by Alfian Sa’at

(This was originally a comment on an FB thread, but it got longer and longer so I decided to post it up here as a note!)

From a Sin Chew Jit Poh report:

“I would say today, we can integrate all religions and races except Islam,” he said in “Lee Kuan Yew: Hard Truths to Keep Singapore Going,” a new book containing his typically frank views on the city-state and its future.

“I think we were progressing very nicely until the surge of Islam came and if you asked me for my observations, the other communities have easier integration — friends, intermarriages and so on…” he stated.

“I think the Muslims socially do not cause any trouble, but they are distinct and separate,” Lee added, calling on the community to “be less strict on Islamic observances.”

My response:

There is a simple reason for LKY’s comments about race in Singapore. Just across the causeway lies a country which is the source of LKY’s nightmares and neuroses. Over there, the Malays are politically dominant, and some of the more grotesque ethno-nationalists among them are very fond of calling the Chinese ‘pendatang‘, or ‘arrivals’, repeatedly emphasising their immigrant status, accusing them of being fairweather sojourners, questioning their loyalties, restricting their access to various programmes under the New Economic Policy, etc.

I don’t of course agree with the way the Chinese are being treated in Malaysia, and in spite of being Malay *Singaporean* I feel tremendous guilt that so many of my Chinese Malaysian friends are made to feel like second-class citizens.

I think LKY is aware that the situation in Malaysia is beyond his control. And I believe he is outraged, actually, that the Chinese there have to study Bahasa Malaysia as the national language, which according to his notions of racial purity, is a kind of assimilationist agenda aimed at diluting their ‘Chineseness’. During the Merger years, he had styled himself, and the PAP, somewhat messianically, as a defender of Chinese interests in Malaysia. Unfortunately the Chinese rakyat chose to recognise the MCA (Malaysian Chinese Association) instead of the PAP as their leaders, and the PAP suffered a humiliating defeat in the 1964 Malaysian general election. And with Singapore’s expulsion, LKY’s ambition of being the leader (which would mean defender, saviour, etc–a feudal concept of patronage and clientism) of the Malaysian Chinese was also extinguished. And I think he’s personally taken this as one of his life’s greatest ‘defeats’.

(then) PM Lee and Tenku Abdul Rahman during happier times. Did the Separation solidify Lee's views on race?

So what does the old man do? In a stunning display of vindictiveness, he vents out his frustrations on the Malay minority in Singapore (Lily Zubaidah succinctly calls this ‘balas dendam‘ politics; a politics of settling old scores). The Malay Malaysians questioning the loyalty of the Chinese? He’ll play tit-for-tat: similarly question Malay loyalty to Singapore, and then turn this into manpower policy in the armed forces. The Malay Malaysians calling the Chinese ‘aliens’? Well, he can’t label Malays in Singapore ‘immigrants’, so he’ll try pulling off the next worst thing: accuse them of being ‘outsiders’ in Singapore society, of not integrating enough as to be accepted as equal members of a (Chinese) Singaporean society. (The implicit message is this: you are not Malaysian Malays, you are Singaporean Malays, so you cannot become as ‘Islamic’ as them, and in fact should conform to whatever watered-down version of Islam this non-Malay state prescribes for you.)

All this explains his incredulity that poll results show that 90% of Singaporeans have no problem with having a non-Chinese PM. According to him, it’s all ‘utter rubbish’ and people are saying what is ‘politically correct’. In LKY’s universe, his ancient blood feud against Malaysia must be perpetuated by succeeding generations. If, in Malaysia, the ethno-nationalists will laugh down the very notion of having a Chinese PM, then Singaporeans are expected to do the same with a non-Chinese PM. And as much as UMNO’s raison d’etre depends largely on its stance of supposedly ‘protecting’ Malay rights and interests, the very idea of ‘Singapore’ is based on creating an enclave for SE-Asian Chinese, with the PAP as defender of Chinese rights (this might sound counter-intuitive for those who might point out the closure of Nantah and other supposed anti-Chinese gestures by the state; however we are talking about a specific species of Chinese here, namely, that of the ruling elite: the English-educated Chinese).

Hence the constant bogeying about ‘a little red dot in a sea of green’, surrounded by hostile Malay populations, as well as the doomsday warnings about a possible re-merger with Malaysia. Chinese Singaporeans are cultivated to be very conscious of their Chinese-ness, which is apparently under threat by a hegemonic Malay regional identity. The only way this Chinese-ness can be preserved and protected is by casting your lot with the likes of LKY and the PAP.

What then, to make of the 90% who would vote for a non-Chinese PM? If we dispense with LKY’s cynicism and take these results at face value, then it simply means that the citizens of Singapore are actually able to rise above the very kind of racialised society that LKY would want them to form. It means that we are not here to assuage his ego and to prolong his vendettas. His noxious ideas will hopefully die along with him. He might have succeeded in imposing some personal idiosyncratic beliefs (in eugenics, in environmental determinism, in the essentialising of race) as disastrous public policies, but no amount of social engineering can turn Singaporeans into the digits, automatons, gene pools or farm animals that LKY is so fond of comparing Singaporeans to. We are living, thinking, human beings, and what better way to assert our common humanity than to completely reject the twilight rantings of someone who over time has become less of a human being and more of a Jurassic monster. Sweet irony: in his anxiety to publish a book addressed to the youth of Singapore and to hopefully perpetuate his ‘hard truths’, LKY has only managed to reveal how obsolete and irrelevant he has become.

This essay first appeared on Alfian Sa’at’s Facebook note. As it was written off the cuff, he would like to apologize if the essay was not up to TOC’s usual high standards.

More of Lee’s views on race, culture and genes here.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

招聘拭子测试员薪资引争议 卫生部澄清该工作属短期合约

为了能够应付大量的检测工作,政府欲招募数以千计的拭子检测人员和助理。然而,此举却引发部分医护人员的不满,有护士在网络上发文,直指拥有专业背景的护士薪资,竟不如非专业的拭子检测人员。 据该护士称,应届毕业的护士平均薪资约1千900元左右,甚至在工作了五至六年后都不一定达到3千800元月薪,然而未有任何的医疗专业背景下,竟然可以在短时间内获得3千800元的薪资。 对此,卫生部于今日(15日)回复媒体询问,拭子检测工作属于短期合约,与全职医护专业人士不同,并没有任何升迁的机会,也不会给予额外的补贴或花红。 而至于大量聘请测试员是为了要应付大规模的病毒检测工作。 卫生部亦表示,本地注册护士入行时,其月薪加上补贴和花红,也会在3300元至5200元,而且他们每年都会加薪,并有培训机构让他们可以发展成为临床护师(Nurse Clinician)、教育者或领导者。

Chan Chun Sing: Govt to consider appeals from returning fast lane travellers for swab test in place of SHN

The Ministry of Trade and Industry (MTI) is prepared to consider appeals…

许通美:第四代领导班子理应能接受异议和批评

昨日,巡回大使许通美教授出席新加坡国立大学政策研究所举办的新加坡开埠200周年研讨会。 席上他被要求给第四代领导班子建议,并谈谈他对国人的看法。对此,他认为“我们是第一世界国家,却有着第三世界国家般的人民”,感叹许多国人缺乏第一世界人民所应具有的公民意识。 “国人应该关心环境课题,但很多国人不关心。许多国人自私而且不友善,看看他们开车的方式就知道。” 他的这番言论引起不少网民热议,在《联合早报》脸书留言区,也有网民调侃,领导们拿的的确实第一世界的薪酬,但还有很多老百姓拿的仍是第三世界薪水;而真正符合第一世界水准的,可能只有本地物价、生活成本和官老爷的高薪。 网民们的反讽,也表达了他们的心声。许通美教授坦言,自己对国人的批判比政府更多;不过除了上述言论,他还促请第四代领导班子,必须正视社会平等和阶级问题。 吁正视阶级和薪资差距 其中,许通美要求政府落实贫穷线准则,同时提高工友薪资,且正视企业高层和属下员工存在的巨大薪资差距。 询及是否有其他制度能替代资本主义,许通美则认为更应该审慎考量,哪一种资本主义更适用于新加坡。他提到道德资本主义,即企业不仅对股东负责,也要对整个社会负责。 他认为,道德资本主义下,企业在维护多元和平等同时,也能保护环境和顾及员工福利。 相信是选举蛩音近,许通美不忘第四代领导班子,他们的优先使命应该是维护种族宗教和谐,以及让新加坡成为更平等的社会。 他提及今日的新加坡仍未能摆脱阶级,我们仍以财富、收入、专业领域、居住区域乃至读什么学校,来相互区分。故此,有必要使新加坡成为去阶级化的社会,且检讨被指存在于职场的聘雇歧视。 对于新加坡和周边国家的关系,他认为我国有必要去改善,包括增加投资和交易往来、重新调整教育计划,例如策划实习或到这些东南亚国家的学习团。…