Andrew Loh
For the past six months, Ali has been braving the Singapore weather and sleeping on the streets in Little India. It is not something which he has chosen to do. Circumstances have dictated that he has no choice in this.
Ali is one of the many Bangladeshi workers who have run into trouble since coming to work in Singapore. Employed by Dong Sing Marine Engineering Pte Ltd, he worked as a pipe fitter from April 2008 to February 2009. When his employer failed to pay him his salaries for the months from November to February, Ali decided to confront his employer – but to no avail.
His employer, in addition to refusing to pay him, told Ali that he had to pay $85 for accommodation if he wanted to continue to stay in the dormitory. With no money on him, Ali decided to pack his bags and ended up on the streets. He then took his case to the Ministry of Manpower (MOM).
“I go many times,” Ali told me when I asked how many times he has approached MOM. Last month, he visited the MOM offices four times. At the last visit, Ali says that he was advised by an MOM officer to go to Labour Court, and if that failed, he should hire a lawyer and bring his case to the High Court. “How I hire lawyer! I no money!” Ali told me. Indeed, during our conversation, he kept asking me if I could find him a lawyer who would act pro bono.
The MOM has extended his Special Pass (S-Pass) till 11 September so that he could continue to stay in Singapore while he seeks resolution to his salary dispute with his employer. He is owed a total of about S$2,500. His employer has offered to pay him $1,500 instead. Ali has refused the offer as he feels that he should be paid his full amount for the work he has done. Besides, he feels that he needs to at least recoup some of the $8,000 he paid his agent in order o come to Singapore. When he last spoke to his boss, he was told that the company had no money and that the company “was finished”, meaning closed down. A check with ACRA (the directory of registered entities), however, shows that the company is still “live”.
Since he left his dormitory in February, Ali has been sleeping at MRT stations and in the streets, waiting and hoping to find some resolution to his case. I first met him one night, at 3 am, sleeping at a car park some months ago. “Very hard,” he tells me. Visibly upset, his eyes begin to tear up. “I money no have, food no have,” he says. “My wife and children now waiting waiting everyday I send them money,” he tells me. Ali, 26, is married and has a 5 year old son back in Bangladesh. “I sell my land come to Singapore,” he explains.
He has only one meal a day given out by aid workers but this is only for Mondays to Fridays. On the weekends, he depends on his friends who would either buy him food or give him a dollar or two. At times, his friends too would recommend him odd jobs so that he can survive on the streets. Sleeping on concrete floors, with the temperate weather, Ali falls sick sometimes. There is not much he can do except to grit his teeth and carry on.
Ali was not the only I saw sleeping in the streets or at car parks. There were at least another 10 workers at the same car park. And when I spoke to them, they told me they were also awaiting resolution to salary disputes with their employers. These men had been on the streets for between four to six months, depending on handouts to survive. They face problems of hygiene, of looking for food, and having to be wary of the police, security guards and car park authorities who would check on them. They would shower at coffeeshops’ toilets or at friends premises.
Before he came to Singapore, Ali’s agent had told him that he could earn S$1,000 per month working here. But he was earning much lesser than that as a pipe fitter. With his S-Pass expiring on 11 September, Ali is desperate that a resolution be found soon. Otherwise, all these months of enduring life on the streets would have been for nothing.
There are many workers such as Ali who are facing salary disputes with their employers. It is quite clear in the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act that “the employer shall pay the foreign worker his salary and allowances not later than seven (7) days after the last day of the salary period. Any salary period agreed between the employer and the foreign worker shall not exceed one month.”
In March this year, the Ministry of Manpower charged one of the directors of Tipper Corp Pte Ltd with 73 counts of not paying salaries to his workers. (See here for story.)
But for Ali, all he hopes is that MOM will help him retrieve what rightfully belongs to him so that he can send money home to feed his wife and son.
—–
HELP keep the voice of TOC alive!
If you like this article, please consider a small donation to help theonlinecitizen.com stay alive. Please note that we can only accept donations from Singaporeans. Thank you for your assistance.Do you have a flair for writing? Volunteer with us. Email us your full name and contact details to theonlinecitizen@gmail.com
Do you guys remember “The Truman Show” where Jim Carrey acted as a man who lived in a made-believe world? Where everything is controlled by the director, thus the town and management looking squicky clean and perfect. Any intruders and potential disturbance would be cast out immediately by the money- and-power-crazy director.
Well I guess that is how Singapore is? And Guess who is the evil director then?
Total Control in itself may appear invincible.
Total Control is also the Weakest link.
Anyone, let me know if this is too cheemilogy for you.
I used to laugh a colleague who migrated.
Now, I am the one being laughed at . He ROFL at me from DownUnder.
What does ROFL mean?
i am one of stupid sinkaporean.
I like to know how can a poor man with only qualifications but no job be entitled to migrate to australia?
I am fed up by singaporeans mentality.
56) No Balls on September 12th, 2009 10.11 pm
“What does ROFL mean? ”
it means Rolling On The Floor Laughing.
No ball, the company already incurred legal cost amounting to thousand dollars to them, this amout of money spent is like a punishement. It is quite strange they accused u n they still more than willing to pay $800 yo u as a form of compensation.
Exactly! If they stood by all their accusations against me, they should not have agreed to pay anything! What does this imply? Guilty conscience of course.
If only there are enough spaces here for me show readers the stacks of letters.
But the main intention of the article is expose the true colours of MOM. You notice? Every time someone has disputes with unscrupulous employers, the media will say “refer to MOM” as if they are always ready to help the oppresed worker.
There were also numerous reports about how the MOM “helped” workers to claim unpaid salaries and so on. And from what I went through, I think the public must not be misled into thinking that MOM is a very helpful authority!
As for the thosands of dollars incurred, well, it’s the company’smoney, not from the pockets of my superior, the colleague who made the accusation and the general manager who made the decision to engage the law firm, thinking that by doing so, it will “show me some colours” for trying to be a hero by lodging a complaint to MOM.
And from the way MOM handled the case, who still got the worst punishments?
I rejected the $800 because this sounds like paying me $800 to admit that I was guilty.
I see that there is only 1 option left for Change.