
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Foolish talk of regulating the Internet (again)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/10/foolish-talk-of-regulating-the-internet-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/10/foolish-talk-of-regulating-the-internet-again/</link>
	<description>a community of Singaporeans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:40:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: abu shamar</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/10/foolish-talk-of-regulating-the-internet-again/comment-page-1/#comment-111346</link>
		<dc:creator>abu shamar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=14804#comment-111346</guid>
		<description>well try as they might, they can never regulate the internet. All these MSM try to do is project one side of the angle. Some are even caught in their hunt for publicity like the Balloon kid incident, so much for free press! They even show that Muslims should apologise for terrorist acts. Well, my take is very simple, terrorism is a crime and should be treated as such, even if they commit it in the name of religion. I do not see other religions apologise for crimes of their breathen, so why single Muslims out? Heck, no US citizen apologised for Tim McVeigh even though he said he was doing it for the sake of his country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well try as they might, they can never regulate the internet. All these MSM try to do is project one side of the angle. Some are even caught in their hunt for publicity like the Balloon kid incident, so much for free press! They even show that Muslims should apologise for terrorist acts. Well, my take is very simple, terrorism is a crime and should be treated as such, even if they commit it in the name of religion. I do not see other religions apologise for crimes of their breathen, so why single Muslims out? Heck, no US citizen apologised for Tim McVeigh even though he said he was doing it for the sake of his country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: singapoorismyBRAND</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/10/foolish-talk-of-regulating-the-internet-again/comment-page-1/#comment-111053</link>
		<dc:creator>singapoorismyBRAND</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 09:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=14804#comment-111053</guid>
		<description>[i]Bloggers who get advertising dollars are just self employed individuals. They have to declare their own earnings[/i]

and overpaid ministers/mps who act as moonshines directors in multinational companies do not needs to delcare @ all...did leekuanyew declared his earnins as consultant to citibank inc?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[i]Bloggers who get advertising dollars are just self employed individuals. They have to declare their own earnings[/i]</p>
<p>and overpaid ministers/mps who act as moonshines directors in multinational companies do not needs to delcare @ all&#8230;did leekuanyew declared his earnins as consultant to citibank inc?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Singapore Daily &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weekly Roundup: Week 42</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/10/foolish-talk-of-regulating-the-internet-again/comment-page-1/#comment-111008</link>
		<dc:creator>The Singapore Daily &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weekly Roundup: Week 42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 05:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=14804#comment-111008</guid>
		<description>[...] for a Third-world country [Recommended] - The Enquirer: It wasn’t just Chee Soon Juan - TOC: Foolish talk of regulating the Internet (again) - Brotherhood Press: Is MDA asking bloggers to declare their income? An interview with Missy Dotty [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for a Third-world country [Recommended] &#8211; The Enquirer: It wasn’t just Chee Soon Juan &#8211; TOC: Foolish talk of regulating the Internet (again) &#8211; Brotherhood Press: Is MDA asking bloggers to declare their income? An interview with Missy Dotty [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: socrates</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/10/foolish-talk-of-regulating-the-internet-again/comment-page-1/#comment-110897</link>
		<dc:creator>socrates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=14804#comment-110897</guid>
		<description>I mean nothing  wrong to say this post is being paid for!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean nothing  wrong to say this post is being paid for!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: socrates</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/10/foolish-talk-of-regulating-the-internet-again/comment-page-1/#comment-110896</link>
		<dc:creator>socrates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=14804#comment-110896</guid>
		<description>If you are paid to post, there is nothing to say right upfront  that this post is being paid for. Maybe no need to name the payer but at least you alert readers to the commercial aspect of your post. There is no need to be dishonest about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are paid to post, there is nothing to say right upfront  that this post is being paid for. Maybe no need to name the payer but at least you alert readers to the commercial aspect of your post. There is no need to be dishonest about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lobo76</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/10/foolish-talk-of-regulating-the-internet-again/comment-page-1/#comment-110892</link>
		<dc:creator>lobo76</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=14804#comment-110892</guid>
		<description>21) HL on October 15th, 2009 11.45 am 
... mountains need to be moved before MDA and IRAS can come to some agreement on how to plug this potential policy blackhole – i.e. who collects the taxes, who polices, etc.

hmm.. the tax issue seems rather straightforward, Bloggers who get advertising dollars are just self employed individuals. They have to declare their own earnings. The policing, if any, will be the same for other self employed individuals. e.g insurance or housing agents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>21) HL on October 15th, 2009 11.45 am<br />
&#8230; mountains need to be moved before MDA and IRAS can come to some agreement on how to plug this potential policy blackhole – i.e. who collects the taxes, who polices, etc.</p>
<p>hmm.. the tax issue seems rather straightforward, Bloggers who get advertising dollars are just self employed individuals. They have to declare their own earnings. The policing, if any, will be the same for other self employed individuals. e.g insurance or housing agents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pokemon</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/10/foolish-talk-of-regulating-the-internet-again/comment-page-1/#comment-110676</link>
		<dc:creator>pokemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=14804#comment-110676</guid>
		<description>cyberspace is a goldmine. Where can you find millions of people who are more than willing to pay out real cash to buy fake money to transact on unreal things?

Who says transactions cannot be taxed there. Go and try to buy a space station without paying tax. See whether it can be done. Cannot.  You will have strange people in funny hats knocking on your door with tax return forms. 

The problem is the people who know how to syndicate all this will never share their knowledge. They started developing their know how some 10 years back ago. They did it quietly.

During that time our gahmen kept saying there is nothing worthwhile in the cyberspace. These people on the otherhand saw gold, so they jaga the cyberspace like a baby tiger, feeding, caring and protecting it from day one.  So they invested in the knowledge. They put their best brains to develop virtual monetary exchange systems that can even put to shame the IMF, ADB and World Bank put together. 

Some even have international networks, linkages complete with banks / insurance / arbitrage and so on and so forth. Gahmen could have done the same.  Who was stopping them? Ten years ago cyberspace was the wild west, but they were too busy dismissing cyberspace. So who do you think stepped into the blank space?

The question is do you think these people will teach the gahmen how to do their song and dance? 

I dont think so. If they did MDA and IRAS can put their act together in less than a week. They are that organized and that good. I guarantee you. The problem as I see it is why should they even teach our gahmen? There is no incentive to do so. No money there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cyberspace is a goldmine. Where can you find millions of people who are more than willing to pay out real cash to buy fake money to transact on unreal things?</p>
<p>Who says transactions cannot be taxed there. Go and try to buy a space station without paying tax. See whether it can be done. Cannot.  You will have strange people in funny hats knocking on your door with tax return forms. </p>
<p>The problem is the people who know how to syndicate all this will never share their knowledge. They started developing their know how some 10 years back ago. They did it quietly.</p>
<p>During that time our gahmen kept saying there is nothing worthwhile in the cyberspace. These people on the otherhand saw gold, so they jaga the cyberspace like a baby tiger, feeding, caring and protecting it from day one.  So they invested in the knowledge. They put their best brains to develop virtual monetary exchange systems that can even put to shame the IMF, ADB and World Bank put together. </p>
<p>Some even have international networks, linkages complete with banks / insurance / arbitrage and so on and so forth. Gahmen could have done the same.  Who was stopping them? Ten years ago cyberspace was the wild west, but they were too busy dismissing cyberspace. So who do you think stepped into the blank space?</p>
<p>The question is do you think these people will teach the gahmen how to do their song and dance? </p>
<p>I dont think so. If they did MDA and IRAS can put their act together in less than a week. They are that organized and that good. I guarantee you. The problem as I see it is why should they even teach our gahmen? There is no incentive to do so. No money there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HL</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/10/foolish-talk-of-regulating-the-internet-again/comment-page-1/#comment-110620</link>
		<dc:creator>HL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=14804#comment-110620</guid>
		<description>I take a slightly different view from most posts here.

The declaration would help to state up front where the blogger is coming from. Might not necessarily mean what the blogger writes is or has to be biased towards the sponsor. The decision then becomes a more informed one for the readers, and overall improved health on info reliability. This, I welcome.

The only issue is how best to effect this. Direct regulation is difficult, and not just because of the &quot;vastness&quot; of cyberspace. Someone mentioned taxation, and that&#039;s a good example of a stumbling block - mountains need to be moved before MDA and IRAS can come to some agreement on how to plug this potential policy blackhole - i.e. who collects the taxes, who polices, etc.

My worry is, now this made public, that some effort will have to be made to come up with some semblance of a policy that is mostly ineffective. Think 377A saga. Too much ambiguity will a) prompt bloggers to ridicule and dismiss it, or b) lead to excessive caution and over-self-regulation. Neither of these outcomes do much good for consumers seeking info online, actually, just throws more smoke into the fray.

Surprisingly, the best solution could be to encourage a &quot;commercial blogger code of honour&quot;, outside the realm of regulation. But there are so many loose strings that comes naturally with this that govt cannot possibly take it up. Nor is there a need to, really, since it would be a community-based evolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take a slightly different view from most posts here.</p>
<p>The declaration would help to state up front where the blogger is coming from. Might not necessarily mean what the blogger writes is or has to be biased towards the sponsor. The decision then becomes a more informed one for the readers, and overall improved health on info reliability. This, I welcome.</p>
<p>The only issue is how best to effect this. Direct regulation is difficult, and not just because of the &#8220;vastness&#8221; of cyberspace. Someone mentioned taxation, and that&#8217;s a good example of a stumbling block &#8211; mountains need to be moved before MDA and IRAS can come to some agreement on how to plug this potential policy blackhole &#8211; i.e. who collects the taxes, who polices, etc.</p>
<p>My worry is, now this made public, that some effort will have to be made to come up with some semblance of a policy that is mostly ineffective. Think 377A saga. Too much ambiguity will a) prompt bloggers to ridicule and dismiss it, or b) lead to excessive caution and over-self-regulation. Neither of these outcomes do much good for consumers seeking info online, actually, just throws more smoke into the fray.</p>
<p>Surprisingly, the best solution could be to encourage a &#8220;commercial blogger code of honour&#8221;, outside the realm of regulation. But there are so many loose strings that comes naturally with this that govt cannot possibly take it up. Nor is there a need to, really, since it would be a community-based evolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Singapore Daily &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily SG: 15 Oct 2009</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/10/foolish-talk-of-regulating-the-internet-again/comment-page-1/#comment-110606</link>
		<dc:creator>The Singapore Daily &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily SG: 15 Oct 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=14804#comment-110606</guid>
		<description>[...] vs X-Stream Media - TOC: Foolish talk of regulating the Internet (again) - Brotherhood Press: Is MDA asking bloggers to declare their income? An interview with Missy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] vs X-Stream Media &#8211; TOC: Foolish talk of regulating the Internet (again) &#8211; Brotherhood Press: Is MDA asking bloggers to declare their income? An interview with Missy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: i am a lobo man</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/10/foolish-talk-of-regulating-the-internet-again/comment-page-1/#comment-110510</link>
		<dc:creator>i am a lobo man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=14804#comment-110510</guid>
		<description>The government should butt off the new media and mind their own business. They have enough issues on the table waiting for them to attend to rather than to stick their nose in new media. Non-accountabilities, non-transparency, ever-rising cost of living, unregulated influx of foreigners, lost of sense of national identity. They have not address the basic issues at hand and want to interfere in the new media. Have they got no sense of priorities ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The government should butt off the new media and mind their own business. They have enough issues on the table waiting for them to attend to rather than to stick their nose in new media. Non-accountabilities, non-transparency, ever-rising cost of living, unregulated influx of foreigners, lost of sense of national identity. They have not address the basic issues at hand and want to interfere in the new media. Have they got no sense of priorities ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: law breaker ??</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/10/foolish-talk-of-regulating-the-internet-again/comment-page-1/#comment-110498</link>
		<dc:creator>law breaker ??</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=14804#comment-110498</guid>
		<description>&quot;There&#039;s no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren&#039;t enough criminals, one &quot;makes&quot; them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What&#039;s there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced nor objectively interpreted -- and you create a nation of law-breakers-and then you cash in on the guilt.&quot; 

(Ayn Rand, &quot;Atlas Shrugged&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren&#8217;t enough criminals, one &#8220;makes&#8221; them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What&#8217;s there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced nor objectively interpreted &#8212; and you create a nation of law-breakers-and then you cash in on the guilt.&#8221; </p>
<p>(Ayn Rand, &#8220;Atlas Shrugged&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: massivelosses_sohow?</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/10/foolish-talk-of-regulating-the-internet-again/comment-page-1/#comment-110493</link>
		<dc:creator>massivelosses_sohow?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=14804#comment-110493</guid>
		<description>they will track and demand from every source of revenue to pay taxes... since like my nick name says... massive losses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they will track and demand from every source of revenue to pay taxes&#8230; since like my nick name says&#8230; massive losses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lop</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/10/foolish-talk-of-regulating-the-internet-again/comment-page-1/#comment-110488</link>
		<dc:creator>Lop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=14804#comment-110488</guid>
		<description>Do these bloggers pay taxes for whatever they got from the companies? If they do, then MDA could start by working with IRAS. If they don&#039;t, then perhaps IRAS should start looking into it LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do these bloggers pay taxes for whatever they got from the companies? If they do, then MDA could start by working with IRAS. If they don&#8217;t, then perhaps IRAS should start looking into it LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: valin</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/10/foolish-talk-of-regulating-the-internet-again/comment-page-1/#comment-110457</link>
		<dc:creator>valin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=14804#comment-110457</guid>
		<description>my mistake, @ singaporean #4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my mistake, @ singaporean #4</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: valin</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/10/foolish-talk-of-regulating-the-internet-again/comment-page-1/#comment-110456</link>
		<dc:creator>valin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=14804#comment-110456</guid>
		<description>@ singaporedaddy #4:

look at which newspaper was promoting it, and who/what it was promoting.
kinda self-explanatory. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ singaporedaddy #4:</p>
<p>look at which newspaper was promoting it, and who/what it was promoting.<br />
kinda self-explanatory. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OnlineShmonline</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/10/foolish-talk-of-regulating-the-internet-again/comment-page-1/#comment-110445</link>
		<dc:creator>OnlineShmonline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 06:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=14804#comment-110445</guid>
		<description>@ 9) singaporedaddy on	 October 14th, 2009 12.09 pm

The final passage &#039;borrowed from 
http://dotseng.wordpress.com/2009/10/13/is-mda-asking-bloggers-to-declare-their-income-an-interview-with-missy-dotty/ 
_____________________________
Q; Just a final question Dotty; you know the people in wayangparty are quite nervous by this development – do you think, the MDA ruling will work against them?

A: Really I don’t see why that should be Darkness. We’ve all being told time and again: there is nothing but lies and disinformation in the internet. Invoking the law may just break that magic spell – why should anyone do such a silly thing?

Really dont be so ridiculous.
_____________________________

ROFL...after so many attempts by Singapore&#039;s body politic to discredit the validity of opinions and comments found on the internet blog sites and opinion pages (except for Reach, etc), any attempt to control the &#039;final frontier&#039; moves a LONG way to legitimize the users of the internet.

*sigh* I don&#039;t know whether to laugh or to cry. I guess the fear of the unknown (and the lack of control) is finally causing enough consternation to the incumbents who want to maintain their way of life...sadly, they keep forgetting that the only constant is change. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 9) singaporedaddy on	 October 14th, 2009 12.09 pm</p>
<p>The final passage &#8216;borrowed from<br />
<a href="http://dotseng.wordpress.com/2009/10/13/is-mda-asking-bloggers-to-declare-their-income-an-interview-with-missy-dotty/" rel="nofollow">http://dotseng.wordpress.com/2009/10/13/is-mda-asking-bloggers-to-declare-their-income-an-interview-with-missy-dotty/</a><br />
_____________________________<br />
Q; Just a final question Dotty; you know the people in wayangparty are quite nervous by this development – do you think, the MDA ruling will work against them?</p>
<p>A: Really I don’t see why that should be Darkness. We’ve all being told time and again: there is nothing but lies and disinformation in the internet. Invoking the law may just break that magic spell – why should anyone do such a silly thing?</p>
<p>Really dont be so ridiculous.<br />
_____________________________</p>
<p>ROFL&#8230;after so many attempts by Singapore&#8217;s body politic to discredit the validity of opinions and comments found on the internet blog sites and opinion pages (except for Reach, etc), any attempt to control the &#8216;final frontier&#8217; moves a LONG way to legitimize the users of the internet.</p>
<p>*sigh* I don&#8217;t know whether to laugh or to cry. I guess the fear of the unknown (and the lack of control) is finally causing enough consternation to the incumbents who want to maintain their way of life&#8230;sadly, they keep forgetting that the only constant is change. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debra Chua Mui Mui of the Hong</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/10/foolish-talk-of-regulating-the-internet-again/comment-page-1/#comment-110421</link>
		<dc:creator>Debra Chua Mui Mui of the Hong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=14804#comment-110421</guid>
		<description>I think Bloggers can  learn from MSM to write how they write what the write but applied to Alternative Media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Bloggers can  learn from MSM to write how they write what the write but applied to Alternative Media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puah Bai Mee</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/10/foolish-talk-of-regulating-the-internet-again/comment-page-1/#comment-110418</link>
		<dc:creator>Puah Bai Mee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=14804#comment-110418</guid>
		<description>AGAIN!,  there is only 1 way out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AGAIN!,  there is only 1 way out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fiona Chan Chee Bee</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/10/foolish-talk-of-regulating-the-internet-again/comment-page-1/#comment-110412</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiona Chan Chee Bee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=14804#comment-110412</guid>
		<description>Does this mean all reporters and writers from all media should declare IF they are also getting goodies in one way or another from anyone or anything?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean all reporters and writers from all media should declare IF they are also getting goodies in one way or another from anyone or anything?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: singaporedaddy</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/10/foolish-talk-of-regulating-the-internet-again/comment-page-1/#comment-110410</link>
		<dc:creator>singaporedaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=14804#comment-110410</guid>
		<description>There, there, there....dont sweat the small stuff....no one is planning to regulate the internet.

http://dotseng.wordpress.com/2009/10/13/is-mda-asking-bloggers-to-declare-their-income-an-interview-with-missy-dotty/

Everything is under control

SD

(Internet Liaison officer of the brotherhood)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There, there, there&#8230;.dont sweat the small stuff&#8230;.no one is planning to regulate the internet.</p>
<p><a href="http://dotseng.wordpress.com/2009/10/13/is-mda-asking-bloggers-to-declare-their-income-an-interview-with-missy-dotty/" rel="nofollow">http://dotseng.wordpress.com/2009/10/13/is-mda-asking-bloggers-to-declare-their-income-an-interview-with-missy-dotty/</a></p>
<p>Everything is under control</p>
<p>SD</p>
<p>(Internet Liaison officer of the brotherhood)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
