Straits Times, Front Page, 22 May 1987

 

Andrew Loh

Read also: “Marxist plot” revisited by Singapore Window.

And: Singapore is holding 12 in “Marxist Conspiracy” by The New York Times.

In May 1987, the government of then-Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew accused 22 church workers and social workers of being part of a plot to topple the Singapore government. The local media called it a “Marxist Conspiracy” and named former student union leader, Tan Wah Piow, as the “mastermind”. Vincent Cheng was alledged to be the man whom Tan Wah Piow, who had left Singapore for England in 1976, tasked to build up a network of “conspirators” in Singapore.

Codenamed “Operation Spectrum”, the Internal Security Department (ISD) swooped in on the 22 (in two different operations, in May and June) and arrested and detained the accused under the Internal Security Act (ISA).

In the following months, the detainees were paraded on television interviews allegedly arranged by the government. The Catholic Church became entangled in the saga and then-Archbishop Gregory Yong had to publicly disavow its involvement. Former Solicitor-General Francis Seow, who was acting for three of the detainees, was later detained under the ISA as well.

The only time the detainees spoke up on their own , away from incarceration, which they did through a press statement claiming they were ill-treated during detention and denied being part of any “Marxist plot”, they were swiftly re-arrested by the ISD. The eight who released the press statement, on 20 April 1988, later recanted.

An earlier promise by the government to hold a Commission of Inquiry to look into the allegations of abuse was shelved. The government said it saw no need for an inquiry as the detainees had signed another statement disavowing their recantation.

The Straits Times termed the detainees’ statement as a “ploy to discredit [the] Government”.

One year after the initial arrests, the government, which earlier claimed that Tan Wah Piow was the “mastermind” behind the “plot”, later insisted that “the plot was a full-blown Communist Party of Malaya operation.”

There has been no independent inquiry or investigation into the arrests till this day.

The Online Citizen looks at the Straits Times’ coverage of the saga in 1987 next.

Straits Times, Front Page, 27 May 1987
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Singapore Customs: Company director fined $1.4m for importing duty-unpaid soju

Singapore Customs (SC) has announced that a company director was sentenced by…

【冠状病毒19】6月16日新增151例确诊

根据卫生部文告,截至本月16日中午12时,本地新增151例冠状病毒19确诊。 新增病患大多为住宿舍工作准证持有者。今增两起社区病例,都是工作证件持有者。今日暂无新增本地公民确诊。 本地累计确诊病例已增至4万0969例。当局仍在搜集病例详情并将在晚些时候公布。

【选举】毕丹星指在野党恐全军覆没? 李显龙:“反向心理战术”

日前工人党秘书长毕丹星,称在野党在此次选举有“全军覆没”的可能,人民行动党秘书长李显龙则指对方使用“反向心理战术”,希望借此争取人们支持。 据《海峡时报》报导,李显龙认为此次选举在疫情影响下,对行动党是场硬仗。他称尽管人民在危机中需要强有力政府,但群众在疫情中也受到冲击,有者失业、工资减少等。 李显龙此次将继续领军行动党宏茂桥集选区团队参选,其团队还包括杰乐·大卫、颜添宝,以及两名新人娜蒂雅和黄玲玲。 李显龙认为,工人党在上届选举过于自信,而人民还未准备好让工人党组政府。2015年选举,工人党仅以50.95微差保住阿裕尼,但失去榜鹅东单选区。而行动党整体得票率近七成。 尽管如此,主流媒体仍倡导在疫情危机下,执政党胜率可能破七成,甚至于能突破75巴仙。对此,工人党阿裕尼集选区准候选人贝理安称,行动党决定选举时机。但是在野党可以掌控的,就是在国会中的斗争,包括提出关乎人民的课题、替代方案以及接触选民的基层工作,这都是工人党在选举前就致力的工作。

水獭相争再起风云! Zouk水獭家族入侵碧山宏茂桥公园失利

水獭家族之战一直是水獭爱好者的热门话题,其争夺之地也经常发生在碧山-宏茂桥公园内,而好几次的“战争”中,都由滨海湾家族胜出,然而此次却出现形势逆转,只能说滨海湾家族险胜。 有水獭爱好者Jeff Tan近日发现,Zouk家族最近在碧山-宏茂桥公园出没,这也踏出了它们平时的“领地”。 网友于本月10日首次在公园发现了七只Zouk家族的水獭。当天他们并没有与“公园常胜军”,滨海湾家族正面冲突,但也已经开始发起“进攻”,偷偷潜入滨海湾家族的领土。 在隔了两日后,于5月12日早上,网友在公园内听见尖叫声,尖叫声则来自于滨海湾家族,相信是因为感觉到“敌军”渐渐靠近。它们也蓄势待发,在公园内游走,最终由10只滨海湾水獭发现了侵入领土的Zouk家族。 随后,“大战”也一触即发,滨海湾水獭先是叫嚣试图吓退对方,但似乎对Zouk家族无法起到任何威吓作用,随即进入“决战”状态。 经过短暂的争吵后,两大家族来个中场休息,并慎用休息时间,叫了更多的家族水獭回头帮忙。最终滨海湾家族还是将Zouk家族赶走,再回到水中。 根据网友指出,所幸此次战斗未出现任何伤亡。