<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Press Muse – The good, bad and ugly (part two)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/press-muse-%e2%80%93-the-good-bad-and-ugly-part-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/press-muse-%e2%80%93-the-good-bad-and-ugly-part-two/</link>
	<description>Singapore&#039;s #1 Socio-Political Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 04:31:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Singapore Daily &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weekly Roundup: Week 51</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/press-muse-%e2%80%93-the-good-bad-and-ugly-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-122024</link>
		<dc:creator>The Singapore Daily &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weekly Roundup: Week 51</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 01:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=17557#comment-122024</guid>
		<description>[...] has the BBC singing like a canary [Thanks Ben] - The Interpreter:  [via Jacob 69er ] - TOC: Press Muse – The good, bad and ugly (part two) - World Through Spider&#8217;s Eyes: Riffing MDA&#8217;s Television Code (Part 1) [Thanks [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has the BBC singing like a canary [Thanks Ben] &#8211; The Interpreter:  [via Jacob 69er ] &#8211; TOC: Press Muse – The good, bad and ugly (part two) &#8211; World Through Spider&#8217;s Eyes: Riffing MDA&#8217;s Television Code (Part 1) [Thanks [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryvyan</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/press-muse-%e2%80%93-the-good-bad-and-ugly-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-121813</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryvyan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=17557#comment-121813</guid>
		<description>I just searched NLB&#039;s catalogue; so surprised to see 8 copies circulating in Singapore. $1.55 to reserve for 2 weeks, people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just searched NLB&#8217;s catalogue; so surprised to see 8 copies circulating in Singapore. $1.55 to reserve for 2 weeks, people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GABRIEL</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/press-muse-%e2%80%93-the-good-bad-and-ugly-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-121804</link>
		<dc:creator>GABRIEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=17557#comment-121804</guid>
		<description>My point exactly. The ST article dampened my interest in Kampfner&#039;s book. Reading the Observer review of the book has rekindled my interest. I shall buy the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point exactly. The ST article dampened my interest in Kampfner&#8217;s book. Reading the Observer review of the book has rekindled my interest. I shall buy the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spiegel</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/press-muse-%e2%80%93-the-good-bad-and-ugly-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-121675</link>
		<dc:creator>Spiegel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 01:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=17557#comment-121675</guid>
		<description>You may wish to read the Observer&#039;s review of the book. It appears that the book takes Singapore as a starting point - the so-called ideal type of this sort of governance - and explores how the rest of the world, especially the West, is moving towards this direction.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/sep/13/freedom-for-sale-john-kampfner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may wish to read the Observer&#8217;s review of the book. It appears that the book takes Singapore as a starting point &#8211; the so-called ideal type of this sort of governance &#8211; and explores how the rest of the world, especially the West, is moving towards this direction.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/sep/13/freedom-for-sale-john-kampfner" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/sep/13/freedom-for-sale-john-kampfner</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GABRIEL</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2009/12/press-muse-%e2%80%93-the-good-bad-and-ugly-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-121673</link>
		<dc:creator>GABRIEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 01:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=17557#comment-121673</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s called reverse psychology, I think. Make others less perceptive think that your enemy has become your friend -- and blunt his ability to deliver his punches.
Offering Kampfner a platform like Kishore&#039;s Mabhubani&#039;s Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy to speak was a masterstroke. An intellectual like Kampfner with a marketing bent would have been hard pressed not to accept the opportunity to spread his views. His publishers would have wanted him to accept. After all , marketing people will have you believe that bad or adverse publicity is better than no publicity at all.
In any case, it was a safe gamble for Kishore and the Kuan Yew School of Public Policy to provide Kampfner a platform in the interests of intellectual discourse. 
The ST, in any event, could have been counted on to spin a story which would effectively defang Kampfner. After reading that article on  Kampfner, I for one am inclined to believe that perhaps his book may not be that interesting after all.
Should I spend my hard-earned dollars to buy his book, which could be just another tirade against LKY&#039;s Singapore, or save them for a better book?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s called reverse psychology, I think. Make others less perceptive think that your enemy has become your friend &#8212; and blunt his ability to deliver his punches.<br />
Offering Kampfner a platform like Kishore&#8217;s Mabhubani&#8217;s Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy to speak was a masterstroke. An intellectual like Kampfner with a marketing bent would have been hard pressed not to accept the opportunity to spread his views. His publishers would have wanted him to accept. After all , marketing people will have you believe that bad or adverse publicity is better than no publicity at all.<br />
In any case, it was a safe gamble for Kishore and the Kuan Yew School of Public Policy to provide Kampfner a platform in the interests of intellectual discourse.<br />
The ST, in any event, could have been counted on to spin a story which would effectively defang Kampfner. After reading that article on  Kampfner, I for one am inclined to believe that perhaps his book may not be that interesting after all.<br />
Should I spend my hard-earned dollars to buy his book, which could be just another tirade against LKY&#8217;s Singapore, or save them for a better book?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

