by Leong Sze Hian

I refer to the Key Household Income Trends 2010 report released by the Department of Statistics, on 14 February.

Income increase only 0.3%

It states that “among resident households, median monthly income from work increased by 3.1 per cent from $4,850 in 2009 to $5,000 in 2010; in real terms, the increase was 0.3 per cent”.

After last year’s record 14.7 per cent GDP growth, this 0.3 per cent real increase is very small indeed.

From 2000 to 2010, the real increase per annum was only about 1.7 per cent.

Does this mean that about half of all households had a real increase of less than 1.7 per cent per annum from 2000 to 2010?

Lower-income households negative increase?

What was the real increase for the bottom 20 or 30 per cent of households? – Negative real increase?

Although the household flat-type which increased the most was HDB 1- and 2-room flats  { “Median monthly household income from work increased by 10 per cent (7.0 per cent in real terms) among employed households living in HDB 1- and 2-room flats}, the median household income for this group in 2010 was only $1,200.

This is a nominal increase of only about 0.4 per cent from $1,190 in 2008 to $1,200 in 2010. In real terms, its is a decrease of about minus two per cent.

Income down, HDB increase rental?

So, if your income is not increasing, and HDB changed its policy some time back to gradually increase the rental of HDB rental flats as tenants’ income exceed $800 and more than two years of staying in a rental flat, our HDB policies may be making the lives of these poorer Singaporeans even harder.

As the HDB recently announced that it would build another 7,500 rental flats to meet demand, in addtion to the 40,000 plus rental flats now, does it mean that the total number of households in 1- and 2-room flats in Singapore is growing?

With half of those living in such flats earning less than $1,200, how do they manage?

Survive on $354 a month?

The Average Monthly Household Income from Work Per Household Member Among Employed Households by Deciles”, for the 1st – 10th decile in 2010, was only $354.

This is a real increase of only about 0.5 per cent per annum, from 2008 ($340) to 2010 ($354).

How does a family survive on $354 per household member? In this connection, the Comcare benchmark for financial assistance is $450 per household member.

I estimate the total number of households in the 1st to the 10th decile to be about 100,000.

Income gap less due government benefits?

As to “The disparity in household income from work per household member among employed households increased marginally in 2010. The Gini coefficient, which is a summary measure of income inequality, increased slightly in 2010. In particular, including employer CPF contributions5, the Gini coefficient was 0.472 in 2010, compared to 0.471 in 2009. Adjusting in addition for government benefits and taxes, the Gini coefficient was 0.452 in 2010”, what this means is that the income gap has continued to widen.

Also, the ratio of average income of top 20% to lowest 20% employed households increased from 12.7 to 12.9, from 2009 to 2010.

Everyone got government benefits?

The report also mentioned that on average, the various government schemes added “$1,110 per household member to resident households in 2010”, I would like to ask the following questions:

How can “schemes relating to healthcare, such as subsidies for medical bills incurred at A&E, day surgery, hospitalisation episodes from 2002 onwards” and also “subsidies for medical bills incurred at specialist outpatient clinics and polyclinics, and Medifund disbursements” from 2006 onwards be counted as “government benefits and taxes” to reduce the Gini coefficient?

Do any countries in the world adopt such a computation?

How can the so called “80 per cent subsidy”when anyone is hopitalised in a Class C ward be counted as a “government benefits” to all residents in Singapore?

How can such public spending on healthcare be counted, when according to the Ministry of Health’s web site, Singapore’s public healthcare spending at about 1 per cent of GDP, is one of the lowest in the world?

How can “GST Credits” be counted – isn’t it for offsetting the GST increase?

How can “Workfare Income Supplement disbursements” be counted, when the bulk of it is to your CPF, which you cannot use now?

How can “rebates on utilities, rental and service and conservancy charges”, be counted, when the electricity tariff and S & CC keep going up over the years?

How can “Edusave Merit Bursary, Edusave Awards and Edusave Scholarships for Government or government aided schools”, be counted as a benefit to all residents?

How can “post-Secondary Education Accounts Top-up and government’s matching grant from 2008 onwards”, be counted when you can’t use the money now – only when your children go for tertiary studies?

You may have noticed a trend of more and more routine Government spending being counted as “benefits” for all residents, such as “Baby Bonus from 2001 onwards, Centre-based Infant and Childcare subsidies from 2002 onwards, and schemes relating to ComCare programmes from 2004 onwards”, etc.

How can “CPF Deferment Bonus from 2008 onwards, CPF Life Bonus and Voluntary Deferment Bonus from 2009 onwards” be counted, when these are top-ups to your CPF in exchange for your voluntary deferrment of your CPF withdrawal until age 65? It is money that you can only see use when you are 65, vide a monthly life annuity.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

扎吉哈冀国人投身建筑业 惟土木工程师薪资低于中位数

人力部兼国家发展部政务部长扎吉哈指出,过去十年从事建筑行业PMET的国人占比呈下降趋势,因此新政策的实施,是为了吸引本地白领能够重返建筑行业。 然而,扎吉哈也坦言,本地人倾向较舒适的工作环境,建筑业也被视为“干粗活”的行业;再者,雇主也可以聘请较低成本、技术较低的外籍工人取而代之。 建筑业占据新加坡国内生产总值(GDP)的4巴仙,因此建设局推断,我国建筑需求将从2021至2022年间,每年需要270亿至340亿元之间;从2023年至2024年,每年需要280亿至350亿元。 预见建筑业发展 扎吉哈表示,“2020年后,我们可以预见建筑行业的发展,尤其是将开启各大大型项目如樟宜机场第五号航站、裕廊湖畔花园的建设、滨海湾金沙与圣淘沙名胜世界的扩建、跨岛地铁路线的建设等。 他是在本月8日,于建设局和新加坡产业发展商公会(REDAS)2020年建筑环境与房地产展望研讨会上,这么指出。 建设局首席执行官林优扬先生向记者透露,有关建筑咨询模型专业转换方案,即协助中期职业的PMET提升技能转换行业之计划,并非相当成功,与医疗保健或制造业的专业人士转业计划(Professional Conversion Programme,简称PCP)相比,只有少部分建筑公司愿意接受。 因此,今年晚些将会推出建筑行业有关技能框架,协助毕业生与中期职业PMET进入建筑行业。 工程师的平均薪资比整体全职收入的中位数还低 若林优扬有关注他们在建筑行业的薪资水平,就会发现为何本地PMET不太愿意在建筑行业工作。…

$5 benefit for every tax dollar a fairytale?

~ By Leong Sze Hian ~ I refer to the article “How…

2015年选举失利仍继续深耕选区 余振忠:没有竞争就没有进步

工人党前非选区议员余振忠在脸书分享,回顾四年前的9月11日,是2015年选举投票日。那时如切单选区(Joo Chiat SMC)已被归入马林百列集选区。 他写道,前日有选民问他,他和严燕松加入工人党多久了?“我回答道我在2011年和2015年参选,燕松比我早两年,都在2011-15年担任非选区议员。”居民对他的回答很满意,因为她不希望候选人只是来了就走。” 他在帖文中转载一则《海峡时报》的报导,内容是指在2015年工人党团队在马林百列集选区失利后,余振忠在投票日隔日接受采访,表示工人党仍会继续在该选区基层服务。 四年过去,余振忠坦言,当时确实对于失利感到失望,但是当年的竞选团队,仍继续在选区耕耘,保持活跃,例如在选区不同地区分发食物。 然而,很多时候他们面对有限的资源,也不可能能使用诸如人民协会的设施和资金,大都仰仗支持者们的热心捐献,他甚至记不清自己和志工有多少次自己开车运送物资,有时候人手不足还要找孩子来帮忙。 “这集选区并不小,从南部的海岸再延伸到中部,我们需要分配时间到选区不同地点进行家访。” 余振忠也认为,新加坡固然已经54岁了,但是在民主发展上仍处在萌芽状态,有时一些国人告诉他,只有一支团队拥有足够的人才治理这个国家。 “我在2011年加入(工人党),就是因为我相信我们不能总是依赖唯一一支政治团队。没有竞争,就没有进步。我见到的,是缺乏政策改革的动力,即便事情远远偏离国际水准、而且改革迫切需要,但这些政策制定者却想规避犯错,而不愿冒险。” 他坦言,要建设一个可信、能组成政府的团队需要时间,也欣慰这个过程已经启动,远在他参与工人党之前。他认为,在野团队固然间中面对无数荆棘挫折,但仍继续往前走,并且他深信会有更多人加入壮大这份志业。

【选举】陈清木反驳 未曾说过让出义顺集选区

昨日行动党义顺集选区候选人尚穆根,指前进党原本有意把义顺集选区让给别的政党,显得“没有诚意”(half-hearted),前进党秘书长陈清木反驳,表示他不曾说过要让出义顺集选区。 前进党秘书长陈清木医生,偕同杨厝港单选区候选人罗舒玉,到宏茂桥第628座巴刹与熟食中心走访,针对尚穆根的言论,陈清木表示,他不在意这些说法,反而应该将焦点放在赢得选民的支持。 除了陈清木,前进党助理秘书长梁文辉和候选人毕博渊亦驳斥尚穆根的说法,表示前进党致力服务义顺。 前进党候选人毕博渊随后作出回应,指对方显然惧怕竞争对手,因此试图以“障眼法”误导选民。 此外,非选区议员制度引起热议,随行记者也随后询问陈清木,陈清木也表示,选区对议员而言相当重要,必须要有民意支持作基础。