Comments on: What the 2010 Edelman Trust Barometer really says

By: The Singapore Daily » Blog Archive » Weekly Roundup: Week 07

The Singapore Daily » Blog Archive » Weekly Roundup: Week 07 — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 04:48:22 +0000

[...] political reform in Singapore – Singapore Alternatives: NSP Press Release on New 13th CEC – TOC: What the 2010 Edelman Trust Barometer really says – Icarus Flew Too High: A Broad Consensus for Democracy in Singapore [Recommended] – Yours Truly [...]

By: Wernetta Dutchez

Wernetta Dutchez — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:09:44 +0000

We can also get other survey companies come up another Barometer.
Its very easy.
Statistics and surveys are flexible in nature.
Its limited by your imagination and size of your wallet.

By: Ganga

Ganga — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:47:18 +0000

Thank you for all the kind words. I agree that the only way is to continue pointing out the unsavoury practices of the MSM so that more people will start exercising their own discretion instead of blindly trusting the material printed in our papers. Sincerely, knowing that people appreciate my efforts definitely spurs me on so thank you for taking the time to let me know!

By: tiredsingaporean

tiredsingaporean — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:41:18 +0000

the whole stats are so badly twisted and manipulated just to hide all the ugliness that are happening inside, nothing new anyway.

By: prettyplace

prettyplace — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:22:43 +0000

well done Mr Ganga.
Keep looking out, they have many survey companies of their own to come up with fantastic stats to show things are just perfect in Singapore.

By: Can Handle the Truth or not?

Can Handle the Truth or not? — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:04:27 +0000

I like to applaud Mr Ganga for this writeup.
All truths should be presented.
Let as many people know as possible.
This is the only way.
It is also an opportunity.

Well done!

By: Boxer

Boxer — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:20:02 +0000

I am appalled at the standard of journalism/news reporting by SPH. Their reporters don’t seem to know how to evaluate and analyse data, too lazy to dig deeper/research the topic, are selective with their reporting and are hardly accurate.