Choo Zheng Xi

New AWARE Executive Committee remain conspicuously silent

No confidence. That is the message which 150 members of the Association of Women for Action and Research (AWARE) want to send to the Society’s new Executive Committee, which was voted in under mysterious circumstances during AWARE’s Annual General Meeting (AGM) of 28 March.

The 150 members yesterday requested that the current Executive Committee hold an Extra-Ordinary General Meeting (EOGM) within 14 days of the request.

The media release sent out by the EOGM petitioners cite the “unusual nature of the AGM…when a large number of new members turned up and appeared to vote for several office bearers, all of whom are also new members”.

9 out of 12 of AWARE’s new Executive Committee are completely new faces who joined the organization between January and March this year, and were voted in by large majorities of similarly new members at the Annual General Meeting (AGM).

Questions on whether the new committee shares AWARE’s values

To date, the new Executive Committee has maintained a wall of silence, declining all media requests on their direction for one of Singapore’s most successful civil society organizations.

The EOGM is in part an attempt to get the new Executive Committee to break their silence on their plans for AWARE.

Ms Corinna Lim, an EOGM petitioner and AWARE member for over 16 years, told TOC that they wanted to “get them (the new Executive Committee) to the table to tell us what their direction is, what their plans are, for AWARE.”

Part of the discomfort with the new Executive Committee seems to be whether the new members share the value system of the organization, which Ms Lim describes as “gender equity, diversity, and respect for the individual.”

While refusing to give media interviews, some of the new committee and their supporters are known to have publicly expressed strongly anti-homosexual sentiments.

Newly elected Secretary Ms Jenice Chua Chor Ping had previously written to The Straits Times criticizing NMP Siew Kum Hong’s attempt to repeal Section 377A, claiming that “Mr Siew has overstepped the boundary as an NMP when he chose to represent the homosexual interest group.” She also wrote a letter equating homosexuality to a mental illness, arguing for its continued criminalization on the grounds that “just as a person with kleptomania is not excused by law when caught in the act of stealing, the law does not excuse people caught in homosexual offences.”

One of the new supporters of the new Executive Committee, Ms Angela Thiang, had previously written a letter to The Straits Times Forum arguing that recognizing homosexuals as a sexual minority could potentially “lead to banning religious texts like the Quran and Bible as ‘hate literature’ for ‘incit(ing) hatred against sexual minorities.”   

Among feminists, concern was voiced about the implications a Christian fundamentalist AWARE Executive Committee would have on feminism. Jolene, Editor of feminist webzine Glass Castle, worries that an overtly Christian fundamentalist AWARE Executive Committee might be regressive to women’s rights. In an editorial, she wrote:

“It is probable the new AWARE will use the perception of AWARE as an organization that speaks for women’s interests, so as to lobby for programmes that are directly contrary to women’s interests. They could well support substantial restrictions on abortion rights”.

Ms Angela Thiang had previously written a letter to The Straits Times pushing for a review of laws permitting abortion.

Former president of AWARE and Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP), Ms Breama Mathi, told TOC she was uncomfortable with the opacity of the new committee’s values.

“I would like them to show cause about what they’re trying to do in relationship with AWARE’s value system. I know they are all highly qualified on paper, and these qualifications are highly valuable to any organization, but this is a 24 year old organization with an established value system. So I’d be more comfortable if they gave some clarity on what they believed in”.

What next?

AWARE’s constitution states that the threshold for calling an EOGM is 10% of AWARE’s membership. The society has around 500 members, so the current petition group of 150 members is sufficient to trigger one.

Ms Lim says that while part of the purpose of the EOGM is to get the new committee to explain its values, she added that “if it is not satisfactory to the EOGM, we will go ahead with the vote of no confidence.”

The AWARE constitution is silent on the time required for an EOGM to be called after the petitioners request one, requiring only that it be called within a reasonable time period.

The petitioners have asked that one be called within the next 14 days, after which another 14 days will be given for members to be notified.

Would legal action against the current Executive Committee be an option if they fail to comply? While hesitant to cite it as a course of action, Ms Lim did not rule it out.

“Legal action is not something we want to think about, we don’t want to destroy AWARE. It’s not something we want, and we’ll only use it as a last resort.”

—– 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

涉五年内漏缴约140万元税款 知名肾脏专科医生遭起诉

我国知名肾脏专科医生黎慧忠涉嫌漏缴约140万元税款。他7月5日被指控分别于2013年、2014年以及2015年漏报诊所收入,抵触所得税和消费税法令。 黎慧忠(60岁)目前任职于伊丽莎白医院的肾脏专科医生,同时兼任伊丽莎白医药中心里Centre for Kidney Diseases的私人肾脏专科诊所的执行董事。 据《海峡时报》报导,该诊所于3年内每年收入逾200万新元,但因漏报诊所收入,导致他于三年内可能漏缴约102万新元税收。 另外,黎慧忠于周三还面临另12项指控,他被指自2011至2014年,在任职执行董事期间,虚报消费税使诊所于三年内漏报约42万新元税收。 一旦罪行成立,将依法判处赔所漏税额一倍的罚金,以及监禁最高三年或罚款5000新元,或两者兼施。 黎慧忠曾于2008年协同另四名医生,在病人与捐肾者血型不配合的情况底下进行肾脏移植手术,是我国首起病人与捐肾者血型不配合的肾脏移植手术。

陈佩玲称四财案人均受惠逾两万元? 革新党肯尼斯吁援引假消息法要求更正

日前,在参与“坚毅向前”附加预算案辩论时,麦波申国会议员陈佩玲提到,政府四次拨款助国人和企业面对困难,粗略计算,政府针对疫情的平均个人援助大约为2万3千225新元。 此番言论立时引来网民非议,有者指出,百姓们实得在手上、看得到的现金或受惠数目,根本没有那么多,更质疑陈佩玲的数据哪里来? 陈佩玲较后则发文解释,自己是依据四个总值近930亿元的预算案,与人口相除,人均可受惠逾两万元,以此与其他国家国民的人均受惠程度作比较,也显示政府为应对此次疫情的决心。 不过,也是经济学家的革新党领袖肯尼斯(Kenneth Jeyaretnam),就质问应探讨930亿元的分配,公民直接收到的现金也只有600元的关怀与援助配套补贴。甚至为此要副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰,援引防假消息法,向陈佩玲发出更正通知! 再者,早前王瑞杰称为应对冠病不可预测情况,政府拨出额外130亿元作为应急基金。这可能包括在340亿元团结预算案的特别调拨款项(special transfers)。 此外,要衡量政府的直接援助,也可看总赤字743亿元中,减去约173亿元的留本基金(endowment fund)及信托基金(trust fund),以及130亿元的应急基金。