Comments on: Latest: Ming Yi lent PAP MP $60,000

By: along

along — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:14:23 +0000

hey. Dr Ong made a big sacrifice in order to serve in Ren Ci. He had to settle $560k loan in order to serve in the hospital, ok?

but,but, why would he quit a job with half-a-million dollar finaicial obligation? not if he’s digging a bigger pond elsewhere.

the truth is out there. and I want to believe.

By: all vice starts small

all vice starts small — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 04:00:41 +0000

testing

By: TrueBlood Singaporean

TrueBlood Singaporean — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:44:29 +0000

As Chinese Saying Money can even motivated the Ghost!

So is he motivated by Gold, Goodness or God? Think Goodness is impt, cause Ren Ci is an organisation using public money to help the sick and poor.

No one accused him corrupted!

By: Badu

Badu — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 07:36:38 +0000

This must be embarrassing for the government.

By: tiredsingaporean

tiredsingaporean — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 03:06:04 +0000

128) Edward on April 20th, 2009 12.36 am #122) tiredsingaporean
Sometime ago, a PAP leader wanted to pass a bill prohibiting private investigators from checking on MPs. NCMP Sylvia Lim argued against the bill in parliament. It is common sense who they want to protect.

Of course Ed, if they allow private investigators to check on MPs, later on it will lead to who we all know, right?

By: porky pork kenna pork hot soup porky pork pork

porky pork kenna pork hot soup porky pork pork — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 01:56:04 +0000

I wonder is it true and legal that Charities, where its said they lack funding like probably most of the times (constant asking for money from public), are suppose to give Loans? If so, I want to apply. But what is the interest chargeable? Is it based on equality? I assume so if the above assumption is true. If a charity can give loans, should it pay business tax to the country?

And why borrow from charities when there are so many banks to choose from? hmmmmmmmmm.

pork n pork

By: Edward

Edward — Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:36:30 +0000

#122) tiredsingaporean
‘ Now you can clearly see that the law here is only made to protect one party and not the country anymore.’
……………………………………………………..
Sometime ago, a PAP leader wanted to pass a bill prohibiting private investigators from checking on MPs. NCMP Sylvia Lim argued against the bill in parliament. It is common sense who they want to protect.

Why the bill killed? What happened to the bill? This is a bad law. Can anyone enlighten the readers here?

By: xISD Tay

xISD Tay — Sun, 19 Apr 2009 12:28:59 +0000

“PM Lee is Not even an elected PM. He became PM through the back door.”

Dio hor, you no say I also cannot remember lor. I tot the Parliment MUST BE ELECTED lor, then hor, hos liz joker become the PM har?

PM is appointed by the roti prata pres meh?

Lawyers? Anyone?

By: blackfeline

blackfeline — Sun, 19 Apr 2009 09:48:50 +0000

#125…well he did said “we are living in a modern world”. He should gone all the way…get his yellow robe custom made by Gucci, Prada…etc with Sworoski diamonds…etc

By: theonlinebochap

theonlinebochap — Sun, 19 Apr 2009 06:06:27 +0000

Read in papers that the monk has 9 credit cards. Why in the world he needs so many credit card is anybody’s guess. You cannot judge a monk by his frock, so they say.

Just like you cannot judge a government by what it says or how much it is paid. Pay them millions, which govt says will keep the MPs clean, and still get monkeys like this fellow.

By: Becky

Becky — Sun, 19 Apr 2009 05:27:37 +0000

I am speechless. I mean, if I were to borrow, I will probably borrow from banks not a from a charity.

By: AlwaysTrustUs

AlwaysTrustUs — Sun, 19 Apr 2009 00:38:40 +0000

It’s PAP no need to ask why and find out why or show the proof and reasons !

It’s built on trust, you commoners MUST trust our words,

Just go about your work and pay you taxes on time, next time don’t ask too many questions, you know the answer already… It’s an honest mistake, let move on.

By: tiredsingaporean

tiredsingaporean — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 17:25:03 +0000

The whole nation is getting very very corrupted now, see no point to carry on living here anymore. Hope the opp parties and the citizens can do something about it to save the country before the whole nation collapse. Now you can clearly see that the law here is only made to protect one party and not the country anymore.

By: ILuvMyself

ILuvMyself — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 11:06:51 +0000

71) tew ah seow on April 17th, 2009 11.56 am To Laura Chew,
10.7% is alot. Dr Chee claimed taxi fare extra $2 , he was sacked by NUS. $2 only imagine is corruption, not to mention $60k.

Chee in the wrong party, actually Chee is smart. Too bad

By: Edward

Edward — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 09:36:13 +0000

#71) tew ah seow on April 17th, 2009 11.56 am To Laura Chew,
‘10.7% is alot. Dr Chee claimed taxi fare extra $2 , he was sacked by NUS. $2 only imagine is corruption, not to mention $60k.’
…………………………………………………………
To the PAP, Dr Chee cheated the govt of $2. This is against the law whereas Dr Ong only borrowed $60K. Borrowing from the employer is not against the law although it may be against one’s conscience.

Dr Chee has no foresight. He didn’t remove all his skeletons from the closet before taking on the PAP. When the PAP passed the bill creating the GRCs and limiting SMCs to a minimum of 8, the PAP will not allow more than ten opposition members into parliament or else they will fix them up and get rid of them especially the troublesome people like Chee. I believe many potential opposition candidates have learnt from his mistakes.

By: I assure you i am clean and honest . trust me. i promise its the last time.

I assure you i am clean and honest . trust me. i promise its the last time. — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 09:33:11 +0000

I wonder is it morally correct for PAP MP Dr Ong Seh Hong to accept the $60,000 loan from a charity funded hospital?

By: DO

DO — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 09:00:45 +0000

If I ask $60K loan from my company, my boss will ask me go fly kite. Bloody stupid fake monk and his bunch of kakis. The fake monk shouldn’t be wearing the robe cos he don’t understand buddhist teaching at all. Real monk don’t get salary, fake monk does.

By: nail

nail — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 08:32:41 +0000

I am sure you wun see this mp next election…. anyone want to have a bet with me??

By: pen is mightier

pen is mightier — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 06:45:41 +0000

Tiger story is a great analogy…but you should have changed the stoty of the tiger to a leopard instead cos like what they say ” A leopard can never change its spots”…no matter what amount of salary they draw.

By: aloha

aloha — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 05:25:14 +0000

actually this is what i think. he is a petty person, so he thought he maybe getting an interest free loan without any repercussion.

with his pay and benefits plus MP allowance, what is $60,000? really? now this action of his is going to haunt him.

i think some parliamentary observer also saw him sticking his gum on the bench. so i wonder if this is a personality problem?