Breaking News:
Bernard Madoff, who was charged with defrauding thousands of investors in the US of some US$65 billion, has been handed a 150-year jail term. (BBC
)

Billboards and banners at various parts of S’pore last year

Andrew Loh

It is that time of year again, as National Day approaches, when our Members of Parliament show their patriotism. To do so, billboards and bannerettes are springing up all over the island, as they did in previous years. They are huge, colourful and according to some, an eyesore. Also, they cost quite a bit of money.

In a time of Singapore’s worse recession in its history, where thousands are out of job and struggling to survive, one would have to question if such ostentatious show of patriotism is necessary.

In a Straits Times report on 29 June 2009, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said that “low-income families approaching the CDCs have increased by about 40 per cent” and, in another report on the same day, the Finance Ministry revealed that “more than 780,000 HDB households will receive $60 million of utility rebates in July.”

Clearly, Singaporeans are finding it tough to cope with living costs.

It was not too long ago that PAP-run town councils were found to have invested in toxic financial products and had lost S$16 million in the process. In a bid to dismiss the losses as small or insignificant, the government revealed that the PAP-run town councils have accumulated, over the last 20 years, S$2 billion worth of reserves in their sinking funds. (Channel NewsAsia)

This writer wrote to the Ang Mo Kio – Yio Chu Kang Town Council last year to ask about the cost of the billboards and the bannerettes. The reply from the town council was that “the total cost of each billboard is $3,300”. The town council said it paid for one billboard “per division/SMC and the rest are borne by the respective CCC through their own fund raising.” The cost of electricity for the spotlights which lights up the boards at night costs S$100 (for two months) for each billboard. The town council had put up 7 billboards in the AMK-YCK constituency but said that “for the rest, we leave it to the CCCs to install at their own costs.” It had also installed 1,336 bannerettes in the area.

While we may understand that MPs would like to celebrate National Day and show their patriotism and solidarity with the nation, we should also question if such spending is necessary, especially in these uncertain times.

In Aljunied GRC constituency, the town council has even introduced electronic LCD screens on its notice boards at the void decks. (See picture, below). Is this necessary?

LCD at an Aljunied void deck notice board

Would it not be more prudent and helpful for the town councils to use the funds spent on these billboards to help families which are struggling with utilities bills and service and conservancy charges instead?

In an interview with the Straits Times two days ago, on 27 June 2009, Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong lamented that residents still do not feel they have a stake in the governance of their estates and that there was a “missing link” in the relationship between the town councils and residents. Indeed, his fellow PAP member, Mr Lim Boon Heng, felt that “we have not yet imbued the sense of personal and collective responsibility in the residents.” (Straits Times)

One would, instead, question the sense of responsibility of the town councils in how they are spending funds collected from residents.

Finally, commenting on the town councils’ investments in December last year, Minister of Health, Mr Khaw Boon Wan also defended the town councils from accusations of being non-transparent in how they spent their funds.  “It’s absolutely transparent,” he said, “because this is not a secret society activity where there is secrecy and so on.” (AsiaOne)

The Online Citizen would thus like to encourage our readers and all Singaporeans to write to their respective MPs and ask about the costs of putting up the billboards and bannerettes (and for Aljunied residents, the cost and necessity of the LCDs).

Also, we welcome our readers to take pictures of these and send them to us at [email protected] and the replies they may receive from their town councils.

—-

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

港七一回归22周年 示威者续抗争游行

香港“反送中”抗争仍在持续。香港政府今早八时举行主权移交22周年升旗仪式。而反对《逃犯条例》修法的示威者,则发起“七一游行”,也齐聚升旗场地外游行抗议。然而示威者和警方再次爆发冲突,甚至有示威者冲击立法会大楼。 香港警方称金钟及湾仔一带情况混乱,示威者霸占道路导致部分主要干道瘫痪。 当局以天气为由,嘉宾改在室内观看周年升旗仪式。不过外界都相信和示威有关。 大约下午1时许,有示威者以铁架推车撞向立法会,或以铁支砸碎落地玻璃。即便有议员在现场劝阻也不听。 民主派会议召集人毛孟静,街工梁耀忠站在立法会门外,呼吁示威者不要冲击。毛孟静警告冲击立法会涉暴动罪,面临10年监禁,反问示威者是否值得。 由于发生冲击活动,警方也与集会主办方民建人权阵线商讨,将游行延期,游行改为集会,不过民阵坚持出发。在维多利亚公园游行队伍井然有序。 昨日,香港建制派则动员“撑警集会”,支持警方坚守岗位。其中多位艺人包括梁家辉、陈欣健、锺镇涛、谭咏麟等亦有出席。

FB page proves historian PJ Thum’s point on criticism of fake news bill by misquoting him

As the debate around the proposed fake news bill continuous, many experts…

网传送口罩借机迷晕民众抢劫? 警方辟谣假消息

日前,疯传一封简讯声称有人借由为家庭派送口罩,借机迷晕民众抢劫,对此新加坡警察昨日(26日)于脸书上发文辟谣该简讯是假消息,当局并未接到任何相关通报。 据简讯称,歹徒会挨家挨户送上口罩,并在口罩上放让人失去意识的迷药,所以在送口罩时,歹徒会怂恿民众戴上口罩,并提醒民众勿随意戴上陌生人给出的口罩。 针对这则消息的真实性,警察部队于昨日发文澄清,消息并非属实。因此警方也促请民众勿随意散播未经证实的消息,避免引起恐慌。 对于故意散播假消息,警方也表示将会严正以待,一旦发现,将会立即采取严厉行动。 警方也提醒民众,所有持有有效身份证的居民可以到各地的民众俱乐部(Community Clubs)获取可重复使用的苦找,而自本月26日起,也可前往口罩自动售货机获取。欲知领取详情,可浏览https://maskgowhere.sg。

Toh Chin Chye and Lee Kuan Yew were cut from the same cloth

~by: Ravi Philemon~ With the passing away of Dr Toh Chin Chye,…