<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: London&#8217;s history, Singapore&#8217;s future?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/07/londons-history-singapores-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/07/londons-history-singapores-future/</link>
	<description>a community of Singaporeans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:43:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apology is difficult !</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/07/londons-history-singapores-future/comment-page-2/#comment-168576</link>
		<dc:creator>Apology is difficult !</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 16:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=25629#comment-168576</guid>
		<description>Hi,

1) Thanks for your reply , but i still disagree the sentence that you had been write. (i know that it can&#039;t be undo when it was done)


2)I prefer the answer is &quot; anyone can be an editor in anywhere regardless of their sex orientation &quot; 

3)oh, i apoloy that i mis-undertood what your mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>1) Thanks for your reply , but i still disagree the sentence that you had been write. (i know that it can&#8217;t be undo when it was done)</p>
<p>2)I prefer the answer is &#8221; anyone can be an editor in anywhere regardless of their sex orientation &#8221; </p>
<p>3)oh, i apoloy that i mis-undertood what your mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theonlinecitizen</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/07/londons-history-singapores-future/comment-page-2/#comment-166419</link>
		<dc:creator>theonlinecitizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 04:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=25629#comment-166419</guid>
		<description>Dear Human Right!

My comments were in response to gemami who said:

&quot;I understand also that there are a number of gays in TOC who may influence your decision making process.&quot;

We do not discriminate anyone here on TOC - whatever their sexual orientation.

Andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Human Right!</p>
<p>My comments were in response to gemami who said:</p>
<p>&#8220;I understand also that there are a number of gays in TOC who may influence your decision making process.&#8221;</p>
<p>We do not discriminate anyone here on TOC &#8211; whatever their sexual orientation.</p>
<p>Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Human Right !</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/07/londons-history-singapores-future/comment-page-2/#comment-166391</link>
		<dc:creator>Human Right !</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=25629#comment-166391</guid>
		<description>TO : Andrew

i read  again u statement &quot;.....we do not have anyone who’s gay on the editorial team....&quot;  may i know what is the objective of this statement  ? are u disagree to work with gay or will not hire gay as your employee ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TO : Andrew</p>
<p>i read  again u statement &#8220;&#8230;..we do not have anyone who’s gay on the editorial team&#8230;.&#8221;  may i know what is the objective of this statement  ? are u disagree to work with gay or will not hire gay as your employee ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pink Triangle</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/07/londons-history-singapores-future/comment-page-2/#comment-156419</link>
		<dc:creator>Pink Triangle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 18:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=25629#comment-156419</guid>
		<description>To : ignorant &amp; arrogant
 
The pink triangle as used as a Nazi concentration camp badge to denote sexual offenders. It is sometimes turned &#039;point up&#039; as a gay pride and gay rights symbolThe pink triangle (German: Rosa Winkel) was one of the Nazi concentration camp badges, used to identify sexual offenders, this also inculded homosexual men along with rapists, bestiality and paedophiles.



Under Nazi Germany every prisoner had to wear a concentration camp badge on their jacket, the colour of which categorized them into groups. Individuals who were sexual offenders (inculding homosexual men) had to wear the Pink Triangle. Other colours identified Jews (two triangles superimposed as a yellow star), political prisoners, Jehovah&#039;s Witnesses, &quot;anti-social&quot; prisoners, and others the Nazis deemed undesirable.

While the number of homosexuals in German concentration camps is hard to estimate, Richard Plant gives a rough estimate of the number of men convicted for homosexuality &quot;between 1933 to 1944 at between 50,000 and 63,000.&quot;

After the camps were liberated at the end of the Second World War, many of the pink triangle prisoners were often simply re-imprisoned by the Allied-established Federal Republic of Germany. An openly gay man named Heinz Dörmer, for instance, served 20 years total, first in a Nazi concentration camp and then in the jails of the new Republic. In fact, the Nazi amendments to Paragraph 175, which turned homosexuality from a minor offence into a felony, remained intact after the war for a further 24 years. While suits seeking monetary compensation have failed, in 2002 the German government issued an official apology to the gay community.

Today, fewer than ten of those imprisoned for homosexuality are known to be still living. In 2000, the documentary film Paragraph 175 recorded some of their testimonies.

1)Homophobia , Please stop your anti-homosexual political agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To : ignorant &amp; arrogant</p>
<p>The pink triangle as used as a Nazi concentration camp badge to denote sexual offenders. It is sometimes turned &#8216;point up&#8217; as a gay pride and gay rights symbolThe pink triangle (German: Rosa Winkel) was one of the Nazi concentration camp badges, used to identify sexual offenders, this also inculded homosexual men along with rapists, bestiality and paedophiles.</p>
<p>Under Nazi Germany every prisoner had to wear a concentration camp badge on their jacket, the colour of which categorized them into groups. Individuals who were sexual offenders (inculding homosexual men) had to wear the Pink Triangle. Other colours identified Jews (two triangles superimposed as a yellow star), political prisoners, Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses, &#8220;anti-social&#8221; prisoners, and others the Nazis deemed undesirable.</p>
<p>While the number of homosexuals in German concentration camps is hard to estimate, Richard Plant gives a rough estimate of the number of men convicted for homosexuality &#8220;between 1933 to 1944 at between 50,000 and 63,000.&#8221;</p>
<p>After the camps were liberated at the end of the Second World War, many of the pink triangle prisoners were often simply re-imprisoned by the Allied-established Federal Republic of Germany. An openly gay man named Heinz Dörmer, for instance, served 20 years total, first in a Nazi concentration camp and then in the jails of the new Republic. In fact, the Nazi amendments to Paragraph 175, which turned homosexuality from a minor offence into a felony, remained intact after the war for a further 24 years. While suits seeking monetary compensation have failed, in 2002 the German government issued an official apology to the gay community.</p>
<p>Today, fewer than ten of those imprisoned for homosexuality are known to be still living. In 2000, the documentary film Paragraph 175 recorded some of their testimonies.</p>
<p>1)Homophobia , Please stop your anti-homosexual political agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedDotWong</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/07/londons-history-singapores-future/comment-page-2/#comment-156302</link>
		<dc:creator>RedDotWong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=25629#comment-156302</guid>
		<description>To Yeah,

Parents certainly do suffer because of the homosexuality of their children... but such suffering is unnecessary and hollow... like wolves selfishly howling at the moon for disturbing the darkness of the night... parents who are knowledgeable, wise, and truly caring do not torment their kids for being gay... these wise parents know that life will be difficult enough because of our society&#039;s backwardness and try their best to make the family an oasis of love and acceptance for all their children.


It is a grave weakness of conservative societies such as ours that irrational prejudices are passed on from one generation to another... and in the case of homosexuality, the ignorance verges on ridiculous and simple-minded ... the very notion that homosexuals can be turned straight by the nagging of their parents or teachers or anybody is a sort of mindless cruelty ... they can perhaps be persuaded to live sterile, passionless lives by pretending to be straight... but i wonder how worthwhile such a life can ever be... would u sacrifice all possibility of love and passion just to please your parents? even worse, would u expect it expect it of your children?

in singapore, it is sometimes apparent that parents need sex education far more than the children ... certainly our society will be happier and healthier when it is more open and tolerant ... we have lived far too long as an uptight, hypocritical, ungracious, stressed-out people who don&#039;t quite yet grasp that life is about happiness, not mindless duty and smug conformity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Yeah,</p>
<p>Parents certainly do suffer because of the homosexuality of their children&#8230; but such suffering is unnecessary and hollow&#8230; like wolves selfishly howling at the moon for disturbing the darkness of the night&#8230; parents who are knowledgeable, wise, and truly caring do not torment their kids for being gay&#8230; these wise parents know that life will be difficult enough because of our society&#8217;s backwardness and try their best to make the family an oasis of love and acceptance for all their children.</p>
<p>It is a grave weakness of conservative societies such as ours that irrational prejudices are passed on from one generation to another&#8230; and in the case of homosexuality, the ignorance verges on ridiculous and simple-minded &#8230; the very notion that homosexuals can be turned straight by the nagging of their parents or teachers or anybody is a sort of mindless cruelty &#8230; they can perhaps be persuaded to live sterile, passionless lives by pretending to be straight&#8230; but i wonder how worthwhile such a life can ever be&#8230; would u sacrifice all possibility of love and passion just to please your parents? even worse, would u expect it expect it of your children?</p>
<p>in singapore, it is sometimes apparent that parents need sex education far more than the children &#8230; certainly our society will be happier and healthier when it is more open and tolerant &#8230; we have lived far too long as an uptight, hypocritical, ungracious, stressed-out people who don&#8217;t quite yet grasp that life is about happiness, not mindless duty and smug conformity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prenatal hormones of sexual orintation</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/07/londons-history-singapores-future/comment-page-2/#comment-156291</link>
		<dc:creator>Prenatal hormones of sexual orintation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 08:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=25629#comment-156291</guid>
		<description>To : Yeah

1)Pls do read your science chapter :

Prenatal hormones 

The prenatal hormonal theory of sexual orientation suggests that people who are exposed to excess levels of sex hormones have masculinized brains and show increased homosexuality. Research on special conditions such as CAH and DES indicate that prenatal exposure to, respectively, excess testosterone and estrogens are associated with female–female sex fantasies in adults. Both effects are associated with bisexuality rather than homosexuality.
There is research evidence that the ratio of the length of the 2nd and 4th digits (index finger and ring finger) is somewhat negatively related to prenatal testosterone and positively to estrogen. Studies measuring the fingers found a statistically significant skew in the 2D:4D ratio (long ring finger) towards homosexuality with an even lower ratio in bisexuals. It is suggested that exposure to high prenatal testosterone and low prenatal estrogen concentrations is one cause of homosexuality whereas exposure to very high testosterone levels may be associated with bisexuality. Because testosterone in general is important for sexual differentiation, this view offers an alternative to the suggestion that male homosexuality is genetic.
The prenatal hormonal theory suggests that a homosexual orientation results from exposure to excessive testosterone causing an over-masculinized brain. This is contradictory to another hypothesis that homosexual preferences may be due to a feminized brain in males. However, it has also been suggested that homosexuality may be due to high prenatal levels of unbound testosterone that results from a lack of receptors at particular brain sites. Therefore the brain could be feminized while other features, such as the 2D:4D ratio could be over-masculinized.

Brain structure

LaVey&#039;s (1991) examination at autopsy of 18 homosexual men, 1 bisexual man, 16 presumably heterosexual men and 6 presumably heterosexual women found that the INAH 3 nucleus of the anterior hypothalamus of homosexual men was smaller than that of heterosexual men and closer in size of heterosexual women

2)Feel sad if your son is &quot;born in the way&quot;. because you will be the sad father soon.

3) which chapther and session of your moral pages builded your parenthood?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To : Yeah</p>
<p>1)Pls do read your science chapter :</p>
<p>Prenatal hormones </p>
<p>The prenatal hormonal theory of sexual orientation suggests that people who are exposed to excess levels of sex hormones have masculinized brains and show increased homosexuality. Research on special conditions such as CAH and DES indicate that prenatal exposure to, respectively, excess testosterone and estrogens are associated with female–female sex fantasies in adults. Both effects are associated with bisexuality rather than homosexuality.<br />
There is research evidence that the ratio of the length of the 2nd and 4th digits (index finger and ring finger) is somewhat negatively related to prenatal testosterone and positively to estrogen. Studies measuring the fingers found a statistically significant skew in the 2D:4D ratio (long ring finger) towards homosexuality with an even lower ratio in bisexuals. It is suggested that exposure to high prenatal testosterone and low prenatal estrogen concentrations is one cause of homosexuality whereas exposure to very high testosterone levels may be associated with bisexuality. Because testosterone in general is important for sexual differentiation, this view offers an alternative to the suggestion that male homosexuality is genetic.<br />
The prenatal hormonal theory suggests that a homosexual orientation results from exposure to excessive testosterone causing an over-masculinized brain. This is contradictory to another hypothesis that homosexual preferences may be due to a feminized brain in males. However, it has also been suggested that homosexuality may be due to high prenatal levels of unbound testosterone that results from a lack of receptors at particular brain sites. Therefore the brain could be feminized while other features, such as the 2D:4D ratio could be over-masculinized.</p>
<p>Brain structure</p>
<p>LaVey&#8217;s (1991) examination at autopsy of 18 homosexual men, 1 bisexual man, 16 presumably heterosexual men and 6 presumably heterosexual women found that the INAH 3 nucleus of the anterior hypothalamus of homosexual men was smaller than that of heterosexual men and closer in size of heterosexual women</p>
<p>2)Feel sad if your son is &#8220;born in the way&#8221;. because you will be the sad father soon.</p>
<p>3) which chapther and session of your moral pages builded your parenthood?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yeah</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/07/londons-history-singapores-future/comment-page-2/#comment-156235</link>
		<dc:creator>yeah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 23:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=25629#comment-156235</guid>
		<description>And red dot wong, 
         whoever talked about burning people at the stake? I didn&#039;t. If you have homosexual friends, surely you see the sadness of their parents. I have. So you want to pin the label of &#039;smallness and lack of imagination&#039; on them then? No, that&#039;s because of love. They love their children and are sad that they are homosexual. 

Why do parents want the contents of sex education in schools to be openly published? Because they love their children enough to care. Why are they angry that AWARE claims &#039;copyright&#039; as a reason not to share their version of sex education? Because they love their children enough to care. 

People from different religions and there are also people who are atheist who are sad if their family members are homosexuals. Don&#039;t call them &#039;small minded&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And red dot wong,<br />
         whoever talked about burning people at the stake? I didn&#8217;t. If you have homosexual friends, surely you see the sadness of their parents. I have. So you want to pin the label of &#8216;smallness and lack of imagination&#8217; on them then? No, that&#8217;s because of love. They love their children and are sad that they are homosexual. </p>
<p>Why do parents want the contents of sex education in schools to be openly published? Because they love their children enough to care. Why are they angry that AWARE claims &#8216;copyright&#8217; as a reason not to share their version of sex education? Because they love their children enough to care. </p>
<p>People from different religions and there are also people who are atheist who are sad if their family members are homosexuals. Don&#8217;t call them &#8216;small minded&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yeah</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/07/londons-history-singapores-future/comment-page-2/#comment-156234</link>
		<dc:creator>yeah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 23:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=25629#comment-156234</guid>
		<description>Hi REd dot wong, 
            Don&#039;t put too much weight on those so-called &#039;medical&#039; evidence on homosexuality. The pain families experience is what counts. You have cousins or close friends or even siblings who are homosexuals? Do you see the grief it brings to parents? I have seen that in families of my close friends and cousins. I have also seen my formerly homosexual friends who married and have children, with great joy. 

Don&#039;t deny the freedom of homosexuals who become heterosexuals and have families. As the Minister of Education puts it well, which parent does not want their children to settle down and have children of their own? I have great joy with my sons. You would too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi REd dot wong,<br />
            Don&#8217;t put too much weight on those so-called &#8216;medical&#8217; evidence on homosexuality. The pain families experience is what counts. You have cousins or close friends or even siblings who are homosexuals? Do you see the grief it brings to parents? I have seen that in families of my close friends and cousins. I have also seen my formerly homosexual friends who married and have children, with great joy. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t deny the freedom of homosexuals who become heterosexuals and have families. As the Minister of Education puts it well, which parent does not want their children to settle down and have children of their own? I have great joy with my sons. You would too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: preston loon</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/07/londons-history-singapores-future/comment-page-2/#comment-156232</link>
		<dc:creator>preston loon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 22:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=25629#comment-156232</guid>
		<description>Please Gemami,i implore you not to leave us.TOC is only a conduit for the minorities to free speeches.The public at large would not be too easily swayed by pro-gay articles or opinions printed here or anywhere else.What you should be more concerned about is our government.Have you not noticed lately that the PAP is working insidiously to introduce liberal activities
in our society which you and i considered moral insanities.Remember scantily dressed women doing pole dancing is allowed now.Did you notice we have more red light districts in Singapore?Just a couple of weeks ago,the PAP allowed a first local made erotic film right here in our own turfs.We now have news about the government allowing condoms to be distributed during the YOG in Singapore.
Have you ever asked yourself why  all these things are happening in a conservative society like Singapore?Would you be shocked if one day,our secular government legalizes unlawful behavior like homosexuality and allowing gay pride parades on our streets.Hey GEMAMI,it is coming soon and it will be imposed on
us not by the LGBT community but by an unsuspecting source which is the PAP.That culprit is a great desensitizer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please Gemami,i implore you not to leave us.TOC is only a conduit for the minorities to free speeches.The public at large would not be too easily swayed by pro-gay articles or opinions printed here or anywhere else.What you should be more concerned about is our government.Have you not noticed lately that the PAP is working insidiously to introduce liberal activities<br />
in our society which you and i considered moral insanities.Remember scantily dressed women doing pole dancing is allowed now.Did you notice we have more red light districts in Singapore?Just a couple of weeks ago,the PAP allowed a first local made erotic film right here in our own turfs.We now have news about the government allowing condoms to be distributed during the YOG in Singapore.<br />
Have you ever asked yourself why  all these things are happening in a conservative society like Singapore?Would you be shocked if one day,our secular government legalizes unlawful behavior like homosexuality and allowing gay pride parades on our streets.Hey GEMAMI,it is coming soon and it will be imposed on<br />
us not by the LGBT community but by an unsuspecting source which is the PAP.That culprit is a great desensitizer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: We have human rights because we exist – not because we are gay or straight and irrespective of our gender identities</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/07/londons-history-singapores-future/comment-page-2/#comment-156193</link>
		<dc:creator>We have human rights because we exist – not because we are gay or straight and irrespective of our gender identities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 16:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=25629#comment-156193</guid>
		<description>To : Yeah

I am homosexuals , i have the &quot;RIGHT&quot; no to change ! You also have the &quot;RIGHT&quot; to be homophabia because we know you are &quot; unchangeable&quot;

Human rights are &quot;rights and freedoms to which all humans are entitled.&quot; Proponents of the concept usually assert that everyone is endowed with certain entitlements merely by reason of being human

The Yogyakarta Principles on the Application of International Human Rights Law in relation to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity is a set of international principles relating to sexual orientation and gender identity, intended to address documented evidence of abuse of rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people, and further of intersexuality requested by Louise Arbour according to the International Human Rights Law

Yogyakarta Principles was launched as a global charter for gay rights on 26 March 2007 in Geneva. Michael O’Flaherty, spoke at the International Lesbian and Gay Association (ILGA) Conference in Lithuania on 27 October 2007; he explained that &quot;All human rights belong to all of us. We have human rights because we exist – not because we are gay or straight and irrespective of our gender identities&quot;, but that in many situations these human rights are not respected or realised, and that &quot;the Yogyakarta Principles is to redress that situation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To : Yeah</p>
<p>I am homosexuals , i have the &#8220;RIGHT&#8221; no to change ! You also have the &#8220;RIGHT&#8221; to be homophabia because we know you are &#8221; unchangeable&#8221;</p>
<p>Human rights are &#8220;rights and freedoms to which all humans are entitled.&#8221; Proponents of the concept usually assert that everyone is endowed with certain entitlements merely by reason of being human</p>
<p>The Yogyakarta Principles on the Application of International Human Rights Law in relation to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity is a set of international principles relating to sexual orientation and gender identity, intended to address documented evidence of abuse of rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people, and further of intersexuality requested by Louise Arbour according to the International Human Rights Law</p>
<p>Yogyakarta Principles was launched as a global charter for gay rights on 26 March 2007 in Geneva. Michael O’Flaherty, spoke at the International Lesbian and Gay Association (ILGA) Conference in Lithuania on 27 October 2007; he explained that &#8220;All human rights belong to all of us. We have human rights because we exist – not because we are gay or straight and irrespective of our gender identities&#8221;, but that in many situations these human rights are not respected or realised, and that &#8220;the Yogyakarta Principles is to redress that situation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedDotWong</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/07/londons-history-singapores-future/comment-page-2/#comment-156141</link>
		<dc:creator>RedDotWong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 05:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=25629#comment-156141</guid>
		<description>to yeah:

fortunately i have educated parents who wouldn&#039;t have nervous breakdowns if i was gay... they are the ones who taught me my values and how to be a good human being

btw, i&#039;m straight and married... it reflects your smallness and lack of imagination to assume that anyone who doesn&#039;t want to burn homos at the stake is gay

i suggest you educate yourself about human sexuality in general and homosexuality in particular.

being trapped in a closed mind makes the world a very, very small place.

perhaps you can start with googling what the American Medical Association, American Psychological Association, American Psychiatric Association, Canadian Psychological Association, Royal College of Psychiatrists, etc say about your uninformed insistence that homosexuals can magically become heterosexuals ... yet i somehow suspect that the even the enormous weight of the world&#039;s medical and scientific consensus will be unable to shake your conviction that you and others of your irrational ilk are right</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to yeah:</p>
<p>fortunately i have educated parents who wouldn&#8217;t have nervous breakdowns if i was gay&#8230; they are the ones who taught me my values and how to be a good human being</p>
<p>btw, i&#8217;m straight and married&#8230; it reflects your smallness and lack of imagination to assume that anyone who doesn&#8217;t want to burn homos at the stake is gay</p>
<p>i suggest you educate yourself about human sexuality in general and homosexuality in particular.</p>
<p>being trapped in a closed mind makes the world a very, very small place.</p>
<p>perhaps you can start with googling what the American Medical Association, American Psychological Association, American Psychiatric Association, Canadian Psychological Association, Royal College of Psychiatrists, etc say about your uninformed insistence that homosexuals can magically become heterosexuals &#8230; yet i somehow suspect that the even the enormous weight of the world&#8217;s medical and scientific consensus will be unable to shake your conviction that you and others of your irrational ilk are right</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yeah</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/07/londons-history-singapores-future/comment-page-2/#comment-156123</link>
		<dc:creator>Yeah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 02:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=25629#comment-156123</guid>
		<description>To red dot wong, don&#039;t blame your parents for being upset with you for being homosexual. They love you. That is why they feel so sad for you. You must change, seek help ok?

Why must homosexuals insist that homosexuals must stay as homosexuals. So sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To red dot wong, don&#8217;t blame your parents for being upset with you for being homosexual. They love you. That is why they feel so sad for you. You must change, seek help ok?</p>
<p>Why must homosexuals insist that homosexuals must stay as homosexuals. So sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Roundup: Week 31 &#171; The Singapore Daily</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/07/londons-history-singapores-future/comment-page-2/#comment-155979</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Roundup: Week 31 &#171; The Singapore Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 03:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=25629#comment-155979</guid>
		<description>[...] - Everything Also Complain: Often-drunk Sikh priest - Singapore Notes: Dastardly Journalism - TOC: London’s history, Singapore’s future? - Singaporean Skeptic: Hong Kongers fight to preserve their culture. - ST Forum: Police and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; Everything Also Complain: Often-drunk Sikh priest &#8211; Singapore Notes: Dastardly Journalism &#8211; TOC: London’s history, Singapore’s future? &#8211; Singaporean Skeptic: Hong Kongers fight to preserve their culture. &#8211; ST Forum: Police and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedDotWong</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/07/londons-history-singapores-future/comment-page-2/#comment-155828</link>
		<dc:creator>RedDotWong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=25629#comment-155828</guid>
		<description>to: yeah

i&#039;m not sure what u expect homosexuals to do to insulate their parents from the grief, pain, and shame that anti-homo people like you impose on them ... u want gays to pretend that they are not gay just so it looks better?

maybe it&#039;s the parents (and you) who should seek help and enlightenment to free themselves (and yourself) from their (and your) prejudices and ignorance... it seems a way lot easier to change what you&#039;ve been taught to believe rather than what nature designed you to be</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to: yeah</p>
<p>i&#8217;m not sure what u expect homosexuals to do to insulate their parents from the grief, pain, and shame that anti-homo people like you impose on them &#8230; u want gays to pretend that they are not gay just so it looks better?</p>
<p>maybe it&#8217;s the parents (and you) who should seek help and enlightenment to free themselves (and yourself) from their (and your) prejudices and ignorance&#8230; it seems a way lot easier to change what you&#8217;ve been taught to believe rather than what nature designed you to be</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bisexual &#38; Homosexuality Research</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/07/londons-history-singapores-future/comment-page-2/#comment-155815</link>
		<dc:creator>Bisexual &#38; Homosexuality Research</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=25629#comment-155815</guid>
		<description>In the June 2008 of the magazine Scientific American Mind, scientist Emily V. Driscoll stated that homosexual and bisexual behavior is quite common in several species, and that it fosters bonding and peacefulness among animals: &quot;The more homosexuality, the more peaceful the species&quot;. The article also stated that &quot;Unlike most humans, however, individual animals generally cannot be classified as gay or straight: an animal that engages in a same-sex flirtation or partnership does not necessarily shun heterosexual encounters. Rather many species seem to have ingrained homosexual tendencies that are a regular part of their society. That is, there are probably no strictly gay critters, just bisexual ones. Animals don&#039;t do sexual identity. They just do sex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the June 2008 of the magazine Scientific American Mind, scientist Emily V. Driscoll stated that homosexual and bisexual behavior is quite common in several species, and that it fosters bonding and peacefulness among animals: &#8220;The more homosexuality, the more peaceful the species&#8221;. The article also stated that &#8220;Unlike most humans, however, individual animals generally cannot be classified as gay or straight: an animal that engages in a same-sex flirtation or partnership does not necessarily shun heterosexual encounters. Rather many species seem to have ingrained homosexual tendencies that are a regular part of their society. That is, there are probably no strictly gay critters, just bisexual ones. Animals don&#8217;t do sexual identity. They just do sex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homophobia (intolerant personality disorder)</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/07/londons-history-singapores-future/comment-page-2/#comment-155806</link>
		<dc:creator>Homophobia (intolerant personality disorder)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=25629#comment-155806</guid>
		<description>In fact , we are help you to alert your disorder encounter.

Homophobia manifests in different forms, and a number of different types have been postulated, among which are internalized homophobia, social homophobia, emotional homophobia, rationalized homophobia, and others.There were also ideas to classify homophobia, racism, and sexism as an intolerant personality disorder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact , we are help you to alert your disorder encounter.</p>
<p>Homophobia manifests in different forms, and a number of different types have been postulated, among which are internalized homophobia, social homophobia, emotional homophobia, rationalized homophobia, and others.There were also ideas to classify homophobia, racism, and sexism as an intolerant personality disorder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yeah</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/07/londons-history-singapores-future/comment-page-2/#comment-155778</link>
		<dc:creator>yeah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=25629#comment-155778</guid>
		<description>wah, so many pro-homosexual clones.

Whatever you say, you surely realize the grief and pain you brought to your parents when they know you are homosexual. Look for help please. Really, I am not here to pour salt into your wound. Please look for help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wah, so many pro-homosexual clones.</p>
<p>Whatever you say, you surely realize the grief and pain you brought to your parents when they know you are homosexual. Look for help please. Really, I am not here to pour salt into your wound. Please look for help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kinsey Scale on sexual orientation</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/07/londons-history-singapores-future/comment-page-2/#comment-155687</link>
		<dc:creator>Kinsey Scale on sexual orientation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=25629#comment-155687</guid>
		<description>The Kinsey scale attempts to describe a person&#039;s sexual history or episodes of their sexual activity at a given time

Rating:Description 

0 Exclusively heterosexual 

1 Predominantly heterosexual, only incidentally homosexual 

2 Predominantly heterosexual, but more than incidentally homosexual 

3 Equally heterosexual and homosexual (bisexual) 

4 Predominantly homosexual, but more than incidentally heterosexual 

5 Predominantly homosexual, only incidentally heterosexual 

6 Exclusively homosexual 

X Asexual 

Kinsey himself avoided and disapproved of using terms like homosexual or heterosexual to describe individuals, asserting that sexuality is prone to change over time, and that sexual behavior can be understood both as physical contact as well as purely psychological phenomena (desire, sexual attraction, fantasy)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Kinsey scale attempts to describe a person&#8217;s sexual history or episodes of their sexual activity at a given time</p>
<p>Rating:Description </p>
<p>0 Exclusively heterosexual </p>
<p>1 Predominantly heterosexual, only incidentally homosexual </p>
<p>2 Predominantly heterosexual, but more than incidentally homosexual </p>
<p>3 Equally heterosexual and homosexual (bisexual) </p>
<p>4 Predominantly homosexual, but more than incidentally heterosexual </p>
<p>5 Predominantly homosexual, only incidentally heterosexual </p>
<p>6 Exclusively homosexual </p>
<p>X Asexual </p>
<p>Kinsey himself avoided and disapproved of using terms like homosexual or heterosexual to describe individuals, asserting that sexuality is prone to change over time, and that sexual behavior can be understood both as physical contact as well as purely psychological phenomena (desire, sexual attraction, fantasy)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MOE SEX EDUCATION PLAN</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/07/londons-history-singapores-future/comment-page-2/#comment-155682</link>
		<dc:creator>MOE SEX EDUCATION PLAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=25629#comment-155682</guid>
		<description>To : Yeah 

Such agenda no good for our kids future.

06 May 2010
MOE and sex ed: let the culture war begin!
 
Last week, Singapore&#039;s Ministry of Education released its new approved sex education vendors list after a revamp and audit of external vendors and their programmes. Word has it that liberals and secularists in Singapore are concerned with the new list - 5 out of 6 of the vendors are linked to Christian organisations

http://akikonomu.blogspot.com/2010/05/moe-and-sex-ed-let-culture-war-begin.html#links</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To : Yeah </p>
<p>Such agenda no good for our kids future.</p>
<p>06 May 2010<br />
MOE and sex ed: let the culture war begin!</p>
<p>Last week, Singapore&#8217;s Ministry of Education released its new approved sex education vendors list after a revamp and audit of external vendors and their programmes. Word has it that liberals and secularists in Singapore are concerned with the new list &#8211; 5 out of 6 of the vendors are linked to Christian organisations</p>
<p><a href="http://akikonomu.blogspot.com/2010/05/moe-and-sex-ed-let-culture-war-begin.html#links" rel="nofollow">http://akikonomu.blogspot.com/2010/05/moe-and-sex-ed-let-culture-war-begin.html#links</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nay</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.com/2010/07/londons-history-singapores-future/comment-page-2/#comment-155652</link>
		<dc:creator>nay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.com/?p=25629#comment-155652</guid>
		<description>Whatever the anti-homosexuals say, their choice bring grief and suffering on themselves and on their parents and family.

Cannot imagine any mother jumping up and shouting ‘hooray’ when her beloved boy is mini-Hitler.

Anyway, the mockery of the Sex Education in schools is going to let the x-tian fundie wolves in again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever the anti-homosexuals say, their choice bring grief and suffering on themselves and on their parents and family.</p>
<p>Cannot imagine any mother jumping up and shouting ‘hooray’ when her beloved boy is mini-Hitler.</p>
<p>Anyway, the mockery of the Sex Education in schools is going to let the x-tian fundie wolves in again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

