by Joshua Chiang

A performance on the death penalty by artist/activist Seelan Palay was disallowed just a day before it was to be staged at the Substation.

Titled ‘Choices, Chances’, it was meant to be the closing piece in a series of short performances presented by contemporary artists to be staged on the 15th of January.  The other performances were unaffected.

According to Palay, the proposal for the performance was submitted to MDA (Media Development Authority ) two weeks before the performance. (Under the Public Entertainment and Meetings Act, most public performances require an Arts Entertainment License)

A few days before the scheduled performance the MDA informed the organizers of R.I.T.E.S by phone of ‘problems’ with his proposal. Palay’s proposal had stated that his performance would include the use of photographs of people who had been hanged in Singapore, such as Vignes Mourthi and Amara Tochi. He would also be giving out photocopied photographs of Malaysian drug trafficker Yong Vui Kong to the audience as part of the performance.

Yong had been sentenced to death in January 2009. He has been granted a stay of execution pending decision on appeal.

“They (MDA) said they had problems with the photographs and it would take longer to process the license,” Palay said.

Concerned that the license would not be approved in time for the performance, Palay decided to replace the photographs with flowers.

But on the day before the performance, Palay was told that MDA would not grant the license for his performance. The reason was because of the use of a set of dice in his performance.

“They claimed that I’m trying to suggest that the judicial process is unfair,” Palay said. It was a claim he denied.

“First of all, who are they (MDA) to interpret what it means?” he said. “The dice was about the choices they have made in their lives and the chances they have of getting hanged.”

This is the second time Palay’s works have been banned. His film, One Nation Under Lee was ‘unofficially’ banned in 2008 because it contained footage of ‘Zahari’s 17 Years’, a film about ex-ISA detainee Said Zahari that was banned in 2007. Another one of his films about Francis Seow was still in the process of being rated one year after Palay’s submission.

Palay felt that MDA’s rejection of the license could be due to the fact that Yong Vui Kong’s hearing regarding the clemency process was to take place on 17th Jan, two days after the his scheduled performance. However, he asserted that he didn’t plan his performance to coincide with the hearing.

Calling MDA’s move ‘high-handed’, Palay asked, “Does that mean no artist will be able to make a work on the death penalty unless it’s really abstract and nobody knows what it’s about?”

“They have invisible OB markers which they expect local artists to somehow know,” Palay continued. “And because of that it leads to a lot of self-censorship.”

In the end, Palay had to verbally describe his performance to the audience.

He then concluded cryptically, “Unfortunately, this performance, like fundamental freedoms in this country, will remain a figment of your imagination.”

Death Penalty in arts – green light or red light?

Even though Justice Quentin Loh had stated in the verdict to the Alan Shadrake case that individuals can, and have the right to air views on the death penalty in public , it appears that MDA still remains unsure of its position in allowing the issue to be featured in the arts.

In the same series of performances that saw Palay’s piece banned, artist Lee Wen was given the green light to perform ‘Highway 69’. a song that touched on death penalty.

Last Meals exhibition along Esplanade Tunnel last January (source: Todayonline)

In 2005, the MDA withheld the licence for the play  “Human Lefts” unless some scenes were edited and all references to the death penalty removed.

In January last year, an exhibition on American death row convicts and their last meals was displayed along the Esplanade Tunnel for two weeks.

When contacted, MDA replied that Palay’s performance  was disallowed as it was “improper in the depiction of the legal system.” It also directed TOC to the full set of guidelines online.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Honour in Singapore – Keepers of the “gates”

Honour in Singapore” is a mini series by TOC following the recent formation…

President Duterte warmly welcomed by Singapore during his State Visit

President of the Republic of the Philippines, Rodrigo Roa Duterte was hosted…

张素兰:对无理不公政策 公民有权批评

建屋发展局和市区重建局在本周一出台调高违例停车罚款额的政策,人权律师张素兰对该政策发表看法,认为人民行动党政府只懂得加重罚款、落实更严苛的刑罚。 “在处理违例停车问题上,却不去反省自身在规划停车位上缺乏效率,且有差别待遇,例如部长可任意停车等。” 不过,就有网民Robert Wee留言反击“难道你反对用罚款来敦促良好公民行为的手段?那么你的解决方案又是什么?” 张素兰特此撰文回应,她忆述当惹耶勒南(JB Jeyaretnam )在80年代早期成为国会里唯一的反对党议员,很多人也不客气指责他只会提问,没有建设性方案,甚至指他连课题也没研究,但他们似乎忘了,惹耶勒南是以一己之力,硬撼满堂的行动党议员。 她很遗憾,如今当她对于时事课题表达疑问,就被要求提出解决方案,否则就闭嘴。 她形容这样的态度也说明,如今群众依赖政府,以为政府做什么都是为他们好的盲从现象,不鼓励人民自己话事当家(disempowered )。 “难道我们是等着被喂饱、然后送上屠宰场的牲畜?我们甚至还不如牲畜,如果我们没钱,政府没有义务养活我们,只能依靠自己的家人,所以我们为何就不能批评自己的政府了呢?” 有权批评有害社稷的政策 他告诫Robert Wee,我们都是新加坡公民,有权评述、批评和反对任何可能对社稷有害的政策。“不幸的是,我没办法站到国会前举海报抗议,这么做会遭致牢狱之灾。所以我只能尽我所能,透过脸书表达我的异议。”…

马国六消防员 为搜救溺水少年集体殉职

为救难而牺牲!马国六名消防拯救人员,于昨晚进入雪兰莪蒲种一个废矿湖,尝试拯救一名失踪者,不幸被急流冲走,全数罹难。 当时,消防局在昨日傍晚5时,接获民众投报,指蒲种Taman Putra Perdana地区,有一名17岁少年失足坠落出口水闸门,遭急流冲至废矿湖,下落不明。 消防部门随即动员莎阿南、赛博再也和巴生消防局,超过15名消防员前往现场搜救。 消防部队在晚上8时55分抵达现场,六名来自巴生港口消防局和莎阿南消防局的潜水队,以蛙人装备潜入水中搜救。 六人身上都连接绑着安全绳索,但是,矿湖中激流汹涌,水流太急,六名消防人员瞬间被卷入激流漩涡中,即便岸上同僚极力拉住绳索,但还是拯救失败。 同僚费了半个小时把溺水消防员拉上岸,但经过抢救,已回天乏术。 六名殉职消防员,年龄介于34至24岁: 马国消防拯救局随后表示,这是当局有史以来首次出现最多消防员殉职溺毙的事件。至于失踪的17岁少年仍在搜救中,至今仍未寻获。 六名消防员的遗体也在今早送往莎阿南消防局,由长官和同僚们致最后敬礼,再运返家乡。