The Workers’ Party is pleased to note that the sub-prime crisis affecting Singapore is behind us and the economy appears to be on track to a healthy recovery.
The Workers’ Party is of the view that it is time for employers to reward workers for the sacrifices made during the economic crisis in the past years. The National Wage Council should review the current wage structure and propose an upward wage revision. The reduced employers’ Central Provident Fund contribution rate should also be restored.
It is noted that the Ministry of Manpower statistics show the employment situation has improved and the outlook is promising. However, the widening income disparity and upgrading of lower income workers to improve their skills and wages remain a challenge.
Although the government has pledged to improve the income of workers through a productivity drive and training, the workers must see real improvements in their employment prospects and incomes rather than simply being put on a treadmill of attending course after course.
Creating value-added jobs which will pay workers better is a key outcome of a successful productivity and training effort. In the long term, the only sustainable way to create value-added jobs is not just about enhancing productivity, but that of supporting continuous innovation.
To this end, having innovation and business incubators to house fledgling firms and ply them with ideas and contacts with financiers has proven successful in other countries to grow new companies and create jobs. For instance in the USA, at the University of Texas, the non-profit Austin Technology Incubator’s 20-year record grew more than 150 companies and created thousands of jobs. As Singapore’s economy moves, continuous innovation through new businesses must be supported, and facilitated by the government.
The Workers’ Party also notes that the conscious effort by the government to modify its policy and slow down the inflow of foreign manpower has somewhat eased the anxiety amongst Singaporeans. It has also reduced the tension and resentment on the ground. However overpopulation (of foreign workers) is still a concern. This is because it causes stress on our infrastructure and social facilities. Furthermore overpopulation also leads to unfair competition for the Singaporean Worker. WP will continue to monitor these issues.
In the midst of a positive outlook and relative optimism, the Workers’ Party salutes the Singaporean Worker who has again braved the economic storm and weathered the dark clouds by responding to the challenges of a rapidly changing world. We should move forward together as a nation towards a brighter tomorrow.
The Workers’ Party wishes all a Happy Labour Day!
Eric Tan Heng Chong
Treasurer
The Workers’ Party
_______________
HELP keep the voice of TOC alive!
If you like this article, please consider a small donation to help theonlinecitizen.com stay alive. Please note that we can only accept donations from Singaporeans. Thank you for your assistance.Do you have a flair for writing? Volunteer with us. Email us your full name and contact details to theonlinecitizen@gmail.com
The trouble with the innovation approach taken is that we are following the wrong model
http://atans1.wordpress.com/2010/04/04/innovation-we-shld-be-new-yorkers/
NY should be our examplar but cannot be because there is soo little local businesses
The WP May Day message is more like a joint message from the PAP and employers.
It’s a shame that the party continues to call itself the Workers’ Party. It’s no longer the party founded by the late David Marshall and later led to its glory by J B Jeyaretnam.
What better choice do you and WP have under THE CIRCUMSTANCES? What say you to this? As what will YOU say and do under THESE circumstances I mean. Meaning all the additional insidious archaic laws old fox has put into place since them you referred to! Let’s think complete and not fractionally okay!
I received a message from a Malaysian friend whom said that if the current rate of influx of foreigners continues in Singapore, Singaporeans will be less than 50% of the population by the next general election. Could workers party research kindly verify this statement?
I wonder why the singles issue hasn’t been raised. Why can’t singles buy HDB flats directly from government? Is the government implying we are not citizen pedigree enough? Why can PR buy and not single Singaporeans buy? Have to compete with foreigners in the open market for housing… 30% singles populations in our country can sway votes either way.
I wonder why the singles issue hasn’t been raised in this election.Why can’t singles buy HDB flats directly from government? Is the government implying we are not citizen pedigree enough? Why can PR buy and not single Singaporeans buy? Have to compete with foreigners in the open market for housing… 30% singles populations in our country can sway votes either way.