth</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/letter-to-toc-an-unhealthy-speculative-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-34950</link>
		<dc:creator>inconvenient truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3216#comment-34950</guid>
		<description>The real reason why TC&#039;s were allowed to invest their surpluses is that this giant pool of funds is used as a &quot;honeypot&quot; to attract fund managers to setup shop in S&#039;pore - part of the govt&#039;s strategy to grow the lucrative financial industry, but the cost is borne by the public.
S&#039;pore is a wet dream for most fund managers as it offers a financially nieve investor base who are happy to pay high upfront charges and annual management fees. Its easy money the FMs just for taking your money - no performance benchmarks to meet at all.
Such fees are either non-existent or miniscule in most developed markets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real reason why TC&#8217;s were allowed to invest their surpluses is that this giant pool of funds is used as a &#8220;honeypot&#8221; to attract fund managers to setup shop in S&#8217;pore &#8211; part of the govt&#8217;s strategy to grow the lucrative financial industry, but the cost is borne by the public.<br />
S&#8217;pore is a wet dream for most fund managers as it offers a financially nieve investor base who are happy to pay high upfront charges and annual management fees. Its easy money the FMs just for taking your money &#8211; no performance benchmarks to meet at all.<br />
Such fees are either non-existent or miniscule in most developed markets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tew N S</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/letter-to-toc-an-unhealthy-speculative-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-34751</link>
		<dc:creator>Tew N S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3216#comment-34751</guid>
		<description>next time the TC increase our S&amp;C, we should protest and tell them off, because they anyhow invest our money, actually they have so much surplus, and yet they are greedy, typical of pap style, greediness will make a person fall. Just tell the MP off, if they want to increase our S&amp;C, the best vote them out, change another team of MPs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>next time the TC increase our S&amp;C, we should protest and tell them off, because they anyhow invest our money, actually they have so much surplus, and yet they are greedy, typical of pap style, greediness will make a person fall. Just tell the MP off, if they want to increase our S&amp;C, the best vote them out, change another team of MPs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dodo</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/letter-to-toc-an-unhealthy-speculative-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-34723</link>
		<dc:creator>dodo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3216#comment-34723</guid>
		<description>i sat in many management corporations before and i understood my role very well. we help to look after the management and maintenance of our properties/estates. no where did they say our role is in investment . so we always put our sinking funds into safest places - FD savings and government bonds. and every year, we have to report to all subsidiary proprietors at AGMs about our actions and be accountable. most importantly, when we make a mistake, we apologise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i sat in many management corporations before and i understood my role very well. we help to look after the management and maintenance of our properties/estates. no where did they say our role is in investment . so we always put our sinking funds into safest places &#8211; FD savings and government bonds. and every year, we have to report to all subsidiary proprietors at AGMs about our actions and be accountable. most importantly, when we make a mistake, we apologise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smallvice585</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/letter-to-toc-an-unhealthy-speculative-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-34530</link>
		<dc:creator>smallvice585</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3216#comment-34530</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Why do we need TOC to taken care such a large sum of money as Sinking Fund? I tot Sinking Fund are to use to repair or upgrade where we Singaporean live&lt;/i&gt; - Richard Tan

Are you referring to TOC or TC? My understanding is that TOC refers to The Online Citizen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Why do we need TOC to taken care such a large sum of money as Sinking Fund? I tot Sinking Fund are to use to repair or upgrade where we Singaporean live</i> &#8211; Richard Tan</p>
<p>Are you referring to TOC or TC? My understanding is that TOC refers to The Online Citizen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Ling</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/letter-to-toc-an-unhealthy-speculative-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-34528</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Ling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3216#comment-34528</guid>
		<description>Hi, For those who asked y or who allowed this to happen. Let&#039;s just say tat We/Us who voted them in allowed it. (I voted against) As i believe this was put up in the Parliment for voting and it was passed. It&#039;s not illegal for them to Invest up to 35%. =D

While writing this statement, a thought came to me, their concern tat led to investing was to fight against Inflatation. By investing 35% can make it meh? Unless is in High Return High Risk. Basically do or die investments. 

Since 35% at 5% returns will protect the 35% from inflation, wat about the 65%?
Food for thought.

As for those who is interested to circulation information. Just often engage ur frenz, collegues and who ever is willing to listen about social issues. Surely the question of where u get such info will pop up. =D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, For those who asked y or who allowed this to happen. Let&#8217;s just say tat We/Us who voted them in allowed it. (I voted against) As i believe this was put up in the Parliment for voting and it was passed. It&#8217;s not illegal for them to Invest up to 35%. =D</p>
<p>While writing this statement, a thought came to me, their concern tat led to investing was to fight against Inflatation. By investing 35% can make it meh? Unless is in High Return High Risk. Basically do or die investments. </p>
<p>Since 35% at 5% returns will protect the 35% from inflation, wat about the 65%?<br />
Food for thought.</p>
<p>As for those who is interested to circulation information. Just often engage ur frenz, collegues and who ever is willing to listen about social issues. Surely the question of where u get such info will pop up. =D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Tan</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/letter-to-toc-an-unhealthy-speculative-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-34510</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Tan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3216#comment-34510</guid>
		<description>Why do we need TOC to taken care such a large sum of money as Sinking Fund?
I tot Sinking Fund are to use to repair or upgrade where we Singaporean live. But instead of using the Sinking Fund to do that, we still need to pay another sum of money to PAP to so call upgrade our living area.

Instead of using the Sinking Fund for us Singaporean and help those that need help at this period of time, where is the help? Losing S$8 million dollars which can help a lot of lower income Singaporean to get thru this crisis. Don&#039;t tell us NOBODY AGAIN.

Better think twice on PM sugestion on ONE TEAM to run the country, now with two Party running the country, already can come out these kind of misuse of Singapore fund for Investment to get profit instead of help us SIngaporean to pull thru together with the Government.

What will come next? Why keep on asking us to tighten our belt and beware of loosing our job? And no actual action to help us?

Taiwan Government giving out Good &amp; Service Voucher to lower income to ask them to spend instead of tigthen their belt.

Malaysia lower toll fee, fuel tax.

How about Singapore? Instead of lower down the fee, Transportation increase, Utilities cost increase, ERP increase nos of Gantries, and so on. The only thing that lower down is our salary. We Singaporean suffer ourselves, howcome Government Salary still so high and not reduce at the time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do we need TOC to taken care such a large sum of money as Sinking Fund?<br />
I tot Sinking Fund are to use to repair or upgrade where we Singaporean live. But instead of using the Sinking Fund to do that, we still need to pay another sum of money to PAP to so call upgrade our living area.</p>
<p>Instead of using the Sinking Fund for us Singaporean and help those that need help at this period of time, where is the help? Losing S$8 million dollars which can help a lot of lower income Singaporean to get thru this crisis. Don&#8217;t tell us NOBODY AGAIN.</p>
<p>Better think twice on PM sugestion on ONE TEAM to run the country, now with two Party running the country, already can come out these kind of misuse of Singapore fund for Investment to get profit instead of help us SIngaporean to pull thru together with the Government.</p>
<p>What will come next? Why keep on asking us to tighten our belt and beware of loosing our job? And no actual action to help us?</p>
<p>Taiwan Government giving out Good &amp; Service Voucher to lower income to ask them to spend instead of tigthen their belt.</p>
<p>Malaysia lower toll fee, fuel tax.</p>
<p>How about Singapore? Instead of lower down the fee, Transportation increase, Utilities cost increase, ERP increase nos of Gantries, and so on. The only thing that lower down is our salary. We Singaporean suffer ourselves, howcome Government Salary still so high and not reduce at the time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monkeys See Monkeys Do</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/letter-to-toc-an-unhealthy-speculative-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-34361</link>
		<dc:creator>Monkeys See Monkeys Do</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3216#comment-34361</guid>
		<description>This whole issue brings the NKF issue back to life again. I am now beginning to see why Dr Chee Soon Chuan and the SDP was sued because of the NKF issue.

We donate, they put our money in surplus and then &quot;invest&quot; (or gamble) with our money instead of benefiting the needies immediately.

We contribute to conservancy charges, they put our money in surplus and then &quot;invest&quot; (or gamble) up to 35% of our money instead of benefiting the people immediately.

We contribute to our money in the CPF, they put our money in reserves and then &quot;invest&quot; (or gamble) with our money buying up losing foreign banks instead of returning our money back to us as early as possible.

See the same fund management (gambling) philosophy throughout the whole spectrum? No wonder, one casino is not enough! Turning into a nation of gamblers!

Monkeys see, monkeys do! What extraordinary talents are they supposed to be???

Totally fed up and sick in the stomach.  Almost want to vomit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole issue brings the NKF issue back to life again. I am now beginning to see why Dr Chee Soon Chuan and the SDP was sued because of the NKF issue.</p>
<p>We donate, they put our money in surplus and then &#8220;invest&#8221; (or gamble) with our money instead of benefiting the needies immediately.</p>
<p>We contribute to conservancy charges, they put our money in surplus and then &#8220;invest&#8221; (or gamble) up to 35% of our money instead of benefiting the people immediately.</p>
<p>We contribute to our money in the CPF, they put our money in reserves and then &#8220;invest&#8221; (or gamble) with our money buying up losing foreign banks instead of returning our money back to us as early as possible.</p>
<p>See the same fund management (gambling) philosophy throughout the whole spectrum? No wonder, one casino is not enough! Turning into a nation of gamblers!</p>
<p>Monkeys see, monkeys do! What extraordinary talents are they supposed to be???</p>
<p>Totally fed up and sick in the stomach.  Almost want to vomit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidC</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/letter-to-toc-an-unhealthy-speculative-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-34309</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3216#comment-34309</guid>
		<description>I know there are many who do not know of this site, and I think spreading the word around will create some awareness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know there are many who do not know of this site, and I think spreading the word around will create some awareness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiredsingaporean</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/letter-to-toc-an-unhealthy-speculative-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-34296</link>
		<dc:creator>tiredsingaporean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3216#comment-34296</guid>
		<description>yes, we can also draw all attention towards TOC by spreading the website at youtube which I know alot of people in singapore are watching everyday, anyone knows how to do it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, we can also draw all attention towards TOC by spreading the website at youtube which I know alot of people in singapore are watching everyday, anyone knows how to do it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/letter-to-toc-an-unhealthy-speculative-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-34293</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3216#comment-34293</guid>
		<description>@12
I believe there are various restrictions on print media. Until those are ironed out, the best practice would be to simply spread the word, or invite your offline neighbours over for tea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@12<br />
I believe there are various restrictions on print media. Until those are ironed out, the best practice would be to simply spread the word, or invite your offline neighbours over for tea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/letter-to-toc-an-unhealthy-speculative-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-34291</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3216#comment-34291</guid>
		<description>I wonder why their actions were not made known to the people. Are they even qualified to speculate? Why are they speculating with OUR money? Collected from higher conservancy charges? Collected from higher taxes?
Did we vote for this to happen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why their actions were not made known to the people. Are they even qualified to speculate? Why are they speculating with OUR money? Collected from higher conservancy charges? Collected from higher taxes?<br />
Did we vote for this to happen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Ling</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/letter-to-toc-an-unhealthy-speculative-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-34262</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Ling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3216#comment-34262</guid>
		<description>Hmm I do not noe about the rest but Ever since i started my hobby, i&#039;ve never passed up a chance to dive into Social Topics with my frenz, collegues, bosses, whoever whose willing to stop and listen.

And during then i&#039;ll always bring up online references which although not licensed but is not just a Simple Rantings. Although future is unknown and maybe 1 day TOC can become official but as of now, before TOC is official, are we making full use of wat we ve to broadcast information to everyone?

Internet has no Limits. Help to Spread the Word.

 The Only Limit is tat Big Bro is Watching. It&#039;s obvious from the recent Article on the Non Bonded Education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm I do not noe about the rest but Ever since i started my hobby, i&#8217;ve never passed up a chance to dive into Social Topics with my frenz, collegues, bosses, whoever whose willing to stop and listen.</p>
<p>And during then i&#8217;ll always bring up online references which although not licensed but is not just a Simple Rantings. Although future is unknown and maybe 1 day TOC can become official but as of now, before TOC is official, are we making full use of wat we ve to broadcast information to everyone?</p>
<p>Internet has no Limits. Help to Spread the Word.</p>
<p> The Only Limit is tat Big Bro is Watching. It&#8217;s obvious from the recent Article on the Non Bonded Education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gemami</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/letter-to-toc-an-unhealthy-speculative-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-34167</link>
		<dc:creator>gemami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 07:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3216#comment-34167</guid>
		<description>Distrubtion of newspapers need licensing like any publication does. We should not do things that are against the law. I know we may be desperate for change and for it to come soon but we must keep focussed and know that patience is a virtue that never fails you.

TOC might want to apply for a license but then again it will become liable for the contents written therein. Best interest for all is TOC&#039;s expansion online. 

May I suggest a a Mandarin version of TOC to reach out to non-English audience. We can also roll out Malay or Tamil versions too. Point is, the scope of expansion is limitless. Let us focus on the online platform first and then sit back and exercise your patience while continue to contribute.

Remember we are setting the wheel in motion and we might not get to taste the fruits of our labour, but we can die knowing that Singapore will be a better and free country for our children and their children for generations to come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Distrubtion of newspapers need licensing like any publication does. We should not do things that are against the law. I know we may be desperate for change and for it to come soon but we must keep focussed and know that patience is a virtue that never fails you.</p>
<p>TOC might want to apply for a license but then again it will become liable for the contents written therein. Best interest for all is TOC&#8217;s expansion online. </p>
<p>May I suggest a a Mandarin version of TOC to reach out to non-English audience. We can also roll out Malay or Tamil versions too. Point is, the scope of expansion is limitless. Let us focus on the online platform first and then sit back and exercise your patience while continue to contribute.</p>
<p>Remember we are setting the wheel in motion and we might not get to taste the fruits of our labour, but we can die knowing that Singapore will be a better and free country for our children and their children for generations to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/letter-to-toc-an-unhealthy-speculative-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-34154</link>
		<dc:creator>DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3216#comment-34154</guid>
		<description>I would donate to TOC to help such a venture, but is it &#039;legal&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would donate to TOC to help such a venture, but is it &#8216;legal&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiredsingaporean</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/letter-to-toc-an-unhealthy-speculative-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-34131</link>
		<dc:creator>tiredsingaporean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 05:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3216#comment-34131</guid>
		<description>Yes, TOC should start a monthly newsletter and blasted out to all emails and also distributing to all estate and households letterbox.This is to keep the citizens well informed of all things good and bad happening in singapore. I agree and if finance is a problem, I believe each and every citizens would be more than glad to chip in our fair share in letting everyone to know the whole truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, TOC should start a monthly newsletter and blasted out to all emails and also distributing to all estate and households letterbox.This is to keep the citizens well informed of all things good and bad happening in singapore. I agree and if finance is a problem, I believe each and every citizens would be more than glad to chip in our fair share in letting everyone to know the whole truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilbert Goh Keow Wah</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2008/11/letter-to-toc-an-unhealthy-speculative-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-34127</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilbert Goh Keow Wah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 05:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=3216#comment-34127</guid>
		<description>10) Best Job In The World

YA my concerns likewise for those who are illiterate and silent. They have no access to the net nor talk about politics to anyone. How to reach out to them?

These are also the die-hard PAP supporters who will only go for the lightning sign anytime as they are fearful of the unknown. They go for things that are familiar to them. They never change their housing their whole life and always stick to the same job even though it pays little.

We can start a newsletter that can be distributed free of charge once a month to educate the population.

We can also link up more with the opposition to allow them to use TOC as a platform to reach out to more people via the net.

It is also my hope that TOC is not just for anti-establishment feedback but also welcomes those who are pro PAP. We should incalculate a site that allows one to love his  country so much that he wants to be in the know on how it is run and not just be politically apathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10) Best Job In The World</p>
<p>YA my concerns likewise for those who are illiterate and silent. They have no access to the net nor talk about politics to anyone. How to reach out to them?</p>
<p>These are also the die-hard PAP supporters who will only go for the lightning sign anytime as they are fearful of the unknown. They go for things that are familiar to them. They never change their housing their whole life and always stick to the same job even though it pays little.</p>
<p>We can start a newsletter that can be distributed free of charge once a month to educate the population.</p>
<p>We can also link up more with the opposition to allow them to use TOC as a platform to reach out to more people via the net.</p>
<p>It is also my hope that TOC is not just for anti-establishment feedback but also welcomes those who are pro PAP. We should incalculate a site that allows one to love his  country so much that he wants to be in the know on how it is run and not just be politically apathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
