Andrew Loh

If one were to follow – and believe – what the Labour Chief and the Manpower Ministry say, one would be inclined to think that the unemployment situation here in Singapore is “not as bad as feared”, as one Straits Times report put it.

In the past few months, the picture painted was, at the very least, a hopeful one. Indeed, Ministers have been consistent in asking Singaporeans to be positive. Labour Chief Lim Swee Say, in particular, has been trumpeting the so-called “tripartite” relationship between the government, the unions and employers. “In Singapore we have tripartism, and the tripartism has served us very well,” he said in January this year. “It is a unique advantage, so as we go through this downturn, our challenge is to continue to unleash this unique Singapore advantage.” (Source)

It seems that even “unleashing this unique Singapore advantage” has not stopped the tide of retrenchments. Three months after Mr Lim made that statement, the Today paper reported that unemployment in Singapore had reached record levels not seen in six years.

Total redundancies hit 12,600 in the first quarter — a 34-per-cent increase from the fourth quarter last year. Among the resident labour force, unemployment reached a five-year high of 4.8 per cent in March, sharply up from December’s 3.6 per cent. (Source)

And as if to choke on his own words, Mr Lim was reported to have said, on the same day the Today report came out, that, “It is not a question of whether we will see a second wave of retrenchment, but a question of when it will reach the peak, how high the peak will be, how long it will last, and how many more workers will lose their jobs in this next wave.” (ST, 29 April, 2009)

So much for the “unique Singapore advantage”. It seems that the NTUC Chief is just sitting tight and waiting for retrenchments to peak. In the meantime, the situation continues to deteriorate. Headlines such as, “Jobless pool shrinks”, “Jobless rate hits 4.8%”, “Expect more layoffs …” provides proof of the dire situation.

Yet, in the midst of all these, one thing is conspicuously absent – any talk of protecting the average Singaporean worker. The only solutions the government and the union seem to have is to one, plead with employers not to retrench workers and two, to continue the “reskilling, upskilling and multi-skilling” of workers. (Source)

The Singaporean worker, thus, is at the complete mercy of his employer. Anecdotal evidence points to discriminatory practices such as age, language and even gender discrimination by employers, together with employers’ preference for hiring foreigners even for jobs which Singaporeans can do.

The government’s response, which seems to miss the point, is to insist that Singapore needs foreigners. Singaporeans understand that the country needs foreigners. Their concern is whether we are opening the door too wide to foreigners of every ilk, even for jobs which Singaporeans can perform in. The government, however, seem to not want to address this.

The Prime Minister, in his May Day message, was reported to have said:

“In hard times Singaporeans think the non-Singaporeans are taking their jobs away from them,” said Mr Lee. However, he said this is a mistaken view because without non-Singaporeans working alongside Singaporeans, the jobs may not be there in the first place, citing the integrated resorts as an example. (Source)

Be that as it may, the Singaporean worker needs more protection from the government. It is unthinkable that while foreigners are let in by the hundreds of thousands, Singaporeans are left to their own devices – with the unions taking the sides of the employers and doing nothing to speak up for or fight for the rights of Singaporeans. Witness the feeble response of the Labour Chief to the retrenchment by DBS of 900 workers in November 2008. (Source)

It is with this in mind – protecting the Singaporean worker – that the event in Hong Lim Park this Saturday was conceptualized by five Singaporeans, including this writer.

Please come support the event and show support for the Singaporean worker.

It is time that we demanded the government do more for the Singaporean who’ve worked hard and slogged for long hours all these years.

Perhaps the Labour and the Manpower chiefs should start thinking about “unleashing the unique Singapore advantage” to protect our workers instead of engaging in meaningless rhetoric and semantics.

——

Read also Ravi Philemon’s blog entry, “A webchat with Mr Gan Kim Yong and Amy Khor“. Ravi will also be one of the speakers at Hong Lim Park this Saturday (9 May at 5pm).

—–

Support the Singaporean worker!

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

NZ’s coronavirus alert system at level three, will be in lockdown for next four weeks and raise to level four in 48 hours

New Zealand’s (NZ) coronavirus alert system has been at level three and…

New A*STAR-SMU centre combines high-powered computing and behavioural sciences to study social behaviour

Singapore, 18 June 2014 – The Agency for Science, Technology and Research…

Ho Ching posts photo of supermarket runs out of toilet paper; Captions “hahahahahahaha” on FB post

The head of Temasek Holdings Singapore investment company, Ho Ching shared on…

车子半夜爆胎求助无门 妇女感恩三年轻人冒雨相助

妇女带着孩子半夜回家时车子突然爆胎,但是老公不在身边,求助保险公司也没用。孩子又因无法回家大哭,可想而知妇女有多着急。所幸三名年轻人冒雨敲她的车门,表示愿意帮忙,换好车胎后就离开,令妇女备受感动。 事主Wai Peng Loh,于9月27日在脸书分享这一段经历,指当晚的经历真的是让她对保险公司感到愤怒,却感动于三名年轻人的暖心之举。 她指出,她于晚上约11时30分回家时,在实里达高速公路(SLE)爆胎了,当时丈夫不在身边,只好拨电向保险公司求助,要求他们安排拖车。“当时保险公司职员拿下我的车牌后,表示会给我回电话。20分钟过去了,人影都不见。我再次拨电,职员表示系统故障而找不到保单,要求我提供保单单号。我顿时无语了!谁会记着那些号码!” “听见对话的儿子(我开着扬声器通电话)大哭了起来,他以为我们回不了家,会被被困在水灾之中(因为当时下着大雨)。” 事主当时就大声要求职员安排拖车,而她愿意先付费,职员就请她等待,说不久会回电通知。 当时已经是午夜了,事主在焦虑的情况下还要安抚儿子。这时,有数名年轻人冒雨朝她的车子走来。其中一人敲了敲她的车门,是否需要帮忙,还主动表示可以帮忙换车胎。 原来他们和沿途一些其他汽车的车子也爆胎了,因此他们在换好车胎后,就沿着马路去帮助其他面对同样困境的车子。“雨越来越大,他们都被淋湿了,我就想叫他们回家。但是,我那时还没有收到保险公司的回应,于是决定接受他们的帮助。” “他们就像专业人士一样,立刻完成需要做的事情,我站在他们的周围,以确保它们的安全,但是他们却要我回到车内,去安抚我那受到惊吓的儿子。” 事主表示,三人在10分钟就完成了换车胎的工作,离开前,其中一人更提醒事主要慢慢开车。“离开前,我握了他们的手并感谢他们每一个人。当我和孩子终于可以启程回家时,我感动非常。” 她表示当时并没询问三名年轻人的名字,只在他们转身离开,朝着他们的车子走去时拍下他们的身影。…