Imagine all the people, living life in peace.

– John Lennon

The abolishment of nuclear weapons, stopping the proliferation and misuse of conventional weapons, and redirecting at least 10 percent of global military expenditure towards achieving the Millennium Development Goals.

Sounds like a tall order? Daniela Torre, a spokesperson for A Nation For Peace disagrees. In an interview with TOC, she was hopeful: “It is, without a doubt, an achievable ideal.”

A Nation For Peace (ANFP) is a Costa Rican-based campaign determined to turn that idea into reality.

“War…is merely an idea,” wrote political scientist John Mueller. “…an institution, like dueling or slavery, that has been grafted onto human existence.”[1]

And, like slavery, Mueller believed that the institution of war could become obsolete as attitudes towards it change.

Maybe the rest of the world does have something to learn from Costa Rica.

Costa Rica is itself the first nation in modern history to formally abolish its military, disbanding its armed forces in 1948 and making a formal declaration of perpetual neutrality in 1983.

A global effort

ANFP seeks to raise awareness of the disarmament cause by inviting people from around the globe to become ‘virtual’ Costa Ricans.

“Since we’re asking people to become virtual citizens of our country, all signatures will represent Costa Ricans raising their voices in favor of disarmament,” explained Daniela Torre, who is a programme officer with the Arias Foundation for Peace and Human Progress – the group that launched ANFP.

Meanwhile, ANFP’s sister campaign, Arms Down! – launched in November 2009 by the non-government organization Religions for Peace in conjunction with the Arias Foundation – has garnered over 6.2 million signatures in support of its three disarmament goals.

The signature drive ends next month on 4 October. Religions for Peace – which provides material support for both campaigns – will present a petition to the UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, representatives of permanent members of the Security Council and other UN member states.

Profit from the barrel of the gun

But even as grassroots support for the cause grows, the ideal remains distant. Disarmament, after all, is an old, fruitless, even discredited dream, which apogee arguably came with the 1932-4 World Disarmament Conference.

Today, even in times of supposed fiscal austerity, the defence industry remains resilient.

Last year, worldwide defence spending totaled about US$1531 billion – a 5.9 percent increase in real terms from 2008 – according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

In the face these realities, Mueller’s theories seem romanticized – governments still see profit, comfort and security emanating from the barrel of a gun, a fact that Torre acknowledges.

“We are no strangers to resistance to certain measures, particularly from countries that are either big weapon exporters for example,” she said.

Torre referred to Costa Rica’s own episodic journey towards total disarmament as an example.

“Both were done under very difficult scenarios,” she said.

“The first was done immediately after a civil war that had left the country divided, in times where the world had just witnessed World War II.”

“The second one took place while all Central American countries were suffering from internal armed conflicts and affected by a strong economic crisis, while dealing with a strong intervention from the United States and in the midst of the Cold War,” Torre said.

Torre also sees hope in the ubiquitousness of the Internet and new media.

She said the “vast majority” of the signatures gathered were collected through social media like Facebook and Twitter. ANFP has received over 31,000 signatures within five weeks of its launch..

“Many have also contacted us to become spokespersons in their own countries and regions from different places such as: Croatia, Pakistan, Brazil, India, United States, Ireland, Madagascar and Kenya.” Torre added.

Nonetheless there’s still a long way to go.

“Having states re-direct at least 10 percent of global military expenditure to [advance the Millennium Development Goal’s] is not a long-term goal,” Torre said.

“Realistically, five years (before the 2015 deadline) is a really short time.”

The road ahead

The presentation of signatures at the UN headquarters is just the first step.

After the presentation, organizers will chart future campaign projects and promote activism globally.

Short-term goals include increasing education on disarmament and advocating “common action through committed individuals and organizations that are looking to create positive change in their communities, cities, countries and regions.”

By harnessing the capabilities of politicians, non-governmental organizations, media, faith communities, and even the private sector – through corporate social responsibility – the campaigners seek to give truth to Mueller’s theory and Lennon’s imagination incrementally.

“Global disarmament is something to hope for,” Torre said. “It’s the means to a better, more equitable world.”

Add your name to the Arms Down! and A Nation For Peace campaigns at:

www.armsdown.net

www.anationforpeace.com

[1] Mueller, John, The Remnants Of War (Cornell University Press, 2004).

[2] Ibid.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

为跨性别学生发声 五人在教育部大楼示威三人被捕

有五人昨日(26日)在教育部大楼外示威,要求本地教育体制停止对跨性别学生的歧视,其中三人因未经批准下举行公众集会而被警方逮捕。目前三人已经被保释外出。 近日因跨性别大学生在Reddit上控诉教育部阻止她进行荷尔蒙补充疗法引起争议。本地媒体人韩俐颖于昨日(26日)发文,指有五人在教育部大楼外,举起属于性少数族群(LGBTQ+)的彩虹旗和标语,写着“该修正的是学校不是学生”(FIX SCHOOLS NOT STUDENTS)、“跨性别学生不应该被剔除”(trans students will not be erased)、“为什么我们不在性别教育内”(Why are we…

网商“坐地起价” 网购平台:恶意抬价就下架!

自新型冠状病毒(前称武汉肺炎)疫情爆发以来,我国口罩成为民众抢购物品,甚至一度出现“口罩荒”,也有一些网卖商家纷纷抬高价格,从5倍至20倍左右。网路购物平台旋转拍卖(Carousell)与Qoo10欲请卖家勿“坐地起价”。 旋转拍卖与Qoo10认为在疫情爆发之际,抬高口罩价格的卖家乃牟取暴利,因此要求卖家停止高额出售口罩。 旋转拍卖营运副总裁陈素玲向媒体表示,近期内将和卖家取得直接联系,并建议他们为口罩合理定价,公平分发口罩,若发现定价不合理的口罩将要求卖家纠正,而卖家如不遵循,将可能会被撤下。 Qoo10的总经理涂家林则与旋转拍卖持有相同的观点,表示将对“坐地起价,试图引发公众忧虑与恐慌,借此牟取暴利的商人采取行动。“ 他表示,“一经调查后,若发现商家借此恶意抬高价格,将可能会被停止在本平台出售任何商品。” 自疫情爆发以来,全球亦开始陷入恐慌,据卫生部的消息指出,我国目前确诊病例已达10例,患者正接受治疗,而口罩也成了必备的防御工具,为能避免受到感染,许多民众也纷纷抢购口罩,其中最抢手的即是高防御性的外科口罩。 尽管卫生部再度劝导目前身体状况良好的民众无需用到外科口罩,但仍然陷入“口罩荒“。在职总平价合作社(NTUC FairPrice)的官网上可见,外科口罩与N95口罩目前已缺货中;而在屈臣氏的网站上亦可见,至少四种类型的口罩已卖光,而网络上有许多网民也拍下为口罩排长龙的的照片和视频。 而零售商也表示,他们目前也正与供应商合作,引进新的口罩库存。 对此,当局也呼吁,外科口罩对于感到不适,出现咳嗽或流鼻涕,或有呼吸道疾病的民众才有效,若身体状况良好,民众是不需要戴上口罩的。 尽管如此,也仍无法阻止口罩抢购一空。 口罩价格竟涨至5至20倍…

【选举】人民之声未受邀参与电视辩论 林鼎揶揄行动党害怕威胁

新传媒在今晚(1日)举办大选辩论会,受邀对象除了人民行动党,还有在野党如新加坡前进党、工人党和新加坡民主党。 然而,人民之声党领袖林鼎,不满该党被排除在外,也推断该党未受邀,可能是该党成为行动党的最大威胁之一。 “新传媒不邀请人民之声参加辩论!可耻!这也证明我们一直所说的,我们已然成为人民行动党最大的威胁。“ 除了写下控诉,林鼎也拍下视频质问,其他参选候选人人数最多的在野党都受邀参加,而人民之声(10人)与民主党(11人)仅差一人,为何不能参加辩论。 “新传媒邀请四个政党进行这场辩论,当然除了人民行动党,还有三个参选人数最多的在野党如前进党24人、工人党20人、和民主党11人,然而,人民之声却被排除在外,尽管仅和民主党差一人。” 他也表示,人民之声当初是为了尊重在野党的原则,避免三角战,才会放弃一些选区,导致参选人数变少,但却并不知道会因此失去辩论的机会。 “如果当初得知结果如此,人民之声一定加派人力,参选更多选区。” 他也坦言,为了遵守在野党原则,放弃许多选区,让许多支持者和准候选人失望,不过他也承诺将在下一次大选卯足全力,让人民之声能够参加大选辩论。 林鼎解释,新传媒不希望人民之声能够参与此次辩论的原因,可能是因为想试图让辩论会变得不具威胁,而他此前却多次挑战人民行动党。 “当然,某媒体不想要让我参加辩论,你可以回顾过往的记录,在过去几年,我多次挑战人民行动党的部长们,可是他们却不敢回应我。” 他说,“他们当然想要邀请不具威胁性的政党,他们想要和平无争议的辩论会,但却无法直戳重点,他们想要移除为人民发声的政党,即指人民之声。” 林鼎直指,尽管无法参加,但他也不会放过质问的机会,他将会观看整场辩论会,并拍摄视频发表意见。…

Lawrence Wong: Govt is preparing for next phase, considering what activities can resume in a safe manner

National Development Minister Lawrence Wong posted on his Facebook page yesterday (17…