Andrew Loh
What we have now is a PAP-infested Select Committee which has picked, to be NMPs, a YPAP member, a NTUC member and 5 people who idolise MM Lee! Good grief!
“Enacted in 1990, the NMP scheme provides for persons …. to contribute to the political process through the presentation of wide-ranging, independent and non-partisan views in Parliament.” (Emphasis mine)
The above statement is taken from the press release by the clerk of Parliament, dated 8 June 2009.
The news that one of the newly-appointed Nominated Members of Parliament (NMP) was a Young PAP member has thrown up several issues of concern. Mr Calvin Cheng, 34, an entrepreneur in the fashion/modeling industry, had joined the People’s Action Party’s youth wing (YPAP) in 2006.
According to the press release by the clerk of Parliament, on 6 April, the Special Select Committee on Nominations for Appointment as Nominated Members of Parliament (NMPs) invited the general public and functional groups to submit names of persons for its consideration for appointment as NMPs. The closing date for the submission of names was 11 May 2009.
When nomination for the new slate of NMPs closed on 11 May 2009, Mr Cheng was among the 46 names submitted – and he was still a YPAP member.
The Committee shortlisted nine names from the list, which was then submitted to the president on July 7 for approval. The president promptly gave his approval on the same day. Mr Cheng has now revealed that he tendered his resignation from the YPAP the next day, 8 July, Wednesday. That is, after his nomination had been approved by the president.
Mr Cheng’s resignation indicates that he was aware that NMPs are expected to be “non-partisan’, otherwise there would be no need for him to resign from the YPAP. In his letter to the Today newspaper on 13 July, Mr Cheng explained why he could only resign on 8 July. “Due to the fact that offices were already closed, and also a technical issue about the exact status of my membership,” he said, “I was only able to email my resignation the very next morning on Wednesday.” (Today)
I think Mr Cheng has missed the point. Application for NMPs was opened on 6 April. The Select Committee’s final list was decided on 7 July. That is a period of three months in between. Mr Cheng, during these three months or so, could have and should have settled the “technical issue” about the exact status of his YPAP membership. As he himself put it, the “technical issue” was whether he was “a member of the General Branch or of the Teck Ghee Branch.” Surely, this is not a question which should or would take months to clarify? As for the offices being closed, well, Mr Cheng had had three months or so to resign his YPAP membership. Why wait till such a late hour to do so?
Did not his YPAP membership raise a red flag for the Select Committee, which incidentally, except for Mr Low Thia Khiang, is made up of PAP MPs? Apparently, the committee did not even ask him about it. One wonders if a Workers Party member, say, would be given approval if he applied to be a NMP.
Also, did the president, who promptly approved Mr Cheng’s nomination, raise the question of Mr Cheng being a YPAP member?
There are now questions being asked about Mr Cheng’s “non-partisanship” as an NMP – and he is not the only new NMP being asked these questions.
Mr Terry Lee is the new “Labour NMP”. His nomination was supported by the NTUC, and no NTUC-backed candidate has failed to be appointed so far. He has held many appointments (see here) and is currently a member of the Central Committee of the NTUC.
The first question one would ask about Mr Lee’s appointment is whether we need another representative from the NTUC to be an NMP, given that many current MPs and ministers already are from the NTUC. These include Minister Lim Swee Say, Minister of State Heng Chee How, Mdm Halimah Yacob, Mr Seng Han Thong, Mr Yeo Guat Kwang and Mrs Josephine Teo – all except for Mr Yeo belong to the NTUC Central Executive Committee. Are these ministers and MPs so incapable of providing alternative views that we need another NTUC member to do so? And how different would his views be from those of his NTUC boss, Mr Lim Swee Say or how “non-partisan” his views would be from the government’s, given that the NTUC has always boasted of its “symbiotic” relationship with the government?
In an earlier article, I highlighted how five of the 9 new NMPs listed Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew as their “favourite politician”. Basically, they idolize MM Lee. (Incidentally, the only PAP member among the new batch, Mr Calvin Cheng, is one of the exceptions in this case. His political idol is US president Barack Obama. ) [Editor's correction: It is Nelson Mandela, not Obama.]
Now, if you were looking for people who would provide “independent, non-partisan” views in Parliament, would you select – not one or two or three but five – NMPs who hero-worship the person who’s regarded as the most influential and powerful man in the cabinet?
And what about the Select Committee itself? Out of the eight members on the committee, seven are PAP MPs. It is a clearly biased committee. Yet, it is tasked to select NMPs who are to be “non-partisan”? Is this even possible? Would a PAP-controlled committee select say, a Singapore Democratic Party member to be NMP? (Of course, he would have to resign his SDP membership but even if he does, would the committee be really impartial?)
So, what we have now is a PAP-infested Select Committee which has picked, to be NMPs, a YPAP member, a NTUC member and 5 people who idolize MM Lee! That sure gives the term “non-partisan” a whole new meaning.
Seriously, is this what you’d want for a scheme which is meant to provide “independent, non-partisan” views?
For the NMP scheme to have any credibility at all, we should start with looking at the composition of the Select Committee and make it one which itself is non-partisan, or multi-partisan. (One opposition MP on the panel hardly makes it so.) We also need to be clear about political party members applying to be NMPs. What is the select committee’s stand? What is the president’s reasons for accepting and approving the names submitted?
There needs to be absolute transparency and accountability in the reasons why certain people are approved while others are not. To this day, Singaporeans have no idea what the deliberations of the Select Committee were. In its report, the Committee did not elaborate on the reasons why the nine were chosen. Or why the applications of two former NMPs, Mr Siew Kum Hong and Mr Gautam Banerjee, were not approved.
The committe, however, did reveal that all MPs in parliament were consulted for their views on the NMP candidates. This is hardly any comfort, given that 82 out of the 84 elected MPs belong to the PAP.
At the moment, the NMP scheme looks far removed from its aims of providing “independent, non-partisan” views in parliament. How can it, when the ruling PAP has a say in and is present in all aspects of the selection process?
Perhaps it should aim for transparency first, especially when the Prime Minister has decided that the NMP scheme will be a permanent feature in the political landscape.
—-
The special Select Committe comprised of the following members:
Mr Speaker (Mr Abdullah Tarmugi) (East Coast) (Chairman)
Mrs Lim Hwee Hua (Aljunied) - Minister, Prime Minister’s Office, Second Minister for Finance and Second Minister for Transport
Mr Low Thia Khiang (Hougang)
Mr Mah Bow Tan (Tampines) - Minister for National Development and Leader of the House
Mr Masagos Zulkifli BMM (Tampines) - Senior Parliamentary Secretary, Ministry of Education and Ministry of Home Affairs
Mr Michael Palmer (Pasir Ris-Punggol)
Mr Sam Tan Chin Siong (Tanjong Pagar) - Parliamentary Secretary, Ministry of Trade and Industry and Ministry of Information, Communications and the Arts
Mrs Josephine Teo (Bishan-Toa Payoh)
—–
Scrap these non-elected parliamentarian system.
Restore the single seat constituencies.
Move towards two party system!
Share a Joke.
“Can I, out of curiosity, DON”T VOTE PAP?”
:)
This new slate of NMP, contradict what PM said of “ensuring” a different voice in parliament
These days, they talk from both sides of their mouths
old saying: “Guan Zhi liang ge kou”
sincerity is absent !
Every year, there are singaporeans who graduate from ivy league.
What happens if all these get invited to be member of ….. and no ivy league grad is left behind? Apply this to all doctorates. Apply these to all successful biz men.
What is left?
16) Jc on July 14th, 2009 10.03 am
\\I think let’s give these new NMP time to prove themselves. We have yet to understand where they stand. Till date, most are speculations. Of course, I do agreed that a person who is in NTUC will most likely sing the same songs with the NTUC bosses who are the MPs. I kn I will suck up to my boss too. After all being old and need a job, will I object to my bosses’ view….hell no. Still, it is speculative. Let’s calm down. \\
There is Private Sector A (non GLC) and there is Private Sector B (with GLC) and there is Public sector, methinks .
In the private sector A, how one achieves the top is his own parsah. What he does affects his company and employees at most. Yes, I would admit people need to be nice to their employer in addition to performing. Without the ‘soft skill’ and ‘EQ’ to apply the hidden leg, one cannot reach higher or even survive long. Its common and expected and unspoken truth in private sector to soak it up.
In public sector, there is special case. While most things can be the same as private sector, the competition is different as there is no private sector business-business competition. So, there is difference. On top of that, the Character of the talent is even more important than his skills and qualification. In private sector, one may ‘sacrifice’ himself and wine and dine and karaoke with his clients and even under the table, using the ‘legal’ way.
In the public sector, the PEOPLE expect honest leaders. This is in a way different from a private sector expectation where anything is possible and can be done as long as you get away with it using ‘legal’ methods.
So, I just hope singaporeans understand that while people will make their employers or boss happy to earn a living, and people will strive to achieve wealth for themselves, for the public sector, WE the PEOPLE better know what to expect from our public servants and not be confused.
Together we beCOME.
52) red_dot on July 15th, 2009 12.47 pm
Scrap these non-elected parliamentarian system.
Restore the single seat constituencies. Move towards two party system!
That is not possible. If they allow a two party system to take place then the loon position will be at stake when the ole man kicks the bucket.
Years ago Ong Teng Cheong resigned from PAP before running for President. It will be interesting if OTC got elected then resigned from PAP.
yeo guat kwang, lucky u not in ajunie , if not you will already be voted out !!!
yeo guat kwang dun b s in here , cut your salary 75% donate to the poor then i believe you , if not u dun try brain wash me!!!!