Guest Writers, Main Stories, Top Story - Written on Thursday, April 2, 2009 23:44 - 18 Comments

The short, hopeful life of Odud Sayed Ahammed

TOC would like to specially thank Ms Lynn Lee for allowing us to publish the following story.

Lynn Lee / Dhaka, Bangladesh

Odud Sayed Ahammed was a hopeful man. So hopeful, he gave his one piece of land to his neighbour, so the neighbour could go find him a job in Singapore. A year passed, and there was no job. The neighbour said, “It’s getting more expensive to secure work in Singapore. Give me another 100,000 takas, and I’ll be able to do something.”

Odud thought hard about it. His neighbour had told him stories about Singapore – that magical place where you could make up to 50,000 takas in a single month. With a bit of luck, and plenty of hard work, Odud thought he’d be able to earn enough money to cover his investment and eventually buy back that piece of land. So he took out a loan for 100,000 takas and handed the cash to his neighbour.

This time, the neighbour made good on his promise. Odud left for Singapore early last year. Several weeks later, he was sent home to his wife and kids – in a coffin. His death certificate says he had collapsed behind a bus-stop along Boon Lay Way. Cause of death: pneumonia. A friend who was with him has a slightly different story. He says Odud died of diarrhoea.

This is Odud’s wife, Maloti. She could barely stop crying long enough to tell us her story. She had said goodbye to her husband, fully expecting him to come home a rich man. He’s dead. She’s destitute. Her two older kids live in an orphanage. Odud’s Singaporean employer didn’t bother with an explanation, let alone any compensation.

This is Odud’s grave. It lies just a short distance from the land he gave away. Maloti cries every time she sees it. 

Was Odud’s death preventable? No one knows. Odud worked for a company called Ree Engineering. Were they negligent? We do not know. Do they owe Maloti some kind of an explanation, if not compensation? Definitely.

What did they do instead? They put Odud’s body in a box, and shipped it back to his family, along with an embalming certificate, a death certificate and a document from the National Environment Agency with the heading:

“PERMISSION TO EXPORT A COFFIN CONTAINING A CORPSE.”

Because you know, Singaporean employers are world class, that way. No condolence note. No explanations. Nothing.

Nothing to show for a man, whose biggest mistake, was to hope.

——-

If you would like to make a donation to the family of Odud, please contact TWC2. The cheque should be made out to “Transient Workers Count Too” and indicate at the back of the cheque that it is for the family of Odud.

——-

Related posts:

  1. Reform Party hopeful that Balldev will be fully exonerated
  2. Disgrace – The life and times of Chua Lee Hoong*
  3. Human Rights in everyday life
  4. CPF Life: Helping Singaporeans to decide?
  5. CPF Life – How can fund become insolvent and thus stop payouts?



18 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

slev
Apr 3, 2009 1:14

More people need to be aware this story! The govt should definitely punish employers if they are found to be negligent!

Chan s p
Apr 3, 2009 1:51

My god these people are sick who runs the company?! I’ll picket his house…

Lee Chee Wai
Apr 3, 2009 4:39

I agree with the author. It is probably too late, but the first thing a company ought to have done was to offer condolences, an explanation of how he died (somewhat present in the death certificate but that’s a really cold way to tell a family member how someone died) and finally, an offer of at least some emotional or token monetary support in difficult days ahead.

To be fair, I am taking with a pinch of salt the article’s claims that absolutely nothing was done other than send his body home (in a nutshell). If true, then that is truly a damning indictment of cooperate culture in that company … not a shred of empathy. As if Odud was not human.

In fact, this is what infuriates me most about how we treat foreign workers in general. The government and companies do not treat them as individual adult human beings, taking away their passports, making them live in dorms (they do not have a choice do they? even if they could somehow afford to rent a flat?). Ok, fine … then surely they are now considered “under your care” and if bad things happen to them, it is “your responsibility”? It seems to me that ONLY when bad things happen, do we suddenly apply the term “individual responsibility” as an excuse …

HHH
Apr 3, 2009 8:50

The foreigners are conveniently termed “talents” such that we do not find them working on the road after midnight. Only in the day are they working clogging up the roads at peak hour. So much for spoiling them!

zook
Apr 3, 2009 9:42

[---deleted by moderator---] our fellow singaporean employers is on their mind? so corrupted by the profit-driven governement so everything must be measured in term of money? god damn pls someone write to the new, young, and supposed to be capable MOM minister to tell him about this fact, and demand them to investigate the issue and prosecute the employer if found guilty.

Singapore is becoming a rotten name, a broken image, and cheapskate country.

KK
Apr 3, 2009 10:26

Hi Singaporeans, you should pity yourselves not the foreign workers as foreign workers working in Singapore are covered under the mandatory Medical Insurance whereas we, Singaporeans, have to take care of our own medical costs. So actually the government has actually taken great care of the foreign workers,

KK
Apr 3, 2009 10:58

If I were to die during my employment in a foreign country, the foreign employer might not even send my body back to Singapore. Reason being our Government got governing rules to protect the foreign workers but not their own citizens. So please Singaporeans wake up.

Ganga
Apr 3, 2009 11:05


What can we expect from a robot city? Everyone is measured in terms of monetary contribution and little else. I would go as far as to say that the first thing the employer(s) probably said when the death was discovered was a set of expletives to curse fate (and the deceased) for adding trouble, more work and unnecesary costs.

Sending back the body was required by law, it was not even the least they would have done.

Spirit-centred
Apr 3, 2009 12:01

This is modern slavery in the most despicable order.

Spirit-centred
Apr 3, 2009 12:12

Our government is condoning this modern slavery trade by allowing recruitment companies to bring these foreign workers into Singapore like commodity to stock them in temporary make-shift quarters(warehouse) waiting for potential employers to employ/pick them up. The recruitment company are profiting a sinful commission from these desperate foreign workers. Thats why Singapore is included in the list of countries that conduct human trade.

Lynn Lee
Apr 3, 2009 12:16

#3 Lee Chee Wai
You’re right, this is just one side of the story. I hope to follow-up with Odud’s employer, Ree Engineering, when I return to Singapore. Odud’s former colleagues will also be able to give us more information.

What is clear though, is the callous way Odud’s employer handled the whole situation. As you said – not a shred of sympathy. It’s also clear that Odud’s wife is living in poverty. She can hardly afford to feed her baby, let alone her two older kids who are now in an orphanage.

thedoc
Apr 3, 2009 12:21

Jesus christ. This is just sick. What have we become?

Daniel Chip
Apr 3, 2009 17:02

What the hell was that?! These stories have to be reported, brought to the fore in the media, in order for Singaporeans to know the kind of unlawful-ness that prevails in our country. Sigh. Do these lives not matter at all? Why are talents treated like kings and queens, and these foreign workers like servants and maids?! Are their lives of any lesser worth?!?!

akira
Apr 4, 2009 11:59

I am a Singaporean. I have nothing against the foreign workers. Nor do I think that we should condemn Singaporean employers based on the death of a worker.

His death certificate says “he had collapsed behind a bus-stop along Boon Lay Way” what a way to write a death cert.

What we should be looking forward to now is to get the employer to speak up! We cannot listen to just one side of the story and moreover WHO is giving this story? Is the employer not providing the medical protection? Or that the employee simply doesn’t know that he can seek treatment when he’s ill?

If the purpose of this article is to ask for help for a foreign family in peril. Fine. But if it is to relegate the morality of Singaporean employers in general, it is too far-fetched.

Condolences.

Shelley
Apr 5, 2009 16:38

14) Akira, employers who bring foreign workers into Singapore are responsible for their upkeep and maintenance. This includes payment of all their medical costs. It is the very least an employer should do for his employee. Odud had been sick for 9 days. He died before he was sent to the doctor for medical treatment. It is a tragedy. Furthermore “he had collapsed behind a bus-stop along Boon Lay Way” which means it will prove difficult for Odud’s family to claim compensation for his death under workers compensation. Now Odud’s wife not only has to find the means to survive, , she has also incurred his debt of S$9,000 to give him the right to come to Singapore to work. There are some good and decent Singaporean employers but not in Odud’s case. Odud’s story is not far-fetched. This is not the first time either that a migrant worker was sent home in a box and his family left to live in poverty.

fjb
Apr 17, 2009 0:03

i am appalled. and as a singaporean and a muslim, embarrassed. how could my government allow this to happen repeatedly. and how could the muslim organization in singapore allow for such an insult to happen to a fellow muslim — to be embalmed and then shipped back without proper rites. it is humiliating, insulting and degrading.
i feel awful for his family. devastation on so many levels. this is harrowing. i think it is tantamount to murder.

Ali Kati
Apr 17, 2009 23:25

There’s a duty of care to be expected from the employment agency, whether it be contractual or moral. They failed to do the basic – to provide medical care, or if they feign ignorance of his condition, to conduct an investigation on negligent practices with regards to employee care, and then provide a full account to the family. It’s unacceptable for them to deliver his body with no report or follow-up.

This got me thinking this morning. In Singaporean society, sometimes it’s hard to identify with foreign menial labour workers. However, there are parallels. Odud’s family and friends pooled their resources to send their beloved friend/husband/brother abroad to further his chances of making a better life for them all. To a certain extent, haven’t many Singaporean families done the same to send a son or daughter abroad for further education so as to create a brighter future for them all? Imagine if one of those sons or daughters died abroad on campus and was sent back with no explanation.

This is an opportunity for the Singporean government to live up to a general global perception of Singapore as an ethical, merit-focused and conscientious society. I hope the government will do its due diligence and follow up on the reports.

Benedict Thambiah
Apr 29, 2009 12:04

This is indeed a really sad story. I can’t believe how hope for a better life has led to a man losing his life. Very sad. Especially so for his wife and children.

The behaviour of the Singapore employer is not surprising. All you need to do is observe how supervisors and managers speak to their workers – there is no respect. Just scolding and yelling. It is symptomatic of our ‘you are lesser than me’ attitude. An attitude we harbour towards foreign workers not expatriates…

I think, we treat our dogs better than the way we treat these poor men and women; who leave their homes to come here to help us build our homes and offices, our economy and look after our loved ones.

Just observe and you will know what I mean.

Leave a Reply

Comment


theonlinecitizen on Facebook

Uncategorized - Jan 15, 2010 10:12 - 126 Comments

It is affordable – Mah Bow Tan

More In Uncategorized


Uncategorized - Jan 15, 2010 10:12 - 126 Comments

It is affordable – Mah Bow Tan

More In Uncategorized


Uncategorized - Jan 15, 2010 10:12 - 126 Comments

It is affordable – Mah Bow Tan

More In Uncategorized