
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog Feature: A word on the PAP and general elections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/04/blog-feature-a-word-on-the-pap-and-general-elections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/04/blog-feature-a-word-on-the-pap-and-general-elections/</link>
	<description>a community of Singaporeans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:22:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SX</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/04/blog-feature-a-word-on-the-pap-and-general-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-63429</link>
		<dc:creator>SX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=7689#comment-63429</guid>
		<description>Please understand that for any political party to maintain a campaign like Anwar did over years and years, huge amounts of donations are required.

For people to donate, the climate of fear and doubt must first be extinguished, and confidence strengthened by:

1. A civil society consisting of activists and NGOs that are openly vocal and organise events (such as protests) either directly against the injustice that the establishment commits, or to grow the people&#039;s awareness of these injustices (such as public forums).

2. An independent media that bravely tells the truth both online and offline. Note that Malaysiakini has had their office raided, journalists arrested and website sabotaged, YET they persevered with what they were doing for years. Also note that Malaysia has the same laws hindering free press / flow of information / film distribution, but the activists there still continue to break the unjust laws by distributing flyers of articles and vcds of political videos.

3. A community of lawyers that are ready and willing to act pro bono on legal cases that the above-mentioned activists and journalists face. Example: Once you&#039;re arrested in Malaysia, you can expect at least one, if not more lawyers waiting for you at the police station ensuring your quick release.

Without these 3 components first in place, a campaign like what Anwar and the PKR coalition had will never be possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please understand that for any political party to maintain a campaign like Anwar did over years and years, huge amounts of donations are required.</p>
<p>For people to donate, the climate of fear and doubt must first be extinguished, and confidence strengthened by:</p>
<p>1. A civil society consisting of activists and NGOs that are openly vocal and organise events (such as protests) either directly against the injustice that the establishment commits, or to grow the people&#8217;s awareness of these injustices (such as public forums).</p>
<p>2. An independent media that bravely tells the truth both online and offline. Note that Malaysiakini has had their office raided, journalists arrested and website sabotaged, YET they persevered with what they were doing for years. Also note that Malaysia has the same laws hindering free press / flow of information / film distribution, but the activists there still continue to break the unjust laws by distributing flyers of articles and vcds of political videos.</p>
<p>3. A community of lawyers that are ready and willing to act pro bono on legal cases that the above-mentioned activists and journalists face. Example: Once you&#8217;re arrested in Malaysia, you can expect at least one, if not more lawyers waiting for you at the police station ensuring your quick release.</p>
<p>Without these 3 components first in place, a campaign like what Anwar and the PKR coalition had will never be possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Playboy_Rick</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/04/blog-feature-a-word-on-the-pap-and-general-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-60842</link>
		<dc:creator>Playboy_Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=7689#comment-60842</guid>
		<description>Andrew Chuah, 
No offence dude.....after reading your latest post...i can see from your perspective. Yeah...there is simply no comparison between the singapore police force and their malaysian counterparts...(among others).

But like &quot;Knowing is Armagedon with pinch of ufo &amp; adam evening&quot; mentioned if we keep comparing ourselves with our neighbours (whom are &quot;sad to say&quot;.... 3rd world standards)....we are gonna look like manchester united compared to a S-league team.... :)

When we are appraised on our performance yearly.....we are done so with stretch targets...... shouldn&#039;t the same be done for a 1st world country ?

Apart from this comparison..... i can see the merits of the points you raised Andrew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Chuah,<br />
No offence dude&#8230;..after reading your latest post&#8230;i can see from your perspective. Yeah&#8230;there is simply no comparison between the singapore police force and their malaysian counterparts&#8230;(among others).</p>
<p>But like &#8220;Knowing is Armagedon with pinch of ufo &amp; adam evening&#8221; mentioned if we keep comparing ourselves with our neighbours (whom are &#8220;sad to say&#8221;&#8230;. 3rd world standards)&#8230;.we are gonna look like manchester united compared to a S-league team&#8230;. :)</p>
<p>When we are appraised on our performance yearly&#8230;..we are done so with stretch targets&#8230;&#8230; shouldn&#8217;t the same be done for a 1st world country ?</p>
<p>Apart from this comparison&#8230;.. i can see the merits of the points you raised Andrew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Chuah</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/04/blog-feature-a-word-on-the-pap-and-general-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-60701</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Chuah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 01:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=7689#comment-60701</guid>
		<description>6/4/09

Hi-Interested (6),Jim (7) and Playboy_Rick (11)-Good to hear from you three. Singapore&#039;s Civil Service is one of the best and at par or perhaps better than those Developed nations and we have the La Creme unlike other members of ASEAN all corrupted from A to Z, and I have my fair share dealing with these civil servants in these ASEAN nations and a good example is a Police ASP who wants to be a super millionaire (in Singapore we don&#039;t have such things as they are highly paid in good times and in bad times, they take a pay cut and this is ok with me. This ASP only earns RM 3k and is involved in this and that projects (remember during the former DPM&#039;s Anwar Ibrahim open trial, we saw a few Police ASPs wanted to own stockbroking houses......madness, again we don&#039;t have this scenario.

Let us not forget that Malaysia and Singapore are abang adik (big brother and small brother) and what one does first, the other will sure follow ok. Singapore has Minister Mentor and two Senior Ministers and Malaysia under the new PM may be appointing such positions for the two PMs ie Dr Mahathir as Minister Mentor and just resigned PM Abdullah as Senior Minister. Hongkong and Singapore are not abang adik (Hongkong is a SAR-Special Administrative Region under China where as our Singapore is an independent and soverign nation). We can have full transparency once we have more Opposition MPs in Parliament now we have only 2.5 MPs in Parliament and this is dead duck, again look at Malaysia they have 82 Opposition MPs and denying the UMNO-BN two third majority (now they cannot simply amend the Malaysia Constitution at their whims and fancies especially now Dr Mahathir will be the next Minister Mentor and during his 22 years as PM, he did what he like and look at the big mess he has created and when the recent retired PM Abdullah came he, he knew these big messes and tried to clean up but failed.

I am a Singapore born and I am trying to balance the whole picture, and it is very important for us to learn more about our neighbours and hence we knwo what is good and what is bad, and we can avoid them in future (the problem with us Singaporean is we think we are high and mighty, a superior nation but we are not and have not reach that stage and we fumble and a very good example is both our Temasek and GIC (they emulated the developed nations and went on a spending spree and now they got badly bitten......not in coma yet)

Regards
Andrew Chuah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6/4/09</p>
<p>Hi-Interested (6),Jim (7) and Playboy_Rick (11)-Good to hear from you three. Singapore&#8217;s Civil Service is one of the best and at par or perhaps better than those Developed nations and we have the La Creme unlike other members of ASEAN all corrupted from A to Z, and I have my fair share dealing with these civil servants in these ASEAN nations and a good example is a Police ASP who wants to be a super millionaire (in Singapore we don&#8217;t have such things as they are highly paid in good times and in bad times, they take a pay cut and this is ok with me. This ASP only earns RM 3k and is involved in this and that projects (remember during the former DPM&#8217;s Anwar Ibrahim open trial, we saw a few Police ASPs wanted to own stockbroking houses&#8230;&#8230;madness, again we don&#8217;t have this scenario.</p>
<p>Let us not forget that Malaysia and Singapore are abang adik (big brother and small brother) and what one does first, the other will sure follow ok. Singapore has Minister Mentor and two Senior Ministers and Malaysia under the new PM may be appointing such positions for the two PMs ie Dr Mahathir as Minister Mentor and just resigned PM Abdullah as Senior Minister. Hongkong and Singapore are not abang adik (Hongkong is a SAR-Special Administrative Region under China where as our Singapore is an independent and soverign nation). We can have full transparency once we have more Opposition MPs in Parliament now we have only 2.5 MPs in Parliament and this is dead duck, again look at Malaysia they have 82 Opposition MPs and denying the UMNO-BN two third majority (now they cannot simply amend the Malaysia Constitution at their whims and fancies especially now Dr Mahathir will be the next Minister Mentor and during his 22 years as PM, he did what he like and look at the big mess he has created and when the recent retired PM Abdullah came he, he knew these big messes and tried to clean up but failed.</p>
<p>I am a Singapore born and I am trying to balance the whole picture, and it is very important for us to learn more about our neighbours and hence we knwo what is good and what is bad, and we can avoid them in future (the problem with us Singaporean is we think we are high and mighty, a superior nation but we are not and have not reach that stage and we fumble and a very good example is both our Temasek and GIC (they emulated the developed nations and went on a spending spree and now they got badly bitten&#8230;&#8230;not in coma yet)</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Andrew Chuah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/04/blog-feature-a-word-on-the-pap-and-general-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-60648</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 12:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=7689#comment-60648</guid>
		<description>#11) Playboy_Rick 
&#039; Hey Andrew Chuah,
why do you keep comparing singapore to malaysia ? Are you a malaysian ?&#039;
..........................................................

When comparing the political freedom and press freedom index between Singapore &amp; Malaysia the international body awarded Malaysia much higher points than efficient and prosperous Singapore. 

Will the PAP imposes more restrictions so that we will become more efficient and more prosperous?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#11) Playboy_Rick<br />
&#8216; Hey Andrew Chuah,<br />
why do you keep comparing singapore to malaysia ? Are you a malaysian ?&#8217;<br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>When comparing the political freedom and press freedom index between Singapore &amp; Malaysia the international body awarded Malaysia much higher points than efficient and prosperous Singapore. </p>
<p>Will the PAP imposes more restrictions so that we will become more efficient and more prosperous?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesser Mortal</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/04/blog-feature-a-word-on-the-pap-and-general-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-60632</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesser Mortal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 08:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=7689#comment-60632</guid>
		<description>9) Ephraim Loy

Thanks for the information. The figure does say something. With the GRC, the government can ensure that the opposition will have difficulty fielding enough candidates to contest in the GRC. After the GRC system is implemented, the % of walkovers MPs increased and remain high until........the 44% in the last election. 

This is the election that is led by LHL. Wonder why it is lower? Will the next election be lower than 44% walkovers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9) Ephraim Loy</p>
<p>Thanks for the information. The figure does say something. With the GRC, the government can ensure that the opposition will have difficulty fielding enough candidates to contest in the GRC. After the GRC system is implemented, the % of walkovers MPs increased and remain high until&#8230;&#8230;..the 44% in the last election. </p>
<p>This is the election that is led by LHL. Wonder why it is lower? Will the next election be lower than 44% walkovers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knowing is Armagedon with pinch of ufo &#38; adam evening</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/04/blog-feature-a-word-on-the-pap-and-general-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-60627</link>
		<dc:creator>Knowing is Armagedon with pinch of ufo &#38; adam evening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 06:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=7689#comment-60627</guid>
		<description>Playboy_rick is right. 
By comparing singapore with non-1st world is unfair and thus not a credible way.

To be credible, Andrew must compare a banana with another banana , so 2 speak. Imagine if people compare Malaysia&#039;s landspace and nature sceneries and quality of life with singapore using states like the nicer parts of JB. 

Imagine comparing malaysia&#039;s huge and cheaper bungalows with singapore&#039;s bungalows. Is it fair?

A person if keep using unfair comparisons is not making himself credible in the long run.  Without close scrutiny on their messages, naive people may fall into the trap of accepting something as fair based on unfair or unsuitable comparisons.  

To compare singapore, should compare with 1st worlds. Hey, singapore is 1st world not determined by me. Its told to me it is one.

Case in point, to compare salaries, must compare only with 1st world leadership salaries. This is actually better in a way since comparing singapore salaries with a country say indonesia or nepal would not be fair to the people of these countries.

But if people insist on comparing a banana with an apple, so 2 speak, then a circus is formed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Playboy_rick is right.<br />
By comparing singapore with non-1st world is unfair and thus not a credible way.</p>
<p>To be credible, Andrew must compare a banana with another banana , so 2 speak. Imagine if people compare Malaysia&#8217;s landspace and nature sceneries and quality of life with singapore using states like the nicer parts of JB. </p>
<p>Imagine comparing malaysia&#8217;s huge and cheaper bungalows with singapore&#8217;s bungalows. Is it fair?</p>
<p>A person if keep using unfair comparisons is not making himself credible in the long run.  Without close scrutiny on their messages, naive people may fall into the trap of accepting something as fair based on unfair or unsuitable comparisons.  </p>
<p>To compare singapore, should compare with 1st worlds. Hey, singapore is 1st world not determined by me. Its told to me it is one.</p>
<p>Case in point, to compare salaries, must compare only with 1st world leadership salaries. This is actually better in a way since comparing singapore salaries with a country say indonesia or nepal would not be fair to the people of these countries.</p>
<p>But if people insist on comparing a banana with an apple, so 2 speak, then a circus is formed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Playboy_Rick</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/04/blog-feature-a-word-on-the-pap-and-general-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-60616</link>
		<dc:creator>Playboy_Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 01:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=7689#comment-60616</guid>
		<description>Hey Andrew Chuah,

why do you keep comparing singapore to malaysia ? Are you a malaysian ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Andrew Chuah,</p>
<p>why do you keep comparing singapore to malaysia ? Are you a malaysian ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Singapore Short Stories</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/04/blog-feature-a-word-on-the-pap-and-general-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-60582</link>
		<dc:creator>Singapore Short Stories</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 16:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=7689#comment-60582</guid>
		<description>Politics is not a science, it is both a science and an art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politics is not a science, it is both a science and an art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ephraim Loy</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/04/blog-feature-a-word-on-the-pap-and-general-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-60578</link>
		<dc:creator>Ephraim Loy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 15:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=7689#comment-60578</guid>
		<description>In 1988, the ruling People&#039;s Action Party amended the Parliamentary Elections Act to create GRCs and to move away from the single member constituency system.

Information from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constituencies_of_Singapore</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1988, the ruling People&#8217;s Action Party amended the Parliamentary Elections Act to create GRCs and to move away from the single member constituency system.</p>
<p>Information from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constituencies_of_Singapore" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constituencies_of_Singapore</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesser Mortal</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/04/blog-feature-a-word-on-the-pap-and-general-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-60575</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesser Mortal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 14:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=7689#comment-60575</guid>
		<description>13.6% in 1988 and then a sudden jump to 50.6% and remain high for the next 4 elections. Was something done after the 1988 election? I read on another discussion that the original GRC was 3 people and PAP increase it to 6 people after their dismal showing in one of the election. Was it the 1988 one?

Actually since they have 66.6% of the votes, why don&#039;t PAP increase the GRC to a 84 candidates mega super duper sukasuka mother-of-all GRC? That way even a 50.1% win means win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>13.6% in 1988 and then a sudden jump to 50.6% and remain high for the next 4 elections. Was something done after the 1988 election? I read on another discussion that the original GRC was 3 people and PAP increase it to 6 people after their dismal showing in one of the election. Was it the 1988 one?</p>
<p>Actually since they have 66.6% of the votes, why don&#8217;t PAP increase the GRC to a 84 candidates mega super duper sukasuka mother-of-all GRC? That way even a 50.1% win means win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/04/blog-feature-a-word-on-the-pap-and-general-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-60546</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 09:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=7689#comment-60546</guid>
		<description>“Further, we in Singapore are far better than our neighbour Malaysia where her government and her ministers are tainted and the new PM carried alot of excess bagges, and the Rule of Law no longer exists and the rich and powerful in Malaysia get away and the instituitions of law are under their payroll….believe me.”

To Andrew:

Hey, Malaysia is not as bad as you think and Singapore is not as good as you think.

The good thing about Malaysia is some reporters are daring enough to report or seek clarification on negative stuff about their political leaders.

I seriously do not think Singapore politics is totally 100% corruption-free, it’s just that no one is publicizing any dirty laundry yet.

As for civil service performance, no doubt we are improving but certain parts are still lagging far behind similar counterparts. For instance, we are not as transparent in our civil servant salary and bonus structure as compared to Hong Kong, where all salaries are disclosed on their civil service website. 

Also your last statement is equally true for Singapore. The leaders of institutions of law are from the government and subjected to its payroll too, isn’t it? This I will believe you then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Further, we in Singapore are far better than our neighbour Malaysia where her government and her ministers are tainted and the new PM carried alot of excess bagges, and the Rule of Law no longer exists and the rich and powerful in Malaysia get away and the instituitions of law are under their payroll….believe me.”</p>
<p>To Andrew:</p>
<p>Hey, Malaysia is not as bad as you think and Singapore is not as good as you think.</p>
<p>The good thing about Malaysia is some reporters are daring enough to report or seek clarification on negative stuff about their political leaders.</p>
<p>I seriously do not think Singapore politics is totally 100% corruption-free, it’s just that no one is publicizing any dirty laundry yet.</p>
<p>As for civil service performance, no doubt we are improving but certain parts are still lagging far behind similar counterparts. For instance, we are not as transparent in our civil servant salary and bonus structure as compared to Hong Kong, where all salaries are disclosed on their civil service website. </p>
<p>Also your last statement is equally true for Singapore. The leaders of institutions of law are from the government and subjected to its payroll too, isn’t it? This I will believe you then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: interested</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/04/blog-feature-a-word-on-the-pap-and-general-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-60540</link>
		<dc:creator>interested</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 08:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=7689#comment-60540</guid>
		<description>andrew, just a comment that we have the best civil service. really? for the money we pay are we getting value for money? the same goes for the government! so many ministers to run a small country? 2 sm, 2dpms, 1 mm, 1 pm, not counting the number of ministers in pm&#039;s office, another 3????  what is our per capita spend on both the civil service and government? anyone worked it out? i am sure we will rank the highest, and like our government like to say &quot;we make no apologies for it&#039;! ha! ha!
think we must have the lowest productivity, yet they keep berating the workers to improve their productivity etc. a case of do as i tell you and dun do as i do???? 
AND not forgetting again, we make no apologies for it! LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>andrew, just a comment that we have the best civil service. really? for the money we pay are we getting value for money? the same goes for the government! so many ministers to run a small country? 2 sm, 2dpms, 1 mm, 1 pm, not counting the number of ministers in pm&#8217;s office, another 3????  what is our per capita spend on both the civil service and government? anyone worked it out? i am sure we will rank the highest, and like our government like to say &#8220;we make no apologies for it&#8217;! ha! ha!<br />
think we must have the lowest productivity, yet they keep berating the workers to improve their productivity etc. a case of do as i tell you and dun do as i do????<br />
AND not forgetting again, we make no apologies for it! LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The chart does say something</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/04/blog-feature-a-word-on-the-pap-and-general-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-60536</link>
		<dc:creator>The chart does say something</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 08:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=7689#comment-60536</guid>
		<description>It does say something. 

In a democracy and in such a small country with so dense a population hence many people, do you think that there would not be good potential candidates wanting to offer competition or run political office other than on the incumbent ticket. In most countries, most seats if not 100% will be hotly contested. 

A person who puts on a mask will always be someone hiding behind a false facade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does say something. </p>
<p>In a democracy and in such a small country with so dense a population hence many people, do you think that there would not be good potential candidates wanting to offer competition or run political office other than on the incumbent ticket. In most countries, most seats if not 100% will be hotly contested. </p>
<p>A person who puts on a mask will always be someone hiding behind a false facade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarek_home</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/04/blog-feature-a-word-on-the-pap-and-general-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-60535</link>
		<dc:creator>sarek_home</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 07:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=7689#comment-60535</guid>
		<description>All these charts really say nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All these charts really say nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Chuah</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/04/blog-feature-a-word-on-the-pap-and-general-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-60531</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Chuah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 07:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=7689#comment-60531</guid>
		<description>4/4/09
i
To No alternative lah-Yes, this is possible in Singapore. Singapore has already opened up and we have the best Civil Service, as good as those developed nations and what we need is a Singapore Anwar Ibrahim to deny the PAP two third majority like the Pakatan Rakyat in Malaysia. Singapore and Singaporeans also can and we must  put in the Oppositions who are equal or better than the PAP. Our Singapore Anwar Ibrahim must also not &quot;kiabor (afraid of wife) and let us pray for this Singapore Anwar Ibrahim.....very possble la

Regards
Andrew Chuah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4/4/09<br />
i<br />
To No alternative lah-Yes, this is possible in Singapore. Singapore has already opened up and we have the best Civil Service, as good as those developed nations and what we need is a Singapore Anwar Ibrahim to deny the PAP two third majority like the Pakatan Rakyat in Malaysia. Singapore and Singaporeans also can and we must  put in the Oppositions who are equal or better than the PAP. Our Singapore Anwar Ibrahim must also not &#8220;kiabor (afraid of wife) and let us pray for this Singapore Anwar Ibrahim&#8230;..very possble la</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Andrew Chuah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No alternative lah</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/04/blog-feature-a-word-on-the-pap-and-general-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-60529</link>
		<dc:creator>No alternative lah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 06:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=7689#comment-60529</guid>
		<description>An alternative party that will contest all the seats at the next election?  

No way lah.  No guts, no money, no time and also kiasu ( sure lose), kiasi (sue to bankruptcy by PAP), kiabor (wife don&#039;t support).

Just earn your money and live your own life lah.  Why ask for it?

And just be alternative on the Online citizen will do lah.  No fish prawn also good. Don&#039;t have to kia (scared) anything also!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An alternative party that will contest all the seats at the next election?  </p>
<p>No way lah.  No guts, no money, no time and also kiasu ( sure lose), kiasi (sue to bankruptcy by PAP), kiabor (wife don&#8217;t support).</p>
<p>Just earn your money and live your own life lah.  Why ask for it?</p>
<p>And just be alternative on the Online citizen will do lah.  No fish prawn also good. Don&#8217;t have to kia (scared) anything also!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Chuah</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/04/blog-feature-a-word-on-the-pap-and-general-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-60516</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Chuah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 06:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=7689#comment-60516</guid>
		<description>4/4/09

Figures and charts......no use. What Singapore needs ia a Singapore Anwar Ibrahim who can deprive the PAP government two third majority and hence ModernSingapore and her citizens can have a better say in the running of our nation. The present PM Lee Hsien Loong has already  relaxed and opened up Singapore alot and there is no U Turn back to those Dark Ages as we are already in the Internet Age where one just log in and all the iformation are there.

Further, we in Singapore are far better than our neighbour Malaysia where her government and her ministers are tainted and the new PM carried alot of excess bagges, and the Rule of Law no longer exists and the rich and powerful in Malaysia get away and the instituitions of law are under their payroll....believe me.

Regards
Andrew Chuah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4/4/09</p>
<p>Figures and charts&#8230;&#8230;no use. What Singapore needs ia a Singapore Anwar Ibrahim who can deprive the PAP government two third majority and hence ModernSingapore and her citizens can have a better say in the running of our nation. The present PM Lee Hsien Loong has already  relaxed and opened up Singapore alot and there is no U Turn back to those Dark Ages as we are already in the Internet Age where one just log in and all the iformation are there.</p>
<p>Further, we in Singapore are far better than our neighbour Malaysia where her government and her ministers are tainted and the new PM carried alot of excess bagges, and the Rule of Law no longer exists and the rich and powerful in Malaysia get away and the instituitions of law are under their payroll&#8230;.believe me.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Andrew Chuah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
