It’s the state media after all, right?

I still have the evidence the loanshark left behind (who has been terrorising our neighbourhood) that the police didn’t care to collect nor come around when I called them. (Perhaps i should contact the loanshark and tell them hey I WILL SELL THIS EVIDENCE TO YOU, WANT OR NOT?? lol Just kidding)

The SPF basically sitting on their butt doing nothing. TOC wants to cover my story?

Not say I wanna say,
but these online readers are actually the non apathetic ones.
Many of these usually are also readers in other social blogs or forums.
so, the real number of such readers in terms of unique individuals is pretty small, imho, and could be just a few thousand out of 4.5 million. Thus, negligible. Why would someone apathetic become a reader of social/political blog or forum, as the name implies?

Change is the only constant and with the internet the masses are gathering online to read, understand and exchange views.

Spoke to a taxi driver and he has gone online for alternative news and its times like these that word gets around quickly :)

Towards a better way of Singapore life.

BlindMan

That last sentence is the bottom line that we are taking issue.

“Employers who have violated the law MAY face prosecution ……”

MAY, which also means MAY NOT.
It is not WILL, or SHALL, which is more definite in consequence.
In other words, the Ministry of Manpower has the Power to waive the option of of prosecuting or not prosecuting. And I am inclined to believe that, for want of expediency and efficiency, the ministry would not prosecute the employers; perhaps only a letter of warning or verbal reprimand usually took place.

So, what has happened in the last ten or twenty years? How many employers have been prosecuted? Who are the employers prosecuted? What about those employers who have political clot or are govt-linked-or-related companies?

If the officials in MOM are doing their job properly and upholding our laws conscientiously, their official reply through the press about the specific complaint/statement made by a foreign worker/victim should have been more specific and directed after a thorough investigation on his case has been diligently carried out. General sweeping statements to refute the accuracy of the complainant/victim’s case is not going to help much. It does not clarify the situation, nor does it put MOM is a better light.

I tend to agree with the victim’s statement that “the Singapore’s labour laws offer little real protection to foreign workers” and that the implied notion that the workers were unable to seek redress once their work permits were cancelled is true, or at least probably true.

Justice must be seen to be fair and just in order for it to be fair and just. Refuting a specific case with a general reply that aims to to cure-all ills would not be appropriate in this case in point.

What is the bottom line? The bottom line says it all!

MOM also very solid.

his mind gets corrupted.

When conscience leaveth the spirit of man,

man becomes evil.

When society is infested with corrupted

and evil kinds,

it is hopeless.

patriot

Meanwhile the ST will print all sorts of nonsense letters of complaint to fill up space. Sometimes even repeat broadcast like that ‘How do I love SIngapore? Lemme count the ways…’ crap.

Those at MOM – the minister, directors, dep directors, etc – are all out of touch. To them, as long as it’s brought to MOM’s attention, they will do something about it , or pretend to do something about it.

I can’t help but feel that all this while, all that MOM is doing is just a public relations exercise.

I refuse to accept that they do not know about how the scam is perpetrated. They know it – how the whole thing works. They have known for years. Yet, they have done nothing. And over the years, thousands of migrant workers have been swindled by these “labour agents” while MOM sits on its ass.

For example:

When Manpower Minister Gan said that the percentage of foreign workers facing problems is only 0.2% of the foreign worker population, it just shows how out of touch he is. There are hundreds and even thousands of these workers who do not and dare not complain because of threats, intimidation, exploitation, physical abuse, mental anguish, etc.

So, the minister says the number is small but he does not know, or pretend not to know, that there are reasons why the workers dare not complain.

Look at those who do – they are sent home, with heavy debts to repay.

So much so that some of them, when they reach their airports, they do not return to their home towns and villages because they’re afraid of their creditors, who include loansharks.

I wonder when the last time someone high up in MOM visited any of the dormitories and spoke with the workers.

I am guessing that Gan himself has NEVER done so.

Maybe his ivory tower is too high up.