By Devadas

After reading Dr Teo Ho Pin’s second forum page letter, I can only conclude that he is unable to understand what Singaporeans are demanding from him. Dr Teo, we do not want you to waste time “exploring” ways of how to keep residents informed of the town councils’ finances. We want you to inform us right now about what the town councils have spent our money on.

We do not need stock replies and interviews from you reassuring us. We want to know the exact details of your investments. And don’t you dare keep referring us to the annual reports as if they contain the information we want. As shown in the analysis by TOC, these reports lack any details about specific investments by the town councils.

It is already outrageous that you have invested our money in such high-risk investments without informing us. Now you conduct this ‘wayang’ about being on top of the matter when in reality you don’t seem bothered at all. Mr Mah Bow Tan has stated, “Each town council has the duty to explain to its residents how it invests its funds, what is its philosophy, what are the risks it takes”. So far neither you nor any of the other PAP town councils have done anything of that sort. You even have the audacity to say that the town councils’ investment strategies cannot be revealed!

We pay the service and conservancy charges (S&CCs) so that the town councils can maintain our estates. We are not paying so that town councils can accumulate enormous sinking funds and act like little “Temaseks” and “GICs”.

If town councils can build up such huge sinking funds that they can invest it in high-risk investments, why is there a need to collect the charges at the present rates? I can’t help but compare this to the old NKF collecting millions in donations but spending only 10 cents out of every dollar on the patients. The rest was wastefully spent or accumulated into huge reserves as we eventually discovered to our horror and disgust.

I believe that our current S&CCs can be reduced dramatically. Such a move would be timely in the face of the worsening recession. Nothing is more ridiculous than paying more than is necessary to the town council so that it can gamble our money away or accumulate it for that elusive “rainy day”.

Much has been said and written about the responsibility of the PAP town councils and MPs in this issue. Dr Teo, as the Coordinating Chairman for PAP town councils, you have the ultimate responsibility in revealing and explaining all the investments by the town councils. For a change, please start giving truly genuine answers to the residents.

So Dr Teo Ho Pin, where is our money?

———–

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Temasek pays US$250m for 3-yr-old Israeli cybersecurity firm when original investor only put in US$4.3m

Reuters reported yesterday (16 Oct) that Temasek Holdings is buying Israeli cybersecurity…

WP candidate draws flak on the Internet

A vote for the PAP is not just an endorsement of its candidate, but more importantly, is an endorsement of its policies. In Mr Yaw’s zeal to endorse MP Teo Ho Pin, perhaps he forgot about this, argues Ng E Jay.

供民众查阅 国家档案馆公布16万政府文件

通讯及新闻部高级政务部长沈颖指出,国家档案馆的门户网页已经公布了16万份政府文件,以供公众查阅。 她昨日(9月4日)在国会中指出,“随着我们与政府机构的合作逐步将政府文件解密,文件的数字还会再增加。而所有解密文件将会放到线上。” 她补充到,并非所有文件都可以供公众查阅,尤其是国防、外交和内部安全,及可能受保密义务或涉及个人隐私的文件。 “目前国家档案馆拥有超过25年,约200万份政府资料被视为公共档案。” 解密文件为优先工作 工人党非选区议员贝理安(Leon Perera)在国会中,询及超过25年并且已在国家资料馆网页中公布的政府文件比例。他也问到,已经公开在线的25年以上文件,是否会在稍后进行重新审查,因为可能在未来,或许50年后,这些在25年来上载到线上的文件,会存在某些涉及个人敏感问题和保密义务。 沈颖对此表示,她之前已经分享了有关的数量,而目前25年及以上的文件数量还有很多,有很多工作要进行。“我认为我们会考虑你的建议,但实际上,优先考虑的是尽可能多解密文件。” 她指出,近年来已经排除750名来自不同政府机构的人员进行基本解密培训,这可以帮助更多官员了解到解密的重要性,使他们能够将工作做得更好更快。 并非所有文件可免费查阅 贝理安也问到,在线官网上解密和发布的文件,是否可以“更自由查阅”。“据我了解,当你到这个平台上查看文件,在某些情况下必须拥有书面许可,有些则是给予有条件的许可。” 沈颖指出,并非所有文件都可以免费获得。“我们希望可以尽可能地多提供可查阅和搜寻到的文件及记录,这一切还在进行中。”