<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook MPs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/09/facebook-mps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/09/facebook-mps/</link>
	<description>Singapore&#039;s #1 Socio-Political Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 04:31:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: YPY</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/09/facebook-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-105301</link>
		<dc:creator>YPY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=12996#comment-105301</guid>
		<description>Most if not all the MPs have their own facebook pages  -  which is the &#039;in&#039; thing and more of a PR stunt for them to appear more &#039;humane&#039; to the ppl on the ground - but to what extent (I&#039;m sure everyone knows).
Also one thing abt some of the facebook page is that, you have to become a &#039;fan&#039; of that person&#039;s page inorder to leave comments - thus it may nt paint an accurate pic of just who is a &#039;fan&#039;.
Example, the WP and Young PAP pages - you have to be a &#039;fan&#039; before you can comment. Hmm..
Anyways...no point checking out the Young PAP page as well - it&#039;s more like a &#039;shrine&#039; for ppl to post positive things and praises abt their policies cos everytime someone raises a question or negative comment abt their discussion topic - they will attack in hordes with their own and often lame defensive comments...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most if not all the MPs have their own facebook pages  &#8211;  which is the &#8216;in&#8217; thing and more of a PR stunt for them to appear more &#8216;humane&#8217; to the ppl on the ground &#8211; but to what extent (I&#8217;m sure everyone knows).<br />
Also one thing abt some of the facebook page is that, you have to become a &#8216;fan&#8217; of that person&#8217;s page inorder to leave comments &#8211; thus it may nt paint an accurate pic of just who is a &#8216;fan&#8217;.<br />
Example, the WP and Young PAP pages &#8211; you have to be a &#8216;fan&#8217; before you can comment. Hmm..<br />
Anyways&#8230;no point checking out the Young PAP page as well &#8211; it&#8217;s more like a &#8216;shrine&#8217; for ppl to post positive things and praises abt their policies cos everytime someone raises a question or negative comment abt their discussion topic &#8211; they will attack in hordes with their own and often lame defensive comments&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RED-man</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/09/facebook-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-104709</link>
		<dc:creator>RED-man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=12996#comment-104709</guid>
		<description>///#4
but it’s not managed by the supposedly “owners” themselves but their supporters. 
Vote Saved.\\\\

if LTK was to manage his facebook himself, that would be a serious problem. Only MPs with nothing to do will manage it themselves. Then again, whoever that manage the facebook for them, has to seek his approval or agreement for what is being replied and what is being post in their facebook, yah?

Imagine if the person scold LKY in LTK facebook, what will happened. Therefore by arguing LTK did not manage the facebook mean nothing and very lame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>///#4<br />
but it’s not managed by the supposedly “owners” themselves but their supporters.<br />
Vote Saved.\\\\</p>
<p>if LTK was to manage his facebook himself, that would be a serious problem. Only MPs with nothing to do will manage it themselves. Then again, whoever that manage the facebook for them, has to seek his approval or agreement for what is being replied and what is being post in their facebook, yah?</p>
<p>Imagine if the person scold LKY in LTK facebook, what will happened. Therefore by arguing LTK did not manage the facebook mean nothing and very lame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pee M eats hum</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/09/facebook-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-104688</link>
		<dc:creator>Pee M eats hum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=12996#comment-104688</guid>
		<description>It will be a damn waste of time for PM Lee to make his presence felt online,
not when Ho Ching and Lee Snr are way ahead of him in real life, for the Wrong reasons of course !   Oh yes, not forgetting younger sister Wei Ling is already one up on him too.   LOL............

Perhaps better for PM Lee to work on .mee rebus mai hum ? meepok mai hum ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be a damn waste of time for PM Lee to make his presence felt online,<br />
not when Ho Ching and Lee Snr are way ahead of him in real life, for the Wrong reasons of course !   Oh yes, not forgetting younger sister Wei Ling is already one up on him too.   LOL&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Perhaps better for PM Lee to work on .mee rebus mai hum ? meepok mai hum ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stanley</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/09/facebook-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-104639</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=12996#comment-104639</guid>
		<description>Is there a Facebook game where I can fix Lee Hsien Loong with Mee Siam Mai Hum?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a Facebook game where I can fix Lee Hsien Loong with Mee Siam Mai Hum?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darky</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/09/facebook-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-104480</link>
		<dc:creator>darky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=12996#comment-104480</guid>
		<description>http://www.facebook.com/search/?q=workers+party&amp;init=quick#/group.php?gid=10878451692&amp;ref=search&amp;sid=647938088.1885798377..1


Other WP-related Facebook Pages:

The Workers&#039; Party Youth Wing
http://www.facebook.com/wpyouth

Low Thia Khiang
http://www.facebook.com/lowthiakhiang

Sylvia Lim
http://www.facebook.com/sylvialimsweelian

WP-related Facebook Groups and past WP leaders:

Workers&#039; Party Singapore Supporters
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=10878451692

David Saul Marshall
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=16063898916

J. B. Jeyaretnam
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=26481019410

Dr Lee Siew Choh
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=15837757356</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/search/?q=workers+party&#038;init=quick#/group.php?gid=10878451692&#038;ref=search&#038;sid=647938088.1885798377" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/search/?q=workers+party&#038;init=quick#/group.php?gid=10878451692&#038;ref=search&#038;sid=647938088.1885798377</a>..1</p>
<p>Other WP-related Facebook Pages:</p>
<p>The Workers&#8217; Party Youth Wing<br />
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/wpyouth" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/wpyouth</a></p>
<p>Low Thia Khiang<br />
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/lowthiakhiang" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/lowthiakhiang</a></p>
<p>Sylvia Lim<br />
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/sylvialimsweelian" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/sylvialimsweelian</a></p>
<p>WP-related Facebook Groups and past WP leaders:</p>
<p>Workers&#8217; Party Singapore Supporters<br />
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=10878451692" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=10878451692</a></p>
<p>David Saul Marshall<br />
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=16063898916" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=16063898916</a></p>
<p>J. B. Jeyaretnam<br />
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=26481019410" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=26481019410</a></p>
<p>Dr Lee Siew Choh<br />
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=15837757356" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=15837757356</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Singapore Daily &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weekly Roundup: Week 37</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/09/facebook-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-104409</link>
		<dc:creator>The Singapore Daily &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weekly Roundup: Week 37</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 05:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=12996#comment-104409</guid>
		<description>[...] Daily Discourse - The Kent Ridge Common: Post-mortem of a saga: Brand name doesn’t aways sell - Singaporean Skeptic: The priorities of our Government. - Chemical Generation Singapore: Cow Heads and Scapegoats - Singapore Angle: The Operating Spectrum of Civil Society - The Singapore Sports Fan: Move over, SIA, it’s the MCYS’ turn to fend off the brickbats - Today In Singapore: Toys For Army Boys - Singabloodypore: Singaporean Capitalism: A Love Story &amp; Freedom for Sale - Yawning Bread: Proscribing seditious and hate speech - Today In Singapore: Uniquely Singapore - The Brotherhood Press: The Words We Regularly Use To Say Nothing Is Something – A Study in the travesty of reason - Chemical Generation Singapore: Passing the Hat Around - TOC: Facebook MPs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Daily Discourse &#8211; The Kent Ridge Common: Post-mortem of a saga: Brand name doesn’t aways sell &#8211; Singaporean Skeptic: The priorities of our Government. &#8211; Chemical Generation Singapore: Cow Heads and Scapegoats &#8211; Singapore Angle: The Operating Spectrum of Civil Society &#8211; The Singapore Sports Fan: Move over, SIA, it’s the MCYS’ turn to fend off the brickbats &#8211; Today In Singapore: Toys For Army Boys &#8211; Singabloodypore: Singaporean Capitalism: A Love Story &amp; Freedom for Sale &#8211; Yawning Bread: Proscribing seditious and hate speech &#8211; Today In Singapore: Uniquely Singapore &#8211; The Brotherhood Press: The Words We Regularly Use To Say Nothing Is Something – A Study in the travesty of reason &#8211; Chemical Generation Singapore: Passing the Hat Around &#8211; TOC: Facebook MPs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artemov</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/09/facebook-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-104401</link>
		<dc:creator>Artemov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 04:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=12996#comment-104401</guid>
		<description>LHL doesn&#039;t even make his presence felt in real life, so why bother with online?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LHL doesn&#8217;t even make his presence felt in real life, so why bother with online?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faker Realism</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/09/facebook-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-104385</link>
		<dc:creator>Faker Realism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 01:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=12996#comment-104385</guid>
		<description>28) admin on September 11th, 2009 5.10 pm

i am sure many readers have been Confused and Distracted by the &#039;change of heart&#039;.

regards
cyberscrewmind divide and conquer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>28) admin on September 11th, 2009 5.10 pm</p>
<p>i am sure many readers have been Confused and Distracted by the &#8216;change of heart&#8217;.</p>
<p>regards<br />
cyberscrewmind divide and conquer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: y</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/09/facebook-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-104321</link>
		<dc:creator>y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 10:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=12996#comment-104321</guid>
		<description>u wan PM come online to kena blast online as well is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>u wan PM come online to kena blast online as well is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tang Li</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/09/facebook-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-104308</link>
		<dc:creator>Tang Li</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 06:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=12996#comment-104308</guid>
		<description>You have to admire politicians for being alert to the benefits of the internet and I sometimes wish that business people would also wake up to the way in which the new media is changing the way that people react.

I actually salute guys like George Yeo who interacts online and faces people who, thanks to the use of pseudonym decide they can be REALLY HONEST with him in the crudest of terms. It speaks well of the Minister that he&#039;s willing to go down on the ground to be able to talk to people at their level. 

For the record, Minister Yeo is the not the only person who has gets &quot;New Media.&quot; For the record, I have Vivan Balakrishnan and Dr Lim Wee  Kiak (Sembawang GRC) as friends on Facebook. Facebook is an easy channel to talk to otherwise unaccessible people.

So, if we have at least two ministers who &quot;Get&quot; new media, why is there a constant gripe in the MSM and beyond about why it&#039;s not credible? Perhaps Acting MICA Minister Lui Tuck Yew should take a leaf from George Yeo and start a blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to admire politicians for being alert to the benefits of the internet and I sometimes wish that business people would also wake up to the way in which the new media is changing the way that people react.</p>
<p>I actually salute guys like George Yeo who interacts online and faces people who, thanks to the use of pseudonym decide they can be REALLY HONEST with him in the crudest of terms. It speaks well of the Minister that he&#8217;s willing to go down on the ground to be able to talk to people at their level. </p>
<p>For the record, Minister Yeo is the not the only person who has gets &#8220;New Media.&#8221; For the record, I have Vivan Balakrishnan and Dr Lim Wee  Kiak (Sembawang GRC) as friends on Facebook. Facebook is an easy channel to talk to otherwise unaccessible people.</p>
<p>So, if we have at least two ministers who &#8220;Get&#8221; new media, why is there a constant gripe in the MSM and beyond about why it&#8217;s not credible? Perhaps Acting MICA Minister Lui Tuck Yew should take a leaf from George Yeo and start a blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spirit-centred</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/09/facebook-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-104306</link>
		<dc:creator>Spirit-centred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 06:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=12996#comment-104306</guid>
		<description>May I suggest that any candidates who do not win the elections should become shadowed MP of the constituency they stand in the elections. They should at least conduct their Meet-The-People-Session online through their constituency tag on their party&#039;s websites. They should annouce this communication channel during election rally and their block visits so that awareness are created among the youths who are most likely to engage online rather MPS at the void deck.
This awareness will create his visibility in the minds of the youths and also make him sincere and credible to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May I suggest that any candidates who do not win the elections should become shadowed MP of the constituency they stand in the elections. They should at least conduct their Meet-The-People-Session online through their constituency tag on their party&#8217;s websites. They should annouce this communication channel during election rally and their block visits so that awareness are created among the youths who are most likely to engage online rather MPS at the void deck.<br />
This awareness will create his visibility in the minds of the youths and also make him sincere and credible to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KopitiamApek</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/09/facebook-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-104304</link>
		<dc:creator>KopitiamApek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 05:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=12996#comment-104304</guid>
		<description>4) DK 

///// Mr Low Thia Khiang and Ms Sylvia Lim are on facebook. In fact, if I’m not wrong, they were there earlier than Minister George Yeo and P65.
http://www.facebook.com/lowthiakhiang
http://www.facebook.com/sylvialimsweelian //////////

Alamak !
It just baffles me why TOC writers repeatedly make such errors?
And I get moderated for voicing about it.
Since &quot;MSM&#039; don&#039;t do accurate reporting, all the more, TOC should rise above that and show that the new media can better then them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4) DK </p>
<p>///// Mr Low Thia Khiang and Ms Sylvia Lim are on facebook. In fact, if I’m not wrong, they were there earlier than Minister George Yeo and P65.<br />
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/lowthiakhiang" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/lowthiakhiang</a><br />
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/sylvialimsweelian" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/sylvialimsweelian</a> //////////</p>
<p>Alamak !<br />
It just baffles me why TOC writers repeatedly make such errors?<br />
And I get moderated for voicing about it.<br />
Since &#8220;MSM&#8217; don&#8217;t do accurate reporting, all the more, TOC should rise above that and show that the new media can better then them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Secret Political Blog</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/09/facebook-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-104280</link>
		<dc:creator>The Secret Political Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 03:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=12996#comment-104280</guid>
		<description>&quot;And here we have the TOC playing “non-partisan” and even singing Geroge Yeo’s praises as in the para:
...
Non-partisan, My Foot!&quot;

This is the full context that you might do well to quote the next time.

&quot;&lt;i&gt;Indeed, Minister Yeo has said that he hopes for his Facebook page to be “fun” and not for spelling out policy positions.&lt;/i&gt; Still, on the thorny issue of Burma, for example, Minister Yeo was sympathetic to what his detractors said on his page, but at the same time stood his ground on S’pore’s and Asean’s policy.

I feel that any politician who is afraid of the Internet and social networking sites like Facebook can take a leaf from Minister Yeo’s example. You can engage your audience and still stand your ground – and be respected for that, even if one is not convinced of his explanations or reasons for doing so.&quot;

As you can see, Andrew Loh was only singing George Yeo&#039;s praises for engaging Singaporeans online. If you must criticise something, you should criticise the way he gives canned responses to people when on facebook, not the fact that he is on facebook and willing to engage Singaporeans online.

As for whether TOC took a partisan stance, I think your conclusion is rather far fetched. Just because George Yeo is to blame for Singapore&#039;s aiding and abetting of the Burmese junta, deosn&#039;t mean the TOC has to point this out at every turn, especially when that would detract from the main point of the article. 

Further, TOC&#039;s statement, &quot;Minister Yeo was sympathetic to what his detractors said on his page, but at the same time stood his ground on S’pore’s and Asean’s policy,&quot; was simply reporting what they observed from his online activities. They have made no judgment whatsoever and you cannot possibly imply that they are not non-partisan for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And here we have the TOC playing “non-partisan” and even singing Geroge Yeo’s praises as in the para:<br />
&#8230;<br />
Non-partisan, My Foot!&#8221;</p>
<p>This is the full context that you might do well to quote the next time.</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>Indeed, Minister Yeo has said that he hopes for his Facebook page to be “fun” and not for spelling out policy positions.</i> Still, on the thorny issue of Burma, for example, Minister Yeo was sympathetic to what his detractors said on his page, but at the same time stood his ground on S’pore’s and Asean’s policy.</p>
<p>I feel that any politician who is afraid of the Internet and social networking sites like Facebook can take a leaf from Minister Yeo’s example. You can engage your audience and still stand your ground – and be respected for that, even if one is not convinced of his explanations or reasons for doing so.&#8221;</p>
<p>As you can see, Andrew Loh was only singing George Yeo&#8217;s praises for engaging Singaporeans online. If you must criticise something, you should criticise the way he gives canned responses to people when on facebook, not the fact that he is on facebook and willing to engage Singaporeans online.</p>
<p>As for whether TOC took a partisan stance, I think your conclusion is rather far fetched. Just because George Yeo is to blame for Singapore&#8217;s aiding and abetting of the Burmese junta, deosn&#8217;t mean the TOC has to point this out at every turn, especially when that would detract from the main point of the article. </p>
<p>Further, TOC&#8217;s statement, &#8220;Minister Yeo was sympathetic to what his detractors said on his page, but at the same time stood his ground on S’pore’s and Asean’s policy,&#8221; was simply reporting what they observed from his online activities. They have made no judgment whatsoever and you cannot possibly imply that they are not non-partisan for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: faceLESSbook</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/09/facebook-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-104277</link>
		<dc:creator>faceLESSbook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 02:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=12996#comment-104277</guid>
		<description>do you all know that in the olden days, our prince the prime minister do not allowed any TVs in his house?
why on earth do he wants to do that? NEWs blackouts perhaps?
butt... he do employed 2 maids..
how i know? simply because when he was seekin pay increased in parliament donkey years ago..he cited the reasons for pay increased was that he too have 2 maids salaries/levies to pay as well...
this expenses cannot be borne by ah kong accounts in istena...
THAT IS THE ONE AND ONLY REASON....
now you want him to do a facebook? when everytime he pee, he have to ask his father to hold his pants?
~sigh~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do you all know that in the olden days, our prince the prime minister do not allowed any TVs in his house?<br />
why on earth do he wants to do that? NEWs blackouts perhaps?<br />
butt&#8230; he do employed 2 maids..<br />
how i know? simply because when he was seekin pay increased in parliament donkey years ago..he cited the reasons for pay increased was that he too have 2 maids salaries/levies to pay as well&#8230;<br />
this expenses cannot be borne by ah kong accounts in istena&#8230;<br />
THAT IS THE ONE AND ONLY REASON&#8230;.<br />
now you want him to do a facebook? when everytime he pee, he have to ask his father to hold his pants?<br />
~sigh~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: why before election a lot of heavy news coverage on Lee?</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/09/facebook-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-104274</link>
		<dc:creator>why before election a lot of heavy news coverage on Lee?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 02:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=12996#comment-104274</guid>
		<description>The STRANGEST thing i find about Oppo is they have not shown they are able to capitalise on the strong turnout in their speech sessions. some please unstrange my thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The STRANGEST thing i find about Oppo is they have not shown they are able to capitalise on the strong turnout in their speech sessions. some please unstrange my thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blastpapfacebook</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/09/facebook-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-104259</link>
		<dc:creator>blastpapfacebook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=12996#comment-104259</guid>
		<description>We should blast the PAP facebook with questions, since they are always called themselves &#039; talent&#039;, till they shut down their facebook account.

I really like the comments about throwing shoes at them in the facebook.  

Hopefully, there is such a game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should blast the PAP facebook with questions, since they are always called themselves &#8216; talent&#8217;, till they shut down their facebook account.</p>
<p>I really like the comments about throwing shoes at them in the facebook.  </p>
<p>Hopefully, there is such a game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fake Meat</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/09/facebook-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-104244</link>
		<dc:creator>Fake Meat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=12996#comment-104244</guid>
		<description>The FUNNY thing about opposite is that 
despite they having 33.3% supporters,
they have not engaged them directly, most of these 33.3% despite the fact that years have passed and the country is just a city small enough to reach out to these easily over many years.

So Funny. I got to tell my taiwan friends about it.
The situation is so funny i afraid i may go mad if i cannot find the reason why the situation is so funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FUNNY thing about opposite is that<br />
despite they having 33.3% supporters,<br />
they have not engaged them directly, most of these 33.3% despite the fact that years have passed and the country is just a city small enough to reach out to these easily over many years.</p>
<p>So Funny. I got to tell my taiwan friends about it.<br />
The situation is so funny i afraid i may go mad if i cannot find the reason why the situation is so funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waiting Game</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/09/facebook-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-104212</link>
		<dc:creator>Waiting Game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=12996#comment-104212</guid>
		<description>And this brings back memories of the several Conspiracy theories since the inception of TOC.

sigh....

i continue to play the waiting game. The only joy to expect. That does not require human intervention. That is a sure thing to happen. That no money nor power can stop it from happening. And maybe enough a bonus holiday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And this brings back memories of the several Conspiracy theories since the inception of TOC.</p>
<p>sigh&#8230;.</p>
<p>i continue to play the waiting game. The only joy to expect. That does not require human intervention. That is a sure thing to happen. That no money nor power can stop it from happening. And maybe enough a bonus holiday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/09/facebook-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-104179</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=12996#comment-104179</guid>
		<description>Singing GY&#039;s praises? Lets put it this way, if someone&#039;s action is worthy of praise, lets not be afraid to give it. Otherwise, it makes us all very small human beings, with very small minds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Singing GY&#8217;s praises? Lets put it this way, if someone&#8217;s action is worthy of praise, lets not be afraid to give it. Otherwise, it makes us all very small human beings, with very small minds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oxford Dude</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/09/facebook-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-104169</link>
		<dc:creator>Oxford Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=12996#comment-104169</guid>
		<description>26) Anonymous on September 11th, 2009 4.05 pm 

&lt;i&gt;And here we have the TOC playing “non-partisan” and even singing Geroge Yeo’s praises as in the para:&lt;/i&gt;

TOC has limited resources in exercising its coverage. You ought to be releastic in your expectations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>26) Anonymous on September 11th, 2009 4.05 pm </p>
<p><i>And here we have the TOC playing “non-partisan” and even singing Geroge Yeo’s praises as in the para:</i></p>
<p>TOC has limited resources in exercising its coverage. You ought to be releastic in your expectations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

