By Sonia Suka
The New Paper reported yesterday that Foyce Le Xuan was advised by her pastor from City Harvest Church (CHC) not to speak to the media about revealing all the details of Jack Neo’s advances towards her, six years ago.
It would have been alright if Foyce got this advice from a pastor from any other church but CHC. Why? Because CHC is the same church that Jack Neo and his family go to; and they are being counselled by the pastors from this church as well.
Is there a conflict of interest in CHC counselling both Jack Neo and Foyce Le Xuan?
CHC is, after all building a multi-million dollar, 12,000-seater building and it is in their interest to keep the best donor in its membership, to see the building project through.
The remorseful Jack Neo may very well turn out to be one of the biggest contributors towards this building project. It is human tendency to cover-up our sins with money. Is that not the reason why many temples and churches coffers overflow?
Even if Jack and Foyce are being counselled by two different pastors, do they not come under a hierarchy? Do these pastors themselves receive their counsel from the ‘higher-ups’, who guide them on what to say to Jack and more importantly to Foyce?
It seems that it is precisely because the church had advised her not to speak with the media that she is unable to move on. Foyce after all, seem to have so much of bitterness in her heart towards Jack, describing him as ‘devil’ and ‘inhuman’; and it is good for her to come clean to the media – especially in this case, lest she be made out to be an attention-seeker or even worse, a liar.
If the rationale behind the advice really is that going to the media is not a good way to resolve such issues, should not have the pastors advised Jack the same? Why did a pastor from CHC accompany Jack and his wife for the press conference (which went horribly wrong), if this was indeed their fundamental reason?
It seems that Foyce has evidence that she was harassed by Jack and the pastors at City Harvest Church should not hold-back Foyce from coming forth to the media with this evidence – especially since Jack has conducted his case through the media.
_______________________________________________________
HELP keep the voice of TOC alive!
If you like this article, please consider a small donation to help theonlinecitizen.com stay alive. Please note that we can only accept donations from Singaporeans. Thank you for your assistance.Do you have a flair for writing? Volunteer with us. Email us your full name and contact details to theonlinecitizen@gmail.com
Yes, she is definately “blacklisted”. Since she is not as famous as Jack, the lesser will be blacklisted as rocking the boat. I believe that Foyce is right and her beliefs in exposing Jack.
It is not advisable for her to stay in CHC, she will always be seen as the black sheep, condemmed.
It will be essential for her to move on to greener pastures.
Regards
My husband 46yo, like him, is talented. But both committed adultery repeatedly.
Betrayal is a sin especially in a marriage vow.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I wonder how much is a glass / bottle of Erdinger Weissbier?
When my ex-husband-to-be Jude Seah, emailed on his plight of being jobless, homeless, and roofless, I agreed to offset the latest sum of $16,xxx accumulated o/s family expenses owed to me and also reduce the family maintenance fee to $1000 for me and 2 kids. He told the lawyer and in the email that he “wishes to see the kids every 2 weeks, provided he has a job (money)”.
When my soon ex-husband-to-be Jude Seah, dropped his pride to ask for a roof in end-Sept 2011, I made things easy for him. I did his laundry, cleaned / tidied his room, cooked his meals, including prepared most of his breakfast.
When my 3-month-old-ex-husband-to-be Jude Seah, couldn't afford to settle an old starhub bill (which became due 5 years ago) but desperately 'need' a phone on 31Dec 2011(obviously a free phone by signing up 2-yr contract with Starhub), I pulled out a $50 for him to settle the problem.
When my 2-month-old-ex-husband-to-be Jude Seah, 'could not' pay me a token rent / food for Jan 2012 and the outstanding legal fee, I just waited patiently for his forever-fail promised-dates (hopes). You know, he had "to work" 'very hard' till midnight (kids were already asleep) and came home terribly hungry, looking for food. He even had “to work”, as demanded by his "event organiser-boss", on CNYeve, CNY 1st, 2nd & 3rd day. No reunion dinner. Kids did not get to see him despite they slept at 2am on the eve.
BUT he was almost all the time in those days mentioned above with a girl (27yo, Seah is 46yo) either at the wine outlet Katong which she works with or out eating / shopping with her.
- 13 Jan waited her at wine outlet Katong, ate at nearby Joo-joo Jap restuarant, shopping at Parkway Parade, spent $39 at Giant Parkway.
- 24 Jan (CNY 2nd day) to Arts Museum, jalanjalan ended at Marina Bay Sand
- 28 Jan along a highway ? french kissing / groping / ?
- 30 Jan Erdinger clark quay, meal & Weissbier. groping the girl.
- 30 Jan Made a video at ?, 'forcing' her to say "wo shi ni de lao po" (I'm your wife).
- 31 Jan made a video at the office of the wine outlet Katong.
- 6 Feb, waited for her at wine outlet Katong, then having fun together at ?
- 22 Feb to 26 Feb went to Hong Kong with the girl.
- 27 Feb to 28 Feb, where was he? staying at the girl's house?
- 29 Feb morning 12.15am, came back home with 2 cheapo phone 'chains' for kids, 1 big bag of laundry, describing & complaining his K.L. job a little, very tired & hungry that he ate the fried rice in the fridge without heating up.
According to the court order, he is supposed to start paying the family maintenance. But he acted / pretended very "cham", (whenever he does not have "spare" money) he would "siam us far far", not even go market or coffee shops with us so to avoid paying; throughout the pre- to post-CNY, did not bring kids out for food or fun (even I did proposed the "River Hongbao" which kids enjoyed in the last few rounds); he "could not afford" to buy new year clothes, had to "borrow" (he said) 2 mandarin oranges twice for his "event organizer-boss' & photography-boss. He further added that the 'event-boss' wife was very unhappy with him 'cos he didn't bring oranges on the CNY 1st day, so took 2 from me on the 2nd day; he is sure that the wife is biased against him (now thinking back, I have a strong feel that that the "wife" is actually the girl's mother).
BUT BUT BUT WAIT, on 21st March 2012, he booked 2 Cathay Pacific air tickets @ $480 each for himself and the girl (the receipts by Kingdom Travel bear both their names) off they went for 5-days spree in Hong Kong from 22Feb – 26Feb. (He lied to me and straight into the faces of my 2 kids that he would be away to Kuala Lumpur for an event job). (and as far as I could gather, this is his 3rd to HongKong with his lovers {different women} since 20th March 2007 (this day he flew with my $5k loan [still owing me today]] which he lied that needed desperately to settle for his special photography lights).
Given the INCONCEIVABLE chance that he could live with his kids again while our divorce proceedings is in process, he does not treasure it and now it is lost AGAIN – FOREVER.
Brothers / sisters, thank you for reading up to here.
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1605229723