The following article was first published on 25 March 2011.


The makeshift cubicle that served as the office for Mr Chiam's Meet The People sessions for the past 27 years

Andrew Loh /

Seeing Mr Chiam See Tong up close is inspiring. Anyone who thinks that age or the two strokes he suffered in recent years have dented his spirit would be highly mistaken. The veteran opposition politician is as stout-hearted as he has always been.

As I waited for him to end his Meet-The-People session on Thursday at Block 108 in Potong Pasir, I was struck by the sight of what must now be legend – that singular table sited at a corner of the void deck, partitioned for privacy by aluminium panels into a makeshift cubicle.

That’s where Mr Chiam has conducted his MPS for 27 years.

The ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) – that is, the Government – has refused to provide offices for opposition Members of Parliament (MP). PAP MPs conduct their MPS’s at the air-conditioned offices of its PAP Community Foundation (PCF) kindergartens premises. And since opposition parties do not have their own chain of kindergartens and their MPs are not of the PAP, the PAP would say it is thus not appropriate to have opposition MPs use the PCF spaces.

Mr Chiam’s void deck cubicle is truly a symbol of how utterly petty our politics is, as played out by the ruling PAP.

As a Singaporean, I am ashamed that we would treat an elected Member of Parliament this way.

But Mr Chiam is unfazed.

“If a person … really wants to be an MP,” Mr Chiam says, “he can work the ground and he can show himself to the people – that he is hardworking and he is for the people. I think he will get elected that way and show that he is a true representative of the people.”

And as such, Mr Chiam does not believe in the Non-constituency MP (NCMP) scheme. “I don’t believe in going into Parliament by the back door,” he says. “[The] NCMP is not really elected by the majority of Singaporeans. It is a token of the PAP.”

I was curious about what the veteran politician thought of the six new PAP candidates unveiled so far. “They look very impressive on paper,” Mr Chiam says. “They have to win the hearts and minds of the voters, isn’t it? And that is a difficult task because it takes time. You can’t [befriend] a person overnight.”

Turning to his health, I asked if he is able to withstand the rigour and stress of an election. “Well, you must remember I was a sportsman in my early days,” Mr Chiam says.  “I was a school swimmer. And when I say school swimmer, I mean school swimmer,” he says with evident pride in his voice, “because I’m from ACS (Anglo-Chinese School).  It’s somebody to be a school swimmer in ACS. You must be strong and fit.”

Those who still doubt his physical ability should visit Bishan-Toa Payoh on Sunday where he will be conducting his walkabout, Mr Chiam says. “Then you see whether I am fit or not,” he added. He is expected to lead a team to contest the area in the elections in his bid to win a Group Representation Constituency (GRC) – something which no opposition party has achieved so far.

Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC is helmed by Deputy Prime Minister Wong Kan Seng. Mr Wong on Wednesday had questioned the opposition’s intention in wanting to win a GRC. He asked if this was to satisfy personal ambitions and questioned if the opposition winning a GRC has anything to do with benefiting Singaporeans.

“Is it about the interest and missions of political parties or an individual’s interest to create a legacy or to make history?” Mr Wong asked. Mr Wong also challenged the opposition to reveal their candidates early so voters can scrutinize them.

“Most of Singapore already know the candidates of the opposition,” Mr Chiam says. “Opposition like to talk a lot. They inadvertently reveal the names of their candidates. I think everybody knows who is standing at Bishan Toa Payoh. In fact I announced my candidacy about a year ago. How can you say that we did not reveal?”

Mr Wong seems to have alluded particularly to Mr Chiam when he asked if the opposition’s reasons for wanting to win a GRC was so that its candidates could leave a legacy – a personal ego trip rather than out of consideration for the future of Singapore.

“We are not so small-minded,” Mr Chiam says. “Our purpose is mainly to expand the opposition. At the moment as you know opposition only has two MPs in Parliament. PAP has 82. If the opposition captures a GRC, that will be a big psychological blow to the PAP. It’s no longer an impregnable fortress.”

And Mr Chiam added: “Any step that the opposition does that dents the PAP is one step forward for the voters.”

Mr Chiam remains just as sharp as he ever was.

Perhaps Mr Wong should be more concerned about his own legacy. Besides going down in history as the minister who let a limping suspected terrorist escape – not once, but twice – Mr Wong has only won in one election, despite having contested six General Elections in total so far.

His first and only victory was at his very first election – in Kuo Chuan SMC in 1984. After the Government introduced the GRC system in 1988, Mr Wong has had five walkovers.

What a contrast to Mr Chiam’s six consecutive contests and victories!

History indeed will remember Mr Chiam as one who went about quietly in his work in serving the people, in spite of the odds and the mountains he has had to climb, put in his way by a ruling party which apparently holds an elected representative of the people in little regard – if he is not of their ilk.

Mr Chiam’s legacy is, really, that of humility and steely determination. He has contested in eight General Elections. Won six of them – and going on his ninth. As far as I know, no other MP in Singapore’s post-independence history has such a record of six consecutive outright wins.  Not even Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew (five).

So, Mr Chiam has nothing else to prove to anyone, least of all to Mr Wong.

He does not need to win a GRC, in my opinion, for his name to be remembered. Indeed, his 27 years of service is testament enough. Yet he continues to serve despite his physical condition.

But perhaps what is most inspiring to me is that Mr Chiam’s example shows that serving the people does not have to include multi-million dollar paychecks and posh or ostentatious surroundings.

All it takes, really, is a bit of heart.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

辩称闻到异味 向保安打喷嚏台女认罪被拒

因涉嫌对商场保安打喷嚏和大声辱骂而被控的台湾女子欲认罪,却仍辩称自己是因为闻到异味而打喷嚏。法官拒绝了被告的认罪。 被告孙兹燕(Sun Szu-Yen译音)于上月在新加坡乌节路商场爱雍·乌节(ION Orchard),向本地妇女故意向对方打喷嚏,被指控骚扰他人。她于昨日(20日)欲认罪,却仍辩称自己是出于反射性动作,而向他人打喷嚏。 法官认为其陈述与案情有所出入,并无承认犯罪的意图,因此拒绝被告的认罪。 根据检方所述,上月12日被告带着10岁的儿子,欲进入商场,但由于当时他们并未戴上口罩,被当时的保安阻止。 而据被告辩称,当时她并未意识到必须戴上口罩,而且现场许多人也未戴上口罩。 今年4月14日起,政府强制规定人民出外必须戴口罩。 另一方面,被告于去年6月4日曾在从武吉知马第五道公寓(Fifth Avenue Condominium)三楼住家抛下了物品,其中包括地球仪、塑料椅子、吸尘器、玻璃瓶和铅笔,无人受伤。 据检方表示,被告在将物品扔出公寓前曾感到紧张和沮丧,从心理卫生学院(Institure…

当权者喉舌 月入过万 国阵倒台网军丢饭碗

“树倒猢狲散”,509全国大选国阵痛失政权,断失资金来源后,过去作为国阵喉舌的众多网络枪手,立时从网路上销声匿迹。 透过在脸书等社交媒体,发帖文和评论诽谤、抨击国阵对手,粉饰和为国阵歌功颂德,一些网络枪手能领上万令吉的月薪,但随着主子不再当权,没了丰厚资源,这些枪手只好各自散去。 一名不愿具名的巫统枪手向《透视大马》披露,自509大选后,司令部再也没有任何指示,协调员也如同人间蒸发。他相信,一些网络枪手可能已过档希望联盟,不过,一些较具有财力的党分部或领袖仍继续资助旗下枪手。 首相署特别事务部统筹网军 国阵主要政党巫统聘请网络军团,和希盟支持者在网络开战,已不是什么秘密。前朝政府甚至开设直接隶属首相署的特别事务局(JASA),统筹“向人民讲解国家政策”事宜。 2012年巫统把网军纳入该党科技通讯部新媒体单位,由时任笨珍国会议员阿末马斯兰领导,另有国阵策略通讯局副主任司徒忠监管媒体。 去年11月4日,巫统资讯科技局还举办规模最大网军集会,人数高达3千500人。 一名网络枪手称,网军针对各种不利国阵的新闻或评论,都有清晰战略。依据背后巫统高层的指示,每个团队由协调员安排,他们书写的议题和论述角度。 网络枪手的薪资取决于当事人的专长和影响力,部落客和网站作者的比较专业,有者甚至领过数百万令吉的酬劳。 马国网络枪手为打击对手,也极尽抹黑、造假之能事,但是《反假新闻法》是被用来对付异议者的,属于同一阵营的自然不受对付。 希盟政府上任后,为节约开支,主要功能为国阵政府传声筒的特别事务局,也被首相马哈迪关闭。 特别事务局为国阵政府进行文宣工作、管理社交媒体、进行政治分析,以及印刷解释政府政策的宣传品,比如图中的《一马公司:谁说没有解答?》,这62页手册耗资62万6250令吉,备受诟病。…

SMRT taxi catches fire along Woodlands Avenue 6

A taxi from Singapore Mass Rapid Transit (SMRT) was seen catching fire…

East-west line train service disrupted on 23 July with passengers stuck on train

Train services on the East-West Line from Clementi to Joo Koon were…