In the September 7 issue of the Straits Times, Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong said that “the surge of immigrants in 2007 and 2008” had “caught the Government by surprise”.

Is this true – or is SM Goh just trying to make excuses for the Government?

Lets go back to the period between 2006 and 2009 and look at some of the statements made by the the most senior members of the Government.

From these statements, it is clear that the Government was not “caught by surprise”. On the contrary, the Government was quite explicit in its aim to attract immigrants and foreign talent. Prime Minister Lee, in 2006, addressed this issue in his National Day Rally speech. The PM even said: “The more we can get our talent… I think the better off we will be.”

So, what does SM Goh mean when he says the Government was ‘caught by surprise” over the foreign influx?

If indeed the Government was “caught by surprise”, one then would have to question how this happened, given that senior ministers had highlighted it as a major issue even prior to 2007 and 2008.

Did the Government take its eyes off the radar? How else could it have been “caught by surprise” by the surge in the number of immigrants?

Or is SM Goh just trying to deflect criticisms of the Government – and in the process contradicting not only his own ministers but himself as well? Didn’t SM Goh say, in 2009, that “PAP MPs have raised these concerns in Parliament over the years”?

In the end, the real question is this: Does the Government know what it is doing at all? And does SM Goh know what he is talking about?

You judge for yourself.

Here are some quotes from senior members of the Government between 2006 to 2009:

Deputy Prime Minister Wong Kan Seng, 2008:

Overall, our flexible foreign workforce policies have enabled us to maintain a critical competitive edge over competing economies by allowing companies to expand their workforce quickly to capitalise on opportunities, at the same time creating more and better jobs for our citizens… Encouraging immigration is therefore a key strategy which we must continue to pursue. … At the same time, we recognize that some Singaporeans may feel threatened by the number of immigrants that Singapore is absorbing.

Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong, 2009:

PAP MPs have raised these concerns in Parliament over the years. (Indeed, as far back as 1998 as we highlighted recently here.)

Deputy Prime Minister Wong Kan Seng, 2006:

We must continue to explore ways to make Singapore an attractive choice for those seeking to eventually relocate their homes… If we can keep up with that – 13,000, 14,000, 15,000, 16,000 (a year) and over time slowly increase it, I think that will be good for us.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, National Day Rally Speech, 2006:

We must continue to promote immigration into Singapore because just as we accept that Singaporeans have the world as their oyster, so too we must promote immigration here and let this be one of the options which talent from around the world will look for when they are considering where to go and live.

We have to promote our immigration programme overseas.  Countries know, people know Singapore.  They no longer think that Singapore is somewhere in China.  They know Singapore is special, they even have heard of the little red dot but they don’t know that Singapore is out looking for talent.  If you go to Channel News Asia website or the Straits Times Interactive website, you will find the banner ad on top, click on this, check out your eligibility for Australian PR, or Green Card, give it a try.  That should be the Singapore advertisement down there.  Our CPU, our Citizenship and Population Unit, click here, application form for Singapore PR will go to you by email.  That’s what we need to do, get our message, get people to be interested.  Then we can choose and have good ones, capable, able to make a contribution, join Singapore.

Because we are open and cosmopolitan, so the foreigners come here and they are comfortable here.  But we want to be open and cosmopolitan, and that is why we need the foreigners to come to add to our colour, to make this a special exciting, diverse, cosmopolitan place.

So, there are things which we can do as a government in order to open our doors and bring immigrants in.  But more importantly, as a society, we as Singaporeans, each one of us, we have to welcome immigrants. Welcome new immigrants.

We have to take a big-hearted approach.  Our forefathers were immigrants too.

What we are short of is talent and the more we can get our talent, as Phillip Yeo says “kidnap them”, I think the better off we will be.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

老人制娘惹串珠鞋卅余载 何廷儒冀帮衬民间好技艺

曾在芽笼东开了30年小工作坊,一名擅长制作手工娘惹串珠鞋的老人,虽然行动不便,仍每周六日继续开修鞋的小铺子。 盛港集选区议员何廷儒,在本周六(24日)走访社区时,发现这名住在万国一带的老人苏先生。 苏先生坦言目前生意很差,即使行动不便,他还是要每周六天,到113座组屋楼下租的小铺子开档营生。 何廷儒到访时,不巧一名客户刚领走了一双串珠鞋。不过,老人也向何廷儒展示传统串珠鞋的样本。 对此,何廷儒则呼吁民众,可以周二至周日早上9时至5点期间,帮忙光顾老人家。一些网民则呼吁工人党,帮助苏先生宣传他难得的娘惹串珠技艺,这些民间好技艺在现今已凋零、不多见了。 Met Mr Soo this morning during our…

Vietnam announced as location for second Trump-Kim Summit on 27-28 Feb

US President Trump announced in his State of the Union address that…

合力追踪数据议题处理不当 前进党忧动摇群众信任不利防疫

“我们对当今国家正在发生的事情深感不安,人民行动党自1月4日起收回此前的说法,表示新加坡警察部队在刑事诉讼法下有权获取“合力追踪”的数据,以作刑事调查。” 本月4日,内政部政务部长陈国明,在国会答复议员质询时表示,刑事诉讼法赋予警方权力,可获取任何数据,包括合力追踪便携器的数据。 此事引发全民议论,部长维文和尚穆根较后澄清,称只有在发生重大罪案时才会启动,但似乎平息不了人民对此事的质疑和失望,甚至有者扬言要删掉该追踪程式。 对此,前进党也发声明回应,重申“人民需要一个透明、独立且对人民负责的政府”,而显然“合力追踪”一事,有悖该追踪程式的初衷,即仅用于对抗如今严峻的疫情。 事实上,主管智慧国计划的外交部长维文,曾在去年6月5日在国会表示,合力追踪数据仅限于防疫追踪用途。他不得不在本月5日再次作出澄清,强调指警方只有在追踪重大罪案时,才能动用“合力追踪”数据。 前进党:此举侵蚀人民对政治机构的信心 “政府要求我们采用合力追踪程式来应付疫情,但时至今日,它却被允许根据刑事诉讼法进行调查。” 此外,声明也表示,政府此举带有更深的含义,且收回说法并非是好的决策,以致于侵蚀人民对政治机构的信心和社会契约。 “对于政府如何处理敏感信息,人民感到非常不安,我们忧心“合力追踪程式”会不必要地暴露用户位置,或侵犯他们的隐私。” 此外,前进党也忧虑政府的越权会全面遏制人民使用合力追踪的可能,反而延缓我国抗疫的进程,尤其当前有消息指出新毒株出现,很可能会白费我国日前的抗疫效果。 “在监督和追踪接触者的过程中,我们必须要同心协力,朝着同一方向前进。因此,我们也担心政府此举会流失人民对国家的信任。 智慧国及数码政府署(Smart…