The following is a letter sent to us by a TOC reader who also writes at his blog.

Professor Lee Wei Ling’s report two Sundays back, “Who cares for the caregivers” (Jan 30) paints a depressing, but realistic picture of the difficulties many caregivers face in taking care of their loved ones struggling with disabilities. I’m glad she had the courage and conviction to speak out for our caregivers- many of whom suffer in silence.

In yesterday’s Sunday Times – February 6, 2011 (Your letters column), three caregivers speak of their deep-set worries and frustrations over caregiving responsibilities. They, like myself are pleading for support from the Government to enabled them to travel an easier journey.

Source: health.allrefer.com

As the sole caregiver to my wife who has to struggle with schizophrenia and arthritis, amongst other health ailments, I have suffered burnout countless times during my 35-year journey with her. Despite endless pleading for help in view of her disabilities, I am not getting the structural support that I so badly need.

Besides writing 102 letters to the various presses, my wife and I have gone on national television and radio to speak of our plight. This has been undertaken over a period of six years. In addition, I have also written to several Cabinet ministers and Members of Parliament requesting for a good structural support for caregivers.

I have also asked some MPs to raise the plight of the mentally ill in Parliament. No one is willing to do so. Why? Are we not citizens who toiled with our blood, sweat and tears in our early years. Done national service, paid our taxes. Aren’t MPs elected to serve the people- ALL people.

The support system for caregivers in Singapore is practically non-existent.

In 2006, when my wife suffered a serious relapse of schizophrenia that required hospitalization, I suffered all alone. On the day that she was admitted to IMH, I sent an email to the Executive Director of a mental health organisation hoping that I could secure some support/comfort. The reply I received really put me off. This is what was told to me: “Dear Raymond, I’m sorry to hear that. Please take care of yourself.” After that I never heard from her.

Is this what support is all about? For two solid months, I cried myself to sleep every night during my wife’s hospitalisation. There was absolutely no one to comfort me. I fell into depression. I only found solace in Jesus for HE is one person who never lets you down.

My biggest worry – who is going to take care of my wife should I pass on before her? Although the Mental Capacity Act allows family members to appoint a surrogate caregiver in the event that I die, I cannot find anyone trustworthy or patient enough to take on that role.

This morning, my wife, fighting back tears, asked me this question: “Ray, who will look after me if you die before me?” I told her I will have to keep pressing for more support for the mentally ill and their caregivers. For that’s the only decent thing to do. I also told her to pray because “God gives when others fails”.

It is not just persons with mental illness that are stigmatised, but their caregivers are also shunned and discriminated against. That’s the harsh reality.

The setting up of a good support network for caregivers by the Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports is taking far too long. Last year and at the opening of this year, there have been several reports of those with special needs – including two teenagers and those with mental illness who have perished in a most tragic manner.

These include:

(a) A cash-strapped 33-year-old mum who wanted to end her life and that of her three young daughters (The New Paper report – “Coughing kid stops her from suicide bid”, Tuesday 28 December 2010).

On 27th December 2010, the divorcee who has depression, gathered her three daughters – aged 10, 11 and 13 – in her bedroom, locked the door and proceeded to burn charcoal which would lead to carbon monoxide poisoning. The mother had a change of heart when one of the daughters began crying and coughing. The police who were informed of her suicide bid by the daughter who was in tears, arrested the mother.

(b) There was another heart-wrenching incident which took place when the new year opened.

On Wednesday 5th January 2011, the Straits Times published a report, “Dead man found solace in religion, ST, Jan 7).

29-year-old Tok Puay Yong was found dead in the compound of the Church of St Mary of the Angels. Tok, who appeared to have developed mental health problems was depressed over not being able to secure a job. He found solace after visiting the Catholic church in Bukit Batok.

(c ) On the 10th of January this year, Madam Ng Sock Luan, 48 who was being treated for depression had fallen from the Bishan block where she lived. Madam Ng who resided on the 11th floor leaves behind her 49-year-old husband, a son, 18, and a daughter, 20.

Who cared for the caregivers?

*****


Last month, I had to bring my wife to Tan Tock Seng Hospital(TTSH) 4 times for her arthritis treatment. This did not include her medical appointment at IMH and the polyclinic where she receives treatment services for her diabetes and high cholesterol. At TTSH last Wednesday, I spent 7 solid hours taking her from station to station for her blood tests, X-rays and so forth. On top of that I have to do all the errands , housework and buy our meals as my wife can no longer cook. Who will not suffer burnout under such circumstances?

I’ve asked for the peak hour taxi and ERP charges to be waived because my wife who is at fall risks cannot take the MRT or buses. Transport Minister Raymond Lim, whom I made an appeal turned down my request saying that LTA leaves it to the taxi operators to follow market rates. Mind you, I don’t have a full-time job.

I fully agree with Prof Lee Wei Ling that we cannot claim to be a civilised society if the weakest and most unfortunate among us are not adequately taken care of.

Singapore has done well in meeting the basic needs of its citizens such as a good education system, health and housing needs, and a safe and clean environment. However, there is still an urgent and dire need to facilitate the inclusion of our marginalised communities who do not have the same sense of belonging in a society that is focused on economic excellence.

As Singapore journeys towards becoming an inclusive society and caring nation, it must bear in mind that there will always be people who may need more help. And undoubtedly, the mentally challenged, the physically disabled and their families are some of those who urgently need a great deal of support.

Source: mumsgather.com

I hope the Singapore Government will find it in their hearts to spare a thought for people like us who do not give up on their stricken ones despite the enormous adversities we face in our daily lives. I love my wife deeply and I will protect her with my life for she is a beautiful human being, who like anyone of us , deserves love, understanding and support.

Sometimes when people are healthy and their families are in the pink of health, they will not be able to empathise with those who are sick.

Sincerely,

Raymond Anthony Fernando

Mental Health Actvitist

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

使用非管制共车服务遭非礼 女南大生帖文促民提高警惕

使用非管制共乘汽车服务Ride Kakis却遭非礼,女南大生在脸书分享经验,呼吁其他同学要提高警惕,同时也引起校方的关注。 一名南大女学生于周一(10月21日)上午在NTU Confessions的脸书网页上帖文,讲述她曾经使用Ride Kakis 服务,乘搭一名非南大学生的男子车子时,被对方载到偏僻的停车场,以“交友”为由对她进行非礼。 25岁男子被逮捕 女学生表示,她已经报案,警方也已经展开调查,并将该名25岁男子逮捕归案。她指事件发生在上周,而在报案时发现该男子并非首次涉及类似案件。“如果男子被判有罪,我希望他在监狱中度过一辈子。” 她澄清帖文并非造谣或其他,只是为了提高人们的警惕性,而她也将会向校方投报有关事件。“我不会埋怨Ride Kakis,因为并非所有司机或乘客都是坏人,但是我只是希望大家能够更小心谨慎。” 她也提醒人们在使用Ride Kakis时能够取得对方的可靠证件和联络详情,因为Ride…

Online users disappointed with LTA for only now considering to ban PMDs with no safety certification

Following a series of fire incidents involving personal mobility devices (PMDs) that…

Carousell’s fraud rate declines with only 3 in every 10,000 transactions fraudulent

Carousell on Wednesday (26 Aug) said the company’s fraud rate has declined…

诉求函来自总理公署、未回应即已公告媒体 许渊臣质疑有悖一般规范

总理诉本社总编许渊臣官司,在今日(2日)续审。许渊臣提出质疑,总理李显龙并非透过私人律师信函、反之透过总理公署名义,要求他道歉,再者在他本身还未作出回应便已公开与媒体,这都有悖于一般规范。 去年9月1日,李总理新闻秘书张俪霖,代表总理向本社总编许渊臣发函,指本社英语站在8月15日刊登的一篇评论,复述针对总理的不实指控,要求本社撤下并道歉。 9月1日是周日。当天他才睡醒,就收到媒体蜂拥询问被总理要求撤文,他将如何回应。 他形容,一般情况下,直到当事人回应前,法律诉求公函都不对外公开,但这种情况下他根本都还来不及考量如何回应,总理要求他道歉的信函,都已公之于众。 对此文达星则质问,如果是律师信函,而不是总理秘书的来函,许渊臣是否会采取不同的应对方式? 许渊臣则解释,若是以私人方式或律师信函,要求撤下文章否则提告,他会撤下文章,以避免陷入进一步的法律冲突。 他也认为,若是由总理公署办公室,发出要求道歉的信函、且已公开散布给媒体,这似乎不符合一般法律信件的规范。 法官则就此继续质询许渊臣的立场,为何会认为,要求道歉的信函如果不是由代表律师发出,会有区别?许渊臣坦言,在这种情况下接到类似信函还是头一遭,再者,这是以总理公署内公务员名义发出的。 法官则不解其中差异,选民也可能接到信函,被要求必须遵从某事否则当局将采取必要行动。 许渊臣则指出,如果信件是由个人发出,他会清楚信函来自哪个人士或组织。但是,如果用公家机构,发出这样的信函,不免让人对于当事人(总理)处理此事的角度,产生怀疑。 在法官询问下,许渊臣确认,他质疑即使遵循了原告的要求,原告都可能进一步采取行动。