This is the letter that appeared today on ST forum.

I HOPE the political parties contesting the general election will agree to televised debates.

Every political party should be represented in the debates, which should be aired on prime time.

The information that Singaporeans will get out of the debates will be invaluable in helping us decide on who to vote for.

Ng Zhao Yang

The following is the original letter sent to ST.

Dear Editor,

On 10 May 2010 my letter with respect to having televised debates about election issues in Singapore just as what happened in the United Kingdom was published. I am writing in again to state my desire that such televised debates do happen. I hope that the parties who are contesting the elections would be able to come together in a studio, with a strong moderator who will keep the debates on track and not degenerate into a mud-slinging session. At the same time, this allows for the majority of citizens to understand what are each party’s manifestos and also for each party to debate with each other on their stance on key issues such as cost of living and immigration.

I sincerely hope that this will happen. I understand that already Channel News Asia had an episode of Talking Point which was similar. However, I feel that every party should be represented and these debates should be televised at prime time so as to ensure that every person in Singapore will have the opportunity to view it. The information that Singaporeans will get out of the debate will be invaluable when we go to the polls to exercise our democratic rights.

Yours sincerely,

Ng Zhao Yang

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s response to wikileaks’ claim

the following is a media release from the Press Secretary of Mr…

Why Hougang by-election is not a local election

~ By Jackson Tan ~ This article is a response to DPM…

眼科中心调低20种疗程收费 降15至32巴仙

新加坡全国眼科中心(SNEC)履行1月份的承诺,将20种疗程的费用降低15至32巴仙。 该中心发言人告诉《海峡时报》,预计中心每年1万4500个的疗程,将受调整价格影响,使得这些疗程收费可减免数百元。 据《海峡时报》早前报导,该中心一名病患无法获得其终身健保(MediShield Life)赔偿全额医药费,引来民众议论,全国眼科中心才在1月份时承诺将检讨减免费用。 终身健保在2015年推出时,旨在协助至少90巴仙的获津贴患者,能减轻较大的医疗负担。 不幸的是,过去三年,显示有多达20巴仙的病患并未获得全额保障,他们仍需为医疗费自掏腰包。 全补贴覆盖率将调动 萧万延是名退休商人,去年到眼科中心(SNEC)进行白内障手术,全额费用高达1万2000多元, 在扣除政府津贴后,最后的医药费为4477元。 萧万延动用自己的保健储蓄(Medisave)存款来支付其中的3000元自付额/免赔额(annual deductible)。 按理说,终身健保(MediShield…

“藐视法庭”诉讼:高庭驳回拒绝盘问申请 限李绳武两周内上庭答辩

日前,总检察署近期申请撤销总理李显龙之侄子李绳武的辩护宣誓书(defence affidavit)中的一些部分,“使之在审讯时不会被纳入考量”。对此,李绳武表示不会再继续参与。昨日(3日)高等法院驳回李绳武拒绝盘问的申请,下令李绳武需在14天内回答总检察署(AGC)所提出的提问。 李绳武去年9月提呈答辩宣誓书,并在法庭未将他的宣誓书采纳为呈堂证据前,就指示律师将宣誓书发布给媒体。总检察署日前已经为他的宣誓书申请进行盘问,并要求他在宣誓时回答相关问题,其中包括当他在发文时,其脸书上拥有多少好友,而该好友群体是否包括媒体从业人员,是否能够预见到帖文透过媒体发布出去。 对此,李绳武于上月表示已拒绝回答总检察署对其答辩宣誓书提出的问题,但其申请如今被高庭驳回,同时还下令出示其辩护宣誓书中提到的文件以及接受盘问。 与此同时,总检察署也向法庭申请指控李绳武与其律师在事前向媒体公开宣誓书,已违反了最高法院的程序。 总检察署昨日发文告表示,法庭目前已删除李绳武宣誓书中含诽谤性与无关紧要的内容,同时李绳武与律师也发宣誓书致歉。针对上述公开宣誓书一事,总检察署则已呈交相关李绳武与其律师违反法院程序的申请,仍待处理,各方在之后也必须再次上庭。 该诉讼起因于2017年7月15日,身为建国总理李光耀孙子、也是现任总理李显龙侄子的李绳武,在脸书贴文批评我国政府“好诉讼” (ligitious),法庭制度“温顺” (pliant),被总检察署指控藐视法庭。 在帖文发布后六天,国家资深律师FrancisNg指该帖文给了新加坡法律制度“令人震惊且毫无根据的攻击”,并要求李绳武签署一份声明,要求他承认虚假指控、藐视司法,并以此道歉。 但李绳武则认为他有促进新闻自由之责,有权批评政府,不料总检察署却选择加剧纷争,并为了“一段社交媒体的帖文”呈交数千页的法律文件。 李绳武也拒绝撤下有关贴文。他曾指出,有关贴文只是设定为只供朋友圈浏览,不公开大众阅读,却还是引来三大媒体和总检察署的注意,令他对新加坡政府琐事必究的程度感到惊讶。…