Uncategorized - Written on Sunday, December 7, 2008 0:47 - 25 Comments
TOC celebrates its 2nd year anniversary
By Chew Joa-Ee and Tng Wen Quan / Citizen Reporters
THE ONLINE CITIZEN (TOC) held their 2nd year anniversary at the Speaker’s Corner in conjunction with the United Nation’s 60th Anniversary of the Declaration of Human Rights yesterday.
The event, which had about 200 people in attendance, saw four speakers raising hot-button issues pertinent to Singaporeans today.
The theme for the day was “Social Justice and Fairness.”
TOC editor-in-chief Choo Zheng Xi started off with well wishes to TOC on its 2nd birthday. He reminded the audience of TOC’s mission, which is “to tell the story of Singapore that is not being told”.
True to those words, he raised the recent issue of Town Council (TC) chairman Dr Ahmad Magad’s decision to withhold information on the TC’s investments. Such issues highlight the importance of transparency, and it is not only the people’s right, but also the people’s duty to hold our Government accountable to their decisions.
Only the people have the power to do so, and such active citizenry is paramount in “shaping the direction of Singapore”, which is another imperative of TOC, he said.
Mr Choo stressed the people’s responsibility to their fellow countrymen, pointing to our treatment of the weakest and poorest in Singapore. Those who are better-off are morally obliged to champion for the rights of the less well-off, and for improvements in fundamental issues such as the imposition of minimum wages.
He finished by saying that Singapore’s progress should not be measured in dollars and cents, but by how well we are able to care for those in need.
A call for HDB to serve the less wealthy
The second speaker, Mr Leong Sze Hian, president of the Society of Financial Service Professionals, an organisation committed to the provision of financial services aimed at achieving long-term financial stability for its clients, continued on this point with his speech on the HDB and how it needs to better serve the less wealthy.
He pointed out that 33,000 HDB home owners now have unpaid concessionary loans. If unpaid bank loans are included, the figure would balloon to an optimistic estimate of 40,000 homeowners, eerily similar to the preliminary stages of the US’s disastrous sub-prime crisis.
Mr Leong questioned many of HDB’s policies which forces Singaporeans to purchase houses they could not afford. These include the income eligibility for the various home sizes and many others.
Similar to Mr Choo’s call for transparency, Mr Leong cracked a joke asking how the statistics that the Government used to release disappeared. Though it humored the audience, the grim reality is hardly humorous.
He continued to release numbers, stating that 490,000 Singaporeans are either unemployed, earning below $1200 (part-time), or below $600 (part-time) a month. These numbers have scarcely improved from the past. Furthermore, inflation has rigorously eroded the value of these numbers.
Mr Leong mentioned that public assistance is at a lowly $330 a month, and raised doubts on the adequacy of that amount. Also in line with Mr Choo’s idea of “active citizenry”, Mr Leong emphasised on our need to speak up for these people who the government does not see as they are “too weak to even leave their homes.”
Uprooting elitism and helping the poor and needy
The third speaker, social activist Ravi Philemon, continued to talk about Social Justice and Fairness with a speech on Singapore’s growing income gap. Social justice, according to him, is “when people don’t get what they deserve.”
He also described Singapore’s situation as one where the elite cannot even identify with the problems the have-nots are facing, pointing to the Wee Shu Min scandal, whereby daughter of MP Wee Siew Kim was criticised for elitist, naive, and insensitive statements.
Mr Ravi blamed this problem on Singapore’s biased education system. He said that Singapore practices “exam meritocracy” instead of “talent meritocracy,” undermining the creativity of its people.
He recommended that Singapore should adopt a “culture of learning”, whereby a child’s future would not be limited by streaming, which is “a form of [social] stratification.”
Regarding the poor and needy, Mr Ravi said they are not only trapped in a cycle of poverty, but also in a “cycle of low self-esteem”. He called for the poor to be given “a way out” in the form of minimum living wages necessary for a person to achieve a suitable standard of living.
He suggested a suitable amount, whereby “no one should have to spend more than 30% on accommodation.”
Tan Kin Lian to seek legal opinion from Queen’s Counsel
The last speaker of the day was Mr Tan Kin Lian. He congratulated TOC on its recent success in the form of rise in viewership and support, and urged the audience not to “stand by” on issues such as the Minibond crisis.
Mr Tan said that he has found someone who is willing to fund his request to the Queen’s Counsel of the United Kingdom for a legal opinion on the Minibond issue, and a response is expected by the end of January.
He also said that investors who have been offered compensation by banks, should consider accepting the deal provided compensation is at least 50%.
Otherwise, he advised them to wait for the Queen’s Counsel’s reply.
To finish, Mr Andrew Loh, deputy editor of TOC, thanked the four speakers, writers of TOC, and “most importantly – the people who support TOC everyday.” Without them, TOC would not be celebrating its 2nd anniversary today.
—
See also:
Related posts:
25 Comments
I sincerely wish more good years for theonelinecitizen.com in reporting TRUE poor + unprivillege people crisis problems in a nation building to be next swiss financial centre + Las Vegas of the south east east to all people.
cheers,
Very poignant for the TOC team though disappointingly I could not attend the event.
I found that you have at least 5 speakers there who can form a GRC team with Ravi being the minority representative. Point for though there.
I agreed with most of your points raised as they all appeal to the social sector. People power can only raise up if we have a good team of capable passionate leaders willing to sacrifice t emselves for the betterment of mankind and I am very thankful that I see that in you.
With an inept opposition team, we can hardly stand up against the fancies of the govt who will rule for a good twenty to fifty years if things go on like this – against the wishes of the people. The ruling party has so far held its’ cards well but history has shown that the most domineering political party will fall some day or it’s power diminished.
I hope that TOC will take up this national mandate to uphold social justice and provide a spark of hope for the people of SIngapore.
My children and children’s children thank you.
Zhengxi,
just a point of clarification: is Mr Tan seeking a “Queen’s Counsel” opinion from UK, instead of a “Queen’s Council of the United Kingdom” opinion?
Seeking a QC’s opinion seems to be the correct statement. The only “Queen’s Council of the United Kingdom” I have heard of (or found from google), is Her Majesty’s Most Honourable Privy Council, or the Privy Council for short. It’s hard to imagine that the Privy Council, who’s members include, among others, the Law Lords, the British Prime Minister, and the Leader of the Opposition, would take up a private inquiry about the Minibond issue.
Well done TOC and cheers for better things to come especially for a better tomorrow. Thanks for giving us the hope to dare to dream.
aiyoyo
this website is informative & hope it continue
so that PEOPLE can drop by for improvement actions.
cheers TOC
aiyoyo
Last time they need yr vote, Now they do not need yr vote.
That is why the attitude has change. Bec the win is already assured.
Hi zz (#4)
I am seeking the opinion of a Queens Counsel from the UK. Most of the Senior Counsels in Singapore are not able to advice because of conflict of interest, as their firms represent the banks. We also need a legal expert who is familiar with this typoe of financial products.
I wish to raise a separate point. In many countries, the Attorney General acts not only as the lawyer of the Government, but also as the lawyer of the people.
For example, the Attorney General of New York State acted on behalf of the ordinary people in approaching the banks who sold the auction rate securities. He argued that the banks had mis-represented the product. The banks agreed to buy back the securities from the investors at their full value.
In the case of Singapore, it is the duty of the Attorney General of Singapore to see if the banks had breached the law (namely, the Securities and Futures Act or the Financial Advisers Act) and negotatiate a fair settlement for both sides, i.e. the financial institutions and the investors. It will be difficult for the ordinary investors to get together and pay for the heavy cost of engaging legal experts to fight the financial institutions.
I hope that the Government or the Attorney General will step forward and act apprpriately to ensure that the people of Singapore are treated fairly.
Thank you Mr Tan for your constant support for commoners..
Hi Friends
In my speech, I talk about the following points in support of the theme “Social Equity and Fairness”.
1. People who put in a full day’s work should be given an adequate wage to pay their mortgaage and meet the cost of living. Some people earn $600 for a full day’s work. This is inadequate. They have to do two jobs to earn enough for their family. We need to have a minimum wage.
2. People are worried about losing their job through retrenchment or for no fault of their own. It will be difficult to find another job within a short time. In some countries, there is unemployment benefit. In the case of Singapore, we should offer them a relief loan for 12 to 24 months at a low interest rate, say 2.5% p.a. This gives them time to adjust to their new situation. They should not be required to borrow money on credit cards or loan sharks and pay 24% p.a. in interest.
3. The elected leaders should speak for the people. They should listen to the people and understand their concerns. In the recent case of the minibonds and other notes, the investors tried to get their MPs to listen to their problems, but failed. We need to have contested elections in the future, so that the MPs will be closer to the people who elected them.
I hope that you will be able to get my points in the youtube recording of my speech. Due to shortage of time, I did not cover the “relief loan” in my speech. I shall find another occasion to explain his matter.
“I hope that the Government or the Attorney General will step forward and act apprpriately to ensure that the people of Singapore are treated fairly.”
The Attorney General in Singapore acts only to defend the courts’ impartiality, and to threaten people who have long gone. Hoping that he takes up the interests of the people is the same as hoping Singapore snows..sighs.
Here is the text of the speech that I wanted to deliver at Speaker’s Corner.
http://tankinlian.blogspot.com/2008/12/toc-social-justice-and-fairness.html
Due to the rain and limited time, I have given a revised version of the speech. I have decided to give the main points in my blog.
Hi me (#11)
I look forward to snow in Singapore.
I agree with Gilbert that some of the speakers should and are more than capable of forming a team to contest in the GRC. I hope Mr Tan would not have to wait until he receives the 100,000 signature before he runs for office. (And this is just a personal opinion but i feel Mr Tan would do more good as an MP than an EP)
I also realize how much of an uphill battle it would be to convince people who don’t come to TOC regularly to put their names on the petition. It was discouraging to see the response of my friends when I asked them to put their names down to say they want Mr Tan to run…. well I guess that’s the nature of most people here, they don’t want to get involved when it doesn’t concern them… kudoes to TOC for fighting such an uphill battle.
Like I said, Mr Tan, please don’t wait for the signatures… Mr Ravi, Mr Leong, Zheng Xi, please consider forming a team. Best speeches I’ve heard on this island since… god knows when.
yesterday , I had one of the petition forms and thought of asking the people present if they can help me sign the form. But then, I realise this is Singapore and we are singaporeans. People are kind and nice at heart but on the surface, its a bit on the cold side, deterring public sollicitation for signatures. This is a known problem that is age-old and typical of singapore. We are not western country where people are more warm or less shy , to put it in a nicer way.
So, you can see that I had thought of helping to get signatures but face challenges in singapore.
Mr Tan #10
support your points…
hope those PEOPLE can look into the current situations in the country
& make necessary CHANGES asap.
aiyoyo
wonder can I write in Chinese here?
Social fairness in Singapore? My foot! Just the topic on fairness makes me puke. This incident for example:
Do you know those security guards are taking a pay of around $3.80 an hour?
Do you know the wage plan for public holidays?
Let say Wednesday is the public holiday. If you take off day (rest day) on Wednesday, you will get a pay cut ($28) on Tuesday and Thursday. The substituting guard will get an extra $28 dollars if he works on Wednesday. Think about this, dont you feel funny?
With this type of f**k plan of using one guard’s pay to subsidise another guard’s pay leaving that security company incurred NO cost when operating in Public Holiday. How can this happen in Singapore!! How can a SERCURITY COMPANY PENALISE a guard for taking a rest day on their festive days (e.g. Chinese New Year). This happen to my dad for the past 2 years!!! He is being forced not to take leave during public holiday just for $28. I am very angry but what to do? Gahman is NOT doing his job.
The way gahman allows these security companies to take advantage of the lower income workers cannot be tolerated.
These few years, I feel that the gahman only think about how to make money thereafter inflation goes up. What happen to the wage and REAL WAGE? Now, there is recession. Inflation is still around!! This is telling me stagflation is here. I am very very angry. It is due to vote for a change.
.
Your continue reports to the public awareness will bring light to many matters and their life. Thou, I am a new reader and only join the readers group very recently and is proud to be a part of it. I congrats your second year round onlinecitizen and many more success in your effort for the people of Singapore.
Appreciate your ideas Gilbert and Zefly. We are all political beings as well and do need to exercise these rights too. My Speech at the 2nd Anniversary of TOC is here: http://singaporesocialactivist.blogspot.com/2008/12/we-citizens-of-singapore.html
Well done TOC! I will definitely support you guys in any Speakers’ Corner event upon my return to SG….
It’s high-time for a radical change in our system. I’ve many colleagues from different countries in my present company and their jaw dropped when they knew how much our civil servants are being paid…
Dear everyone behind The Online Citizen,
Happy Birthday to the 2-year TOC.
Due to unforeseen commitments, I was unable to attend your Hong Lim Park event as much as I wanted, for which I regret and apologise.
Your team has done very well in the couple of years. Keep up the spirit and here’s wishing all of you the best.
Regards
Dear TOC, thanks for speaking up for the weak, the poor, the exploited and the marginalised of our society. I am glad that in a country ruled by people who worship $, and whose greed for it knows no bounds, there are still those who have a conscience and a passion to help others, especially the poor and weak among us. May we all help to bring about greater social justice here.
Hey Melvin,
Thanks for the congrats and best wishes.
Thanks also to everyone for their kind words. And a special thanks to those who turned up at Speakers’ Corner on Saturday and stayed throughout the drizzle.. :)
Andrew
Belated Happy 2nd Birthday TOC
So sorry missed the gathering and late Birthday Wish
Deep down my Heart, I sincerely wish TOC All the Very Best.
Thank you sooooooo much for all the Team Effort continously.
Keep Up the Good Work, Well Done!!!
God Bless All
Leave a Reply
Uncategorized - Jan 15, 2010 10:12 - 124 Comments
It is affordable – Mah Bow Tan
More In Uncategorized
- Rebutting Law Minister K Shanmugam
- Challenge of communication
- TOC & Talk Politics hold successful Year in Review forum
- “Live” from Post Museum – TOC’s Year End Review
- The Fajar Generation
Uncategorized - Jan 15, 2010 10:12 - 124 Comments
It is affordable – Mah Bow Tan
More In Uncategorized
- Rebutting Law Minister K Shanmugam
- Challenge of communication
- TOC & Talk Politics hold successful Year in Review forum
- “Live” from Post Museum – TOC’s Year End Review
- The Fajar Generation


well done.
all the best.