Guest Writers, Top Story - Written on Monday, January 19, 2009 15:50 - 15 Comments
Muddy Singapore – an update
This is an update on the Chinese workers who were featured in Alex Au’s articles, Muddy Singapore Swallows China Workers (Part One & Two). You can also read Alex Au’s updates here: http://yawningbread.org/


Stephanie Chok
There has been much interest and concern generated by Alex Au’s blog entries about a group of China construction workers employed by Xuyi Building Engineering Co. (see ‘Muddy Singapore Swallows China Workers’). Here is an update on the six men.
The photo above – of former Xuyi employees, Chen Yu Guang and Xue Cheng Ming, who were taken by repatriation companies hired by their company - was taken on 12 Dec 2008, the day Chen and Xue returned to China. Released from the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority just two days earlier, the men were relieved to be released and anxious to return home after their ordeal.
Xue told me his wife in China received a telephone call the morning he was taken against his will from his dormitory. The caller told Xue’s wife ‘your husband is causing trouble in Singapore and will be taken away’. Shortly after, Xue’s wife tried to ring him but as his phone had been confiscated, was unable to get through. For the next eight days, as Xue was confined in a repatriation company, then the police station and finally at ICA, she was frantic with worry. Her husband had gone missing and she had no way to contact him.
Both Chen and Xue lodged police complaints on 10 Dec 2008 about their phones being confiscated by force and being locked up illegally by repatriation companies [Picture right, click to enlarge]. Both men had their phones returned, but no charges appear to have been laid against either the repatriation companies (one of which is UTR) nor Xuyi for removing and holding the men against their will.
This was the last meeting I had with both Chen and Xue, as they rushed off shortly after to the ICA and called to say they were leaving that same night for China. Their flight was at midnight and worried calls were being exchanged till 11pm, when Xue finally confirmed they received their money. There was visible elation and relief in his voice as he told me they were about to board the plane. The following morning, I receive an sms from Chen, who’s back in China. Just last week, I called Chen, who’s back in Jiangsu, and in his usual cheerful voice, tells me he is fine. He also tells me that he is waiting to return to Singapore and has already paid up his first installment of SGD500 to an agent in Singapore and is waiting for further news.
As for Xue Han Ming, Liu Xiao Ping, Tian Su Yin and Yang Zhi Qiang, they returned to China a day earlier, on 11 Dec 2008. Three of them (Xue, Liu and Yang) settled their dispute the day before during negotiations at MOM, which took place individually. Each worker was taken aside and an offer was made. When the worker agreed, they had to sign a document testifying to this. They were not given copies of this document.
After the meeting, Yang revealed that his wife in China received a phone call from their labour agent, saying ‘your husband is causing trouble in Singapore’. Yang showed me an sms his wife sent, pleading with him to come home as soon as possible. This pressure made him accept half of what he was owed in unpaid wages and overtime pay and return home.
None of them got their full wages owed (generally, they accepted half in their settlements) but all were eager to be returning home after a harrowing few weeks. They also received much more than in earlier meetings, where amounts offered were generally less than $1000 (some workers who signed at the first MOM meeting on 11 Nov 08, attended by the larger group of 34, were offered a few hundred dollars.)
Tian, who refused to sign on 10 Dec 2008, was called back to the MOM on the morning of 11 Dec 2008. The MOM officer present at the meeting commented that the men were now ‘celebrities’, after appearing on Channel 8 and Channel U news the night before. [You can watch the newsclip here].
Apparently, the media coverage had not gone unnoticed – it seems the Chinese embassy had rung to tell the MOM ‘this matter must be settled today’. The MOM officer had also read Yawning Bread’s entry and was displeased with the portrayal.
The matter was, indeed, settled that very day. Tian eventually signed after being offered $3500 (he was owed $6941 in unpaid wages, unpaid overtime and recovery of unlawful deductions). The men commented how swiftly things moved in the last two days after all the media interest, a marked contrast to their earlier attempts to resolve their case. As talk turned to future plans, the men said they planned to return to Singapore after Chinese New Year. They said they would be more careful now which company they worked for, though it appears agency fees must still be paid.
As the arrangement was that outstanding monies was to be paid at the airport just before departure, the men were asked to report if they received the rightful amounts. Tian, who was scheduled to leave on an afternoon flight, said he would only ring if there was a problem. There was no call, so it is assumed the money was received. Xue, Yang and Liu left together on a night flight. Close to midnight, Liu called from the airport to confirm they received the money they were promised before boarding the plane. He said it was hard to find words to express how he felt, and said a heartfelt thank you.
——
Related posts:
15 Comments
It is most heartening to learn that all the time, energy and effort invested into looking out for this group of PRCs have yielded results that is satisfactory to the workers; even though they may not have been paid the actual amount due to them.
It will be good if a Mandarin account can be written by these Chinese nationals to share with the Chinese literate community on the pitfalls of being a migrant worker.
There is still a dire need to make these companies accountable for the crime and be brought to justice.
What is this MOM officer so displeased about? It is his job to settle labour disputes and he has been pencil pushing all this while.
If he had done his job properly in enforcing the labour laws and regulations, this matter would not have blown up.
I must say that the compensation of the repatriated workers was hardly adequate. There ought to be further investigation on the miscellaneous charges and whether the these charges were actually allowed under the Singapore law. Any contract, regardless where it is signed, would not be valid in Singapore if the contract itself has terms/clauses that contradicts the laws and constitution of Singapore.
and Yawning bread and all blogers and alternate media.
Keep up the good work of speaking out for the downtrodden.
Thank you to Yawning Bread,TOC and Stephanie for your loud and clear voice and restless effort in the follow-up. Bravo!!!
I can bet you all that these workers will never be issued another Work Permit again by our elites.
Many thanks to TOC, Stephannie, Alex and many others to attempt to right the wrong. It also shows the uselessness of our main stream media and how reliable and objective new media can be.
Dealing with MOM (and MINDEF for that matter), it is rare to see the ministry yield to requests. However, pressures from all sides appear to make them tick the way we want and the way that they are not comfortable. Good, get them out of their usual comfort zone!
As for the police force who is so ever efficient to arrest selectively some protestors who really did nothing wrong according to our constitutions, why are actions not taken against people who are really breaking the law?
Good work, one’s heart gets warmed by these moving stories with a just ending.
And this they (the ministers) claim themselves as efficient by taking non consented high salaries :P
They really really don’t deserve it.
MOM – incompetent, couldn’t be bothered, or corrupted!?
Would this government ever let a local get away with not paying in full? Then why not apply the same standards to the companies in the case of unpaid wages? Why the need for settlement? O$P$. Amount owed + interest!
MOM’s mediation is not the right thing as it is forever on the side of employers and I come to this conclusion on the basis of my experience with the labour officers of this ministry.
It is the Labour Court that the many cases of foreign workers should go to. Why? Then you get the world’s media in or outside the court. Again I am talking from experience. The Singapore media to my case, Sunny Tan versus SICC. They were not allowed inside and after the verdict, in which I was the victor, I was so surprised to see them outside the court. I told them my story and told them it is newsworthy and why it is so and that I was a journalist with Bernama and The Star. Fair go. No bluff. The truth.
Then I rang them and they said they will not be writing to submit to their editors. Why? I know. They were told by their big big superiors not to do so. What they did was to get The Sunday Times to write a plain vanilla eight-paragraph story but in spite of all this the message is very clear and that is I a humble small timer won this case against this Goliath.
So, I know why the garmen wants to keep the foreign workers cases very quiet and there must be in the thousands out of court. They fear the stories will go round and round the world. Very bad PR for Singapore. Muddy Sing.
MOM involved?
its only want money
the levies
the rest?
your problemo
even singaporeans who was retrenched
(including YOURS truly)
mom did NOTHIN
tellin you
try the UNION
i replied yeah right
for a small chinese company
being part of the union will worked har?
i asked the MOM officer
who are you workin for?
(when MOM was ministry of LABOUR)
the employer or the labourer?
I feel that it is the norm these days for government departments to ignore you and brush you aside even for small problems unless you make a big hooha by getting ministers and media involved.
When you make a big hooha, they accuse you of breaking their rice bowls. Despite the ministers proclaiming we have a first rate civil service, this is the type of problem people are facing on the ground.
While we are moved by the plight of these foreign workers, it must be noted that local workers have also been given the short end of the stick.
From what I heard, the company running the Heritage Museum at Haw Par Villa has not been paying its staff for a couple of months now. Employees were either asked to delay banking in the cheques or the cheques bounced when they were banked in after the waiting period.
Leave a Reply
Uncategorized - Jan 15, 2010 10:12 - 125 Comments
It is affordable – Mah Bow Tan
More In Uncategorized
- Rebutting Law Minister K Shanmugam
- Challenge of communication
- TOC & Talk Politics hold successful Year in Review forum
- “Live” from Post Museum – TOC’s Year End Review
- The Fajar Generation
Uncategorized - Jan 15, 2010 10:12 - 125 Comments
It is affordable – Mah Bow Tan
More In Uncategorized
- Rebutting Law Minister K Shanmugam
- Challenge of communication
- TOC & Talk Politics hold successful Year in Review forum
- “Live” from Post Museum – TOC’s Year End Review
- The Fajar Generation


Apparently, the media coverage had not gone unnoticed – it seems the Chinese embassy had rung to tell the MOM ‘this matter must be settled today’. The MOM officer had also read Yawning Bread’s entry and was displeased with the portrayal. – the author
This is an excellent example of how the internet is being used as a platform of media freedom to address urgent labour issues in Singapore. While the Chinese Embassy deserves an applause (same goes to to Bangladeshi Embassy for the Tagore Lane workers), it is shocking to read that MOM is displeased to be pressured to do the right thing. What’s the point of having labour laws when all MOM does is mediate and not prosecute? It is high time that repatriation companies must be regulated under an established code of practice.