A letter to TOC from Ms Michelle Tan.

I am disappointed that the Elections Committee disqualified Mr Ng Teck Siong from contesting in Tanjong Pagar on the basis of him submitting his form late by 35 seconds.

We know that for any measuring device, there is a percentage error. When you measure something as relative as time, different clocks may measure time differently. very precise clocks may register very good accuracy but to for a clock to be off by 35 seconds, it is all possible due to clock drift. That is why clocks have to be periodically synchronized. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clock_synchronization ). Hence, there is a possibility Mr Ng may not have been late in the strict sense but that the clock was off by a few seconds.

Secondly, in school exams, even after the examiner says ‘Stop writing’, I still see students scribbling for up to a minute after that. Yet, the examiner does not say anything. Does this mean all these students broke the law and the examiner is negligent? Should we haul up all the students that broke the law by a few seconds now, and the examiners who did not stop them? I believe not.

There is something called a few seconds grace.

The grace of a bus driver when he pulls his bus out of the busstop, and then he sees an old lady hobbling towards the bus she is about to miss; he stops for her.

In primary school I remembered very well my school song had this line “To give always with a gracious heart”. It stuck with me. The government keeps urging Singapore to be a gracious society, for example The Singapore Kindness Movement. We are not machines and to penalize somebody who wants to play his part for Singapore in an election is not gracious nor public-spirited.

If Mr Ng had qualified, he may or may not win the election. But I believe he deserves to have a chance, especially after the effort he invested in the paperwork. I beg the Elections Committee to give Mr Ng Teck Siong a few minutes grace.

Regards,

Tan Minxuan Michelle

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

王乙康抵触选举条例警不追究 张素兰质问为何有差别待遇?

日前,教育部长王乙康被指选举期间,出现与小学生对话的短片,已违反选举规则,短片也已取下。 根据选举法(第218章)第83条文,不得参与选举活动的人士,包括中小学生、非公民、破产、或有犯罪记录者,都不得参与选举活动。 然而,选举局和警方告知媒体,警方虽确认接获有关报案,但不会对王乙康采取进一步行动,理由是短片已被取下,选举官已经训诫后者,需遵守选举条例。 对此,张素兰律师质问,警方为何不追究王乙康短片一事。 文内指出,在她阅读了相关报道后得知王乙康已违反选举法第81(1)条文,并指警方有权针对相关违法人士进行扣押电子设备、摄像机、电脑和手机等。 “我刚阅读了警方不会对教育部长采取进一步行动的报导,王乙康确实违反了第81(1)条文,并援引第81(7)条,警方有权进行逮捕。“ 张素兰:其他被指抵触同样条例者却遭“羞辱” 但选举局与警方却选择不采取进一步行动,王乙康甚至都没有接到警方的警告。然而,其他被警方声称有着相同违法行为的人包括她自己却不得不忍受警方的羞辱。 “包括我在内的人如鄞义林、拉维、库玛兰等人却在2016年时不得不忍受警方所带来的羞辱。“ 她也忆述当时被抓捕的情形,指当时遭受署名警方的威胁,要求交出手机,并指出当时被告知犯下“可予拘捕罪行“,却与王乙康的待遇截然不同。 “犹记当时深夜,便衣警察找上门,他们开始追踪我的动向,并在门缝地下留了一封信。翌日,警方早上9点来敲我门,并要求我必须到警察总部报到。在警察总部时,我被几名凶狠的警察审问和威胁,并要求交出手机,当时有人告诉我,我犯下的罪行是“可予拘捕罪行”,与王乙康所犯下的罪行相同。“ 未犯下谋杀罪,却被八名警员“护送”回家…

宝马和电动滑板车碰撞 司机骑士互相指责险酿冲突

宝马司机和电动滑板车骑士起冲突,司机责怪对方违法在公路上行驶,还碰撞了其爱车,但是骑士却指司机驾驶危险,差点被撞,各持己见,甚至一度拳拳相向。 有关事件于昨日(11月28日)在脸书上流传开来,根据行车记录画面显示,事件发生于昨日下午2时许,在丹戎巴葛一带。 有关的事情经过被涉事宝马司机的行车记录拍下后,随后上传到脸书群组SG Road Vigilante-SGRV上,立刻引起网民热议。 帖文中,司机表示他当时自Skysuites地区出路,发现到一名电板车骑士在马路上行驶,随后他要右转进入丹戎巴葛停车场,在朝向丹戎巴葛路和英莪街(Enggor Street)的分叉线时,却听到车后传来一声巨响。 “约30岁的白人骑士当时撞了我的车后部,就停下来,我问他为什么这么做时,他却指责我几乎撞到他,并抗议新加坡人的开车方式。” “我当时提醒他不要再撞我的车子,否则我会报警,他就直接停止抗议,并表示明天不会再做。” 涉事司机表示,当时他还提醒对方这是给车辆行驶的马路,而个人代步工具不可以在路上行驶。“我问他是否明白我的意思时,他说他应该了解了,我就想开门下车查看我的车子。” “他却立刻开门抓住我的领子,并用其右掌卡住我。” 司机指出,他当时就要求对方放手,还问他要做什么,而骑士也在卸货区工作的员工前来帮忙时,放开司机。…

Ong Ye Kung: “Two strikes and you are out cannot be the standard application”

Minister of Education, Ong Ye Kung has just posted on his Facebook…

民主党40岁了! 放眼扩大竞选版图

民主党在本月6日迎来创党40周年。 该党在官方脸书专页发文指出,该党也着眼扩大竞选版图,持续发展和本地政治生态保持关联。 民主党配合40周年也进行了2020年选举后检讨,以及提出一系列关于该党发展的倡议。 民主党自1980年8月6日创党以来,参加了10届选举,从1980年角逐三系,1988年最高竞逐18席。自1991年,七届选举中平均都派出了10.3位候选人出战。 该党也指出,过去10届选举,民主党在44个单选区和12个集选区,总共派出了97位候选人–44人出战单选区、53人出战集选区。 在21个单选区,民主党平均得票率都在40巴仙以上,以及夺下五次单选区议席,包括波东巴西(1984、1988和1991年),以及1991年在义顺北(蒋才正)和武吉甘柏(林孝谆)胜选。 与此同时,也在两次补选–1992年的马林百列集选区和2016年武吉巴督单选区补选上阵。民主党称,多达六次的单选区竞选,以及1992年的马林巴列集选区补选,该党也面对多角战,都能得到第二高的得票率。 然而,民主党也声称,该党扩大规模,即便面对三角或多角战,都是一个强而有力的竞争者。 民主党在1991年获得15万8341票的最高得票率,或39.4巴仙,当年该党派出了18名候选人。 该党放眼10年后迈入50周年,并认为若要持续发展和本地政治生态保持关联,形塑新加坡的民主历史,该党需着眼扩大竞选版图。