<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Complaint against TOC made to S&#8217;pore Police</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/complaint-against-toc-made-to-spore-police/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/complaint-against-toc-made-to-spore-police/</link>
	<description>Singapore&#039;s #1 Socio-Political Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 04:31:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous1</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/complaint-against-toc-made-to-spore-police/comment-page-4/#comment-219318</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 19:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18231#comment-219318</guid>
		<description>Singapore Police Force SUCKS!
I hate everything about their useless &amp; stupid (shit) police force.
SPF are scum, dumb morons &amp; arrogant assholes.
Singapore Police (forever) SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS &amp; SUCKS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Singapore Police Force SUCKS!<br />
I hate everything about their useless &amp; stupid (shit) police force.<br />
SPF are scum, dumb morons &amp; arrogant assholes.<br />
Singapore Police (forever) SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS, SUCKS &amp; SUCKS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr.P</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/complaint-against-toc-made-to-spore-police/comment-page-3/#comment-126355</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr.P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18231#comment-126355</guid>
		<description>Perhaps Janet Wee is another greenhorn lawyer, dreaming to get on board Lee &amp; Lee?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Janet Wee is another greenhorn lawyer, dreaming to get on board Lee &amp; Lee?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Singapore Daily &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weekly Roundup: Week 02</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/complaint-against-toc-made-to-spore-police/comment-page-3/#comment-125976</link>
		<dc:creator>The Singapore Daily &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weekly Roundup: Week 02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 03:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18231#comment-125976</guid>
		<description>[...] Lee Kuan Yew had suggested &#8220;instigating riots and disorder&#8221; to crush opposition - TOC: Complaint against TOC made to S’pore Police [Thanks Seelan] - The Temasek Review: The ‘Janet Wee’ versus The Online Citizen [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lee Kuan Yew had suggested &#8220;instigating riots and disorder&#8221; to crush opposition &#8211; TOC: Complaint against TOC made to S’pore Police [Thanks Seelan] &#8211; The Temasek Review: The ‘Janet Wee’ versus The Online Citizen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aiyoyo</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/complaint-against-toc-made-to-spore-police/comment-page-3/#comment-124760</link>
		<dc:creator>aiyoyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 23:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18231#comment-124760</guid>
		<description>aiyoyo,

can this Jarnet help to solve unemployment rate in this red dot?

else, spend more time thinking 1st, before talk talk talk...

so many people no jobs, tummy hungry, need $ to pay

seems this Jarnet belly belly free...

aiyoyo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aiyoyo,</p>
<p>can this Jarnet help to solve unemployment rate in this red dot?</p>
<p>else, spend more time thinking 1st, before talk talk talk&#8230;</p>
<p>so many people no jobs, tummy hungry, need $ to pay</p>
<p>seems this Jarnet belly belly free&#8230;</p>
<p>aiyoyo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: myveryveryBIGview</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/complaint-against-toc-made-to-spore-police/comment-page-3/#comment-124432</link>
		<dc:creator>myveryveryBIGview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 03:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18231#comment-124432</guid>
		<description>[i]E.g.
Quesiton: How to defence SIngapore against armed insurgency and major terrorist attacks in an urban setting:

Answer: Buy Leopard MBT for counter-insurgency urban warfare.[/i]

ello ello encil LAI....
you know or not?
we have the best navy fulLEE armed vessel protectin the lighthouse..instead of protectin we largared into an unarmed container ship and got 1/2 sunk...
now the navy advert is on again... iliked the singapore navy seal advert..wah garang..macho as well... yet mas salas manged to swim across johore in a manmade balloon bag...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[i]E.g.<br />
Quesiton: How to defence SIngapore against armed insurgency and major terrorist attacks in an urban setting:</p>
<p>Answer: Buy Leopard MBT for counter-insurgency urban warfare.[/i]</p>
<p>ello ello encil LAI&#8230;.<br />
you know or not?<br />
we have the best navy fulLEE armed vessel protectin the lighthouse..instead of protectin we largared into an unarmed container ship and got 1/2 sunk&#8230;<br />
now the navy advert is on again&#8230; iliked the singapore navy seal advert..wah garang..macho as well&#8230; yet mas salas manged to swim across johore in a manmade balloon bag&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilbert Goh</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/complaint-against-toc-made-to-spore-police/comment-page-3/#comment-124401</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilbert Goh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 00:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18231#comment-124401</guid>
		<description>It just goes to show how popular and well supported LKY is.

The older generation still holds him in high regard becasue he turns Singapore from an unknown seaport to a economic advanced powerhouse.

I am unsure how the younger generation will view him though as they have not really know him well as a person - more like a tyrant supported by a PM son.

Those in their 30s-40s may support him if they belong  to the higher middle income. They all gain from the government policies especially if they are doing business.

Those in the lower middle income may not support him as they all suffer a drop in disposable income during these past few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It just goes to show how popular and well supported LKY is.</p>
<p>The older generation still holds him in high regard becasue he turns Singapore from an unknown seaport to a economic advanced powerhouse.</p>
<p>I am unsure how the younger generation will view him though as they have not really know him well as a person &#8211; more like a tyrant supported by a PM son.</p>
<p>Those in their 30s-40s may support him if they belong  to the higher middle income. They all gain from the government policies especially if they are doing business.</p>
<p>Those in the lower middle income may not support him as they all suffer a drop in disposable income during these past few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: April Fool joke in December</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/complaint-against-toc-made-to-spore-police/comment-page-3/#comment-124398</link>
		<dc:creator>April Fool joke in December</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 23:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18231#comment-124398</guid>
		<description>This cannot be real.  She even complained to Google!  Is &#039;LKY&#039; a registered trademark violated by TOC???

Anyway it is clear that some Singaporeans (maybe many) think that the world oeprates like Spore, that the system practised in Spore including &#039;Asian values&#039; is the normal order of the day.  They have not got a clue that this sort of govt and &#039;Asian values&#039; are shocking to the outside world and Janet Wee&#039;s complaint can only be possible from North Korea or China.

As if the Lees suing Wall street Journal and the Economic magazine editors are not harmful to Spore&#039;s reputation enough, now even getting Google involved.  At this rate, Spore will sink further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This cannot be real.  She even complained to Google!  Is &#8216;LKY&#8217; a registered trademark violated by TOC???</p>
<p>Anyway it is clear that some Singaporeans (maybe many) think that the world oeprates like Spore, that the system practised in Spore including &#8216;Asian values&#8217; is the normal order of the day.  They have not got a clue that this sort of govt and &#8216;Asian values&#8217; are shocking to the outside world and Janet Wee&#8217;s complaint can only be possible from North Korea or China.</p>
<p>As if the Lees suing Wall street Journal and the Economic magazine editors are not harmful to Spore&#8217;s reputation enough, now even getting Google involved.  At this rate, Spore will sink further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clement Tan</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/complaint-against-toc-made-to-spore-police/comment-page-3/#comment-124234</link>
		<dc:creator>Clement Tan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 04:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18231#comment-124234</guid>
		<description>Leopard MBT with NSmen will not stop terrorists who will take hostages.

What &quot;Age of Terrorism&quot;...as if there wasn&#039;t terrorism at any period of history. 

How can PAP be a party of national security when it lets out a limping terrorist wannabe under supposedly close guard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leopard MBT with NSmen will not stop terrorists who will take hostages.</p>
<p>What &#8220;Age of Terrorism&#8221;&#8230;as if there wasn&#8217;t terrorism at any period of history. </p>
<p>How can PAP be a party of national security when it lets out a limping terrorist wannabe under supposedly close guard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lai CF</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/complaint-against-toc-made-to-spore-police/comment-page-3/#comment-124227</link>
		<dc:creator>Lai CF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 04:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18231#comment-124227</guid>
		<description>Lee Kuan Yew, if I recalled correctly in a 1978 ND Rally Speech, is very much an admirer of strategic planning, quoting how Shell predicted the 1970s&#039; Oil Crisis adn SOny&#039;s 50-Year Strategy Planning.

Never udnerestimated PAP as they are no slough in strategic Planning and SIngapore&#039;s Future at that.
And that is why they keep winning GE after GE, simply by keeping HDB Heartlanders (90% of SIngaporeans living in &#039;em) sweet and happy with &quot;incentives and handouts&quot;.

I beleive it is a slip of the old man&#039;s tongue, iandvertently let slipped something best not spoken, and providing an insight in SIngapore&#039;s strategic planning in this Age of terrorism.

And this may answer my puzzlement on why do they bought those Leopard Main Battle Tanks which are useless in jungle warfare, sittign duck from the air, and sittign duck against guerillas and mobile infantry in modern warfare...(guess I read too much of Tom CLancy&#039;s novels).

Recalled Hungary 1956&#039;s Uprising
Recalled Prague Spring 1968
recalled Isrealis invasion of Gaza.

That is, Leopard MBT is a vital component in defence and suppressing a sudden terrorist uprising as wella s armed insurgency.

Wil soembody re-post MM Lee speech on this &quot;uprising and called in the Armed Forces&quot; for our perusal again?

Recalled carefully between the lines.
He may meant that in case of a violent uprising to topple PAP Government...and not if Opposition wins the election in a non-violent democratic process.

That is how litigation suits begin if careful attention is not taken &quot;to read between the lines&quot; and you all took that lure of a honey-trap and jumped to conclusion publicly.

E.g.
Quesiton: How to defence SIngapore against armed insurgency and major terrorist attacks in an urban setting:

Answer: Buy Leopard MBT for counter-insurgency urban warfare.

of course, the above is a mere conjecture on my part as:

MM alleged slip of tongue + Leopard MBT = &quot;How to counter internal armed insurgency&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee Kuan Yew, if I recalled correctly in a 1978 ND Rally Speech, is very much an admirer of strategic planning, quoting how Shell predicted the 1970s&#8217; Oil Crisis adn SOny&#8217;s 50-Year Strategy Planning.</p>
<p>Never udnerestimated PAP as they are no slough in strategic Planning and SIngapore&#8217;s Future at that.<br />
And that is why they keep winning GE after GE, simply by keeping HDB Heartlanders (90% of SIngaporeans living in &#8216;em) sweet and happy with &#8220;incentives and handouts&#8221;.</p>
<p>I beleive it is a slip of the old man&#8217;s tongue, iandvertently let slipped something best not spoken, and providing an insight in SIngapore&#8217;s strategic planning in this Age of terrorism.</p>
<p>And this may answer my puzzlement on why do they bought those Leopard Main Battle Tanks which are useless in jungle warfare, sittign duck from the air, and sittign duck against guerillas and mobile infantry in modern warfare&#8230;(guess I read too much of Tom CLancy&#8217;s novels).</p>
<p>Recalled Hungary 1956&#8242;s Uprising<br />
Recalled Prague Spring 1968<br />
recalled Isrealis invasion of Gaza.</p>
<p>That is, Leopard MBT is a vital component in defence and suppressing a sudden terrorist uprising as wella s armed insurgency.</p>
<p>Wil soembody re-post MM Lee speech on this &#8220;uprising and called in the Armed Forces&#8221; for our perusal again?</p>
<p>Recalled carefully between the lines.<br />
He may meant that in case of a violent uprising to topple PAP Government&#8230;and not if Opposition wins the election in a non-violent democratic process.</p>
<p>That is how litigation suits begin if careful attention is not taken &#8220;to read between the lines&#8221; and you all took that lure of a honey-trap and jumped to conclusion publicly.</p>
<p>E.g.<br />
Quesiton: How to defence SIngapore against armed insurgency and major terrorist attacks in an urban setting:</p>
<p>Answer: Buy Leopard MBT for counter-insurgency urban warfare.</p>
<p>of course, the above is a mere conjecture on my part as:</p>
<p>MM alleged slip of tongue + Leopard MBT = &#8220;How to counter internal armed insurgency&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lai CF</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/complaint-against-toc-made-to-spore-police/comment-page-3/#comment-124216</link>
		<dc:creator>Lai CF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 03:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18231#comment-124216</guid>
		<description>It is a long time since I last visited here.

In December, I read one of the posters&#039; posted Lee Kuan Yew infamous&#039;s quotation..&quot;never mind what you think, we know what is best for you....&quot;..plus one more quotation.

Can anybody reproduces here?

I ahd been branded a &quot;PAP runing dog&quot; voer at www.deluxecoffeeclub.com  previously, a &quot;double-headed snake&quot; at REACH....and now this latest &quot;Janet Wee&quot; incident over here.

It sets me thinking....is GE2011 coming within first half of this year?

There is a parallel incident over at REACH where I am active since 2003..and lo and behold, out of the blue, a &#039;Roger Ho&quot; suddenly branded me as &quot;malcontents&quot;, &quot;ungrateful&quot;, etc....and encouraging netizens to &quot;brand together and drive anti-SIngapore malcontents like Lai CF out&quot;.

This is the very first time that I ahd been so seriously attacked at FBU and REACH since I started posting in 2003.

Make me wonder why can&#039;t PAP suporters let &quot;sleeping dog lies&quot; and start to reinsurrect that so-called CYperspace PAP Anti-Insurgency Squad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a long time since I last visited here.</p>
<p>In December, I read one of the posters&#8217; posted Lee Kuan Yew infamous&#8217;s quotation..&#8221;never mind what you think, we know what is best for you&#8230;.&#8221;..plus one more quotation.</p>
<p>Can anybody reproduces here?</p>
<p>I ahd been branded a &#8220;PAP runing dog&#8221; voer at <a href="http://www.deluxecoffeeclub.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.deluxecoffeeclub.com</a>  previously, a &#8220;double-headed snake&#8221; at REACH&#8230;.and now this latest &#8220;Janet Wee&#8221; incident over here.</p>
<p>It sets me thinking&#8230;.is GE2011 coming within first half of this year?</p>
<p>There is a parallel incident over at REACH where I am active since 2003..and lo and behold, out of the blue, a &#8216;Roger Ho&#8221; suddenly branded me as &#8220;malcontents&#8221;, &#8220;ungrateful&#8221;, etc&#8230;.and encouraging netizens to &#8220;brand together and drive anti-SIngapore malcontents like Lai CF out&#8221;.</p>
<p>This is the very first time that I ahd been so seriously attacked at FBU and REACH since I started posting in 2003.</p>
<p>Make me wonder why can&#8217;t PAP suporters let &#8220;sleeping dog lies&#8221; and start to reinsurrect that so-called CYperspace PAP Anti-Insurgency Squad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sweeney 38</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/complaint-against-toc-made-to-spore-police/comment-page-3/#comment-124201</link>
		<dc:creator>sweeney 38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 01:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18231#comment-124201</guid>
		<description>@140

It takes one to recognise one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@140</p>
<p>It takes one to recognise one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: death upon mankind</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/complaint-against-toc-made-to-spore-police/comment-page-3/#comment-124190</link>
		<dc:creator>death upon mankind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18231#comment-124190</guid>
		<description>didnt Lee Kuan Yew said that singaporeans are champion grumblers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>didnt Lee Kuan Yew said that singaporeans are champion grumblers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thinktok</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/complaint-against-toc-made-to-spore-police/comment-page-3/#comment-124132</link>
		<dc:creator>thinktok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18231#comment-124132</guid>
		<description>Some of the bloggers here seem jumpy.  Janet Wee is just a silly dude exercising her right to post.  You either agree with her or you disagree.  No need to insinuate again.

TOC should remain neutral and allow the free flow of opinions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the bloggers here seem jumpy.  Janet Wee is just a silly dude exercising her right to post.  You either agree with her or you disagree.  No need to insinuate again.</p>
<p>TOC should remain neutral and allow the free flow of opinions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caned lah</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/complaint-against-toc-made-to-spore-police/comment-page-3/#comment-124127</link>
		<dc:creator>caned lah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 11:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18231#comment-124127</guid>
		<description>&quot;Janet is certainly a brave girl to instigate and test the tolerant level of the whole establishment from MM, AG to SPF.&quot;

what rubbish lah. at the end of the day if some people are not so tolerant, who will get caned lah. definitely not you and that hornet gal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Janet is certainly a brave girl to instigate and test the tolerant level of the whole establishment from MM, AG to SPF.&#8221;</p>
<p>what rubbish lah. at the end of the day if some people are not so tolerant, who will get caned lah. definitely not you and that hornet gal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sefergfe</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/complaint-against-toc-made-to-spore-police/comment-page-3/#comment-124116</link>
		<dc:creator>sefergfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 09:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18231#comment-124116</guid>
		<description>more people will read TOC, more people will know about TOC.

even might be known  Internationally. 

Web server company in Utah, Bluehost.com is in Usa right?

Usa human rights should be number 1 in the world.

Obama is a black. He surely know what is human right.

He is the elected president of USA, a democratic country.

They will never close down TOC.

They know what is real democarcy.

They know what is real human rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>more people will read TOC, more people will know about TOC.</p>
<p>even might be known  Internationally. </p>
<p>Web server company in Utah, Bluehost.com is in Usa right?</p>
<p>Usa human rights should be number 1 in the world.</p>
<p>Obama is a black. He surely know what is human right.</p>
<p>He is the elected president of USA, a democratic country.</p>
<p>They will never close down TOC.</p>
<p>They know what is real democarcy.</p>
<p>They know what is real human rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theforgottongeneration</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/complaint-against-toc-made-to-spore-police/comment-page-3/#comment-124098</link>
		<dc:creator>theforgottongeneration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 06:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18231#comment-124098</guid>
		<description>Just another gimmick to ensure she gets her promotion and 6 months bonus this time round. Boy, desperate times really call for desperate actions. How much bootlicking can one really do?

I suggest TOC check their archives to see if any &quot;Janet Wee&quot; was likely disadvantaged by any posting in the past on this &quot;well known anti-government blog.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just another gimmick to ensure she gets her promotion and 6 months bonus this time round. Boy, desperate times really call for desperate actions. How much bootlicking can one really do?</p>
<p>I suggest TOC check their archives to see if any &#8220;Janet Wee&#8221; was likely disadvantaged by any posting in the past on this &#8220;well known anti-government blog.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elitist Face</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/complaint-against-toc-made-to-spore-police/comment-page-3/#comment-123888</link>
		<dc:creator>Elitist Face</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 06:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18231#comment-123888</guid>
		<description>Now which PAP kindergarten is she attending?
English not bad for a five-year old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now which PAP kindergarten is she attending?<br />
English not bad for a five-year old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spirited-centred</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/complaint-against-toc-made-to-spore-police/comment-page-3/#comment-123863</link>
		<dc:creator>spirited-centred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 03:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18231#comment-123863</guid>
		<description>When anybody conduct political activities such as selling party newspapers, conduct political forum and block visits may be considered seditious act as the political intention is to undermine the power of the current government. Right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When anybody conduct political activities such as selling party newspapers, conduct political forum and block visits may be considered seditious act as the political intention is to undermine the power of the current government. Right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mad93</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/complaint-against-toc-made-to-spore-police/comment-page-3/#comment-123851</link>
		<dc:creator>mad93</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 02:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18231#comment-123851</guid>
		<description>I believe that we are protected under the paramount Constituition, this is a free country, freedom of speech is practiced all the time. Criticism to government is allowed as long it is constructive and is accepted by the general public.. This women have no idea about the power of the supreme Constituition. Maybe her life is painted dark for her in the future, sad reality isnt it? So she had no choice but to do something stupid and ridiculous to its very core by writing a letter to the SPF and complaint about the &quot;seditious&quot; remarks make by TOC which of course is untrue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that we are protected under the paramount Constituition, this is a free country, freedom of speech is practiced all the time. Criticism to government is allowed as long it is constructive and is accepted by the general public.. This women have no idea about the power of the supreme Constituition. Maybe her life is painted dark for her in the future, sad reality isnt it? So she had no choice but to do something stupid and ridiculous to its very core by writing a letter to the SPF and complaint about the &#8220;seditious&#8221; remarks make by TOC which of course is untrue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/complaint-against-toc-made-to-spore-police/comment-page-3/#comment-123841</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18231#comment-123841</guid>
		<description>It is mind-boggling to me. Has anyone sit back and calmly thought about this?
 
A mere EXPRESSION OF INFORMATION released from historical archive – even if disputed – a seditiou offence at law?
 
If it is, anyone reading the bibliography of Adolf Hitler in Germany, must be engaged in seditious act in Germany? Anyone reading or writing any comment even by way of MERE historical reference about the May 13 1969 tragedy also commits sedition in Malaysia including the Government’s television media portrayal of past history? Anyone writing about “Operation Coldstore” and “Operation Spectrum” in Singapore or any newsreader on national television network or print media or anyone reading those words in news print uttering those “repugnant” words of “Operation Coldstore” and “Operations Spectrum” commit sedition?
 
I am about to die from a heart attack soon. I am frightened that Changi Hotel might be overcrowded soon. 

Maybe someone should call an ambulance soon!!!! HURRY UP!!!!.

I believe that sedition is about any conduct (not just passing reference to and expression of ) to incite ( “to urge” emotively ) violent overthrown of “democractically-elected” or “undemocratically-elected” political institutions such as advocating terrorism.
 
A writing reference of information is equal to “terrorism” amounting to “sedition”?
This one looks to me NOT like a “slippery slope” but a very steep and deep vertical cliff over the other side of extreme “irrational exuberance”

I think TOC just need to ask those power that be these question – IS THE EXPRESSION OF INFORMATION, not an emotional-driven incite to violent overthrow of establish order – seditious? 

And, if so, is the IMAGINARY HYPOTHETICAL PROHIBITING BAN ON writing about Singapore history of overthrowing Japanese occupation an UNLAWFUL VIOLATION OF OUR CONSTITUTION FREEDOM OF SPEECH PROTECTION?

If we cannot CONSTITUTIONALLY write history, HOW IS OUR KIDS IN PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL GOING TO LEARN ANYTHING ABOUT OUR HISTORY and relate it to our highfalutin pledge and our flag every school mornings?

Anyone wants to beat up the stupidity of my “seditious” thoughts here????

ALL ARE WELCOME.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is mind-boggling to me. Has anyone sit back and calmly thought about this?</p>
<p>A mere EXPRESSION OF INFORMATION released from historical archive – even if disputed – a seditiou offence at law?</p>
<p>If it is, anyone reading the bibliography of Adolf Hitler in Germany, must be engaged in seditious act in Germany? Anyone reading or writing any comment even by way of MERE historical reference about the May 13 1969 tragedy also commits sedition in Malaysia including the Government’s television media portrayal of past history? Anyone writing about “Operation Coldstore” and “Operation Spectrum” in Singapore or any newsreader on national television network or print media or anyone reading those words in news print uttering those “repugnant” words of “Operation Coldstore” and “Operations Spectrum” commit sedition?</p>
<p>I am about to die from a heart attack soon. I am frightened that Changi Hotel might be overcrowded soon. </p>
<p>Maybe someone should call an ambulance soon!!!! HURRY UP!!!!.</p>
<p>I believe that sedition is about any conduct (not just passing reference to and expression of ) to incite ( “to urge” emotively ) violent overthrown of “democractically-elected” or “undemocratically-elected” political institutions such as advocating terrorism.</p>
<p>A writing reference of information is equal to “terrorism” amounting to “sedition”?<br />
This one looks to me NOT like a “slippery slope” but a very steep and deep vertical cliff over the other side of extreme “irrational exuberance”</p>
<p>I think TOC just need to ask those power that be these question – IS THE EXPRESSION OF INFORMATION, not an emotional-driven incite to violent overthrow of establish order – seditious? </p>
<p>And, if so, is the IMAGINARY HYPOTHETICAL PROHIBITING BAN ON writing about Singapore history of overthrowing Japanese occupation an UNLAWFUL VIOLATION OF OUR CONSTITUTION FREEDOM OF SPEECH PROTECTION?</p>
<p>If we cannot CONSTITUTIONALLY write history, HOW IS OUR KIDS IN PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL GOING TO LEARN ANYTHING ABOUT OUR HISTORY and relate it to our highfalutin pledge and our flag every school mornings?</p>
<p>Anyone wants to beat up the stupidity of my “seditious” thoughts here????</p>
<p>ALL ARE WELCOME.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

