Leong Sze Hian

The unemployment rate is of concern to many Singaporeans. Thus, it is important not only for the government to release accurate data on it but also for our news media to report such data accurately.

However, in their latest reports, the Straits Times, Channel NewsAsia and Today have failed to do so. Their selective reporting of important statistics on the unemployment rate leaves much to be desired.

The Straits Times Online Breaking News Online article, “Job losses double in Q2” on July 31, said:

“An estimated 116,600 residents were jobless in June. The seasonally adjusted figure was 91,800.”

And:

“Among the resident labour force, the non-adjusted unemployment rate was 6 per cent in June, higher than the 4.4 per cent in the previous quarter.”

However, in the same article in the print edition on August 1, (“More layoffs likely later in the year”) there was no mention of the 116,600 unemployed or the 6 per cent unemployment rate.

What happened to this important piece of information?

Instead, all it said was:

“They (the Jobs Credit wage subsidy scheme and the Skills Programme for Upgrading and Resilience (Spur) were particularly instrumental in lowering the jobless rate among residents from 4.8 per cent in March to 4.6 per cent in June.”

The Channel News Asia report, “Retrenchments down sharply, unemployment stabilises in Q2” on July 31, said:

“An estimated 91,800 residents were unemployed in June.”

And:

“Among the resident labour force, the unemployment rate declined from 4.8 per cent in March to 4.6 per cent in June.”

So, similar to the ST print edition, there was no mention of the 116,600 unemployed or 6 per cent unemployment rate.

These two statistics are also not mentioned in the Today newspaper of August 1, “Productivity concerns: Job losses double in Q2 as foreigners’ services terminated“.

It seems to be quite a coincidence that all three news medium omitted these two statistics, which are in the Ministry of Manpower’s report, “Employment Situation In Second Quarter 2009“, from which the reports were derived.

Apparently it was decided that only the “better” seasonally adjusted figures be reported, and the non-seasonally adjusted figures were dropped altogether.

In any case, it is perhaps arguable to say that “unemployment has stabilised in the second quarter”, when the number of unemployed residents (Singaporeans and PRs) increased from 95,600 in March to 116,600 in June, and the resident unemployment rate increased from 4.4 to 6 per cent.

Anyone who reads the ST Breaking News Online version on July 31, compared to the 1 August print version, the Channel NewsAsia and Today articles, may come to a very different perception of whether unemployment has gotten better or worse.

Bus companies to Malaysia were recently fined for fixing prices. Perhaps we may need to consider action for “fixing the news statistics” too!

The Manpower Minister was quoted as saying, “The most important message is to remind all of us that the worst is not yet over”. Well, I think it also depends on what statistics we “choose” to compare with – in the news.

By the way, how many of those undergoing training under Spur may be people who are actually unemployed, who may not be counted in the unemployment statistics?

—-

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

过去个资泄露事故前车之鉴 人民党疑虑政府推出穿戴式配备

早前,主管智慧国计划的外交部长维文,宣称首批“合力追踪”穿戴式配备将在本月下旬推出,他也指出还配备不是追踪器,设备无网络连接性或卫星定位晶片,当局须取得确诊者同意,才能索取数据。 他强调穿戴式配备不会追踪使用者的位置。 不过,人民党副秘书长Ariffin Sha针对有关穿戴式配备表达疑虑,呼吁政府应当谨慎处理新加坡人的隐私,也提及过去政府曾有数次大型的数据泄露事故: 2018年新保集团150万病患资料被盗,其中16万住院治疗记录外泄,堪称历年来最严重,卫生部长颜金勇甚至特别为此事致歉。 2019年:1万4200名艾滋病病患,姓名、身份证号码、电话号码、住址和相关医疗资料等遭泄露。卫生部长颜金勇再度道歉。 2019年3月:卫生科学局(HSA)透露,超过80万名捐血者的姓名、身份证号码、性别和血性等个人资料,被挂上有互联网连接的服务器长达九个星期,面临资料疏漏风险。 该党认为,尽管疫情当前,惟不应正当化对民众隐私的干预,再者,配备仍会记录私人的数据,若落在不法之徒手上遭滥用是很危险的。该党为此呼吁政府寻求其他更合适的方案。

PAP Alex Yeo gives free legal services to Paya Lebar residents and launches new health programme for them

Alex Yeo, the grassroots adviser and People’s Action Party (PAP) branch chairman…

高庭驳回梁实轩反诉总理滥用程序申请

本地时评人梁实轩被总理李显龙提告诽谤,对此梁早前提出上诉反告总理滥用司法程序。不过高庭作出裁决驳回梁实轩的反诉,指后者“没有合理的诉讼理由”。 法官Aedit Abdullah,在昨日(12日)针对上述反诉作出裁决时,引述2018年Lee Tat发展公司提告301号分层地契管理公司的上诉庭判决先例,驳回以滥用程序为诉讼理由。 这是根据总理针对梁实轩反诉,在1月9日作出的辩词,指梁的反诉“既没有法律依据,也没胜诉希望”。 法官认为,“合理诉讼理由”,是有关上诉受理时,有些胜诉机会。故此驳回梁实轩的反诉总理申请。 法官引述Lee Tat发展公司诉讼案例,认为如果允许梁实轩反诉总理滥用程序,可能导致: 破坏“法律终局性原则”(树立司法权威性),助长不必要且冗长的小型诉讼 大开诉讼闸门 产生寒蝉效应 法官Aedit也阐释Lee…

Success of Joseph Schooling and lack of support to families behind athletes, should spur reconsideration of foreign sports talent scheme

Interview with Joseph Schooling’s mother I refer to the article “Lunch With…