The following is a letter to the ST Forum by See Leong Kit which was rejected for publication:
I refer to your report, “Market-based pricing fairest for new HDB flats: Mah” (ST Nov 19).
The HDB has yet to rebut forum writer Tan Kim Chuan’s contention that it is “either over-pricing its flats or is profiteering from the property boom”.
Our private property market is now in a downturn. But the HDB resale flat market is still firm due to Permanent Resident buyers pushing up prices.
Thus, HDB’s pegging its new flat prices to similar resale flat market prices had resulted in prices of new flats and resale flats chasing each other in an upward spiral that is detrimental to buyers of both new and resale flats.
The Total Breakeven Cost of a new flat comprise Construction Cost(CC), Land Cost(LC) and Other Related Cost(ORC).
Its Pinnacle@Duxton project has 1,848 units cramped into 50-storey blocks occupying a small plot of land.
From available public tender information, the actual CC component is $150,000 per unit. The onus is now on HDB to publicly disclose the remaining LC and ORC components.
A quick estimate of LC plus ORC is around $80,000, leading to an estimated Total Breakeven Cost of $230,000 per flat.
When launched in 2004, average Selling Price was $370,000 (actual range: $288,000 to $450,000), which translates to an average profit to HDB of $140,000 per unit sold.
428 unsold units were recently relaunched at average Selling Price of $550,000 (actual range: $450,000 to $645,000), which is $180,000 higher than initial launch prices. This arose from the HDB market-based pricing approach as market prices of similar resale flats in the vicinity were between $593,000 to $670,000.
Applicants of HDB new flats are mostly young Singaporeans wanting to get married, move into their own homes and produce babies, which will alleviate our declining birth rate.
Why then is the HDB not doing the right thing as a not-for-profit low-cost public housing developer by passing on to such citizens the economy-of-scale cost savings in its huge developments through pricing new flats on a cost-based break-even basis?
A recent Ministry of Trade and Industry Forum reply on the huge electricity price hike had stated that “the Government’s approach is to price goods and services at their full cost”. Why then the double standards in the HDB statement that “the prices of new HDB flats are based on the market prices of resale HDB flats, and not their costs of construction”?
For the average Singaporean, his HDB flat is the single most expensive purchase item in his lifetime. Thus, it is important for HDB to clear the air once-and-for-all by providing transparent replies to the above two simple questions, and disclosing detailed cost figures for its Pinnacle project.
See Leong Kit
———–
Read also: Fed up with statistics (Part One) by Leong Sze Hian.
And: Reaching for the Pinnacles the profitable way by My Singapore News.
—–
HELP keep the voice of TOC alive!
If you like this article, please consider a small donation to help theonlinecitizen.com stay alive. Please note that we can only accept donations from Singaporeans. Thank you for your assistance.Do you have a flair for writing? Volunteer with us. Email us your full name and contact details to theonlinecitizen@gmail.com
This is pure monopolized profiteering business to make everyone suffer so you have no choice but to keep them in power. Instead of providing a decent home for each and every citizens here as our garments, they are now being manipulated to provide consistant revenues for the party to stay in power over you people.
well.. if the cpf was all drawn out by the retirees at retirement age, there will be no reserves to pay our righteous snr officers of the garment… which pte organisation can afford the kind of manpower and salary scale that our garment has and still make a constant profit???
ppl of spore just have to constantly look out for themselves and ensure that there is always some spare in the kitty instead of relying on the cpf.. from wat i see, cpf will always be the reserves that backs up the frivolous investments made.. loss?? no prob, increase cpf min sum and draw out age…
this thread has died a natural death, lost in time.
garmen create job, mentor, senior mentor… maybe principal mentor…
CPF for retirement??? Looks like those youngster who got their new period hole will have little left when they retire… work like slave… haiz
this trend is no longer living… pls continue to breath leh.
Would you be considering exchanging hyperlinks?