Story and picture by Chong Zi Liang for The Enquirer.
ALL HAIL new media! Without it, we wouldn’t have four different ways of saying: “Yes, the ministerial forum was awesome.”
An online poll with the question, “How do you find the ministerial forum?” offered “inspiring”, “refreshing”, “fantastic” or “innovative” as answers.
Still, about 3000 people actually bothered to take part and more than 50 had decided what they felt about the forum even before it took place.
No surprise that “innovative” was the most popular choice at press time, since the other choices were even greater declarations of the forum’s brilliance.
But perhaps it was the Internet’s fault that attendance was less than stellar since students could pose questions to the PM on twitter instead of turning up in person.
—–
More on the Ministerial Forum:
SINGAPORE CITIZENSHIP — A NATIONAL CREDIT CARD?
Justin Zhuang questions whether the meaning of a citizenship is tied too closely to financial incentives.
—–
HELP keep the voice of TOC alive!
If you like this article, please consider a small donation to help theonlinecitizen.com stay alive. Please note that we can only accept donations from Singaporeans. Thank you for your assistance.Do you have a flair for writing? Volunteer with us. Email us your full name and contact details to theonlinecitizen@gmail.com
Is that Ah sor in the photo Mdm Ho?
“Is that Ah sor in the photo Mdm Ho?”
Wow ! After losing more than $40 billions of state assets with propensity to “buy high and sell low”, you still don’t recognize the Jinx ? Look like HoJinx must try harder to lose more money ! LOL
Shiny Happy People glowing !!!!! I should not insult REM’s beautiful song. Reminds me of the typical boardroom meeting when you have to laugh at all the boss’s stupid jokes.
I notice TOC has a good sense of humour if one looks at the pictures of Ho Ching, LKY and Lee Hsien Loong on the right of the home page.
The famiLee portrait is not complete without Wei Ling and Hsien Yang. LOL
Perhaps an article by Wei Ling and a quote from Hsien Yang to complete TOC’s famiLee home page.
She looks like an old auntie so much … wonder which part of hers that arouse LHL interest
Macham poster for Scary Movie Part 5.
Nothing personal
Liang Si Mei is prettier than the powerful woman in TH by 10 times
Come and watch Singaporeans’ Hitler slams Ho Ching video clip. It was banned by PAP. Very funny video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7skdIMzVJPw
Is is not Ho Chin, this is Ho Boo, I like love her sister Ho Kan.
Husband “Li Seng Lon” where ever he speak, look like the Merlion throwing sylvia.
Old Fart “Li Kan You”
Uncle stand by “Wah Kan Sin”.
Whole FamilEE name end up with “Boo & Kan” Ah———-Ah———AH———–Ah
Nantah Past Ghost
Seriously I actually thought this person was a man.
well this is the AH SOH that Forbes 3rd most powerful woman – for losing billions in SWF. See the trademark Grins?? remind you of…..
Mr borderless p/s look carefully, it not a man. It “Pontianak”
Calling #8,
you know what, I actually played that video you provided.
That is banned?
My word! the film is outrageous, its …its Sinful! ….its…its SHOCKING! and disturbing.
This film should be banned but why is it online ?
Should someone not do something about this film?
Lets shut it down!
Let shut down, …..erm…..Youtube???!!!?? 8O?
someone pls shut it down before more youths sees it.
oh my lord!
Excerp from awarding winning blog : http://www.littlespeck.com/content/economy/CTrendsEconomy-090909.htm
“Temasek is a commercially-driven investment company and is responsible to its sole shareholder, the Singapore Government, for delivering sustainable long-term returns,” the company said.
Questions:
1. Is the People the shareholder of Temasek?
2. What is defined as “sustainable long-term return” is,
3. Who sets that goal ? how it is set?
today i couldn’t helped laughin out LOUD…@ the F1 sport minister comment regardin the RIGGED F1 race last year
he says it not the VENUE fault @ all.. it the racer/committee whatever…
let see from a different point of view shall we?
now if your maid is pregnant in whatever she do without YOUR knowledge or consent.. you will lose the $5000 deposits plus all repraition expenses as gazette by the maid minister in charged..you still have to pay a monthly levy for her worked here..the maid minister did NOTHIN..but collect from YOU a monthly extrotion fee of near or aroun $300..when the pregant maid got troubled..the maid minister is not guilty of any charges..YOU the employer is GUILTY…
if this Ministerial forum is not humour….what is?
by the way who is THAT laughin woman in the picture? is she the ONE who lost more than $50 billion$ and laughin @ us the peasants for bein suckers?
“by the way who is THAT laughin woman in the picture? is she the ONE who lost more than $50 billion$ and laughin @ us the peasants for bein suckers?”
Oh yes, that laughing woman could well be laughing at your example and wonder how her husband can be so smart and far-sighted to approve the policy of “money the gov business, but problem the citizen business”