Leong Sze Hian


(Top: Singapore ranks 2nd, Credit: CLP Power)

I refer to the report “Electricity tariffs for households to go up by 12.5% in Q4” (CNA, Sep 29).

According to Hong Kong electricity producer CLP Power, which supplies about 80 per cent of Hong Kong’s power needs, in a media statement last year (Sep 2008), Singapore was ranked second among 21 cities for raising electricity tariffs most, since 2005.

For example, Singapore’s tariff in the table, rose by about 60 plus per cent, compared to about 15 per cent and 10 plus per cent for Hong Kong and Kuala Lumpur respectively.

Singapore Power’s (SP) Net Profit After Taxation for FY08/09 was $798 million, with revenue of $6,618 million.

Since SP provides the delivery of electricity, what about the profits of the power generation companies? Three of Temasek’s power generation companies have been sold to foreign companies.

For example, one of Singapore’s power companies, Seraya Power, was sold to YTL Corporation in Malaysia.

According to YTL’s web site, YTL Power registered a 43.8% jump in revenue for the 12 months ended 30 June 2009, due principally to the consolidation of approximately 4 months’ results from PowerSeraya, with PowerSeraya contributing RM197.4 million (US$56.4 m) in profit before tax.

As this is the profit from just one power generation company, how much in total profits do all the power generation companies make in a year?

And how much of these profits end up in the hands of foreign companies?

With about 117,000 unemployed residents as of June, and perhaps hundreds of thousands of Singaporeans suffering from reduced earnings in the current economic downturn, isn’t it time for a review of our national utilities policies, which allow the power sector to make huge profits, and to sell companies to foreign companies, without the need for parliamentary debate or approval?

Singapore’s tariff for the quarter starting in October, will be 21.69 cents per kilowatt hour, compared to Hong Kong’s 75.7 HK Cents (S$0.136) to 95.5 HK Cents (S$0.172) depending on consumption volume.

By the way, Hong Kong’s CLP Power froze and maintained their tariff for nine consecutive years until 2007.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

New Aware president Dana Lam’s first message to members

“Women and men, young and old, now feel empowered by your exemplary voices.”

摄24沐浴视频及裙底照 前耶鲁国大生辩称能减压

和五名女学生同住校园宿舍的26岁耶鲁—国大(Yale-NUS)高材生,被指控拍摄四名同学的24个沐浴视频,还拍下女同学的裙底照,只因为这样做能够减少学习压力。 在辩方成功提出申请后,法院已经下令禁止在媒体上公布被告和受害者的名字。 在去年的听证会上,辩方表示,已经确认了被告和受害者身份,他们都来自很小的社交圈子。法官认为没有必要协助隐瞒被告身份,然而警察检控官表示,为了保护受害者身份,当局接受有关的禁令,而法院才下达“禁口令”。 被告昨日(1月13日)承认八项侮辱女性尊严的指控,另外有16项控状仍在考量中。 根据法庭文件指出,被告在犯罪时仍是一名学生,干案时段落在2017年8月至2018年5月,以及2019年1月至3月之间。 被告与五名女同学同住,各别有自己的卧室,但是共用一间浴室,而他的罪行于2019年3月偷拍一名22岁的受害者沐浴时,被揭发。 被发现后立刻删除手机记录 当受害者在沐浴时,被告站在浴室门前,将手机以倾斜的角度偷偷拍摄女子沐浴。 控方指出,受害者当时听到厕所外面有声音,并在门缝隙下看见一双腿,抬起头就看见对准她的手机摄像头,因此大声呼叫当时也在宿舍内的男朋友,并围着毛巾跑出浴室。 被告在被发现时立刻跑到客厅的沙发,删除了受害者的沐浴视频,以及其他的偷拍视频,还清空了已删除的文件夹,并取下手机的黑色手机套,以免被识破。 受害者和其男友曾问被告,是否有看见任何人进入宿舍,并且要求检查被告的手机,但是都一无所获。 为了消除自己的嫌疑,被告就告知这对情侣有另一名室友进入宿舍,并建议受害者向校方报告有关事件。…

One year of COVID-19 in Indonesia: Five key points from the global crisis

JAKARTA, INDONESIA — The COVID-19 pandemic has gripped the world for a…

【选举】李显扬发长文《品格与勇气》 质问是否仍要拥护行动党“天生贵族”机制?

前进党成员、建国总理李光耀次子李显扬,自宣布加入前进党后,经常公开呼吁人民支持在野党。尽管在此次大选中未参与任何的竞选,但在竞选期间亦频频现身前进党候选人的选区,以示对前进党的支持。 他亦于今早(5日)以中、英和马来文三语,发表长文声援前进党,除了赞许在野党候选人是为民发声的人,同时也比较在野党候选人与人民行动党候选人,指如今的国会已然成为官员谋取更高职位的垫脚石,非为人民发声之地,质问人民是否应该继续拥护人民行动党“天生贵族”的机制。 “这个大选年,新加坡涌现了许多可靠和能干的在野党选人。这群候选人不但有爱心,而且也很真实。他们拥有高尚的品格与资历。更重要的是,他们已全力以赴准备为新加坡国人,无畏地表达他们的需求。“ “与他们相反的,正正是苍白无色的PAP竞选人。对他们而言,国会只是谋取更高官职的垫脚石。纸上文凭和多年来的塑造粉饰,是否造就了更优秀或更强大的领袖?人民行动党(PAP)系统是否有助加强4G领袖的表现?我们是否还要继续拥护PAP的“天生贵族”机制?” 在野党的困境VS人民行动党的一帆风顺 李显扬也提及在野党候选人近年来所面对的困境,经常面对不公平对待与人格抹黑,甚至是亲友的打击,但他也表示,在野党候选人无所畏惧,因为他们关心的是国家的未来,因此相当佩服他们的勇气。 “相对于成为人民行动党(PAP)的候选人,成为反对党候选人需要品格和勇气,后者体现的是为国家牺牲的意愿。反对党候选人经常成为不公平对待、人格抹黑的受害者,而且也必须面对亲朋戚友的打击。然而,这些候选人选择站出来,为全民追求公正与平等。他们选择为人民发声,因为他们关心我们国家的未来。” 反观,他指出,人民行动党国会议员的政途一帆风顺,甚至可以进入内阁,或获得高薪职位。 “PAP国会议员的政途都一帆风顺,有者获得进入内阁、有者获得非常高薪的政治职位,而另一些则获颁董事职位及各种其它职位。” 李显扬:自己检查自己是行不通的 此外,他也阐述两者在国会上的立场,形容人民行动党,因党鞭(Party whip)的推动与对党的义务,加上各种回报,因此根据党的指示投票是意料中事,反观在野党会质疑一些不受欢迎的政策,并合理质询,避免出现滥权。他也提及各在野党候选人如前进党秘书长陈清木医生、工人党等。…