<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HDB housing policies – tilting the advantage towards PRs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/01/hdb-housing-policies-%e2%80%93-tilting-the-advantage-towards-prs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/01/hdb-housing-policies-%e2%80%93-tilting-the-advantage-towards-prs/</link>
	<description>a community of Singaporeans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:25:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alistair Fook</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/01/hdb-housing-policies-%e2%80%93-tilting-the-advantage-towards-prs/comment-page-3/#comment-248839</link>
		<dc:creator>Alistair Fook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 09:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18787#comment-248839</guid>
		<description>HDB is supposedly a publicly subsudused housing system.  Why should non-citizens like prs (Never done NS?) be allowed to buy?

But a more important wuestion which no one has asked (or no one has dared to publish?) is why are we handing out PRs?  Isn&#039;t it supposed to be a first step to citizenship?  If so, why do we have a whole bunch of people who remain PRs forver and never take up citizenship. Even worse, disappear back to their own country and legally let out their HDB flats, depriving honest citizens.  And why does the government allow it?  Three years should be long enough of a transition.  Anyone who then doesn&#039;t take citizenship should have their PR status taken away</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HDB is supposedly a publicly subsudused housing system.  Why should non-citizens like prs (Never done NS?) be allowed to buy?</p>
<p>But a more important wuestion which no one has asked (or no one has dared to publish?) is why are we handing out PRs?  Isn&#8217;t it supposed to be a first step to citizenship?  If so, why do we have a whole bunch of people who remain PRs forver and never take up citizenship. Even worse, disappear back to their own country and legally let out their HDB flats, depriving honest citizens.  And why does the government allow it?  Three years should be long enough of a transition.  Anyone who then doesn&#8217;t take citizenship should have their PR status taken away</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dvd6263</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/01/hdb-housing-policies-%e2%80%93-tilting-the-advantage-towards-prs/comment-page-3/#comment-176588</link>
		<dc:creator>dvd6263</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18787#comment-176588</guid>
		<description>Hi, I&#039;m not well educated so do excuse me if my suggestions below sounds lame.

Part of the way to solve the problem is to only allow HDB purchase or rental if one or both applicants are SCs.  Unfortunately, this will dampen demand so some may not be to happy about this, but we can&#039;t have everything in life.  We have to decide.

It can also help with the FT sintuation because anyone coming here to work alone or with his family must factor this higher cost of housing before accepting employment here.  Employers must decide who they want to hire - locals who need a higher liveable salary, or FTs for whom he may have to include a housing component on top of the salary acceptable to the FT.

Same principle should apply for school fees and medical fees in Gov&#039;t clinics and hospital.

Its the same for Singaporeans when we are hired to work overseas.  We have to ask for a package that includes housing, medical, schooling fees if we want to take our children along, etc....

If the employer really needs the FT because they need the often tauted &quot;higher skills&quot; or &quot;better&quot; attitude, they must be willing to pay for this premium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I&#8217;m not well educated so do excuse me if my suggestions below sounds lame.</p>
<p>Part of the way to solve the problem is to only allow HDB purchase or rental if one or both applicants are SCs.  Unfortunately, this will dampen demand so some may not be to happy about this, but we can&#8217;t have everything in life.  We have to decide.</p>
<p>It can also help with the FT sintuation because anyone coming here to work alone or with his family must factor this higher cost of housing before accepting employment here.  Employers must decide who they want to hire &#8211; locals who need a higher liveable salary, or FTs for whom he may have to include a housing component on top of the salary acceptable to the FT.</p>
<p>Same principle should apply for school fees and medical fees in Gov&#8217;t clinics and hospital.</p>
<p>Its the same for Singaporeans when we are hired to work overseas.  We have to ask for a package that includes housing, medical, schooling fees if we want to take our children along, etc&#8230;.</p>
<p>If the employer really needs the FT because they need the often tauted &#8220;higher skills&#8221; or &#8220;better&#8221; attitude, they must be willing to pay for this premium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/01/hdb-housing-policies-%e2%80%93-tilting-the-advantage-towards-prs/comment-page-3/#comment-166487</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18787#comment-166487</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I have a 5 room flat in Punggol and have been renting out for the last 7 years as I have been posted to work overseas every since I got the flat. I have applied to HDB to legally sublet our the room. Also, I have exhausted my CPF savings and as such, I am paying the loan with cash every month. 

My question is if I can sell my flat in the open market. Can HDB allow case like mine? My house would be better off for people who really need a house to stay in and I can benefit from the selling.

If yes, I look for an agent to assist me with this.

Eugene</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I have a 5 room flat in Punggol and have been renting out for the last 7 years as I have been posted to work overseas every since I got the flat. I have applied to HDB to legally sublet our the room. Also, I have exhausted my CPF savings and as such, I am paying the loan with cash every month. </p>
<p>My question is if I can sell my flat in the open market. Can HDB allow case like mine? My house would be better off for people who really need a house to stay in and I can benefit from the selling.</p>
<p>If yes, I look for an agent to assist me with this.</p>
<p>Eugene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fair Citizen</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/01/hdb-housing-policies-%e2%80%93-tilting-the-advantage-towards-prs/comment-page-3/#comment-144610</link>
		<dc:creator>Fair Citizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 16:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18787#comment-144610</guid>
		<description>While I agree buying a HDB flat should be more affordable to Singapore citizens than PRs, I must say this article is biased, unfair and unenlightened.

Why?

&quot;Since foreigners do not need to contribute to CPF, they generally may have more cash to pay for the COV, when they become PRs.&quot;

Then, since foreigners do not need to contribute to CPF, they also don&#039;t have the quick access to pay the downpayment from the CPF Ordinary Account.  Paying COV doesn&#039;t help if you don&#039;t have enough for the downpayment in the first place!

&quot;When they become citizens, they can buy their second flat of any size and get a HDB loan.&quot;

If Singaporeans want to buy their first...and second.. and third... and nth flat without a HDB Concessionary loan, no-one will stop us.  And when we want to buy the (n + 1)th flat (OF ANY SIZE) using HDB loan, we will still qualify!

&quot;PRs just buy any size resale flat that they can afford. Even if a PR earns $1 million, he can buy a 2-room resale flat as there is no Income Ceiling for resale.&quot;

Singaporeans earning a million dollars are also free to buy 2-room resale flat as there is no Income Ceiling for resale.  what&#039;s your point?

&quot;Some Singaporeans also perceive that it is better to get a CPF Housing Grant. But you may have noticed in recent years that every time the grant is increased, the prices of new flats increase by even more.&quot;

It&#039;s every Singaporean&#039;s right to refuse CPF Housing Grant.  No-one forces it on any of us!  It&#039;s like this: Singaporeans are offered a cake, and PRs are not.  Whether we want to eat it or not, it&#039;s our choice.  Why blame the PRs, who are not even offered this choice?  Also, you said &quot;every time the grant is increased, the prices of new flats increase by even more.&quot;  Actually, it&#039;s the other way around: every time the prices of new flats increase, the grant is increased by more!  That&#039;s the whole point!  To make it easier for Singaporeans to buy their flats, even when prices rise!  You want the CPF grant to increase, but not HDB prices?  You thought the CPF grant is free money?

Please don&#039;t make Singaporeans sound like a spoilt lot.  We are generally lucky to have the HDB option.  Many people in other countries have to rent a home all their lives, because their government does not want to get involved in housing them, and leaves it to private developers who charge a bomb!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree buying a HDB flat should be more affordable to Singapore citizens than PRs, I must say this article is biased, unfair and unenlightened.</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>&#8220;Since foreigners do not need to contribute to CPF, they generally may have more cash to pay for the COV, when they become PRs.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then, since foreigners do not need to contribute to CPF, they also don&#8217;t have the quick access to pay the downpayment from the CPF Ordinary Account.  Paying COV doesn&#8217;t help if you don&#8217;t have enough for the downpayment in the first place!</p>
<p>&#8220;When they become citizens, they can buy their second flat of any size and get a HDB loan.&#8221;</p>
<p>If Singaporeans want to buy their first&#8230;and second.. and third&#8230; and nth flat without a HDB Concessionary loan, no-one will stop us.  And when we want to buy the (n + 1)th flat (OF ANY SIZE) using HDB loan, we will still qualify!</p>
<p>&#8220;PRs just buy any size resale flat that they can afford. Even if a PR earns $1 million, he can buy a 2-room resale flat as there is no Income Ceiling for resale.&#8221;</p>
<p>Singaporeans earning a million dollars are also free to buy 2-room resale flat as there is no Income Ceiling for resale.  what&#8217;s your point?</p>
<p>&#8220;Some Singaporeans also perceive that it is better to get a CPF Housing Grant. But you may have noticed in recent years that every time the grant is increased, the prices of new flats increase by even more.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s every Singaporean&#8217;s right to refuse CPF Housing Grant.  No-one forces it on any of us!  It&#8217;s like this: Singaporeans are offered a cake, and PRs are not.  Whether we want to eat it or not, it&#8217;s our choice.  Why blame the PRs, who are not even offered this choice?  Also, you said &#8220;every time the grant is increased, the prices of new flats increase by even more.&#8221;  Actually, it&#8217;s the other way around: every time the prices of new flats increase, the grant is increased by more!  That&#8217;s the whole point!  To make it easier for Singaporeans to buy their flats, even when prices rise!  You want the CPF grant to increase, but not HDB prices?  You thought the CPF grant is free money?</p>
<p>Please don&#8217;t make Singaporeans sound like a spoilt lot.  We are generally lucky to have the HDB option.  Many people in other countries have to rent a home all their lives, because their government does not want to get involved in housing them, and leaves it to private developers who charge a bomb!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/01/hdb-housing-policies-%e2%80%93-tilting-the-advantage-towards-prs/comment-page-3/#comment-143652</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 03:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18787#comment-143652</guid>
		<description>In general, I think there is a lack of knowledge of real ground situation. For example, the policies may apply to a large number of citizens but missing out on those who fall in between the gaps. Instead of rejected citizens, HDB should really study each problem on a case by case basis and have some passion for those who fall in between the gaps. When I mention case by case, I think there should be some passion and feel for the citizens instead of basis of evidences and proofs. Right now, we keep appealling but end of the day, there are no alternatives for us. Since public housing is the main home for us, I think we should have a alternative. HDB is not solving problems for those who fall in the gaps but keep saying their jobs is to solve issues for us when it comes to elections. I am very skeptical on this. The policies kept changing and it&#039;s really one sided benefit at one time. There is no real address to issues of those who fall in the gaps. By changing the policies here and there, there are major changes always. There isn&#039;t a fine tweak of policies to ensure policies improve over a long term but always the drastic changes over the policies. This is a reactive approach and not a proactive approach due lack of understanding of real ground issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In general, I think there is a lack of knowledge of real ground situation. For example, the policies may apply to a large number of citizens but missing out on those who fall in between the gaps. Instead of rejected citizens, HDB should really study each problem on a case by case basis and have some passion for those who fall in between the gaps. When I mention case by case, I think there should be some passion and feel for the citizens instead of basis of evidences and proofs. Right now, we keep appealling but end of the day, there are no alternatives for us. Since public housing is the main home for us, I think we should have a alternative. HDB is not solving problems for those who fall in the gaps but keep saying their jobs is to solve issues for us when it comes to elections. I am very skeptical on this. The policies kept changing and it&#8217;s really one sided benefit at one time. There is no real address to issues of those who fall in the gaps. By changing the policies here and there, there are major changes always. There isn&#8217;t a fine tweak of policies to ensure policies improve over a long term but always the drastic changes over the policies. This is a reactive approach and not a proactive approach due lack of understanding of real ground issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: senior citizen</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/01/hdb-housing-policies-%e2%80%93-tilting-the-advantage-towards-prs/comment-page-3/#comment-127111</link>
		<dc:creator>senior citizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 14:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18787#comment-127111</guid>
		<description>Well done, Mr. Leong.
They said &quot;citizens first&quot;, really????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done, Mr. Leong.<br />
They said &#8220;citizens first&#8221;, really????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cheaper better faster</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/01/hdb-housing-policies-%e2%80%93-tilting-the-advantage-towards-prs/comment-page-3/#comment-126962</link>
		<dc:creator>cheaper better faster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18787#comment-126962</guid>
		<description>In 1996 PRs and singaporean private property owners couldn&#039;t buy resale flats, 400k for a 5-room was high. Back then, direct hdb prices were still in the range of 100k, if my memory doesnt fail me. 1997, property prices peaked.

In 2005 when PRs and singaporean private property owners were allowed to buy resale flats, hdb resale prices never looked back.  2007, property prices peaked, most surpassing the 1997 peaks.

If the PRs and singaporean private property owners were not allowed to buy resale flats back then, the liquidity from the enbloc boom could have caused the private property to increase even further, and the average hdb dweller will never materialise their condo dream. The policy made a lot of hdb upgraders dream come true, so they will love the old man for it.

It was a political move to me and I don&#039;t foresee the policy to be retracked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1996 PRs and singaporean private property owners couldn&#8217;t buy resale flats, 400k for a 5-room was high. Back then, direct hdb prices were still in the range of 100k, if my memory doesnt fail me. 1997, property prices peaked.</p>
<p>In 2005 when PRs and singaporean private property owners were allowed to buy resale flats, hdb resale prices never looked back.  2007, property prices peaked, most surpassing the 1997 peaks.</p>
<p>If the PRs and singaporean private property owners were not allowed to buy resale flats back then, the liquidity from the enbloc boom could have caused the private property to increase even further, and the average hdb dweller will never materialise their condo dream. The policy made a lot of hdb upgraders dream come true, so they will love the old man for it.</p>
<p>It was a political move to me and I don&#8217;t foresee the policy to be retracked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lobo76</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/01/hdb-housing-policies-%e2%80%93-tilting-the-advantage-towards-prs/comment-page-3/#comment-126868</link>
		<dc:creator>lobo76</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 04:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18787#comment-126868</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;105) Charles on January 14th, 2010 10.13 am 
The ascertion that PRs have more cash to spend on Singapore Real-Estate because they do not have CPF (first I assume it means “CPF for as along as citizens”, since PRs also buy into into CPF) does not hold water.&lt;/b&gt;

A PR doesn&#039;t immediately become PR upon arrival in Singapore. First, s/he works as a Foreigner that does NOT buy into CPF. ... did you read the article or not? 

Quote from Article: &lt;i&gt;Since foreigners do not need to contribute to CPF, they generally may have more cash to pay for the COV, when they become PRs.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>105) Charles on January 14th, 2010 10.13 am<br />
The ascertion that PRs have more cash to spend on Singapore Real-Estate because they do not have CPF (first I assume it means “CPF for as along as citizens”, since PRs also buy into into CPF) does not hold water.</b></p>
<p>A PR doesn&#8217;t immediately become PR upon arrival in Singapore. First, s/he works as a Foreigner that does NOT buy into CPF. &#8230; did you read the article or not? </p>
<p>Quote from Article: <i>Since foreigners do not need to contribute to CPF, they generally may have more cash to pay for the COV, when they become PRs.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Views</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/01/hdb-housing-policies-%e2%80%93-tilting-the-advantage-towards-prs/comment-page-3/#comment-126800</link>
		<dc:creator>My Views</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18787#comment-126800</guid>
		<description>Refer to (101) by [hopeless]
&quot; all PR who buy house in singapore must convert to singapore if not pay a levy of $100000. That will test their loyalty. we don’t wants to stay with people who will escape during war time. &quot;

PRs will not come  to Singapore if they need to pay levy of $100,000 or prove their loyalty in order to buy a house in Singapore.

PRs must not be loyal to Singapore because they are citizens of their own countries.

Singaporeans must guarantee that they will ensure all PRs are safely escorted out of the country before a war erupts, or else no PR will come to Singapore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Refer to (101) by [hopeless]<br />
&#8221; all PR who buy house in singapore must convert to singapore if not pay a levy of $100000. That will test their loyalty. we don’t wants to stay with people who will escape during war time. &#8221;</p>
<p>PRs will not come  to Singapore if they need to pay levy of $100,000 or prove their loyalty in order to buy a house in Singapore.</p>
<p>PRs must not be loyal to Singapore because they are citizens of their own countries.</p>
<p>Singaporeans must guarantee that they will ensure all PRs are safely escorted out of the country before a war erupts, or else no PR will come to Singapore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/01/hdb-housing-policies-%e2%80%93-tilting-the-advantage-towards-prs/comment-page-3/#comment-126635</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 02:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18787#comment-126635</guid>
		<description>A much better article:

http://singaporemind.blogspot.com/2010/01/high-hdb-prices-curbing-surge.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A much better article:</p>
<p><a href="http://singaporemind.blogspot.com/2010/01/high-hdb-prices-curbing-surge.html" rel="nofollow">http://singaporemind.blogspot.com/2010/01/high-hdb-prices-curbing-surge.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/01/hdb-housing-policies-%e2%80%93-tilting-the-advantage-towards-prs/comment-page-3/#comment-126634</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 02:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18787#comment-126634</guid>
		<description>To the question &quot;Can single PR buy HDB?&quot;, the answer is &quot;No&quot;.

The ascertion that PRs have more cash to spend on Singapore Real-Estate because they do not have CPF (first I assume it means &quot;CPF for as along as citizens&quot;, since PRs also buy into into CPF) does not hold water.

 Now the statement would assume that PRs, like Singaporeans, would put all their retirement savings into Singapore real-estate.
 I would hope that they are smarter than that and that they would have invested a good portion of their money elsewhere, hence reducing their cash available for real-estate money.

 In fact it is the Singaporeans who would have the most money to spend on Real-Estate  and would be inflating the prices *because* their CPF money can mostly be spent into real-estate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the question &#8220;Can single PR buy HDB?&#8221;, the answer is &#8220;No&#8221;.</p>
<p>The ascertion that PRs have more cash to spend on Singapore Real-Estate because they do not have CPF (first I assume it means &#8220;CPF for as along as citizens&#8221;, since PRs also buy into into CPF) does not hold water.</p>
<p> Now the statement would assume that PRs, like Singaporeans, would put all their retirement savings into Singapore real-estate.<br />
 I would hope that they are smarter than that and that they would have invested a good portion of their money elsewhere, hence reducing their cash available for real-estate money.</p>
<p> In fact it is the Singaporeans who would have the most money to spend on Real-Estate  and would be inflating the prices *because* their CPF money can mostly be spent into real-estate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iamapapgovernmentdoubleagent</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/01/hdb-housing-policies-%e2%80%93-tilting-the-advantage-towards-prs/comment-page-3/#comment-126551</link>
		<dc:creator>iamapapgovernmentdoubleagent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 08:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18787#comment-126551</guid>
		<description>[i]Oh Holy on January 13th, 2010 10.27 am The problem is, since 1996, when the property market crashed, HDB had decided to make HDB never fall and always rise becos, they…the smart ones tot that with rise and fall, it be fun and will encourage speculations so that they can earn more money, since fall or rise, they will gain money.[/i]

that what they did to the hongkies immigrant.. the hongkies snapped all the 2ndhand 3 room flats @ high prize..we even sell them shops way above market rates @ lauya spots...
now the hongkies left 1 by 1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[i]Oh Holy on January 13th, 2010 10.27 am The problem is, since 1996, when the property market crashed, HDB had decided to make HDB never fall and always rise becos, they…the smart ones tot that with rise and fall, it be fun and will encourage speculations so that they can earn more money, since fall or rise, they will gain money.[/i]</p>
<p>that what they did to the hongkies immigrant.. the hongkies snapped all the 2ndhand 3 room flats @ high prize..we even sell them shops way above market rates @ lauya spots&#8230;<br />
now the hongkies left 1 by 1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lobo76</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/01/hdb-housing-policies-%e2%80%93-tilting-the-advantage-towards-prs/comment-page-3/#comment-126498</link>
		<dc:creator>lobo76</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 05:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18787#comment-126498</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;95) RW on January 12th, 2010 7.33 pm
The conditions imposed is based on whether you take subsidies or not.
Obviously, a non-citizen cannot take subsidies, so they will not have to follow the conditions. Even if they want to be imposed the conditions (in exchange for subsidies), they cannot do so. &lt;/b&gt;

But citizens themselves are &#039;forced&#039; along the route to take the subsidies due to having lesser cash (locked in CPF). The choice is, as i said before, not equal. All things being equal, why would anyone want the &#039;citizen&#039; route which gives you a roof only after 8 years, during which 7 of those years, you can be earning rent?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>95) RW on January 12th, 2010 7.33 pm<br />
The conditions imposed is based on whether you take subsidies or not.<br />
Obviously, a non-citizen cannot take subsidies, so they will not have to follow the conditions. Even if they want to be imposed the conditions (in exchange for subsidies), they cannot do so. </b></p>
<p>But citizens themselves are &#8216;forced&#8217; along the route to take the subsidies due to having lesser cash (locked in CPF). The choice is, as i said before, not equal. All things being equal, why would anyone want the &#8216;citizen&#8217; route which gives you a roof only after 8 years, during which 7 of those years, you can be earning rent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oh Holy</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/01/hdb-housing-policies-%e2%80%93-tilting-the-advantage-towards-prs/comment-page-3/#comment-126451</link>
		<dc:creator>Oh Holy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 02:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18787#comment-126451</guid>
		<description>The problem is, since 1996, when the property market crashed, HDB had decided to make HDB never fall and always rise becos, they...the smart ones tot that with rise and fall, it be fun and will encourage speculations so that they can earn more money, since fall or rise, they will gain money.

But..the problem is, they made so many people bankrupted and there is the 1997 crisis, it contributed to one of the worse policies ever. 

You must know that HDB controlled the price, it will never drop cos they decided it.

So they decided to control the prices by having a policy of rise only. But in 2006, when the HDB increased too fast, and the country poor and medium class is still trying to recover from the 1997, 2001 (911), 2004 (Sars), alot of people couldnt afford Houses and they have many unsold HDB.

This pissed them off, so they come out with BTO scheme so that HDB houses would be further filled in while at the same time, they can increase the prices.

That is why PR regarded HDB as a safe investment. It have better annual appreciation rate than even the property properties for the last 2 years in fact.

A PR with the cash, can pay 400k for a house (Condo) and then resell it instantly 3 months later or 1 year later (HDB), to reap profits. In the meantime, they can also rent their HDB away...it may be illegial but anyway, most r doing it and the gov wont want to catch these cash cows.

And the problem is , if a citizen took a loan of 400k, the bank immediately make a loan of 600k to the citizen for 30 years. So even if a citizen sells his flat for 500k 5 years later, he have to pay the bank 600k first and he end up losing 100k with a 30 months ban and he cant own another HDB flat. By then, HDB price will further increase.

The real question is not PR but why is the gov encouraging speculators and make HDB such a insane appreciation. 

A queentown 5 rm flat is priced at 600k, and taking a 600k loan means u have to borrow 1mil from the bank becos the bank will calc 30 years later with immediately effect before they divide it by 360 months, to tell u how much u need to pay.

Citizens r suckers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is, since 1996, when the property market crashed, HDB had decided to make HDB never fall and always rise becos, they&#8230;the smart ones tot that with rise and fall, it be fun and will encourage speculations so that they can earn more money, since fall or rise, they will gain money.</p>
<p>But..the problem is, they made so many people bankrupted and there is the 1997 crisis, it contributed to one of the worse policies ever. </p>
<p>You must know that HDB controlled the price, it will never drop cos they decided it.</p>
<p>So they decided to control the prices by having a policy of rise only. But in 2006, when the HDB increased too fast, and the country poor and medium class is still trying to recover from the 1997, 2001 (911), 2004 (Sars), alot of people couldnt afford Houses and they have many unsold HDB.</p>
<p>This pissed them off, so they come out with BTO scheme so that HDB houses would be further filled in while at the same time, they can increase the prices.</p>
<p>That is why PR regarded HDB as a safe investment. It have better annual appreciation rate than even the property properties for the last 2 years in fact.</p>
<p>A PR with the cash, can pay 400k for a house (Condo) and then resell it instantly 3 months later or 1 year later (HDB), to reap profits. In the meantime, they can also rent their HDB away&#8230;it may be illegial but anyway, most r doing it and the gov wont want to catch these cash cows.</p>
<p>And the problem is , if a citizen took a loan of 400k, the bank immediately make a loan of 600k to the citizen for 30 years. So even if a citizen sells his flat for 500k 5 years later, he have to pay the bank 600k first and he end up losing 100k with a 30 months ban and he cant own another HDB flat. By then, HDB price will further increase.</p>
<p>The real question is not PR but why is the gov encouraging speculators and make HDB such a insane appreciation. </p>
<p>A queentown 5 rm flat is priced at 600k, and taking a 600k loan means u have to borrow 1mil from the bank becos the bank will calc 30 years later with immediately effect before they divide it by 360 months, to tell u how much u need to pay.</p>
<p>Citizens r suckers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hopeless</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/01/hdb-housing-policies-%e2%80%93-tilting-the-advantage-towards-prs/comment-page-3/#comment-126450</link>
		<dc:creator>hopeless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 02:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18787#comment-126450</guid>
		<description>all PR who buy house in singapore must convert to singapore if not pay a levy of $100000. That will test their loyalty. we don&#039;t wants to stay with people who will escape during war time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all PR who buy house in singapore must convert to singapore if not pay a levy of $100000. That will test their loyalty. we don&#8217;t wants to stay with people who will escape during war time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angry_one</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/01/hdb-housing-policies-%e2%80%93-tilting-the-advantage-towards-prs/comment-page-2/#comment-126449</link>
		<dc:creator>angry_one</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 02:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18787#comment-126449</guid>
		<description>I should also highlight that the housing policy in sinkapore is unique in the world. 80% of it is controlled centrally by the govt, who even allocates housing based on race. That is very communist, even more than china or cuba. This unnatural control paves the way for abuse, as we are all experiencing now. If you leave more space for private developers and control the quota for foreigners and PRs who can buy any housing, everything can be solved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should also highlight that the housing policy in sinkapore is unique in the world. 80% of it is controlled centrally by the govt, who even allocates housing based on race. That is very communist, even more than china or cuba. This unnatural control paves the way for abuse, as we are all experiencing now. If you leave more space for private developers and control the quota for foreigners and PRs who can buy any housing, everything can be solved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whovotedthisgovernment</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/01/hdb-housing-policies-%e2%80%93-tilting-the-advantage-towards-prs/comment-page-2/#comment-126408</link>
		<dc:creator>whovotedthisgovernment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18787#comment-126408</guid>
		<description>[i]Once a while politicians get shot and survived… [/i]

good what..than again singapore leadin politicians are afraid of death..
last hear rumoured that even when they go to the jumbuan..they must have an armed bodyguard to tag along...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[i]Once a while politicians get shot and survived… [/i]</p>
<p>good what..than again singapore leadin politicians are afraid of death..<br />
last hear rumoured that even when they go to the jumbuan..they must have an armed bodyguard to tag along&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whovotedthisgovernment</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/01/hdb-housing-policies-%e2%80%93-tilting-the-advantage-towards-prs/comment-page-2/#comment-126406</link>
		<dc:creator>whovotedthisgovernment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18787#comment-126406</guid>
		<description>[i]without PRs contributing to its economy! When that happened, Singapore will become a dead town![/i]
and the hdb heartlands must be boomin
right? if that is so how come many smaller hdb shop/kiosk is closed with shutter collectin dust...with so many flyers as well
off course without a doubt you would had says the pr are not stupid they also do their shoppin in jb and bataams as well bypassin chennai and shenzhen...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[i]without PRs contributing to its economy! When that happened, Singapore will become a dead town![/i]<br />
and the hdb heartlands must be boomin<br />
right? if that is so how come many smaller hdb shop/kiosk is closed with shutter collectin dust&#8230;with so many flyers as well<br />
off course without a doubt you would had says the pr are not stupid they also do their shoppin in jb and bataams as well bypassin chennai and shenzhen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Views</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/01/hdb-housing-policies-%e2%80%93-tilting-the-advantage-towards-prs/comment-page-2/#comment-126399</link>
		<dc:creator>My Views</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18787#comment-126399</guid>
		<description>If you guys keep bashing the PRs and making it difficult for them to own a home here, Singapore will soon end up without PRs contributing to its economy!  When that happened, Singapore will become a dead town!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you guys keep bashing the PRs and making it difficult for them to own a home here, Singapore will soon end up without PRs contributing to its economy!  When that happened, Singapore will become a dead town!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hopeless</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/01/hdb-housing-policies-%e2%80%93-tilting-the-advantage-towards-prs/comment-page-2/#comment-126389</link>
		<dc:creator>hopeless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=18787#comment-126389</guid>
		<description>next election is my last hope for singapore, after that must find place to migrate....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>next election is my last hope for singapore, after that must find place to migrate&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

